The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Ouch!
Ouch! [message #55895] Fri, 15 July 2005 16:20 Go to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
t;
>> Erling
>>
>>
>> derek" <derekvonkrogh@gmx.net
Re: Ouch! [message #55900 is a reply to message #55895] Fri, 15 July 2005 16:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
you have
>> called people.
>>
>> DC
>
>Actually, I'd rather align myself with the nut balls saying that some sort
of super weapon was being tested in the Nevada desert circa 1944.

Was this the kind of guy that thought there was a JFK conspiracy?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/021104vonbuelow.html
"Former German Defense Mi
Re: Ouch! [message #55906 is a reply to message #55895] Fri, 15 July 2005 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
do you think that Rabin had any more hope of success with these
> >> >>people than did Clinton or anyone else?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > yes, absolutely. talk about it all as you will, rabin remains
> >> > the ONLY person to ever effectively reduce the terror plague down
> >> > there. you obviously missed the part where i stressed
> >> > that i do acknowledge that both approaches, both the
> >> > deescalation
> >> > one and the brute force one can
Re: Ouch! [message #55909 is a reply to message #55900] Fri, 15 July 2005 18:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
other cases they take on in terms of the bill of
> rights, not in terms of the reputation of the plaintiffs. Not a
> prescription for popularity.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie K
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
> DJ wrote:
> > Well..............letsee..........I guess ever since they went on
retainer
> > to NAMBLA, I've had a few reservations.
> >
> > ;o)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:
Re: Ouch! [message #55910 is a reply to message #55909] Fri, 15 July 2005 17:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
42d8578d@linux...
> >
> >>Got a low opinion of the ACLU, Deej? Civil liberties not your cup o'
tea?
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >> -Jamie K
> >> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>
> >>
> >>DJ wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>...............the ACLU will probably sue the horse.
> >>>
> >>>"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> wrote in message news:42d844cd$1@linux...
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002382718_h orse15m.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
&
Re: Ouch! [message #55911 is a reply to message #55906] Fri, 15 July 2005 17:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
gt; >>>
> >>>
> >
> >What, no horse? ;^)

Cheers,
-Jamie K
http://www.JamieKrutz.com


DJ wrote:

> Hey man........gimme a break. I didn't say that there was anything wrong
> with suing the horse, now did I? As far as Rush Limbaugh goes, I'll bet you
> a dime to a dollar if the drug charges become a reality, he'll be praying
> his ass off for a
Re: Ouch! [message #55912 is a reply to message #55909] Fri, 15 July 2005 17:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
liberal judge ;o).
>
> Now back to my fantasy of a 4 way with me, Mara Liasson, Janine Garafolo and
> Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
>
> ;oD
>
>
>
> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:42d875ed@linux...
>
>>Gotcha. And they also defended Rush Limbaugh. But they see those
>>examples and the other cases they take on in terms of the bill of
>>rights, not in terms of the reputation of the plaintiffs. Not a
>>prescription for popularity.
>>
>>Cheers,
>> -Jamie K
>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>DJ wrote:
>>
>>>Well..............letsee..........I guess ever since they went on
>
> retainer
>
>>>to NAMBLA, I've had a few reservations.
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Jamie K&
Re: Ouch! [message #55913 is a reply to message #55911] Fri, 15 July 2005 19:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
quot; <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:42d8578d@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Got a low opinion of the ACLU, Deej? Civil liberties not your cup o'
>
> tea?
>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>> -Jamie K
>>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>DJ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>...............the ACLU will probably sue the horse.
>>>>>
>>>>>"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.n
Re: Ouch! [message #55917 is a reply to message #55912] Fri, 15 July 2005 20:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
a>> wrote in message
news:42d8578d@linux...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Got a low opinion of the ACLU, Deej? Civil liberties not your cup o'
> >
> > tea?
> >
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>> -Jamie K
> >>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>DJ wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>...............the ACLU will probably sue the horse.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> wrote in message news:42d844cd$1@linux...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
>
>>>>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002382718_h orse15m.htm
l
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >BOOM!!!!!! oops.........make that 89

"justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote in message
news:42d86db2@linux...
> Anyone else have fun with this yet?<
Re: Ouch! [message #55919 is a reply to message #55917] Fri, 15 July 2005 20:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
hat the entire city only has 90 cops.
> Ouch, but making progress.
>
>Welllllllll shit. I guess I've finally just lost all semblance of decency.
My comment was totally inappropriate. These 90 cops (or at least the ones
who are really cops) are probably some of the bravest humans on earth.

I was wrong.

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:42d884ba$1@linux...
> BOOM!!!!!! oops.........make that 89
>
> "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote in message
> news:42d86db2@linux...
> > Anyone else have fun with this yet?
> >
> > I was looking at Fallujah... seems like quite a city. not too far
> fetched
> > that the civilians in the "OH DUDE" movie could have been going to a
bday
> > part.
> >
> > Anyway, I just heard on the news that the entire city only has 90 cops.
> > Ouch, but making progress.
> >
> >
>
>Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>What, no horse? ;^)

HAH HAH HAH! Good one.

DC

>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie K
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>DJ wrote:
>
>> Hey man........gimme a break. I didn't say that there was anything wrong
>> with suing the horse, now did I? As far as Rush Limbaugh goes, I'll bet
you
>> a dime to a dollar if the drug charges become a reality, he'll be praying
>> his ass off for a liberal judge ;o).
>>
>> Now back to my fantasy of a 4 way with me, Mara Liasson, Janine Garafolo
and
>> Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
>>
>> ;oD
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:42d875ed@linux...
>>
>>>Gotcha. And they also defended Rush Limbaugh. But they see those
>>>
Re: Ouch! [message #55920 is a reply to message #55919] Fri, 15 July 2005 21:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
;examples and the other cases they take on in terms of the bill of
>>>rights, not in terms of the reputation of the plaintiffs. Not a
>>>prescription for popularity.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>> -Jamie K
>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>>DJ wrote:
>>>
>>>>Well..............letsee..........I guess ever since they went on
>>
>> retainer
>>
>>>>to NAMBLA, I've had a few reservations.
>>>>
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:42d8578d@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Got a low opinion of the ACLU, Deej? Civil liberties not your cup o'
>>
>> tea?
>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>> -Jamie K
>>>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>DJ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>...............the ACLU will probably sue the horse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> wrote in message news:42d844cd$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002382718_h orse15m.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>He, he, Don, maybe it's all of us:-)

erlilo

"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:42d84ae7$1@linux...
>
> I don't know who it is you are casting as Quixote here, you, me,
> or Jef.
>
> I suppose all three could be true in one way or another.
>
> DC
>
>
> "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote:
>>As said about your writing to Jef in "I'm ready to talk nukes": It can be
>
>>really frustated to fight against windmills;-)
>>
Re: Ouch! [message #55921 is a reply to message #55920] Fri, 15 July 2005 20:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
r /> >>Take care
>>
>>Erling
>>
>>"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:42d7fc82$1@linux...
>>>
>>> "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm seeing exactly the same pattern in American behavings in our modern
>>>
>>>>times as it was before the first world war. American sivilians generally
>>>
>>>>don't know what a war is on their own body
>>>
>>>
>>> We do now. Remember 911? Pearl Harbor? Everyone knows
>>> someone who lost someone in either Vietnam, Korea, or WWII.
>>>
>>> We do not have a romantic picture of war. That is a myth.
>>>
>>>
>>>>As far as I can understand in readings and seeing, the human feelings
>>>>haven't changed much since then in north and south, after observe what's
>>>
>>>>happening in the last two president votings.
>>>
>>> This is simply not the case. I am a northerner who has lived and
>>> travelled in the south and I can tell you that no one in the north
>>> cares about the civil war, at least as far as having personal feelings
>>> about it, and very few in the south do. We are united. I love the
>>> south BTW, Memphis, Nashville, New Orleans. Wonderful places.
>>>
>>>
>>>>So maybe it's really understandable with their "shoot
>>>>first, then ask" menthality that's often showing up.
>>>
>>> arrgghhh! How can you say that? If we had that mentality,
>>> what would we have done after the first WTC bombing?
>>> What would we have done in the first gulf war?
>>>
>>> Why don't you recognize that it was european and UN corruption
>>> and collusion with Saddam that prevented their supporting us, not
>>> a more patient and less violent nature. Shoot first?? Do you
>>> think that is supportable? c'mon Erling. You guys get your
>>> view of america from movies, admit it.
>>>
>>>
>>>>So, as far as I can understand, the only real Americans are the indians.
>>>
>>> Who came from Siberia and Mongolia.
>>>
>>> Guess the real americans are bears, huh?
>>>
>>>
>>> DC
>>
>>
>The truth will allways be a problem if we don't want to see it.

Take care

erlilo

"DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:42d84a0d$1@linux...
>
> But if they are lies, and they are, then an open mind makes little
> difference.
>
> The heat wasn't the problem, the truth was.
>
> DC
>
>
>
> "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote:
>>Pleazzzzzzzzze Don, Jef is heating up in his writings here but again, take
>
>>away his heating, read his stuff with an OPEN mind, try to find out real
>
>>documents about his writings, not only what some of you American wish to
>
Re: Ouch! [message #55924 is a reply to message #55920] Fri, 15 July 2005 22:14 Go to previous message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
; "quotes"....
>>>
>>>
>>>>Let's start with "them". The dehumanizing of others is an important
>>>>diagnostic point in the evalutation of pathological personality
>>>>disorders. Underlying this is the idea that one is not harming a
>>>>"person" but a "thing" or "non-person". It allows the ego to remain
>>>>intact while performing otherwise unthinkable actions.
>>>
>>>
>>> You obviously do not know any soldiers. Despite understanding
>>> that the ghouls must be killed, and understanding that they are
>>> indeed, ghouls, our soldiers pay a terrible price for doing the
>>> unthinkable, precisely because they are not able to completely
>>> depersonalize them. Only to have you call them pathological...
>>>
>>> Pathetic. And of course, the actions of the ghouls are not
>>> pathogical in Jef-land at all, They are understandable, maybe even
>>> noble! Maybe they are even like the minutmen!
>>>
>>>
>>>>But who are "them"?. For the most part they are normal, everyday
>>>>famillies like yours and mine. Shop keepers, TV reparimen, gas station
>>>>attendants, secretaries....who only want to live freely, in peace,
>>>
>>> BWAA HAHH AHHA HHHHAAAA!
>>>
>>> Oh that's good. Do you screenwrite for Michael Moore?
>>>
>>> They are foreigners who come into places like Fallujah and kill
>>> anyone who looks like they may desire freedom, take over the
>>> neighborhood, and rule by terror. Iraqis are even rising up and
>>> killing them now. They are also diehard baathists who want a
>>> return to the good ole days of rape rooms and plastic shredders.
>>>
>>>
>>>>The US has done more harm in this region, to the people and their
>>>>country, than Saddam ever could have.
>>>
>>> BULLSHIT. I guess you forgot about the entire familes, little
>>> kids and all, buried in the 300,000 person mass graves.
>>>
>>> I get it, you are a Saddam supporter. Ok, at least we know where
>>> you are coming from now. When you tell egregious lies like the
>>> one above, you lose all credibility.
>>>
>>>>The US, in it's quest for
>>>>middle-east domination vis-a-vis their oil supply, has turned a thriving
>>>
>>>>people (albeit with nasty leadership) into an empoverished, toxic
>>>>waistland.
>>>
>>> This is so stupid and dishonest it isn't even worth rebutting.
>>>
>>> It's too easy. OIl? We didn't steal their oil in 91 and we are not
>>> doing so now. Liar.
>>>
>>>
>>>>And for you who can't see the forest for the trees, let me make the
>>>>fairly-fucking-clear observation that if you have a natural resourse
>>>>that someone else wants and they decide to come and get it from you by
>>>>force (the Chinese could do this) You will be labeled "insurgents" and<
Previous Topic: have you guys seen Google Earth?
Next Topic: What a bizarre day this has been so far
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 28 11:06:37 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01664 seconds