Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » My all time favorite gear manufacturing company is making me proud
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: My all time favorite gear manufacturing company is making me proud [message #58384 is a reply to message #58381] |
Wed, 21 September 2005 07:05   |
Cujjo
Messages: 325
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
<BR>> bought since I just got a MAGMA 13 slot;now I'm running =
with=20
the<BR>> big boys.<BR>> <BR>> Anyway thanks again,<BR>>=20
Pete</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_010F_01C5BE95.96E6A670--LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!
ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL...
Oh My God - That's the greatest ever!
I am quiting my job and approaching them to be the PR
guy for the group - they have BIG opertunities ahead
and I want to be part of it.
"DC" <dc@spamthesinger.org> wrote:
>
>http://reservoirstock.free.fr/deep%20sunshine%201.wmv
>
>I warned you..."DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>www.markertek.com
I'll second the recommendation of Markertek...Hey all –
Question about using PCI expansion devices. Is there any
measurable delay or timing issue between using your PARIS
cards internally or loading them into the expansion Device?
Have you experienced either more or less of the “PCI Bus is
too busy” PARIS error messages? Are there any other issues
to be aware of?
Thanks -Oh, one more question - Which PCI expansion device do you reccomend?
"Deadmeat" <scott@postmodernblues.com> wrote:
>
>Hey all –
>
>Question about using PCI expansion devices. Is there any
>measurable delay or timing issue between using your PARIS
>cards internally or loading them into the expansion Device?
>Have you experienced either more or less of the “PCI Bus is
>too busy” PARIS error messages? Are there any other issues
>to be aware of?
>
>Thanks -
>No issues at all as far as response time between mobo or PCI chassis host
card.
Magma 13 slot 32 bit chassis is what I'm using here. I tried using an SBS
for a while. the Magma is much friendlier from an IRQ standpoint.
Deej
"Deadmeat" <scott@postmodernblues.com> wrote in message
news:433197a1$1@linux...
>
> Hey all -
>
> Question about using PCI expansion devices. Is there any
> measurable delay or timing issue between using your PARIS
> cards internally or loading them into the expansion Device?
> Have you experienced either more or less of the "PCI Bus is
> too busy" PARIS error messages? Are there any other issues
> to be aware of?
>
> Thanks -
>Guys, I've been out of the loop for a couple of years, taking
care of my parents in their home. Just getting into my Paris 2
set-up now.
A recording engineer friend, who knows a ton more than I, is
recommending that I switch to an Emu 1820M, claiming that it
will sound as good as Paris, and has a much more integrated
architecture than my V2.11. He is also a computer freak who
is aware that I'm not knowledgeable enough to sort out some of
the workarounds that might be necessary.
Would appreciate thoughts from any of you Paris Vets out
there. I love the SOUND, and really dig the C16, but already
encountering a few little snags that make me consider my buddys'
suggestion. This said, he WAS impressed by the sound of my
setup!
I question whether a rookie like myself should tackle Paris, unsupported,
except perhaps by this wonderful family that you guys are, which is significant,
especially w. archives
available. I do have the B.T. DVD.
Prayer-thoughts for the Gulf Coast as Rita approaches.
KimCould be something simple like a video card, battery or a power supply. I
get it looked at by Apple.
Let us know how things work out.
James
"jim phillips" <jmp@ncounty.net> wrote:
>
>my old mac g4 died that I run my second paris sytem on anyone KNOW A good
>mac guy in boston area? Its real dead cant get a recovery to work and moniter
>stays blank.
>
>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Maybe tone is not such an issue, but feedback and the range of garbage I've
>seen these things pick up is.
Mmm, yes that's true. I guess I'm basing this idea on an AKG that a singer
from a previous band had. They sell here for around $350 (probably $200-250
in the states) and he didn't have any trouble with it interference wise.
He did upgrade in the end to a Shure, but he said that was only for the tonal
improvement, not bec
|
|
|
|
| Re: My all time favorite gear manufacturing company is making me proud [message #58404 is a reply to message #58384] |
Thu, 22 September 2005 06:43 |
Cujjo
Messages: 325
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ering just to be on the safe side to add these copper
> >little
> >> addons that can be put right over the chips so whenever air is blowing
> on
> >> them they got somehow cooler.
> >> Anyone ever tried this or other things ?
> >> Regards,
> >> Dimitrios
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>You nudge backwards ....:)
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:4332bac2@linux...
> Hi,
> That was touph.
> You copy your drumtracks to the same EDS card.,
> say you have your kick ,snare and stereo OH's.
> So you copy these on empty tracks.
> then you put the senderella on each of the first set of drumtracks and
> redirect inside senderella so that the sending audiotrack does not output
> any audio.
> you nudge these tracks by 4096 samples forward using any method known if
you
> use Soinaudio wrapper for UAD1, if you use FXpansion you nudge for 16384
> samples.
> Then on your reciving audio tracks (you put empty audio file (24bit track)
> just after the senderella audio tracks.
> I mean if kick is 1 snare 2 OH's 3 & 4 then put the receiving senderella
> track on channel 5 and just put the copies of 1,2,3&4 on 13,14,15,16
> The remaining drumtracks could stay on 7,8,9,10,11,12 if you have that
many.
> So now the senderella return on 5 takes the LA2 UAD1 compressor and time
> alligns with audio drumtracks 13,14,15&16 and as well with 7,8,9,10,11,12.
>
> I have also a UAD1 but I would prefer using the Sonalksis which is 0
latency
> so I don't have to copy and move, anyway here is a working solution
> Regards,
> Dimitrios
> "cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message
news:4332b448$1@linux...
> >
> >
> > D, can you explain a few things?
> > How do you compensate for lateny on say a stereo UAD la2a on track 15
and
> > 16 set up to recieve drums and bass guitar for smashing and blendin with
> > the orignal tracks that also may be using UAD plugs or not?
> >
> > Also I'd like to use the UAD plate and send more than one thing to it.
How
> > do I compensate here?
> >
> >
> >
> > "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
> > >Note that under Me the senderella thing has some problems with timing !
> > >Under XP though it is very solid the timing thing.
> > >So senderella is only usable (in my system ) only under XP with 0
latency
> > >and perfect timing in summing audio tracks, you need though to put 8,16
> > or
> > >8,8 in Paris cfg for EDSTransfer.
> > >I use 8,16
> > >Regards,
> > >Dimitrios
> > >"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message
news:43326fe6@linux...
> > >> Hi to everyone...
> > >> I was trying the Senderella thing under Me.
> > >> The only way that works great is using the EDSTransfer=8,16 thing.
> > >> Note that it also works with 8,8 but this setting is not stable , you
> > get
> > >> disk errors "too slow" things etc.
> > >> Things work very stable with that EDSTransfer setting and senderella
> > >newest
> > >> version can now save its sttings along with saving Paris song.
> > >> So now you can have your bus system inside Paris you always wanted.
> > >> There no latency at all (0) when using senderella so you can use your
> > >> favoured DX plugin or EDS effect to effect your submix buss.
> > >> You can also have a stereo bus summing -effecting thing using two
> > >senderella
> > >> instances.
> > >> I use of course chainer to load senderella but I am surte it can be
> used
> > >> without chainer.
> > >> Someone has mentioned several times on this forum that the
EDStransfer
> > >might
> > >> get EDS cards working hotter thus producing more heat.
> > >> I would like to know from you who used to use the EDSTransfer 8,8
thing
> > in
> > >> the past if you had ny eds cards burnted out.
> > >> I have two big fans blowing over the eds cards anyway.
> > >> I am also considering just to be on the safe side to add these copper
> > >little
> > >> addons that can be put right over the chips so whenever air is
blowing
> > on
> > >> them they got somehow cooler.
> > >> Anyone ever tried this or other things ?
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Dimitrios
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>That EMU is certainly a great sounding card, and matched with Nuendo will
>make a formidable system.
>The Emu has onboard fx processing also, lik
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Dec 17 17:10:22 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01287 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
