| OK all you DSP Experts... [message #59122] |
Sat, 15 October 2005 15:59  |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
eps staring at me from the corner of my control room.
>
> I keep wonderiing if I should be tracking drums and bass on it then
bouncing
> in to Paris..
>
> Is anyone else doing that here?
>
> My problem is my old board is gone. I would need to use Paris as a monitor
> portion of a console. I think I'd need to send my pre amps in to tape,
open
> a Paris project and send the outs of the tape machine there, and send that
> to the musicians as a monitor, I wonder if there will be too much latency
> and it would screw with perfomances. It seems like this should work
though.
>
> Then right after the take, roll it back, hit record on paris, and play the
> tape into paris.
>
> Rewind and record over that take for the next song.
>
> Does this sound like it's worth the effort?Yeah, I wont really need to lock to Paris especially if I track a click to
the tape machine then use the same click in Paris I can visualy line up the
tracks to the
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK all you DSP Experts... [message #59125 is a reply to message #59122] |
Sat, 15 October 2005 20:59  |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
need to send my pre amps in to tape,
>open
>> a Paris project and send the outs of the tape machine there, and send
that
>> to the musicians as a monitor, I wonder if there will be too much latency
>> and it would screw with perfomances. It seems like this should work
>though.
>>
>> Then right after the take, roll it back, hit record on paris, and play
the
>> tape into paris.
>>
>> Rewind and record over that take for the next song.
>>
>> Does this sound like it's worth the effort?
>
>I usually kept the tape and dumped the the tracks back in at final mixdown,
aligning them with the original tracks and then deleting the original tracks
if I liked the tracks that were recorded to tape better. In this scenario,
you've got options and that is what using the deck is all about. Just the
circuitry is sometimes enough and just running the signals through the tape
recorder, along with Paris' inherent ability to saturate was often
preferable. A lot depended on what type of signal processing I was using on
other instruments. It was a win-win situation either way.
;o)
"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:43527b2f$1@linux...
>
> Yeah, I wont really need to lock to Paris especially if I track a click to
> the tape machine then use the same click i
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK all you DSP Experts... [message #59128 is a reply to message #59122] |
Sun, 16 October 2005 07:10 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>> I keep wonderiing if I should be tracking drums and bass on it then
> >bouncing
> >> in to Paris..
> >>
> >> Is anyone else doing that here?
> >>
> >> My problem is my old board is gone. I would need to use Paris as a
monitor
> >> portion of a console. I think I'd need to send my pre amps in to tape,
> >open
> >> a Paris project and send the outs of the tape machine there, and send
> that
> >> to the musicians as a monitor, I wonder if there will be too much
latency
> >> and it would screw with perfomances. It seems like this should work
> >though.
> >>
> >> Then right after the take, roll it back, hit record on paris, and play
> the
> >> tape into paris.
> >>
> >> Rewind and record over that take for the next song.
> >>
> >> Does this sound like it's worth the effort?
> >
> >
>Howdy,
If you use the repro heads, the sound will go straight on-off tape with
very little time delay. You can use one tape for an entire album this way.
The repro heads stripe to tape, and send back to monitor post tape.
Cheers
"cujo" <chris@applema
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
