Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Ron Paul Video
| Re: Ron Paul Video [message #91563 is a reply to message #91470] |
Wed, 17 October 2007 11:08   |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
You guys are so smart'n stuff. Gives me a headache just trying to follow
this exchange. I'm still just tryin to learn how to spell "nukular".
Peace gentlemen,
;o)
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4713ecdb$1@linux...
>
> But why? You summarized the issue so well in a couple of
> sentences. They are so succinct and elegant, that they
> almost represent proof that PoMo is dead!
>
> <grin>
>
> DC
>
> assuming of course that the text has any meaning in itself...
>
>
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Nope, but apparently someone had his text cutting shears handy to be sure
>>he didn't have to answer my argument!
>>
>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can I understand Plato in exactly the same way a third century BC
>>>>Athenian
>>>>did? Of course not.
>>>
>>>Well, there it is, isn't it? It works the other way 'round too.
>>>
>>>
>>>>But to claim that this robs me of any chance of gathering
>>>>something from his writing, and that he can't possibly have the tools
> to
>>>>understand personality defects because he was denied the opportunity to
>>>read
>>>>Hare, that is reductivist solipsism dressed in its most jarring, garish
>>>vestments.
>>>
>>>Ahhh, discount sale at the strawman shop today, eh?
>>>
>>>DC
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ron Paul Video [message #91564 is a reply to message #91563] |
Wed, 17 October 2007 11:25 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Nahh, we ain't that smart. It's just that I miss not having
SSC around to help me with my needs for a good, vigorous
discussion! It's brain excercise, or wanking.
You pick...
How you doing?
DC
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>You guys are so smart'n stuff. Gives me a headache just trying to follow
>this exchange. I'm still just tryin to learn how to spell "nukular".
>
>Peace gentlemen,
>
>;o)
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4713ecdb$1@linux...
>>
>> But why? You summarized the issue so well in a couple of
>> sentences. They are so succinct and elegant, that they
>> almost represent proof that PoMo is dead!
>>
>> <grin>
>>
>> DC
>>
>> assuming of course that the text has any meaning in itself...
>>
>>
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Nope, but apparently someone had his text cutting shears handy to be sure
>>>he didn't have to answer my argument!
>>>
>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Can I understand Plato in exactly the same way a third century BC
>>>>>Athenian
>>>>>did? Of course not.
>>>>
>>>>Well, there it is, isn't it? It works the other way 'round too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>But to claim that this robs me of any chance of gathering
>>>>>something from his writing, and that he can't possibly have the tools
>> to
>>>>>understand personality defects because he was denied the opportunity
to
>>>>read
>>>>>Hare, that is reductivist solipsism dressed in its most jarring, garish
>>>>vestments.
>>>>
>>>>Ahhh, discount sale at the strawman shop today, eh?
>>>>
>>>>DC
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ron Paul Video [message #91576 is a reply to message #91564] |
Wed, 17 October 2007 21:09 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
There you go Deej, it's 'wanking' when Don is losing an argument. But it's
'revealed truth' when he's winning.
If you want some really fun reading, do check out 'The Twelve Caesars.' There's
a cheap Penguin edition you can get at Amazon. It's literally a great bathroom
book. Sit down to take a piss and read about what Domitian did in the Colosseum.
What Vespasian complained about to the Senate. That Octavian wore lifts in
his shoes because he thought himself too short. And that's all without even
getting into Nero and Caligula. And, there's some psychological insight as
well, but you'll have to consult Don about that, he's the expert.
TCB
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>Nahh, we ain't that smart. It's just that I miss not having
>SSC around to help me with my needs for a good, vigorous
>discussion! It's brain excercise, or wanking.
>
>You pick...
>
>How you doing?
>
>DC
>
>"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>You guys are so smart'n stuff. Gives me a headache just trying to follow
>
>>this exchange. I'm still just tryin to learn how to spell "nukular".
>>
>>Peace gentlemen,
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4713ecdb$1@linux...
>>>
>>> But why? You summarized the issue so well in a couple of
>>> sentences. They are so succinct and elegant, that they
>>> almost represent proof that PoMo is dead!
>>>
>>> <grin>
>>>
>>> DC
>>>
>>> assuming of course that the text has any meaning in itself...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Nope, but apparently someone had his text cutting shears handy to be
sure
>>>>he didn't have to answer my argument!
>>>>
>>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can I understand Plato in exactly the same way a third century BC
>>>>>>Athenian
>>>>>>did? Of course not.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, there it is, isn't it? It works the other way 'round too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>But to claim that this robs me of any chance of gathering
>>>>>>something from his writing, and that he can't possibly have the tools
>>> to
>>>>>>understand personality defects because he was denied the opportunity
>to
>>>>>read
>>>>>>Hare, that is reductivist solipsism dressed in its most jarring, garish
>>>>>vestments.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ahhh, discount sale at the strawman shop today, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>>DC
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ron Paul Video [message #91580 is a reply to message #91576] |
Wed, 17 October 2007 22:33 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>There you go Deej, it's 'wanking' when Don is losing an argument. But it's
>'revealed truth' when he's winning.
No, it's wanking when you're in fantasy land once again...
>If you want some really fun reading, do check out 'The Twelve Caesars.'
There's
>a cheap Penguin edition you can get at Amazon. It's literally a great bathroom
>book. Sit down to take a piss and read about what Domitian did in the Colosseum.
>What Vespasian complained about to the Senate. That Octavian wore lifts
in
>his shoes because he thought himself too short. And that's all without even
>getting into Nero and Caligula. And, there's some psychological insight
as
>well, but you'll have to consult Don about that, he's the expert.
wank wank...
heh heh
Oh hey, I was just kidding. I really do think yer a smart guy...
On thursdays. for a wanker...
DC
>
>TCB
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>Nahh, we ain't that smart. It's just that I miss not having
>>SSC around to help me with my needs for a good, vigorous
>>discussion! It's brain excercise, or wanking.
>>
>>You pick...
>>
>>How you doing?
>>
>>DC
>>
>>"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>>You guys are so smart'n stuff. Gives me a headache just trying to follow
>>
>>>this exchange. I'm still just tryin to learn how to spell "nukular".
>>>
>>>Peace gentlemen,
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4713ecdb$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> But why? You summarized the issue so well in a couple of
>>>> sentences. They are so succinct and elegant, that they
>>>> almost represent proof that PoMo is dead!
>>>>
>>>> <grin>
>>>>
>>>> DC
>>>>
>>>> assuming of course that the text has any meaning in itself...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Nope, but apparently someone had his text cutting shears handy to be
>sure
>>>>>he didn't have to answer my argument!
>>>>>
>>>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Can I understand Plato in exactly the same way a third century BC
>>>>>>>Athenian
>>>>>>>did? Of course not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well, there it is, isn't it? It works the other way 'round too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But to claim that this robs me of any chance of gathering
>>>>>>>something from his writing, and that he can't possibly have the tools
>>>> to
>>>>>>>understand personality defects because he was denied the opportunity
>>to
>>>>>>read
>>>>>>>Hare, that is reductivist solipsism dressed in its most jarring, garish
>>>>>>vestments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ahhh, discount sale at the strawman shop today, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DC
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ron Paul Video [message #91621 is a reply to message #91580] |
Thu, 18 October 2007 11:08 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
<sigh>.............well.OK then..........
;}
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4716f02f$1@linux...
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>There you go Deej, it's 'wanking' when Don is losing an argument. But it's
>>'revealed truth' when he's winning.
>
> No, it's wanking when you're in fantasy land once again...
>
>
>
>>If you want some really fun reading, do check out 'The Twelve Caesars.'
> There's
>>a cheap Penguin edition you can get at Amazon. It's literally a great
>>bathroom
>>book. Sit down to take a piss and read about what Domitian did in the
>>Colosseum.
>>What Vespasian complained about to the Senate. That Octavian wore lifts
> in
>>his shoes because he thought himself too short. And that's all without
>>even
>>getting into Nero and Caligula. And, there's some psychological insight
> as
>>well, but you'll have to consult Don about that, he's the expert.
>
> wank wank...
>
>
> heh heh
>
> Oh hey, I was just kidding. I really do think yer a smart guy...
>
> On thursdays. for a wanker...
>
> DC
>
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Nahh, we ain't that smart. It's just that I miss not having
>>>SSC around to help me with my needs for a good, vigorous
>>>discussion! It's brain excercise, or wanking.
>>>
>>>You pick...
>>>
>>>How you doing?
>>>
>>>DC
>>>
>>>"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>>>You guys are so smart'n stuff. Gives me a headache just trying to follow
>>>
>>>>this exchange. I'm still just tryin to learn how to spell "nukular".
>>>>
>>>>Peace gentlemen,
>>>>
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4713ecdb$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> But why? You summarized the issue so well in a couple of
>>>>> sentences. They are so succinct and elegant, that they
>>>>> almost represent proof that PoMo is dead!
>>>>>
>>>>> <grin>
>>>>>
>>>>> DC
>>>>>
>>>>> assuming of course that the text has any meaning in itself...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nope, but apparently someone had his text cutting shears handy to be
>>sure
>>>>>>he didn't have to answer my argument!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Can I understand Plato in exactly the same way a third century BC
>
>>>>>>>>Athenian
>>>>>>>>did? Of course not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, there it is, isn't it? It works the other way 'round too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But to claim that this robs me of any chance of gathering
>>>>>>>>something from his writing, and that he can't possibly have the
>>>>>>>>tools
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>understand personality defects because he was denied the opportunity
>>>to
>>>>>>>read
>>>>>>>>Hare, that is reductivist solipsism dressed in its most jarring,
>>>>>>>>garish
>>>>>>>vestments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ahhh, discount sale at the strawman shop today, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>DC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 22 17:05:04 PDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03184 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
