The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » More info on using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » More info on using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

More info on using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor [message #73561]

Wed, 04 October 2006 11:56

animix

Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006

Senior Member

OK,

Before you guys start getting too exicted about this, it appears that there
is one more hoop to jump through if you are using multiple MECs. When
looping audio from Paris *through* Cubase SX channels while Cubase SX is
slaved to Paris ADAT sync, Cubase crashes once audio is being looped from
two different MECs. This is likely due to the latency between EDS cards
causing a trainwreck with the clocking.
This will not be an issue to those who are not wanting to have plugin
automation in SX. As long as SX is not slaving to the Paris timeline, the
audio passes through the audio interface on Cubase and back to Paris with no
problem. If, however, you want to automate plugin parameters, you will need
both machines timeline synced so that you can write automation data to
Cubase SX.

I am hoping to solve this problem by sending Paris ADAT sync to a JL Cooper
Datasync II unit which converts ADAT timecode to MTC and then slaving Cubase
SX to incoming MTC form the Datasync II.

Thank goodness for yet another kludge. I thought I had finally succeeded in
accomplishing everything I started out to do and there was this sudden
realization that my life would have no further purpose.

;o)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		More info on using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 11:56
		Re: More info on using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 12:38
		UH OH!!......not good! By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 12:47
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 13:43
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Don Nafe on Wed, 04 October 2006 14:44
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 18:04
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Martin Harrington on Thu, 05 October 2006 00:26
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Nappy on Wed, 04 October 2006 14:50
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Martin Harrington on Thu, 05 October 2006 00:29
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Nappy on Thu, 05 October 2006 00:43
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: rick on Thu, 05 October 2006 02:00
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Martin Harrington on Thu, 05 October 2006 03:37
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: animix on Thu, 05 October 2006 05:20
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Nappy on Thu, 05 October 2006 07:32
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: animix on Thu, 05 October 2006 08:06
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: Nei on Thu, 05 October 2006 06:21
		Re: UH OH!!......not good! By: rick on Thu, 05 October 2006 11:36
		Re: More info on using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 20:03
		AHhhh.........HA!!! By: animix on Wed, 04 October 2006 21:44
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: rick on Thu, 05 October 2006 02:02
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: animix on Thu, 05 October 2006 05:02
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: rick on Thu, 05 October 2006 11:34
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: animix on Thu, 05 October 2006 13:46
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: rick on Fri, 06 October 2006 02:48
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: Don Nafe on Thu, 05 October 2006 05:28
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: animix on Thu, 05 October 2006 05:27
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: Don Nafe on Thu, 05 October 2006 14:53
		Re: AHhhh.........HA!!! By: animix on Thu, 05 October 2006 17:47

Previous Topic:	Sort of an emergency Wavelab question
Next Topic:	Kewl toys.....

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Mar 26 17:06:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01781 seconds