|
|
| Re: Yamaha Subkick-you need this [message #63942 is a reply to message #63925] |
Sun, 29 January 2006 23:15  |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
So, are saying BFD or Drummagog??
I'm lazy these days..I'll stay with Drummagog( I have BFD as well)..I just
got Battery2, with 4 gigs of new acoutic Multi Mic drums..KillER!!!
It's a good time for replacing or even using a midi kit for real performances
using any of the sampled drum librarys.
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I've been going through some mixes re4placing the kicks with various BFD
>samples. The original kick tracks were OK, but not really stellar. They
were
>recorded here with a Beta 52 inside the shell and a 57 on the beater. They
>were also compressed and EQ'ed while tracking. Very tight and focused, but
>nothing like the BFD samples as far a s fidelity goes. Then I opened up
a
>project where I used the Yamaha subkick in fornt of the kick and a beta
52
>inside the shell. WOAH!!!!(says I). This track sounds easily as good as
the
>BFD samples. What a huge difference this makes. Another thing of note
>concerning the Subkick, I have been using it a bit while tracking electric
>bass as a close mic on the cone. For a while I was liking it, until I tried
>to get it to work in a mix. Somewho it just doesn't flatter an amp as I
had
>hoped. An ATM 25 up close with an LDC (I'm liking the RODE NTV these days)
>off the amp about 8 ft away and 5' off the floor has yielded much better
>results when the room mic track is phase aligned with the close mic'ed
>track.
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
