Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #108039 is a reply to message #108037] |
Tue, 14 January 2014 10:08 |
excelav
Messages: 2130 Registered: July 2005 Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
My reply from the Adat thread...
Sorry to mix the threads. Yeah, it looks like my idea would be too much work. If the end cost would only be around $500.00, it makes sense to build new. I will mention that when Paris Pro 3.0 was released it was supposed to work with third party control surfaces. It is in the press releases, and as a dealer, I was told that they had it working with the CM MotorMix and a german control surface called the K2. It might be an easier way to go, to get Paris to work with an existing control surface. However, your idea to build a new C-16 is the best.
Third party control surfaces are mentioned in this release.
http://www.digitalprosound.com/2001/02_feb/news/emu-paris.ht m
[Updated on: Tue, 14 January 2014 16:06] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|