The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » My Paris post!
My Paris post! [message #86343] Fri, 08 June 2007 10:06 Go to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I think
it would take a special bio hazard suit; )

I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order. I thought
45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real criminals
a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really straitened
the spoiled brat out.

We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
)
Re: My Paris post! [message #86344 is a reply to message #86343] Fri, 08 June 2007 10:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
You're really getting annoying.
Re: My Paris post! [message #86346 is a reply to message #86343] Fri, 08 June 2007 10:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I think
>it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>
>I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order. I thought
>45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real criminals
>a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really straitened
>the spoiled brat out.
>
>We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
> )
>
>

If she did become president, she probably start a war and nuke Canada; )
Re: My Paris post! [message #86347 is a reply to message #86346] Fri, 08 June 2007 10:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
brandon[2] is currently offline  brandon[2]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C7A9C5.7D0DDB20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

She would be giving the BJ instead of getting it.

(sorry I couldnt resist):-)


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message =
news:46698dff$1@linux...

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I =
think
>it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>
>I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order. =
I thought
>45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real =
criminals
>a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really =
straitened
>the spoiled brat out.
>
>We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become =
president.
> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to =
elect;
> )
>
>

If she did become president, she probably start a war and nuke Canada; =
)

------=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C7A9C5.7D0DDB20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16441" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>She would be giving the BJ instead of getting=20
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>(sorry I couldnt resist):-)</FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>"James McCloskey" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>&gt; wrote in =
message=20
<A href=3D"news:46698dff$1@linux">news:46698dff$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>"James&nbsp;=20
McCloskey" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>&gt;=20
wrote:<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Paris, well I think some time she looks good and =
some=20
times not.&nbsp; I think<BR>&gt;it would take a special bio hazard =
suit;&nbsp;=20
)<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;I think she should get a week in jail for breaking =
her court=20
order.&nbsp; I thought<BR>&gt;45 days was a bit too much, after all =
the=20
liberal Judges give real criminals<BR>&gt;a break every day of the =
week.&nbsp;=20
Then again, 45 days might have really straitened<BR>&gt;the spoiled =
brat=20
out.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;We better be nice to Paris, some day she will =
probably=20
become president.<BR>&gt; After all she is a dumb rich spoiled =
brat.&nbsp;=20
That's all we seem to elect;<BR>&gt; )<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR><BR>If she =
did=20
become president, she probably start a war and nuke Canada;&nbsp;=20
)<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C7A9C5.7D0DDB20--
Re: My Paris post! [message #86443 is a reply to message #86343] Mon, 11 June 2007 06:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sarah is currently offline  Sarah   UNITED STATES
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
Senior Member
Come on, man . . . turning rapists and thieves loose on early parole to make
room for more potheads with mandatory sentences is not the work of liberal
judges or liberal anything else. A few years ago here in Oregon a man
caught smuggling hashish got a mandatory 10 years/no parole sentence, while
a man who raped and tortured a woman got only 7 and was released after
something like 3 years! The explanation given? Prison overcrowding. This
is the result of insane drug policies, which are definitely not the work of
liberals.

Are you sure you understand what "liberal" means? I ask, because half of
the things you rant about sound like stereotypical liberal rants. Not to
mention the confusing fact that you seem on the one hand to believe George
Bush to be an incompetent idiot while on the other hand supporting the mess
he and his cronies have made in Iraq.

Maybe you're a consiberal? A libervative?

Sarah


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46698ca2$1@linux...
>
> Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I think
> it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>
> I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order. I
> thought
> 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real
> criminals
> a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really
> straitened
> the spoiled brat out.
>
> We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
> )
>
>
Re: My Paris post! [message #86463 is a reply to message #86443] Mon, 11 June 2007 10:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
i have to add that it was the sheriff who released her and not a
liberal judge...those damn liberal cops...



On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:49:12 -0700, "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com>
wrote:

>Come on, man . . . turning rapists and thieves loose on early parole to make
>room for more potheads with mandatory sentences is not the work of liberal
>judges or liberal anything else. A few years ago here in Oregon a man
>caught smuggling hashish got a mandatory 10 years/no parole sentence, while
>a man who raped and tortured a woman got only 7 and was released after
>something like 3 years! The explanation given? Prison overcrowding. This
>is the result of insane drug policies, which are definitely not the work of
>liberals.
>
>Are you sure you understand what "liberal" means? I ask, because half of
>the things you rant about sound like stereotypical liberal rants. Not to
>mention the confusing fact that you seem on the one hand to believe George
>Bush to be an incompetent idiot while on the other hand supporting the mess
>he and his cronies have made in Iraq.
>
>Maybe you're a consiberal? A libervative?
>
>Sarah
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:46698ca2$1@linux...
>>
>> Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I think
>> it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>>
>> I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order. I
>> thought
>> 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real
>> criminals
>> a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really
>> straitened
>> the spoiled brat out.
>>
>> We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
>> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
>> )
>>
>>
>
Re: My Paris post! [message #86465 is a reply to message #86463] Mon, 11 June 2007 11:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
rick, go reread my original post.

rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>i have to add that it was the sheriff who released her and not a
>liberal judge...those damn liberal cops...
>
>
>
>On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:49:12 -0700, "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Come on, man . . . turning rapists and thieves loose on early parole to
make
>>room for more potheads with mandatory sentences is not the work of liberal

>>judges or liberal anything else. A few years ago here in Oregon a man

>>caught smuggling hashish got a mandatory 10 years/no parole sentence, while

>>a man who raped and tortured a woman got only 7 and was released after

>>something like 3 years! The explanation given? Prison overcrowding.
This
>>is the result of insane drug policies, which are definitely not the work
of
>>liberals.
>>
>>Are you sure you understand what "liberal" means? I ask, because half
of
>>the things you rant about sound like stereotypical liberal rants. Not
to
>>mention the confusing fact that you seem on the one hand to believe George

>>Bush to be an incompetent idiot while on the other hand supporting the
mess
>>he and his cronies have made in Iraq.
>>
>>Maybe you're a consiberal? A libervative?
>>
>>Sarah
>>
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:46698ca2$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I think
>>> it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>>>
>>> I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.
I
>>> thought
>>> 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real
>>> criminals
>>> a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really

>>> straitened
>>> the spoiled brat out.
>>>
>>> We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
>>> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
>>> )
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: My Paris post! [message #86467 is a reply to message #86465] Mon, 11 June 2007 12:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
"I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.
I thought 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges
give real criminals a break every day of the week. Then again, 45
days might have really straitened the spoiled brat out."

i did.

On 12 Jun 2007 04:42:58 +1000, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>rick, go reread my original post.
>
>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>i have to add that it was the sheriff who released her and not a
>>liberal judge...those damn liberal cops...
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:49:12 -0700, "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Come on, man . . . turning rapists and thieves loose on early parole to
>make
>>>room for more potheads with mandatory sentences is not the work of liberal
>
>>>judges or liberal anything else. A few years ago here in Oregon a man
>
>>>caught smuggling hashish got a mandatory 10 years/no parole sentence, while
>
>>>a man who raped and tortured a woman got only 7 and was released after
>
>>>something like 3 years! The explanation given? Prison overcrowding.
>This
>>>is the result of insane drug policies, which are definitely not the work
>of
>>>liberals.
>>>
>>>Are you sure you understand what "liberal" means? I ask, because half
>of
>>>the things you rant about sound like stereotypical liberal rants. Not
>to
>>>mention the confusing fact that you seem on the one hand to believe George
>
>>>Bush to be an incompetent idiot while on the other hand supporting the
>mess
>>>he and his cronies have made in Iraq.
>>>
>>>Maybe you're a consiberal? A libervative?
>>>
>>>Sarah
>>>
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:46698ca2$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I think
>>>> it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>>>>
>>>> I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.
>I
>>>> thought
>>>> 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real
>>>> criminals
>>>> a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really
>
>>>> straitened
>>>> the spoiled brat out.
>>>>
>>>> We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
>>>> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: My Paris post! [message #86468 is a reply to message #86467] Mon, 11 June 2007 12:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
My point was, liberal judges give criminal breaks all the time, why not Paris!
A criminal would be getting a break regardless to Jail vacancy or jail overcrowding.


My original post was tung and cheek.

rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.
>I thought 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges
>give real criminals a break every day of the week. Then again, 45
>days might have really straitened the spoiled brat out."
>
>i did.
>
>On 12 Jun 2007 04:42:58 +1000, "James McCloskey"
><excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>rick, go reread my original post.
>>
>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>i have to add that it was the sheriff who released her and not a
>>>liberal judge...those damn liberal cops...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:49:12 -0700, "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Come on, man . . . turning rapists and thieves loose on early parole
to
>>make
>>>>room for more potheads with mandatory sentences is not the work of liberal
>>
>>>>judges or liberal anything else. A few years ago here in Oregon a man
>>
>>>>caught smuggling hashish got a mandatory 10 years/no parole sentence,
while
>>
>>>>a man who raped and tortured a woman got only 7 and was released after
>>
>>>>something like 3 years! The explanation given? Prison overcrowding.

>>This
>>>>is the result of insane drug policies, which are definitely not the work
>>of
>>>>liberals.
>>>>
>>>>Are you sure you understand what "liberal" means? I ask, because half
>>of
>>>>the things you rant about sound like stereotypical liberal rants. Not
>>to
>>>>mention the confusing fact that you seem on the one hand to believe George
>>
>>>>Bush to be an incompetent idiot while on the other hand supporting the
>>mess
>>>>he and his cronies have made in Iraq.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe you're a consiberal? A libervative?
>>>>
>>>>Sarah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:46698ca2$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I
think
>>>>> it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>>>>>
>>>>> I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.

>>I
>>>>> thought
>>>>> 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real

>>>>> criminals
>>>>> a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really
>>
>>>>> straitened
>>>>> the spoiled brat out.
>>>>>
>>>>> We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
>>>>> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: My Paris post! [message #86480 is a reply to message #86468] Tue, 12 June 2007 01:53 Go to previous message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
tung...another clever trap...;o)



On 12 Jun 2007 05:38:51 +1000, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>My point was, liberal judges give criminal breaks all the time, why not Paris!
> A criminal would be getting a break regardless to Jail vacancy or jail overcrowding.
>
>
>My original post was tung and cheek.
>
>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.
>>I thought 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges
>>give real criminals a break every day of the week. Then again, 45
>>days might have really straitened the spoiled brat out."
>>
>>i did.
>>
>>On 12 Jun 2007 04:42:58 +1000, "James McCloskey"
>><excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>rick, go reread my original post.
>>>
>>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>i have to add that it was the sheriff who released her and not a
>>>>liberal judge...those damn liberal cops...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:49:12 -0700, "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Come on, man . . . turning rapists and thieves loose on early parole
>to
>>>make
>>>>>room for more potheads with mandatory sentences is not the work of liberal
>>>
>>>>>judges or liberal anything else. A few years ago here in Oregon a man
>>>
>>>>>caught smuggling hashish got a mandatory 10 years/no parole sentence,
>while
>>>
>>>>>a man who raped and tortured a woman got only 7 and was released after
>>>
>>>>>something like 3 years! The explanation given? Prison overcrowding.
>
>>>This
>>>>>is the result of insane drug policies, which are definitely not the work
>>>of
>>>>>liberals.
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you sure you understand what "liberal" means? I ask, because half
>>>of
>>>>>the things you rant about sound like stereotypical liberal rants. Not
>>>to
>>>>>mention the confusing fact that you seem on the one hand to believe George
>>>
>>>>>Bush to be an incompetent idiot while on the other hand supporting the
>>>mess
>>>>>he and his cronies have made in Iraq.
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe you're a consiberal? A libervative?
>>>>>
>>>>>Sarah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:46698ca2$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paris, well I think some time she looks good and some times not. I
>think
>>>>>> it would take a special bio hazard suit; )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think she should get a week in jail for breaking her court order.
>
>>>I
>>>>>> thought
>>>>>> 45 days was a bit too much, after all the liberal Judges give real
>
>>>>>> criminals
>>>>>> a break every day of the week. Then again, 45 days might have really
>>>
>>>>>> straitened
>>>>>> the spoiled brat out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We better be nice to Paris, some day she will probably become president.
>>>>>> After all she is a dumb rich spoiled brat. That's all we seem to elect;
>>>>>> )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Previous Topic: Some trippy sh*t for ya to check out...
Next Topic: New McCartney sucks totally
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jun 05 10:08:50 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01652 seconds