The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » What about Wormhole?

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » What about Wormhole?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

What about Wormhole? [message #95978]

Thu, 14 February 2008 22:10

excelav

Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit

Senior Member

What about Wormhole? Did anybody get this to work with paris, with out latency?

Hey Deej, what were the results when you tried Wormhole? Did you try the
last version?

FYI, It's now open source.

Report message to a moderator

Re: What about Wormhole? [message #95986 is a reply to message #95978]

Thu, 14 February 2008 22:32

Deej [5]

Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008

Senior Member

Never tried it James.

You got me.

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47b51ecc$1@linux...
>
> What about Wormhole? Did anybody get this to work with paris, with out
> latency?
>
> Hey Deej, what were the results when you tried Wormhole? Did you try the
> last version?
>
> FYI, It's now open source.

Report message to a moderator

Re: What about Wormhole? [message #95989 is a reply to message #95986]

Fri, 15 February 2008 00:23

excelav

Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit

Senior Member

"Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>Never tried it James.
>
>You got me.

Hmmm, I thought you tried it out. Here is the info on Wormhole. Just thinking
you might be able to run the UAD-1s on separate computers, but you'd be back
to multiple computers.

http://plasq.com/wormhole

http://plasq.com/wormhole/paq

http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/

You can also get it here:
http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/downloads/list

http://www.kvraudio.com/get/1284.html

http://analoguedigital.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/plasq-wormho le-2-now-open-source/

>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:47b51ecc$1@linux...
>>
>> What about Wormhole? Did anybody get this to work with paris, with out

>> latency?
>>
>> Hey Deej, what were the results when you tried Wormhole? Did you try
the
>> last version?
>>
>> FYI, It's now open source.
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: What about Wormhole? [message #95990 is a reply to message #95989]

Thu, 14 February 2008 23:49

Erling

Messages: 156
Registered: October 2008

Senior Member

I believe Dimitros knows the answer.

Erling

On 15 Feb 2008 18:23:50 +1000, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>Never tried it James.
>>
>>You got me.
>
>Hmmm, I thought you tried it out. Here is the info on Wormhole. Just thinking
>you might be able to run the UAD-1s on separate computers, but you'd be back
>to multiple computers.
>
>http://plasq.com/wormhole
>
>http://plasq.com/wormhole/paq
>
>http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/
>
>You can also get it here:
>http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/downloads/list
>
>http://www.kvraudio.com/get/1284.html
>
> http://analoguedigital.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/plasq-wormho le-2-now-open-source/
>
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:47b51ecc$1@linux...
>>>
>>> What about Wormhole? Did anybody get this to work with paris, with out
>
>>> latency?
>>>
>>> Hey Deej, what were the results when you tried Wormhole? Did you try
>the
>>> last version?
>>>
>>> FYI, It's now open source.
>>
>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: What about Wormhole? [message #95998 is a reply to message #95989]

Fri, 15 February 2008 05:56

Deej [5]

Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008

Senior Member

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47b53e06$1@linux...
>
> "Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>Never tried it James.
>>
>>You got me.
>
> Hmmm, I thought you tried it out. Here is the info on Wormhole. Just
> thinking
> you might be able to run the UAD-1s on separate computers, but you'd be
> back
> to multiple computers.
>
> http://plasq.com/wormhole
>
> http://plasq.com/wormhole/paq
>
> http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/
>
> You can also get it here:
> http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/downloads/list
>
> http://www.kvraudio.com/get/1284.html
>
> http://analoguedigital.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/plasq-wormho le-2-now-open-source/
>
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:47b51ecc$1@linux...
>>>
>>> What about Wormhole? Did anybody get this to work with paris, with out
>
>>> latency?
>>>
>>> Hey Deej, what were the results when you tried Wormhole? Did you try
> the
>>> last version?
>>>
>>> FYI, It's now open source.

The issue with me was and still is latency. If I have to start sliding
individual tracks around as I add plugins, it's a no-go. This is the main
reason I sold my Paris rig.

Report message to a moderator

Re: What about Wormhole? [message #96002 is a reply to message #95998]

Fri, 15 February 2008 12:25

excelav

Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit

Senior Member

"Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:47b53e06$1@linux...
>>
>> "Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>Never tried it James.
>>>
>>>You got me.
>>
>> Hmmm, I thought you tried it out. Here is the info on Wormhole. Just

>> thinking
>> you might be able to run the UAD-1s on separate computers, but you'd be

>> back
>> to multiple computers.
>>
>> http://plasq.com/wormhole
>>
>> http://plasq.com/wormhole/paq
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/
>>
>> You can also get it here:
>> http://code.google.com/p/wormhole2/downloads/list
>>
>> http://www.kvraudio.com/get/1284.html
>>
>> http://analoguedigital.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/plasq-wormho le-2-now-open-source/
>>
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:47b51ecc$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> What about Wormhole? Did anybody get this to work with paris, with
out
>>
>>>> latency?
>>>>
>>>> Hey Deej, what were the results when you tried Wormhole? Did you try
>> the
>>>> last version?
>>>>
>>>> FYI, It's now open source.
>
>The issue with me was and still is latency. If I have to start sliding
>individual tracks around as I add plugins, it's a no-go. This is the main

>reason I sold my Paris rig.
>
>

Yeah, it looks like you would have to delay all the tracks by 32000 samples,
and delay plugins would have to be dealt with separately.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Good Lord, look what they're building again...
Next Topic:	OK...it's click track pointy hat time!!!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 03 07:02:34 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05757 seconds