|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: what's in your paris.cfg ? [message #63548 is a reply to message #63540] |
Sat, 21 January 2006 18:52   |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
XP can use lower cache and I/O sizes than ME and achieve equal results, except
much snappier.
Those settings look OK, theyk're kind of on the large side, escpeially the
256 I/O, but if your running lots of tracks, have lots of edits, or a slowish
computer, you may need that.
I've done a lot of experimentation with this and find that a lot of times,
I get the best performance with equal cache and I/O numbers, so with that
in mind I'd suggest lowering your I/O to 128, and see how that works.
On XP I run a lot with cache=64 and I/O=64 if the track count or edit count
doesn't get too high.(40 or less tracks) Very snappy.
Rod
John <no@no.com> wrote:
>Do my values look correct for win98se and xp?
>
>DJ wrote:
>> UseHouseSync=1
>> (for external WC)
>>
>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43d22f99@linux...
>>
>>>Is this good for both win98se and xp?
>>>
>>>
>>>*** PARIS Configuration ***
>>>
>>>*** ENGINE configuration parameters ***
>>>* Cache Size in MB
>>>CacheSize=128
>>>
>>>* Overview cache size in KB
>>>OvwCacheSize=8192
>>>
>>>* I/O configuration
>>>IOSize=256
>>>
>>>* SubMix Cache Size in KB
>>>SubMixCacheSize=256
>>>
>>>ManualRecDelay=4096
>>>
>>>RecXFadeLen=20
>>>Use32BitWinMTC=0
>>>
>>>DisableDirectX=0
>>>
>>>MasterOutputCard=0
>>>
>>>ScrubMaxRate=1
>>>
>>>WheelSensitivity=20
>>>
>>>WheelInertia=68
>>>
>>>CSProVersion=ABCDEFGH
>>>
>>>VSTDirectory=C:\Program Files\steinberg\vstplugins\
>>>
>>>MIDIPlayDisabled=1
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: what's in your paris.cfg ? [message #63566 is a reply to message #63548] |
Sun, 22 January 2006 08:07 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Rod, I always look forward to your replies. You really help out an
awful lot. My box is a 2.4 celeron with 512 ram and i'm only doing 32
tracks average if that helps. Thanks again for the great info. So
how'd you manage to get looks and brains, rick and i didin't get either?
hehe
John
Rod Lincoln wrote:
> XP can use lower cache and I/O sizes than ME and achieve equal results, except
> much snappier.
> Those settings look OK, theyk're kind of on the large side, escpeially the
> 256 I/O, but if your running lots of tracks, have lots of edits, or a slowish
> computer, you may need that.
> I've done a lot of experimentation with this and find that a lot of times,
> I get the best performance with equal cache and I/O numbers, so with that
> in mind I'd suggest lowering your I/O to 128, and see how that works.
> On XP I run a lot with cache=64 and I/O=64 if the track count or edit count
> doesn't get too high.(40 or less tracks) Very snappy.
> Rod
> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>>Do my values look correct for win98se and xp?
>>
>>DJ wrote:
>>
>>>UseHouseSync=1
>>>(for external WC)
>>>
>>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43d22f99@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Is this good for both win98se and xp?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>*** PARIS Configuration ***
>>>>
>>>>*** ENGINE configuration parameters ***
>>>>* Cache Size in MB
>>>>CacheSize=128
>>>>
>>>>* Overview cache size in KB
>>>>OvwCacheSize=8192
>>>>
>>>>* I/O configuration
>>>>IOSize=256
>>>>
>>>>* SubMix Cache Size in KB
>>>>SubMixCacheSize=256
>>>>
>>>>ManualRecDelay=4096
>>>>
>>>>RecXFadeLen=20
>>>>Use32BitWinMTC=0
>>>>
>>>>DisableDirectX=0
>>>>
>>>>MasterOutputCard=0
>>>>
>>>>ScrubMaxRate=1
>>>>
>>>>WheelSensitivity=20
>>>>
>>>>WheelInertia=68
>>>>
>>>>CSProVersion=ABCDEFGH
>>>>
>>>>VSTDirectory=C:\Program Files\steinberg\vstplugins\
>>>>
>>>>MIDIPlayDisabled=1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
