Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Lost in the ozone again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56522 is a reply to message #56520] |
Tue, 02 August 2005 11:13   |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
syncs. If it flashes, it's
not sync'd
Highest it will do is 48k 24bit
I'd use it's SPDIF I/O, but my digital out on the Mec feeds my DAC-1.
Hope that helps.
What we need is a good AES/EBU box.(ahem) ;0)
Mike
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>Deej says you're clocking a Rumour along with your Paris rig. I have some
>specific questions about that, if you don't mind emailing me. Or, we can
>handle it here.
>
>Thanks!
>Jimmy
>
>heheheheh!!!!!!!!!.........and right after the *detection* they started
production of Gaucho.
I still listen to *th' Dan*......a lot. The guitar instrumental on Third
world Man still gives me a rush.
;o)
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:42f00fb6$1@linux...
> Ha! Good stuff. And you can bet that was the least of the stuff they were
> "detecting" before, during, and after their sessions....
>
> Jimmy
>
>
> "Neil" <OIUIOU@OI.com> wrote in message news:42f00456@linux...
> >
> > "Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >I thought that was because they were enjoying the el supremo in the
room
> > at
> > >the top of the stairs.
> >
> > No, just detecting it. :D
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:42eef408@linux...
>>
>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >I vote for Northcote, because you said you can get a house
>> >there, and therefore have a slightly more proper recording
>> >environment.
>>
>> Yeh, I'm fast settling on Northcote, which is a shame because it means
no
>> beach, but things exactly like that are very relavant. If I get a house
I
>> will have far better chance of getting away with some noise, far better
>chance
>> of getting some quiet, and far more space...
>>
>> ...I think this is starting to answer itself really. ;o)
>>
>> >Plus that 2nd place looks like a good spot to get laid as a
>> >result of going to lol
>>
>> Hehe, well yes, didn't I mention that in my rundown? Must have slipped
my
>> mind... ;o)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>So this would be St. Mattress cathedral?
Now THAT is funny! :DA band out of state is wanting me to do some drum programming
on a song for them (the drummer's not available at this time...
Columbian prison or something - you know, typical drummer...
JUST KIDDING lol). Anyway, so the guy sends me a CD - audio
CD, not wav, even. and i'm supposed to
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56525 is a reply to message #56520] |
Tue, 02 August 2005 15:16 |
Mark McDermott
Messages: 204
Registered: February 2006
Location: Portland, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
c Pro can do it in 10,000ths (sheer overkill), and
you can change the tempo while you listen. Really handy for this sort of
thing.
Cheers,
-Jamie K
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
Neil wrote:
> A band out of state is wanting me to do some drum programming
> on a song for them (the drummer's not available at this time...
> Columbian prison or something - you know, typical drummer...
> JUST KIDDING lol). Anyway, so the guy sends me a CD - audio
> CD, not wav, even. and i'm supposed to strip out the click on
> one channel & his rhythm guitar on the other & program a MIDI
> drum track to match it, but..... (wait for it)
> it drifts no matter what tempo i use; 81 is perfect for about a
> minute in, then it starts drifting, 82 starts drifting too fast
> almost instantly, 80 starts drifting too slow in the same
> manner; i double it to 162 to get more precise "nudges", but
> 163 starts drifting too fast & 162 starts drifting too slow -
> just takes longer to do it. Sorry, can't go up to 324, I tell
> him, workstation won't go that high LOL He's not on a DAW, so
> we can't exchange any kind of files directly.
>
> I'm gonna have to program it from scratch by ear at 81 while
> listening to his rhythm track on a regular CD player - uurgh.
> Anyway, just griping... anyone else ever deal with this?
>
> NeilI'll add a "ahem", too :)
"Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Jimmy,
>
>I'm only using my Rumour with analog I/O right now, so it has to be set
to
>it's own internal clock.
>
>To use an external clock source, set the Rumour's digital clock parameter
>to "External" and it gets it's sync over the SPDIF from the external device.
>The Digital Lock LED will light up solid when it syncs. If it flashes, it's
>not sync'd
>
>Highest it will do is 48k 24bit
>
>I'd use it's SPDIF I/O, but my digital out on the Mec feeds my DAC-1.
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>What we need is a good AES/EBU box.(ahem) ;0)
>
>Mike
>
>"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>Mike,
>>
>>Deej says you're clocking a Rumour along with your Paris rig. I have some
>>specific questions about that, if you don't mind emailing me. Or, we can
>>handle it here.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>Jimmy
>>
>>
>Many programs have become good at this. I think Performer may be the best.
DP can examine the click (or any a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56530 is a reply to message #56527] |
Tue, 02 August 2005 18:32 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
.. (wait for it)
> it drifts no matter what tempo i use; 81 is perfect for about a
> minute in, then it starts drifting, 82 starts drifting too fast
> almost instantly, 80 starts drifting too slow in the same
> manner; i double it to 162 to get more precise "nudges", but
> 163 starts drifting too fast & 162 starts drifting too slow -
> just takes longer to do it. Sorry, can't go up to 324, I tell
> him, workstation won't go that high LOL He's not on a DAW, so
> we can't exchange any kind of files directly.
>
> I'm gonna have to program it from scratch by ear at 81 while
> listening to his rhythm track on a regular CD player - uurgh.
> Anyway, just griping... anyone else ever deal with this?
>
> Neil"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Yup, and here's how I handle it.
>
>Pull the wav, split it out to two PAF files.
>Drop those in Paris. Get a basic tempo, which you have already done.
>Cut them both in the editor so that the first click starts right at the
top.
>Enable Grid.
>set the tempo to be 8/4, or even 16/4.. you'll get
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56547 is a reply to message #56530] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 02:14 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
them (the drummer's not available at this time...
> Columbian prison or something - you know, typical drummer...
> JUST KIDDING lol). Anyway, so the guy sends me a CD - audio
> CD, not wav, even. and i'm supposed to strip out the click on
> one channel & his rhythm guitar on the other & program a MIDI
> drum track to match it, but..... (wait for it)
> it drifts no matter what tempo i use; 81 is perfect for about a
> minute in, then it starts drifting, 82 starts drifting too fast
> almost instantly, 80 starts drifting too slow in the same
> manner; i double it to 162 to get more precise "nudges", but
> 163 starts drifting too fast & 162 starts drifting too slow -
> just takes longer to do it. Sorry, can't go up to 324, I tell
> him, workstation won't go that high LOL He's not on a DAW, so
> we can't exchange any kind of files directly.
>
> I'm gonna have to program it from scratch by ear at 81 while
> listening to his rhythm track on a regular CD player - uurgh.
> Anyway, just griping... anyone else ever deal with this?
>
> NeilHi Neil,
If the click track isnt noisy Cubase should be able to make a tempo map
of the it by detecting hit points on the file. This will cause the click
track in Cubase to follow any changes in tempo.
Chris
Neil wrote:
> A band out of state is wanting me to do some drum programming
> on a song for them (the drummer's not available at this time...
> Columbian prison or something - you know, typical drummer...
> JUST KIDDING lol). Anyway, so the guy sends me a CD - audio
> CD, not wav, even. and i'm supposed to strip out the click on
> one channel & his rhythm guitar on the other & program a MIDI
> drum track to match it, but..... (wait for
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56548 is a reply to message #56525] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 00:16 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
it)
> it drifts no matter what tempo i use; 81 is perfect for about a
> minute in, then it starts drifting, 82 starts drifting too fast
> almost instantly, 80 starts drifting too slow in the same
> manner; i double it to 162 to get more precise "nudges", but
> 163 starts drifting too fast & 162 starts drifting too slow -
> just takes longer to do it. Sorry, can't go up to 324, I tell
> him, workstation won't go that high LOL He's not on a DAW, so
> we can't exchange any kind of files directly.
>
> I'm gonna have to program it from scratch by ear at 81 while
> listening to his rhythm track on a regular CD player - uurgh.
> Anyway, just griping... anyone else ever deal with this?
>
> Neil
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK
chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
(859) 635-5762One of my all-time favs is still Aja... first CD I ever bought... even
before I had anything to play it on!! :-)
David.
DJ wrote:
> heheheheh!!!!!!!!!.........and right after the *detection* they started
> production of Gaucho.
>
> I still listen to *th' Dan*......a lot. The guitar instrumental on Third
> world Man still gives me a rush.
>
> ;o)
>
> "uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:42f00fb6$1@linux...
>
>>Ha! Good stuff. And you can bet that was the least of the stuff they were
>>"detecting" before, during, and after their sessions....
>>
>>Jimmy
>>
>>
>>"Neil" <OIUIOU@OI.com> wrote in message news:42f00456@linux...
>>
>>>"Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I thought that was because they were enjoying the el supremo in the
>
> room
>
>>>at
>>>
>>>>the top of the stairs.
>>>
>>>No, just detecting it. :D
>>
>>
>
>Personally, I can't wait till they get rid of smoking from bars/pubs
here... I get back from some gigs and want throw away my clothes
rather than bring them into the house.
David
justcron wrote:
> I mean smoker/drinker or not, you gotta admit that bars just aint the same
> without that cloud and it feels like something has been taken away from
> life.
>
>
>
>
>Cubase/Nuendo has a feature where you can set the bar markers to the
actual audio, thereby allowing the sequencing and subsequent
quantizing of midi events to the aforementioned audio. :-)
David.
Neil wrote:
> A band out of state is wanting me to do some drum programming
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56555 is a reply to message #56530] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 08:04 |
EK Sound
Messages: 939
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
Thanks but no thanks.
Cheers,
-Jamie K
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
justcron wrote:
> I mean smoker/drinker or not, you gotta admit that bars just aint the same
> without that cloud and it feels like something has been taken away from
> life.
>
>
>
>
>Hey Jimmy,
If the MEC is getting it's clock signal from the Lucid, then the spdif
output signal will be derived from the Lucid as well. I'm using a pair of
Digipatch units here routing spdif in and out of 3 x MECs, a Quantec
Yardstick, Sony V77 and a Lexicon PC 90 on one of them (the other is routing
ADAT/optical I/O from one of the MECs and various I/O on my RME cards, etc.)
The Digipatch should pass the signals with no problem and you should be able
to Mangler them easily.
;o)
uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:42f0e1db$1@linux...
> Yeah, I've got an "ahem" as well. Deej......
>
> So Mike, what I want to do is clock a 3-MEC system from a Lucid clock via
> BNC. Will the Rumour pick up the clcok signal via SPDIF from an MEC? And I
> guess if it will do that it will pick the signal up with a Digipatch in
the
> way as well...I'm adding a Mangler soon....
>
> Thanks!
> Jimmy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lost in the ozone again [message #56602 is a reply to message #56601] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 21:29 |
justcron
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
dont think we've ever discussed this
>
>me... tribal armband on my left arm so far.... more in the future
>
>
I got man tits.
Or as Ren Hoeck would say "HUGE pectoral muscles!"
;o)"justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote:
>reply with your tattoo info!
>
>I dont think we've ever discussed this
>
>me... tribal armband on my left arm so far.... more in the future
>
>
Get a tat of a barbershop pole, too!
......for tha ladies!
:-)
actually I plan on going into the sideshow circuit when I retire as "one
of the last unmarked, unpierced codgers in existence!"
"The Un-Illustrated Man"
Tats are so mainstream now, and I especially hate "ass antlers" on women!
Give me a gal with nice clean, unmarked skin.
But then, I'm OLD and opinionated!!!I've never smoked in my life. But I actually feel the same way. It just isn't
quite the same atmosphere without the smoke.
I feel the same way about truckstops. A greasy cheeseburger and fries with
a coke justs tastes better to me when there's a little cig smoke mixed in.
rod
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote:
>>I mean smoker/drinker or not, you gotta admit that bars just aint the same
>>without that cloud and it feels like something has been taken away from
>
>>life.
>
>Our pubs here are still smokey at this point, but the bans are on their
way.
>I must admit I hear what you're saying. There's a definate part of me that
>likes the smokey pub thing. Don't get me wrong I'm in favour of the bans.
>The bans helped finally tip the balance and make me quit... I figured
if
>the future said I wouldn't be able to smoke in pubs, I'd better get in early
>so that, when the ban
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 05 18:59:28 PDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01669 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
