The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Proposed royalty rate changes Part II
Proposed royalty rate changes Part II [message #95403] Sat, 02 February 2008 15:48 Go to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   CANADA
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
http://www.loc.gov/crb/proceedings/2006-3/index.html#trial
Re: Proposed royalty rate changes Part II [message #95405 is a reply to message #95403] Sat, 02 February 2008 16:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   CANADA
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:47a50499@linux...
> http://www.loc.gov/crb/proceedings/2006-3/index.html#trial


Digital Media is proposing a rate of 4.1 %

i.e. $0.04 USD per digital download

ya think we'd at least get a kiss before...
Re: Proposed royalty rate changes Part II [message #95407 is a reply to message #95405] Sat, 02 February 2008 16:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dedric Terry is currently offline  Dedric Terry   UNITED STATES
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
On 2/2/08 5:08 PM, in article 47a5093e@linux, "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca>
wrote:

>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:47a50499@linux...
>> http://www.loc.gov/crb/proceedings/2006-3/index.html#trial
>
>
> Digital Media is proposing a rate of 4.1 %
>
> i.e. $0.04 USD per digital download
>
> ya think we'd at least get a kiss before...
>
>
>

And 0% on streaming media, which is likely to be the future that replaces
CDs and even downloads. It's amazing how DiMA and even the RIAA are simply
ignoring the simple fact that without motivation to sell content, there are
no content creators. "Fame" is of no use in a billion-song download market
(needle in a haystack) when there is no "fortune" to accompany it.

They are sadly mistaken if they think writers and artists are going to
practically give their art away just so distributors can make a mint on it.

If the industry doesn't want creative professionals, then a new industry
will simply replace it. I already have an idea along those lines....
Re: Proposed royalty rate changes Part II [message #95408 is a reply to message #95405] Sat, 02 February 2008 16:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
There is a *recording artists safety guide to the beach* floating about
somewhere that pretty well sums this up.
You might see if it's reachable on google. Warning: Adult language... which
is why I won't post it here.

AA

"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:47a5093e@linux...
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:47a50499@linux...
>> http://www.loc.gov/crb/proceedings/2006-3/index.html#trial
>
>
> Digital Media is proposing a rate of 4.1 %
>
> i.e. $0.04 USD per digital download
>
> ya think we'd at least get a kiss before...
>
>
>
Re: a new model [message #95447 is a reply to message #95403] Sun, 03 February 2008 05:15 Go to previous message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   CANADA
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
A new model?

http://womb.mixerman.net/showthread.php?t=6409
Previous Topic: Uninvited harp player...
Next Topic: More build questions.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 02 04:10:05 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01493 seconds