The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » OK How about this!!!!

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OK How about this!!!!

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

OK How about this!!!! [message #55771]

Thu, 14 July 2005 17:49

Spappy

Messages: 19
Registered: September 2007

Junior Member

lever about the way he did this. it was just
enough, never too much, and he had a very precise feel about
the tempo in which to go.

this must have been to incredibly hard, its unbelievable, i
really admire than man. he had to keep the fine balance
about not asking too much from his own people (the seddlers
and religious extremists in particular), while at

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! (bump) [message #55815 is a reply to message #55771]

Thu, 14 July 2005 22:40

Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006

Senior Member

incidence.

im not saying its the ultimate solution. i find pretending
to have absolute solutions (a very popular practice here,
or so it seems) rather silly. im trying to have a civiliced
discussion about the possible different paths to a solution,
if there is one at all. i can ackownledge and talk about
both approaches, you seem to struggle with that part
and fall back into europe-is-so-whatever rants, which,
btw, are no better than george-bush-is-pure-evil bullshit.
its kindergarden. no thanks.

>And what could you possibly dislike about the present Israeli
>leadership? Draggin settlers out by the scruff of the neck,
>responding to the worst terrorism with measured and ration

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #55822 is a reply to message #55771]

Fri, 15 July 2005 02:16

erlilo

Messages: 405
Registered: June 2005

Senior Member

might have made
>>>progress. I kinda understand more where people are coming from. Its
>>>admirable to think the best about humans and believe the government is
>>>acting in our best interest. I know people are ultimately concerned with
>>>their own security and survival.
>>>
>>>The politicalcompass thing was helpful to show that political beliefs are
>>>really a complex combination of issues, at the very least needing 2 axes...
>>>liberal/conservative context is hardly useful to categorize people.
>>>
>>>Some people say you shouldn't catch feelings over a message board, but I
>>>can't help it when we're talking about life and death. If anyone is still
>>>heated... I know I've been disrespectful probably a hundred times over the
>>>years... I'm sorry.
>>>
>>>Anyway, I thought it was a good discussion.
>>>
>>>
>
>heh heh... sorry fo the namecalling rick....

"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fuved1hkcn0qakq3m4gddnf05dlj7f1io3@4ax.com...
> hey, i found out i'm probably a drunk and definitely a jackass...so i
> guess i'm

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #56019 is a reply to message #55822]

Mon, 18 July 2005 07:35

Miguel Vigil [1]

Messages: 258
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

18 Jul 2005 07:55:56 -0600, "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >just follow the trail of smashed up car parts by the interstate...
> >
> >
> >El Crumbs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:53gkd197fapohekpdm96psq62r39eq0i47@4ax.com...
> >> "and we know where you live"...that's good to know. as a drunken
> >> jackass, there may come a day when i'll need help finding the right
> >> driveway to pull up...whew.
> >>
> >> ;o)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:45:25 -0600, "DJ"
> >> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hehehe..........Mr. Simplicity is down for repairs. Chipset fan
crapped
> >out
> >> >on Mr. S' mobo. I'm picking up the slack until heatsink arrives.
There
> >> >really is no human associated with either of these names........only
> >> >electornic componentry.......and we know where you live.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:e64jd1h050tesjr8taququt3sbnokoo6gi@4ax.com...
> >> >> after 2 months mr. simplicity is finally ready to figure out how to
> >> >> actually mail me the cd and...well...it appears to be a serious
> >> >> challenge so Dj is filling in whilst he figures it out.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 17 Jul 2005 08:38:38 +1000, "Mike Claytor" <clay

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #56026 is a reply to message #56019]

Mon, 18 July 2005 08:45

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

gether right? i wonder if that puts a
> noticeable strain on the system.
>
> being that its working like you want... if it were me i wouldn't worrying
> about trying to get the cpu performance any better. you know how puters
> are... sometimes you can make things worse by over tweaking.
>
> picking up a 3200 might give you that extra 5-10% you are looking for....
> but you won't know till you pop it in. i'd just go make music and plan
on
> going to the athlon 64 at some point in the not to distant future.
>
> that's my $.02.
>
> jeremy
>
>
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:42dbbd87$1@linux...
> > oh yeah.........and I am judging this by the performance meter in
Windows
> > XP, not the VST meter in Cubase SX. Am I looking at the wrong thing
here?
> I
> > can sometimes get well above 90% CPU usage in the Win performance meter
> and
> > the system just hums along fine so maybe this isn't accurate?
> >
> > Hmmmm.....
> >
> >
> > "Jeremy Luzier" <j.luzier@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:42dbbaeb@linux...
> > > hey DJ,
> > >
> > > what is your latency set at during this project?
> > >
> > > is that 60-75% vst performance or actual system performance... via
> windows
> > > task manager?
> > >
> > > it sounds like your pci bus is working pretty hard... i just have 2
> uad's
> > > and the rme running on mine right now.
> > >
> > > i would say that amount of cpu usage would be right if you
> buffer/latency
> > > was set at 256 or maybe 512 and/or you were using some native
plug-ins.
> > but
> > > then again i don't know how much of a strain all your pci stuff might
be
> > > causing the cpu.
> > >
> > > i have the xp2800 on an asus a7n8x-e with 2 gig of pc3200.
> > >
> > > i am playing tracks from a 7200 8meg cache 80 gig WD drive.... (no
> sata).
> > >
> > > on average... i will have 48 tracks or more playing.... 50-90% uad-1
> > > usage.... a couple convo reverbs... and 12-20 other native plug-ins
> going.
> > > my buffer is set at 1048. that usually takes me to between 50 and
> 70%....
> > > 75% tops.... monitoring with the vst performance meter in SX.
> > >
> > > thought that might help give you some kinda reference.
> > >
> > > i am gettin ready to do a m

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #56032 is a reply to message #56026]

Mon, 18 July 2005 10:37

Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

; >> after 2 months mr. simplicity is finally ready to figure out how to
>> >> >> actually mail me the cd and...well...it appears to be a serious
>> >> >> challenge so Dj is filling in whilst he figures it out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 17 Jul 2005 08:38:38 +1000, "Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >>OMG!!! ;o(.........I just listened to the MP3's. Bad mistake. I
>> >gonna'
>> >> >have
>> >> >> >>to buy all five models or I might...........
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >>news:42d97a82@linux...
>> >> >> >>> http://www.platesonics.com/index.html
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> ...........now go build a sound-proof room
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> ;o)
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> Yup...I'm looking at the album right now. I'm kind of upset that
> Brian P. beat me to the punch on the answer.

Sorry, man. I'll try to be a little slower next time! :-)No worry about the cards over heating there :)

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Don Morrell...........but he's in Anchorage.
>
>
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6n7id1p2s434fdk7himmo3f9e76bcge300@4ax.com...
>> who has paris in alaska???
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:02:30 -0600, "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I have it on unimpeachable authority that the eight card limit is a
>software
>> >switch.
>> >
>> >Ten cards have been successfully tested by a gnome.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >
>> >El Miguel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:42d50996$

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #56052 is a reply to message #56019]

Mon, 18 July 2005 17:37

Spappy

Messages: 19
Registered: September 2007

Junior Member

be nice if you can put up with the....
>
>
>
>well the church really. :-0
>
>Jeremy
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:42dbe8a0$

Report message to a moderator

Re: OK How about this!!!! [message #56149 is a reply to message #56026]

Fri, 22 July 2005 06:55

Miguel Vigil [1]

Messages: 258
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

Gantt Kushner" <gizmo@his.com> wrote in message
news:42E17134.45CDDA72@his.com...
> Yup... I edit about 10 times faster in Paris than DP or Protools too,
>
> Gantt
>
> Tony Benson wrote:
>
> > I've been using DP for about six months for midi and VSTi stuff, then
> > transferring the files over to PARIS. I'm sure some of it's just that
I'm
> > not used to DP, but I can edit and mix at least 10 times faster in
PARIS.
> > It's just so intuitive. At least for me. Plus, she sounds better IMHO.
The
> > old gal won't be retiring any time soon.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > "Gantt Kushner" <gizmo@his.com> wrote in message
> > news:42E1464C.98E76879@his.com...
> > > In all fairness to DP, it was a classical piano piece w/ a lot of
rubato
> > > and
> > > retards, so we didn't use a click. The client wanted to be able to
change
> > > the key and she wasn't sure what key she needed, so I needed to record
> > > MIDI.
> > >
> > > Sequencing without a time reference is probably not a strong point for
any
> > > sequencing program...
> > >
> > > Gantt
> > >
> > > Gantt Kushner wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just spent two days working in Digital Performer and I have only this
to
> > >> say:
> > >>
> > >> I LOVE PARIS!
> > >>
> > >> Gantt
> > >
>Anyone know what Paris error 61/3d is?
This is not my Paris rig.
Gene"Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>I recently bought off eBay, a Mytek Stereo DAC 96k and it makes even mp3s
>purr...

Well that is nice to know. :o)

I'm currently looking into setting up a Linux Media Centre running Freevo
perhaps. Could be nice to have a nice convertor hanging off it. :o)

Cheers,
Kim.Ok, I'll let you in on my secret..sheesh..I just scoop a bit of mud, ad some
attack and a tiny bit of bottom,

Of course this depends on the music..I am not big on huge toms.
That guitar I tracked on a tune a a scratch was done with me infront of
the monitors with a little AT mic and no eq, I had no noise problems at all

"Dan B" <daniel_burne@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Cujo,
>
>That's reassuring. The Spirit stuff definitely has suprisingly sweet eq
for
>the price. Presumably the same pres in the Racpac as the SX (ultramic).
I
>find them a bit noisy, especially when turned up. That said, for drums you
>rarely need a lot of gain. What kind of eq are you tracking with (especially
>on toms)? I'm usually track with no effects or eq, but my toms often sound
>a bit weak with the C418s clip on mics... Advice appreciated.
>
>I figure that most listeners won't notice the difference between the spirit
>pres and a platinum focusrite... except possibly on guitars and vocals.
So
>I may supplement my mono Focusrite Voicemaster with a SPL Gold Mic stereo
>channel (c.$550) for overheads, acoustic guitar and vocals (and to amplify
>my Redeye passive di for guitar).
>
>Thanks for all the advice.
>
>Dan
>
>"cujo" &l

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Syncing an AKAI DR 16 to Paris
Next Topic:	OT: dont click this link

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Oct 21 04:34:41 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01060 seconds