|
|
Re: Any trick to do eq automation? [message #68480 is a reply to message #68479] |
Mon, 22 May 2006 05:57 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988 Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/audio/pmidi.htm
It's the Paris. It's got MIDI. Nuff' said. Automation of ALL of the
controls on the MiniMixer display, from the fader, to the EQ, effects,
panning, phase, etc, etc, etc! Now supports MIDI TRANSMISSION of fader
movements/mutes/solos, as well as imbedded support for the Yamaha Promix/01
mixer for, you guessed it, flying faders! Unlock the potential of the Paris
today, with ParisMIDI! You must have a MIDI interface on the same system as
the Paris in order to use this program. Make sure to read the enclosed
documentation to find out how to configure and run the program properly!
AA
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:4471a977$1@linux...
> Yep, get Cubase or Nuendo, or.....
> --
> Martin Harrington
> www.lendanear-sound.com
>
> "John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:44719930@linux...
>>
>> Is there any way to do eq automation? Some tricky way would be fine.
>
>
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Any trick to do eq automation? [message #68485 is a reply to message #68484] |
Mon, 22 May 2006 07:51 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
It appears that if you use the Analog x midi thingy then you can't use your
C16 at all. Or I'm misreading the docs. Has anyone used this thing?
"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>That's what I've been doing and was looking for a more elegant way. Anyone
>used that midi thingy Aaron is posting?
>
>"Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote:
>>If just for a single track, seems like you could use another duplicate
track
>>with eq set and then automate faders for the 2 tracks - sort of a crossfade
>>between tracks..
>>E
>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:44719930@linux...
>>>
>>> Is there any way to do eq automation? Some tricky way would be fine.
>>
>>
>
|
|
|