Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-REALITY CHECK
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-REALITY CHECK [message #66703] |
Fri, 14 April 2006 12:18  |
Music Lab Sweden
Messages: 12 Registered: January 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi All,
I am a former Paris user who still use Paris now and then, especially when
I remix old songs recorded in Paris. I gave up in favour of Soundscape which
I truly love.
Anyway, I agree with most of the comments about Paris and it�s sound but
when it comes to classical music, Paris simply has much left so desire. It
nowhere as clean and accurate as the newer modern systems, be it PT, Soundscape,
Nuendo, Samplitude etc.
I have a fairly large Paris setup and as much magic as it has it is quite
unreliable compared to the other systems.
For example: Paris can sometimes (randomly) add strange DC offset to the
files. It can depending on heat cause clicks. Aux leakage. Just to mention
a few anomalies. IOW to me it simply isn�t crystal clear and accurate. Also,
what is by some percieved as warmth, sounds to me like a bit clouded midrange.
I have recorded a fair amout of classical choirs in both Paris, Soundscape
and Nuendo. In this genre there is simply no competition at all. My Soundscape
converters (Apogee) simply kills Paris in clarity and detail. OTOH with pop/rock,
especially acoustic pop/rock (live drums), Paris can sound a bit more exciting
than the others.
Last but not least, sound aside Paris is a dinosaur. The routing options
leave A LOT to desire. The I/O flexibility is back to the stone age compared
to newer systems. The non-sample accurate editing is a PITA. Lack of professional
I/O options. Very rudimentary handling of native plugins, especially in stereo.
No bussing possibilites. No VST/DX on master bus. No delay compensation.
etc. ect...
IMHO most people who are sticking to Paris are doing it for financial reasons.
Given the very low price the SH systems are going for, the price vs. sound
preformance ratio is amazing, compared to other DSP-based system. In a true
professional enviroment with clients hanging over your shoulder, the compromises
are just to big, all IMO of course.
Just my 2 cents.
Babu
|
|
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-REALITY CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Fri, 14 April 2006 16:48
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Fri, 14 April 2006 17:47
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Fri, 14 April 2006 20:58
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: Kim on Fri, 14 April 2006 22:25
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sat, 15 April 2006 00:03
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sat, 15 April 2006 18:36
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: Deej [1] on Sat, 15 April 2006 19:26
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sat, 15 April 2006 00:30
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sat, 15 April 2006 00:37
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: DC on Sat, 15 April 2006 10:27
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sun, 16 April 2006 09:51
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sun, 16 April 2006 13:06
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sun, 16 April 2006 09:47
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: dc[4] on Sun, 16 April 2006 13:23
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: Ed on Sat, 15 April 2006 03:42
|
 |
|
Re: My evolving position on the Paris sound vs. PT.-Ear CHECK
By: Don Nafe on Sat, 15 April 2006 04:38
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Mar 31 07:05:29 PDT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02108 seconds
|