|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: mastering for television?!!! [message #92257 is a reply to message #92253] |
Thu, 01 November 2007 20:19 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ha, that's true enough
rod
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>I guarantee that the director would not have a clue.
>Best to check with the tech guys at the network.
>--
>Martin Harrington
>Lend An Ear Sound
>Sydney Australia
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4729cc0d$1@linux...
>>
>> Mike's right, do what he said.
>> Rod
>> "Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote:
>>>
>>>The Audio for television I've done couldn't peak above -10dB, and had
to
>> be
>>>48k. But, I think you should ask the director, too.
>>>
>>>All the best,
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>"Chris Latham" <latham_c@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>I agreed to master one song that will be in an upcoming History channel
>>>
>>>>show. The guy that lined me up to do it said the client wanted a
>>>>mastered
>>>
>>>>version for CD replication and a mastered version for the TV broadcast.
>>>
>>>>Does anybody know if there's a difference, and if so, what's different?
>>>
>>>>level, compression...?!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|