|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #56149 is a reply to message #56026] |
Fri, 22 July 2005 06:55 |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Gantt Kushner" <gizmo@his.com> wrote in message
news:42E17134.45CDDA72@his.com...
> Yup... I edit about 10 times faster in Paris than DP or Protools too,
>
> Gantt
>
> Tony Benson wrote:
>
> > I've been using DP for about six months for midi and VSTi stuff, then
> > transferring the files over to PARIS. I'm sure some of it's just that
I'm
> > not used to DP, but I can edit and mix at least 10 times faster in
PARIS.
> > It's just so intuitive. At least for me. Plus, she sounds better IMHO.
The
> > old gal won't be retiring any time soon.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > "Gantt Kushner" <gizmo@his.com> wrote in message
> > news:42E1464C.98E76879@his.com...
> > > In all fairness to DP, it was a classical piano piece w/ a lot of
rubato
> > > and
> > > retards, so we didn't use a click. The client wanted to be able to
change
> > > the key and she wasn't sure what key she needed, so I needed to record
> > > MIDI.
> > >
> > > Sequencing without a time reference is probably not a strong point for
any
> > > sequencing program...
> > >
> > > Gantt
> > >
> > > Gantt Kushner wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just spent two days working in Digital Performer and I have only this
to
> > >> say:
> > >>
> > >> I LOVE PARIS!
> > >>
> > >> Gantt
> > >
>Anyone know what Paris error 61/3d is?
This is not my Paris rig.
Gene"Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>I recently bought off eBay, a Mytek Stereo DAC 96k and it makes even mp3s
>purr...
Well that is nice to know. :o)
I'm currently looking into setting up a Linux Media Centre running Freevo
perhaps. Could be nice to have a nice convertor hanging off it. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.Ok, I'll let you in on my secret..sheesh..I just scoop a bit of mud, ad some
attack and a tiny bit of bottom,
Of course this depends on the music..I am not big on huge toms.
That guitar I tracked on a tune a a scratch was done with me infront of
the monitors with a little AT mic and no eq, I had no noise problems at all
"Dan B" <daniel_burne@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Cujo,
>
>That's reassuring. The Spirit stuff definitely has suprisingly sweet eq
for
>the price. Presumably the same pres in the Racpac as the SX (ultramic).
I
>find them a bit noisy, especially when turned up. That said, for drums you
>rarely need a lot of gain. What kind of eq are you tracking with (especially
>on toms)? I'm usually track with no effects or eq, but my toms often sound
>a bit weak with the C418s clip on mics... Advice appreciated.
>
>I figure that most listeners won't notice the difference between the spirit
>pres and a platinum focusrite... except possibly on guitars and vocals.
So
>I may supplement my mono Focusrite Voicemaster with a SPL Gold Mic stereo
>channel (c.$550) for overheads, acoustic guitar and vocals (and to amplify
>my Redeye passive di for guitar).
>
>Thanks for all the advice.
>
>Dan
>
>"cujo" &l
|
|
|