|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: noise problems [message #62254 is a reply to message #62252] |
Mon, 02 January 2006 18:28   |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
make sure your unused faders are below this value). Lets say it is at 2db.
Now select Normalize Mix and set the maximum db gain at 5db (its 2db level +
your 3d increase). Now this fader moves up 3db to reach the max 5db value
you chose. At the same time the other faders will move up 3db as well.
If you wanted to lower the levels, just set the maximum level of the highest
fader down by however many db you want. Lets say the 3db above was too
much and you would like to reduce it by a db. Same procedure, just set the
maxumum db level to 4db. This reduces your max level fader from 5db to
4db - a one db change for all faders.
Hope this helps. I use it a lot and it works for well for me.
Edna
"Ed" <askme@email.com> wrote in message news:43b9a83a$1@linux...
>
> Ummm... I am afraid your advice didn't work Edna. I failed to mention
that
> I am using Paris 3.0. I only see the "normalize mix" option in the
Functions
> section on the Mixer. When I select it, it wants me to adjust the total
> mix by maximun Db. I'll have to play with it I suppose. But I could have
> sworn there was a way to control all faders at the same time....
>
> "Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote:
> >Well I just got into Paris a couple months ago. Its my first DAW. I am
> >amazed at what all it can do. I did try out a Roland unit one time but
> was
> >disappointed with the sound - dead, cold, etc. I am using Paris to track
> >vocals and synth mainly for church related things, BG tracks, CDs, etc.
> >Also for writing my own stuff - I play kybds/sing. Used to play in
bands.
> >I got Paris for the sound. I prefer analog, and Paris was touted as the
> >nearest to that. It certainly wipes the floor with the Roland, IMHO. And
> I
> >love the editing features. At the moment I am experimenting with
mixdowns,
> >trying to get the exported stereo files to sound as good as the original
> mix
> >and as loud as comm cds - when I bring the stereo wav back to the projec
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: noise problems [message #62261 is a reply to message #62257] |
Mon, 02 January 2006 19:43 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, you can use the normalize function to do this - bring them up
or
>>>>
>>>>down.
>>>>
>>>>>>For example say you want to lower them all by 3db. On an unused channel
>>>>>>move its fader to 10 and then normalize with highest at 7. This brings
>>>>>>down all faders by 3. (To bring them back up to where they were,
>>>>
>>>>normalize
>>>>
>>>>>>to 10.)
>>>>>>Edna
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Ed" <askme@email.com> wrote in message news:43b952d0$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi All. Perhaps a quick n' easy question for you Paris power users.
>>>
>>>I
>>>
>>>>>>mainly
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>use the mouse for controlling everything on the mixer(s) and such.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Anyway,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I was working on a few projects and found that I sonically liked the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>levels
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>of one of the projects. It is very frustrating going back through
>>>
>>>all
>>>
>>>>>the
>>>>>
>>>>>>>other songs in the other projects to bring down each channel fader
>>>>>>
>>>>>>individually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My question is... is there a way to control all active (active meaning
>>>>>>
>>>>>>there
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>is something on the channel) channel faders at the same time? Another
>>>>>>
>>>>>>words,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have all the channel faders set properly, but I want to bring them
>>>>
>>>>all
>>>>
>>>>>>>down a few db's. Is there a way to bring them all down at the same
>>>>
>>>>time
>>>>
>>>>>>>without doing them individually?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Lastly, I don't have any automation set, so that won't be effected
>>>
>>>by
>>>
>>>>>>this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In fact, I try to stay away from automation because of this reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>may be an easy way to "edit" the automation, but I haven't figured
>>>
>>>it
>>>
>>>>>out.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just try to stay away from it. Some day I may delve into that
>>>>
>>>>learnin
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: noise problems [message #62447 is a reply to message #62346] |
Wed, 04 January 2006 19:42 |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
g playback, tap the Select
> button on the ARMED channel(s) to write fader automation. The yellow
> LED will light indicating Automation "Write Mode". Move faders, press
> Mute or adjust EQ to record the moves.
>
> 6. Press the Stop button when no further volume or Mute-button changes
> are to needed and disable the Auto button.
>
> 7. To un-arm each Channel to stop the recording of automation data,
> press and hold the channel's Select button for one second. The RED led
> will go out.
>
> 8. To activate playback of each Channel's automation data, open the
> Mixer window and turn on the "A" enable automation playback button at
> the bottom of each fader.
>
> To do this for Mutes and Pans, skip step 5.
>
> PUNCH IN/OUT: You can punch in and out of Automation Write Mode by
> tapping the Select button during playback.I'm absolutely floored by this VSTi. It literally sounds like there is a
Steinway D sitting right here in my control room. I'm not a keyboard player,
but this thing may inspire me to go there. I'm flabbergasted!! Another big
surprise was that it's not a huge resource hog as I had expected. It uses a
lot of RAM, but they warn you about that upfront. As far as CPU usage goes,
it's a pussycat. I've got my RME buffers set at 64k and I'm streaming BFD
grooves and simultaneously playing the Bosendorfer mofofromhell piano with
the most sample layers and expression options enabled with the sustain pedal
working overtime and my dual core 64 4200+ CPU is hitting around 8-9% (with
1.35G of RAM being utilized for both VSTi's, Cubase SX and the system. Glad
I've got 4G of RAM though. The 7200 RPM dedicated HD is having no problems
with this at all. I was thinking that I might need to go to a SATA RAID
array in order to get this app to function correctly. If you're looking for
a VSTi piano, this would be one to consider if you've got the rig to operate
it or are considering building a dedicated VSTi box.
Man.....this is friggin AWESOME sounding!!!!I-rovy, huh?
;0)
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I'm absolutely floored by this VSTi. It literally sounds like there is a
>Steinway D sitting right here in my control room. I'm not a keyboard player,
>but this thing may inspire me to go there. I'm flabbergasted!! Another big
>surprise was that it's not a huge resource hog as I had expected. It uses
a
>lot of RAM, but they warn you about that upfront. As far as CPU usage goes,
>it's a pussycat. I've got my RME buffers set at 64k and I'm streaming BFD
>grooves and simultaneously playing the Bosendorfer mofofromhell piano with
>the most sample layers and expression options enabled with the sustain pedal
>working overtime and my dual core 64 4200+ CPU is hitting around 8-9% (with
>1.35G of RAM being utilized for both VSTi's, Cubase SX and the system. Glad
>I've got 4G of RAM though. The 7200 RPM dedicated HD is having no problems
>with this at all. I was thinking that I might need to go to a SATA RAID
>array in order to get this app to function correctly. If you're looking
for
>a VSTi piano, this would be one to consider if you've got the rig to operate
>it or are considering building a dedicated VSTi box.
>
>Man.....this is friggin AWESOME sounding!!!!
>
>To add to what Deej said, the Audio Unit version also works great on a
PowerMac dual 2.5GHZ using an internal SATA drive, not breaking a sweat
when playing along with plenty of other AU synths and FX.
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
DJ wrote:
> I'm absolutely floored by this VSTi. It literally sounds like there is a
> Steinway D sitting right here in my control room. I'm not a keyboard player,
> but this thing may inspire me to go there. I'm flabbergasted!! Another big
> surprise was that it's not a huge resource hog as I had expected. It uses a
> lot of RAM, but they warn you about that upfront. As far as CPU usage goes,
> it's a pussycat. I've got my RME buffers set at 64k and I'm streaming BFD
> grooves and simultaneously playing the Bosendorfer mofofromhell piano with
> the most sampl
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
