The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Semi-sorta OT: A new view on studio rates
Semi-sorta OT: A new view on studio rates [message #57412] Mon, 29 August 2005 23:50 Go to next message
DT is currently offline  DT
Messages: 42
Registered: July 2005
Member
a>
>
> Did he sell his studio/house in TN? Sure was a nice place.
>
> James
>
> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>A long time ago I heard there were family health issues but have not
>>heard a peep. Anyone know how this fine man and family is doing ?
>>
>>John
>so did he bail on Paris too. bummer !

Mark McCurdy wrote:
> Not sure. Aaron might know.
>
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4313adeb$1@linux...
>
>>Did he sell his studio/house in TN? Sure was a nice place.
>>
>>James
>>
>>John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>>A long time ago I heard there were family health issues but have not
>>>heard a peep. Anyone know how this fine man and family is doing ?
>>>
>>>John
>>
>
>another person sees the light!
:-)
rod
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Yes, yes, yes, yes, I know, I know, I know, I know, I'm late to the party.
>
>I always knew how good it was but just never forked out the cash for it
because
>I figured "How often do you really have to reload your machine?".
>
>This new box though with all the HDD space in the world got me think
Re: Semi-sorta OT: A new view on studio rates [message #57413 is a reply to message #57412] Tue, 30 August 2005 00:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
ing
that
>"If I want to have 6 partitions all with different purposes all running
XP,
>it's going to speed things up a lot if I can copy an image from place to
>place...".
>
>And OH MY!!! How FAST is it?
>
>I've got a clean Windows XP install, with all the latest drivers, Service
>Packs, Windows updates, Acrobat Reader, WinRAR, Video Codecs and Firefox.
>Just my basic beginners install to which I can add the optional applications.
>I don't know how big it is. Maybe 3-4 Gig I'd guess.
>
>So I ghosted an image of the whole thing, with high compression. About 5
>and a half minutes.
>
>I start ghosting it on to other partitions on the other SATA HDD. I can
create
>a whole extra boot of Windows, complete with all the updates and basic essentials
>loaded... probably 5 hours work, and it takes about 3 minutes. 3 minutes
>and the whole thing is on another partition.
>
>If I'd realised just how quick and easy it is, I would have bought it years
>ago.
>
>This thing is better than sliced bread. I mean some people make a big deal
>about sliced bread, but honestly it doesn't take hours to slice off a peice
>of bread. Loading windows, drivers, updates, accessories... now that takes
>time.
>
>Anyone who doesn't have Ghost, honestly, go get it NOW! Especially if you
>have a DVD burner, because you can image your drives to DVD and load them
>back up at will. If your system goes crazy during a tracking session you
>can load up a working install in maybe 10 minutes and you're back.
>
>I feel stupid for not getting it sooner. At least I wont be wasting my life
>any more.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.You mean you guys don't do this already? Jeez..I've been doing this for years
now.
8op
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>i'm gonna go for broke and charge $10,000,000.00 per day to cull out
>those who musically suck and those who can't pay and suck musically.
>
>damn, wish i had thought of this years ago, i'm ordering that new car
>right now.
>
>
>On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:10:11 -0600, "DJ"
><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>
Re: Semi-sorta OT: A new view on studio rates [message #57415 is a reply to message #57413] Tue, 30 August 2005 02:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
/> >>> thinking, proactive method of speculative pricing, my company's rate
went
>>up
>>> by $5/hr yesterday because I was looking at some sweet mic pres (they
were
>>> pretty sweet, not really sweet, or it would have been $10/hr). I thought
>>> about lowering it back down again when I didn't buy them, but nobody
who
>>> matters asked why (and nobody else really matters), so I figured, why
>>> bother? Next week I think a client might get in a jam and need an extra
>>few
>>> hours to complete their project - rate goes up tomorrow! Today my rate
>>just
>>> went up because I might need a new car someday - probably a hydrogen
fuel
>>> cell car. I'm sure the Flying Spaghetti Monster would approve
>>whole-noodly.
>>>
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>> Dedric
>>>
>>
>He has 4 Nuendo dual-Opteron rigs running. I believe I read on the Nuendo
forum the church also has Euphonix consoles - MADI from Nuendo to consoles
for tracking, etc (mixing - ?). That's just putting pieces of other posts
together. Maybe he'll pop in and say hi sometime, unless someone else has
talked to him recently.

Regards,
Dedric

On 8/30/05 6:31 AM, in article 431451a5@linux, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:

> so did he bail on Paris too. bummer !
>
> Mark McCurdy wrote:
>> Not sure. Aaron might know.
>>
>>
>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4313adeb$1@linux...
>>
>>> Did he sell his studio/house in TN? Sure was a nice place.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A long time ago I heard there were family health issues but have not
>>>> heard a peep. Anyone know how this fine man and family is doing ?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>
>>
>>I was thinking of trying an FM transmitter to monitor out in my car and
other home stereo devices.
Anyone doing this?
I would think it would kick the shit out of burning test CD after CD.
Any suggestions?




http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/radi/canux300.htmWell, when the church moved into the old Compaq Center in Houston (Where the
Rockets used to play) that tells you what kind of budget they have. :)

I do see him post on the Nuendo site once in a while.

"DTerry" <

Report message to a moderator

Re: Semi-sorta OT: A new view on studio rates [message #57420 is a reply to message #57415] Tue, 30 August 2005 06:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rod Lincoln is currently offline  Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
l out
>>those who musically suck and those who can't pay and suck musically.
>>
>>damn, wish i had thought of this years ago, i'm ordering that new car
>>right now.
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:10:11 -0600, "DJ"
>><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>
>>>...........hmmmm........I like this!!! I probably need a new API console
>and
>>>a new studio building to put it in......and a Bosendorfer for the 4000
>sq
>>>ft. live room. My rates just went up to $1000.00 per day.
>>>
>>>Take a number and .....hey stop cutting in line!!!!!
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>"DTerry" <dterry@no_spamkeyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>news:BF395DC8.3EFD%dterry@no_spamkeyofd.net...
>>>> I've been thinking that maybe we musicians and engineers have been looking
>>>> at this business all wrong. We charge for what we do rather than what
>>>might
>>>> happen to us tomorrow. Tsk, tsk, tsk. How shortsighted we are! For
>>>> example, in the oil industry, if your customer goes on vacation during
>the
>>>> summer, the price of a barrel goes up. A hurricane blows through the
>Gulf
>>>> of Mexico, the price goes up. Not because it has to, but just because
>it
>>>> might slow down the production rate by an imperceptible amount. From
>the
>>>AP
>>>> News wire on Katrina:
>>>>
>>>> "Oil refiners said damage to their equipment in the Gulf region appeared
>>>to
>>>> be minimal, and oil prices dropped back from the day's highs above $70
>a
>>>> barrel" (Yahoo/AP News).
>>>>
>>>> Brilliant! This is the beauty of the law of controlling supply and
>>>> demanding demand, albeit, shall we say, a "slightly altered" approach
>to
>>>the
>>>> Economics 101 version once boringly named the law of "supply and
>>>> demand"[yawn], which was naively reactive. So, based on this more forward
>>>> thinking, proactive method of speculative pricing, my company's rate
>went
>>>up
>>>> by $5/hr yesterday because I was looking at some sweet mic pres (they
>were
>>>> pretty sweet, not really sweet, or it would have been $10/hr). I thought
>>>> about lowering it back down again when I didn't buy them, but nobody
>who
>>>> matters asked why (and nobody else really matters), so I figured, why
>>>> bother? Next week I think a client might get in a jam and need an extra
>>>few
>>>> hours to complete their project - rate goes up tomorrow! Today my rate
>>>just
>>>> went up because I might need a new car someday - probably a hydrogen
>fuel
>>>> cell car. I'm sure the Flying Spaghetti Monster would approve
>>>whole-noodly.
>>>>
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Dedric
>>>>
>>>
>>i re
Re: Semi-sorta OT: A new view on studio rates [message #57425 is a reply to message #57420] Tue, 30 August 2005 11:53 Go to previous message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
gt;>Rod
>>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>Dimitrious/All,
>>>
>>>Once you start moving files around between submixes it introduces a new
>>
>>>timing issue.. sample level latency problems. My rig shows 10 samples
>>>submix
>>
>>>one to two and 2 samples for each submix thereafter. This might be the
> cause
>>
>>>of your phase issue?
>>>AA
>>>
>>>
>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:4313216d@linux...
>>>> Yes that would work as long as you could figure out exactly how many
>
>>>> samples
>>>> is the processing eating up.
>>>> That is with 0 lookahead.
>>>> Then you just nudge 1ms back for lookahead 1 and so on...
>>>> Nice.
>>>> I tried to find the latency but no lack.
>>>> Cannot seem to make sound almost dissapear even if compression is not
>>>> actually working , 1:1 ratio no threshold etc.
>>>> Can you try ?
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dimitrios
>>>> "cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:43131153$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> How could we solve the flanging?
>>>>>
>>>>> COuld we say, copy all the drum tracks to an adjacent 7 group of
>>>>> tracks,
>>>>> slide em ahead, than sample slide back (Like UAD1 Situation) them
>>>>> before
>>>>> sending em to the AUX1? Then tuck em under the original drumtracks?
>>>>>
>>>>> would sample slide be before the Aux send?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>>>> >To group your drumtracks and send them thru stereo compression ,only
>>one
>>>>> EDS
>>>>> >stereo instance I am sure most of you are already using this but
>>>>> >maybe
>>>> still
>>>>> >some never tried...
>>>>> >
>>>>> >1.You put stereo compressor EDS on AUX1.
>>>>> >2.You put on every drumtrack you wanna compress the aux1 in prefader
>>>> status
>>>>> >and control with auxe's panpot level the place you wanna put it in
> the
>>>>> >stereo field.
>>>>> >3.You push the fader all the way down -90 as to not have flanging on
>>
>>>>> >your
>>>>> >drumsounds.
>>>>> >4. You control indivindual drumlevels from Aux1 level knob and
>>>>> >pannong
>>>> from
>>>>> >panpot knob.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >5. For you comressor outpout level you have that on Auxe's 1 return
>>knob
>>>>> >with panpot again possibilities.
>>>>> >6. For EQ you put after the stereo compressor in aux1 the FreakQ
>>>>> >which
>>
>>>>> >is
>>>>> >also stereo to have control over frequencies.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >7. That makes me happy as opposed to using UAD1
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Regards,
>>>>> >Dimitrios
>>>>
Previous Topic: what happened to Tankersley ?
Next Topic: Have you evr thought of that ? -UPDATE-
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Dec 28 06:45:47 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05132 seconds