legal alternative route for lack of support [message #59173] |
Mon, 17 October 2005 08:23 |
Fred Bloggs
Messages: 1 Registered: October 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
gt;
> Jimmy
>
>
>I can't believe this is still an issue.
http://www.exetools.com/07-2001.htm
Check out anti-pace universalYou leave tomorrow! ;-)
David.
DJ wrote:
> ........me too. I will be going down to Austin in the near future. I called
> Neve in Wimberley and talked to the manager (not Rupert) about a month ago.
> He told me I could come out there and see the place. I'm going to ask some
> questions. It's about an hour south of Austin.
>
>
>
> "Dave(EK Sound)" <audioguy_nospam_@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:43533a80$1@linux...
>
>>Test tapes were recorded at low levels (185-200nWB) on low
>>print tape for this exact reason... to maintain frequency
>>response over time. Taking a roll of 250 or 456 to the edge
>>of its retentivity will produce significant print in just 1
>>day. The finer domains will easily realign to this higher
>>level changing the frequency response of the recorded
>>material... hence my suggestion to get it transfered as soon
>>as possible.
>>
>>Regarding the Portico... I still don't see how having a tape
>>head circuit in the audio path would emulate the tape
>>transfer characteristics of "actual tape". I would love to
>>sit down with Rupert and discuss how he gets it to do this! :-)
>>
>>David.
>>
>>gene lennon wrote:
>>
>>>"W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've read numerous times that tape holds it's broadest freq and dynamics
>>>
>>>for
>>>
>>>
>>>>about 5 seconds a
|
|
|
Re: legal alternative route for lack of support [message #59175 is a reply to message #59173] |
Mon, 17 October 2005 09:17 |
uptown jimmy
Messages: 441 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;linux..." target="_blank">1@linux...
> I can't believe this is still an issue.
>
> http://www.exetools.com/07-2001.htm
>
> Check out anti-pace universal
>
>
>
>I have my KSP8 setup with analogue ins X4 (multed together from the cards)
with the 4 stereo returns coming back in on an ADAT card. Works like a charm
:)
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>Howdy!
>
>I've never paid much attention to this, but do the ADAT cards work well?
Any
>known issues?
>
>Swen has ADAT ins and outs on his Kurzweil KSP8....
>
>Jimmy
>
>
>An aquantiance of mine manages Paul Westerberg and David Johanson
He played us an advance copy of this at a Christmas party last year. What
I heard sounded great, but it was at a loud and lively party.
P.S., I had the fortune of opening for a solo Alex Chilton show once.
He was fantastic then and a very cool guy to boot.
"Larry Hogan" <ooglybong@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'm spending a dreary Saturday afternoon doing some studio chores and cranking
>>some lovely lovely music from a band that some of you may not know much
>about: Big Star
>>
>>BIg Star's main man was Alex CHilton who is more famous perhaps as the
17
>>year old singer of "The Letter" and"Cray Like A Baby" a member of The Box
>>Tops
>>
>>Although recorded at Aredent in '72 and some a bit later, the engineerign
>>is still almost unmatched, I had met Jim Dikinson a few years back (Jim
>engineered
>>Big Star's Third) he told me that Engineer John Fry put everything he had
>>into the making of these records and pretty much gave up after them.
>>
>>The songs, the playing and the sound are marvelous.
>>
>>My good friend Phil Aiken will bakc me up on this, check em out if you
have
>not.
>>Start whith #1 Record and Radio City as "third" is a bit dreary.
>>
>> http://www.rykodisc.com/Catalog/CatalogArtist_01.asp?Action= Get&Artist_ID=21
>
>
>Hi,
>
>FYI, Big Star has jus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: legal alternative route for lack of support [message #59194 is a reply to message #59173] |
Mon, 17 October 2005 12:34 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
from another machine so I reformated it and reinstalled Windows ME and install
paris and now all is well with the system.
Only thing I can come up with is that the drivers,etc for the system hardware
from the cloned harddrive windows setup were working for the most part but
not well enough for paris to function correctly.
Thanks for all the help
Keith
"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Right on man.. keep us posted, we'll figure it out.
>AA
>
>
>"Keith" <klee311@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:433b0b0c$1@linux...
>>
>> Aaron,
>>
>> I pulled the card and sent it back to the party I bought it from and they
>> are sending me another one to replace it. When the new card arrives I
will
>> see if I have the same problem. Will keep ya'll informed when I try to
get
>> the system up again.
>>
>> Thanks for the reply
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>Sort of separate, but also no. It uses a locked piece of the DSP chips
>>>that
>>
>>>the effects run on, but in a different way... in your situation I don't
>> know
>>>that it indicates anything. That way, unlike pro tools, you will always
>> have
>>>4 bands of EQ per channel.
>>>It is possible you have a bad install executable? Try downloading again
>> from
>>>another source, though my gut tells me this is probably not it. On ME,
>> you
>>>will not need the effects subsystem patch for XP drivers, wanted to make
>>
>>>sure you aren't applying that. I do remember that from the early days
>>>(1.xx)
>>
>>>there was a bit of a gotcha in installing/reinstalling/upgrading
>>>versions. -reboot- between every move. In other words, if you uninstall..
>>
>>>reboot. come back, check the status, reboot... install, reboot.... etc..
>>
>>>Some ppl had this problem, some did not. You will also want to verify
the
>>
>>>directory paths on the install and where it puts the Ensoniq system folder
>>
>>>(and this is where I think you have the issue in some way) that the plugs
>>
>>>reside in.
>>>
>>>AA
>>>
>>>
>>>"Keith" <klee311@bell
|
|
|
|
Re: legal alternative route for lack of support ( can we SUE them ) ?? [message #59198 is a reply to message #59194] |
Mon, 17 October 2005 14:51 |
Yasser Shaaban
Messages: 30 Registered: October 2005
|
Member |
|
|
l an eds1000 and the paris software and drivers and when
>> I
>>>>
>>>>>> bring
>>>>>> up the program it comes up, all is well but when I try to use the
eds
>>>>
>>>>>> inserts
>>>>>> or aux effects in the mixer window for compression, reverb, etc...
the
>>>>
>>>>>> drop
>>>>>> down menu only has (no effect) or (external) to chose from, nothing
>>
>>>>>> else.
>>>>>> However in the native insert I get a listing for the vst plugins I
>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have uninstalled the software and reinstalled and reseated the eds1000
>>>>
>>>>>> card,
>>>>>> still the same thing.
>>>>>> Am I missing something or could the eds1000 card be bad?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for all the help this group has been over the years,
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>what size
EK Sound wrote:
> Good luck with the 8meg cache Segates here.
>
> David.
>
> John wrote:
>
>> What IDE drives are the fastest for the most Paris tracks, my western
>> digital is crap and just died so i need a new one pronto. I hear
>> smaller drives are faster too. So which ones are fastest?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John80's and 120's
David.
John wrote:
> what size
>
> EK Sound wrote:
>
>> Good luck with the 8meg cache Segates here.
>>
>> David.
>>
>> John wrote:
>>
>>> What IDE drives are the fastest for the most Paris tracks, my
>>> western digital is crap and just died so i need a new one pronto. I
>>> hear smaller drives are faster too. So which ones are fastest?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> JohnSeems like a worthwhile test. I will put it on my list.
But…
I’ve been thinking about what appeals to me about tape. (This could be dangerous.)
I think the fact that you don’t get back what you put in is part of what
I like about analog tape!
This is not what you would theoretically want, (don’t tell George Massenburg)
but just like a Neve console changes the sound but in a good way, and a C12
mic sounds different than the sound in the room, but in a good way, and just
about every tool in the studio that I like is a tool of change as opposed
to a tool of accuracy, I think that most of the artifacts and distortions
that come from tape are musical.
I also like that fact that you can use technique to shape the effect, but
you never know exactly what you are going to get without listening back.
All this uncertainty gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling. Kind of like a drummer
compared to a drum machine.
Keep in mind that I am a VERY early digital audio user a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|