|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Adat sync can this send sample accurate sync ? [message #58000 is a reply to message #57999] |
Thu, 08 September 2005 10:53   |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
oln@nospam.kc.rr.com" target="_blank">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
> >news:432036fd$1@linux...
> >>
> >> the adat card does indeed send sample acurate sync.
> >> Rod
> >> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>I wonder if the Paris adat sync out of card's a mec can send sample
> >>>accurate
> >>>sync...
> >>>I have read on an old post that is used minly for transport controls.
> >>>But if it is used only for that then midioverlan sending MTC is
adequate
> >> for
> >>>me.
> >>>I am asking because I am using on second PC Creamware's pulsar cards
and
> >> I
> >>>could get the sync plate for pulsar which has 9 pin adat connectionns
>
> >>>along
> >>>with extra wordclock in/out.
> >>>So if the sony out from Paris would start my Cubase with ALWAYS sample
> >>>accurate positioning, instead of MTC which is not alkways sample
accurate
> >>>(without using the wordclock in/out) then this would be great.
> >>>Regards,
> >>>Dimitrios
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>Well I opened here up, re-seated the main IC / connections, checked the
surface mount fuses on that little pwr supply brd and I think its as far as
I can go without a schematic.
It was a small challenge to put back together but patients is the key there.
"Rob Arsenault" <mani2@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message news:431f8448@linux...
> I come in the studio tonight, turn on my rig, my second C-16 doesn't show
up
> in Paris, I look, no heartbeat on the mute button, I swapped cables with
my
> other C-16, still no heart beat, I tried my other C-16 on this cable,
works
> perfect. So does this mean I'm shopping for a new C-16? Anyone had similar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Adat sync can this send sample accurate sync ? [message #58012 is a reply to message #58000] |
Thu, 08 September 2005 19:09 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rslutz.com for several months and
have learned quite a bit. I see that some of you are using other DAWs with
PARIS. I'd like to do the same. I also have some decent outboard gear I'm
using.
Right now, I have PARIS set up on it's own, using some outboard gear as
inserts and aux. FX. I've also found a way to use the Aux sends as busses so
that I may strap stereo dynamics across a multiple track sub. I do very
little editing, and don't really use any PARIS effects. I esentially am
using PARIS as you would a tape deck and desk, I do use the editor for track
alignment with multi mic sources, and I will on ocasion remove a flub, but I
did that with mutes back in the day anyway.
I have a second computer running SX which has an RME HDSP 96/52 in it. I
really only use it to transfer SX tracks from another studio into PARIS, but
I think I'd eventually like to either begin recording into SX or even
upgrade to Nuendo, and simply use PARIS as a mixer. THe main reason dor this
is to use the SX latenc compensation. I also have a couple UAD-1s and some
soft synths that I may or may not use (I have 8 analog channels of decent
compression and EQ, and prefer using these, printing them to disk as I need
more channels). My ultimate goal is to eventually replace PARIS with either
a mixer (probably a neotek) or a summing box (probably an API). The bigest
problem is that PARIS is SO easy to use for me compared to SX. I'm from the
old school. Learned on a 4 track cassete, moved to a Tascam 38 1/2",
eventually replaced it with a couple af DA-38s and then PARIS.
My first question is...where would you all go from here? I will eventually
need some nice converters. Should I buy a Lynx Aurora or Appogee DA and
AD-16x now (I have a big ben and it makes a noticable difference with the
stock PARIS converters). Has anyone compared either to the stock converters
at 44.1 with a good clock? How would that integrate with the ADAT module at
only 20bit? (I noticed one of you all mentioning having to dither every
track to 20 bit).
Maybe I should use what I have now, then when I'm ready, move to something
like a Nyquist RADAR and a real board? SX or Nuendo just seems more tempting
because I'm half way there, and only need the converters, but I sure like
the idea of a closed system such as RADAR or even the new TASCAM 48 track.
The problem is I am sometimes frustrated with PARIS as it seems to have some
issues with routing sound when I don't tell it to (I was recently doing a
drum sub using an auxilary mix to two new tracks and I was getting aux
bleed, even when no auxilary send was active). It's stuff like that that
just makes me drop what I'm doing and go eat a doughnut or something.
Anyway, sorry if this post is a little confused, but I AM a little confused
right now. Maybe I just need to vent a little bit, but hopefully a
benificial discussion can come of this.
Thanks,
Joey BeeMy CD player in my truck crapped out last week. I haven't
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Adat sync can this send sample accurate sync ? [message #58025 is a reply to message #58009] |
Fri, 09 September 2005 08:20 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
edu/~jhalderm/cd3/
> >
> > This driver is designed to prevent unauthorized copying of audio CDs
using
> > personal computers. MediaMax interferes with audio copying by
installing
> a
> > device driver the first time software from the CD is executed. It's
> > supposed to make the ripped tracks stutter thus leaving them unusable.
On
> > my system it also made my Fireface driver crazy. I couldn't even play
my
> > older cd's which I bought without skips and stutters. To make a long
> story
> > short I had to get a link from the SunnComm Technologies that
uninstalled
> > the software and then (They didn't tell me this) delete the sbcphid.sys
> > driver from my device manager which the uninstall left behind. This
file
> is
> > hidden so you have to select the view hidden devices option in the
device
> > manager window. MediaMax and similar copy-prevention systems are
> > irreparably flawed and believe record companies should find more
> > customer-friendly alternatives for reducing infringement. I hope this
> helps
> > anyone else having problems similar to mine.<
> >
> > Just a heads up guys.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>I was speaking of the French government, not so much, people that are french,
although the people of France did elect Chirac. For Cojo to in effect say
that the french where right, is wrong! The French undermined the purpose
of UN and UN resolutions by selling arms to Saddam and buying oil from Iraq
under the table.
I personally think what the french did was shameful and corrupt. Their dirty
oil deal with Saddam, made the sacrifice of cost and lives lost in the 1991
Gulf War, in vain. The truth is, France along with Germany, Russia, and
China, tried to stop the invasion to keep their dirty little oil deal and
arms deals going. That's the truth and now we know it. It's too bad that
some people wont let the truth get in the way of their liberal opinion.
When Iraq broke the treaties and forced the UN weapons inspectors out in
1997, we should have immediately invaded. It's too bad Clinton was too busy
trying to cop a hummer in the White House and selling our pulse weapons technology
to the Chinese to do something about Saddam. Now we have to deal with it.
The French also knew that we would probably be going in to Iraq and st
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
