Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » For SSC
| For SSC [message #67921] |
Mon, 08 May 2006 22:37  |
Chris Lang
Messages: 91
Registered: March 2007
|
Member |
|
|
I never met or spoke with SSC, but:
I just submitted some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,
so he could mix my latest project, and save me a bunch of time,
and I could get out on the old mountain bike for once.
He spent 10 hours mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed
me to let me know that he would pass on the mixing. He could
not get the PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I
dithered down to an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.
At higher levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,
while the Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous
experience with Paris, and is passing up income to give this
project back to me.
I really wanted to go mountain biking, but I am amazed at the
continued relevance of Paris, here in 2006. That's a pretty
cool legacy of SSC.
Chris
|
|
|
|
| Re: For SSC [message #67924 is a reply to message #67921] |
Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38  |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey Chris,
(Sorry to detour this thread momentarily with a personal reply to the
group). If you still want to get on the mountain bike and out of the studio,
email me offline. I have an alternative that would be a much more
interesting comparison, esp. given the levels discussion - even if only for
one track. I'm in Co. Springs now - you're in or near Denver aren't you?
Regards,
Dedric
dedric at keyofd dot net
"Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote in message news:44602a88$1@linux...
>
> I never met or spoke with SSC, but:
>
> I just submitted some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,
> so he could mix my latest project, and save me a bunch of time,
> and I could get out on the old mountain bike for once.
>
> He spent 10 hours mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed
> me to let me know that he would pass on the mixing. He could
> not get the PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I
> dithered down to an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.
>
> At higher levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,
> while the Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous
> experience with Paris, and is passing up income to give this
> project back to me.
>
> I really wanted to go mountain biking, but I am amazed at the
> continued relevance of Paris, here in 2006. That's a pretty
> cool legacy of SSC.
>
> Chris
|
|
|
|
| Re: For SSC [message #67993 is a reply to message #67921] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 09:16 |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Paris interface is still the best looking in daw Hands-Down. It's really a
shame that even after all these years, no other DAW has come close to it's
(Paris) Pro, polished well laid-out
Gui.. That, my friend(s) is Real Talent..
Steve, may your soul rest with the Lord forever..LaMont
"Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
>
>I never met or spoke with SSC, but:
>
>I just submitted some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,
>so he could mix my latest project, and save me a bunch of time,
>and I could get out on the old mountain bike for once.
>
>He spent 10 hours mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed
>me to let me know that he would pass on the mixing. He could
>not get the PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I
>dithered down to an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.
>
>At higher levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,
>while the Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous
>experience with Paris, and is passing up income to give this
>project back to me.
>
>I really wanted to go mountain biking, but I am amazed at the
>continued relevance of Paris, here in 2006. That's a pretty
>cool legacy of SSC.
>
>Chris
|
|
|
|
| Re: For SSC [message #67998 is a reply to message #67993] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 09:56 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Back in the 90's I was joensin' of a Lexicon 480L. SSC chimed in about this
and happened to mention that he had one that he had been using for target
practice and was now being used as a doorstop. He went on to renumerate a
few reasons why he thought it sucked and also opined that Quantec and Sony
made far superior products. I took that to heart and though I do own Lexicon
products, I also own Quantec and Sony units as well and I have been very
happy with them so I'm gonna' have to buy him a drink when we meet up
eventually.
;o)
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:446211d1$1@linux...
>
> Paris interface is still the best looking in daw Hands-Down. It's really a
> shame that even after all these years, no other DAW has come close to it's
> (Paris) Pro, polished well laid-out
> Gui.. That, my friend(s) is Real Talent..
> Steve, may your soul rest with the Lord forever..LaMont
>
>
> "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
> >
> >I never met or spoke with SSC, but:
> >
> >I just submitted some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,
> >so he could mix my latest project, and save me a bunch of time,
> >and I could get out on the old mountain bike for once.
> >
> >He spent 10 hours mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed
> >me to let me know that he would pass on the mixing. He could
> >not get the PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I
> >dithered down to an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.
> >
> >At higher levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,
> >while the Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous
> >experience with Paris, and is passing up income to give this
> >project back to me.
> >
> >I really wanted to go mountain biking, but I am amazed at the
> >continued relevance of Paris, here in 2006. That's a pretty
> >cool legacy of SSC.
> >
> >Chris
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: For SSC [message #68005 is a reply to message #67998] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 13:01 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C6744A.F5908950
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DJ,
I heard the drinks are free but it's the thought that counts.
Tom
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message =
news:44621c6b@linux...
Back in the 90's I was joensin' of a Lexicon 480L. SSC chimed in about =
this
and happened to mention that he had one that he had been using for =
target
practice and was now being used as a doorstop. He went on to =
renumerate a
few reasons why he thought it sucked and also opined that Quantec and =
Sony
made far superior products. I took that to heart and though I do own =
Lexicon
products, I also own Quantec and Sony units as well and I have been =
very
happy with them so I'm gonna' have to buy him a drink when we meet up
eventually.
;o)
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message =
news:446211d1$1@linux...
>
> Paris interface is still the best looking in daw Hands-Down. It's =
really a
> shame that even after all these years, no other DAW has come close =
to it's
> (Paris) Pro, polished well laid-out
> Gui.. That, my friend(s) is Real Talent..
> Steve, may your soul rest with the Lord forever..LaMont
>
>
> "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
> >
> >I never met or spoke with SSC, but:
> >
> >I just submitted some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,
> >so he could mix my latest project, and save me a bunch of time,
> >and I could get out on the old mountain bike for once.
> >
> >He spent 10 hours mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed
> >me to let me know that he would pass on the mixing. He could
> >not get the PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I
> >dithered down to an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.
> >
> >At higher levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,
> >while the Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous
> >experience with Paris, and is passing up income to give this
> >project back to me.
> >
> >I really wanted to go mountain biking, but I am amazed at the
> >continued relevance of Paris, here in 2006. That's a pretty
> >cool legacy of SSC.
> >
> >Chris
>
------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C6744A.F5908950
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>DJ,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I heard the drinks are free but =
it's the=20
thought that counts.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net">animix_spam-this-ahole=
_@animas.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:44621c6b@linux">news:44621c6b@linux</A>...</DIV>Back in =
the 90's I=20
was joensin' of a Lexicon 480L. SSC chimed in about this<BR>and =
happened to=20
mention that he had one that he had been using for target<BR>practice =
and was=20
now being used as a doorstop. He went on to renumerate a<BR>few =
reasons why he=20
thought it sucked and also opined that Quantec and Sony<BR>made far =
superior=20
products. I took that to heart and though I do own =
Lexicon<BR>products, I also=20
own Quantec and Sony units as well and I have been very<BR>happy with =
them so=20
I'm gonna' have to buy him a drink when we meet=20
up<BR>eventually.<BR><BR>;o)<BR><BR><BR>"LaMont" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:jjdpro@ameritech.net">jjdpro@ameritech.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:446211d1$1@linux">news:446211d1$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&g=
t;=20
Paris interface is still the best looking in daw Hands-Down. It's =
really=20
a<BR>> shame that even after all these years, no other DAW has come =
close=20
to it's<BR>> (Paris) Pro, polished well laid-out<BR>> Gui.. =
That, my=20
friend(s) is Real Talent..<BR>> Steve, may your soul rest with the =
Lord=20
forever..LaMont<BR>><BR>><BR>> "Chris Lang" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:yo@yo.yo">yo@yo.yo</A>> wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> =
>I=20
never met or spoke with SSC, but:<BR>> ><BR>> >I just =
submitted=20
some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,<BR>> >so he could =
mix my=20
latest project, and save me a bunch of time,<BR>> >and I could =
get out=20
on the old mountain bike for once.<BR>> ><BR>> >He spent =
10 hours=20
mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed<BR>> >me to =
let me=20
know that he would pass on the mixing. He could<BR>> >not =
get the=20
PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I<BR>> >dithered =
down to=20
an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.<BR>> ><BR>> >At =
higher=20
levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,<BR>> >while =
the=20
Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous<BR>> =
>experience=20
with Paris, and is passing up income to give this<BR>> >project =
back to=20
me.<BR>> ><BR>> >I really wanted to go mountain biking, =
but I am=20
amazed at the<BR>> >continued relevance of Paris, here in =
2006. =20
That's a pretty<BR>> >cool legacy of SSC.<BR>> ><BR>>=20
>Chris<BR>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML >
------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C6744A.F5908950--
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Dec 23 14:59:29 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01020 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
