The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » Antares Auto Tune

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Antares Auto Tune

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Antares Auto Tune [message #80956]

Fri, 02 March 2007 06:58

Rich Lamanna

Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

Guys, which version of Antares Auto Tune is the most stable with Paris? I'm
still using ME is there any difference if I upgrade to XP?

Thanks,
Rich

Report message to a moderator

Re: Antares Auto Tune [message #80958 is a reply to message #80956]

Fri, 02 March 2007 07:17

Rich Lamanna

Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

I should ask, after checking on Antares web, would you recommend the Direct
X or the VST versions? It looks like only Filter, Tube and Mike Modeler will
work with ME from the website. What's the difference in these versions? Are
they all pitch tuners or are they just mike filters?

Rich

"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:45e82bf2$1@linux...
> Guys, which version of Antares Auto Tune is the most stable with Paris?
I'm
> still using ME is there any difference if I upgrade to XP?
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Antares Auto Tune [message #80993 is a reply to message #80956]

Fri, 02 March 2007 10:01

EK Sound

Messages: 939
Registered: June 2005

Senior Member

1.3...

David.

Rich Lamanna wrote:
> Guys, which version of Antares Auto Tune is the most stable with Paris? I'm
> still using ME is there any difference if I upgrade to XP?
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Antares Auto Tune [message #81033 is a reply to message #80993]

Fri, 02 March 2007 16:37

Rich Lamanna

Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

Thanks, Dave.

Rich

"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:45e8666f$1@linux...
> 1.3...
>
> David.
>
> Rich Lamanna wrote:
> > Guys, which version of Antares Auto Tune is the most stable with Paris?
I'm
> > still using ME is there any difference if I upgrade to XP?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rich
> >
> >

Report message to a moderator

Re: Antares Auto Tune [message #81126 is a reply to message #80993]

Sun, 04 March 2007 08:21

Rich Lamanna

Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

Dave, does the DirectX version work as well as the vst version? Is there any
advantage to either?

Rich

"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:45e8666f$1@linux...
> 1.3...
>
> David.
>
> Rich Lamanna wrote:
> > Guys, which version of Antares Auto Tune is the most stable with Paris?
I'm
> > still using ME is there any difference if I upgrade to XP?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rich
> >
> >

Report message to a moderator

Re: Antares Auto Tune [message #81131 is a reply to message #81126]

Sun, 04 March 2007 10:52

Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006

Senior Member

The VST Version is somewhat less CPU-intensive.

"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
>Dave, does the DirectX version work as well as the vst version? Is there
any
>advantage to either?
>
>Rich
>
>"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:45e8666f$1@linux...
>> 1.3...
>>
>> David.
>>
>> Rich Lamanna wrote:
>> > Guys, which version of Antares Auto Tune is the most stable with Paris?
>I'm
>> > still using ME is there any difference if I upgrade to XP?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Rich
>> >
>> >
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	FS Paris Gear -
Next Topic:	tpt error WTF? - image included

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Apr 27 03:51:30 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01568 seconds