Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » TWO DISPLAYS OR ONE?
TWO DISPLAYS OR ONE? [message #59092] |
Fri, 14 October 2005 07:33 |
Richard Faylor
Messages: 18 Registered: September 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
l be superior in quality to any typical PC-world display with a VGA connection.
>
> My question: Which is better for monitoring Paris--two 17" or 19" displays
> (costing $1,000 or so together) of decent quality or one 20" display (costing
> $800) of marginally better quality?
>
> Many thanks,
> Richard Faylor
>
> RichardFaylor@aol.com
> (208) 343-7681
>Hi,
I heave to sell a Control 16 ,EDS-1000, Interface 2, Interface 442 with Paris
2.2.
Any one?"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>If you have to pull it apart, you may find this useful.
>AA
....But a PITA....be careful with those little LEDs
James
>
>"uptown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TWO DISPLAYS OR ONE? [message #59109 is a reply to message #59108] |
Fri, 14 October 2005 18:10 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVI
to study up a bit on the DVI-LCD combo and indeed read that "computers with
DVI video connectors can use many DVI-equipped HDTV sets as display." It
also said that "the vast majority [of LCD screens] are no longer just for
TV and HDTV (DVB). They can also be used as a computer monitor with a VGA/DVI
signal, although resolution support can vary widely." My concern is "support."
I thought, perhaps mistakenly, that no matter what display you use, you have
to have some software (delivered via CD) to coordinate the computer output
with the display. I've also assumed that that support comes with the display.
Did the Olevia come with software specifically designed to work with an Apple
computer? Regardless of the answer to that question, do you feel that the
Olevia is producing a high-quality image? In addition, to working in Paris
I do a lot of writing, so the display's ability to produce crisp, clear text
(which I've been told is the real test of a display) is very important to
me. Does the Olevia pass that test? Also, is it your opinion that the Olevia
is better than most other LCD screens, or are they all roughly equivalent?
Sorry for asking so many questions. Many thanks!
--Richard Faylor
RichardFaylor@aol.com
"Mike" <spamthis@alltel.net> wrote:
>This is better!
> https://www.bestbuyplasma.com/Plasma/Product.asp_X_sku_Y_LT3 2HV
>
>I just got one and all I can say is WOW! Especially with the DVI!
>
>Then I have an 18" flat panel over to the side for displaying plug-ins
>though really not required.
>
>Mike
>
>"Richard Faylor" <RichardFaylor@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:434fc1ba$1@linux...
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> I've bought a used Mac G4 to use with Paris that has more horsepower than
>> my previous Mac G3. Now I have to make a decision about displays. The
G4
>> has two video cards so it can support two monitors. But one of the video
>> cards provides a DVI digital connection that, according to Apple, works
>> better
>> with the newest Apple displays, such as their 20-inch $800 display. My
>> local
>> Apple salesman claims therefore that the Apple display with the DVI
>> connection
>> will be superior in quality to any typical PC-world display with a VGA
>> connection.
>>
>> My question: Which is better for monitoring Paris--two 17" or 19" displays
>> (costing $1,000 or so together) of decent quality or one 20" display
>> (costing
>> $800) of marginally better quality?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Richard Faylor
>>
>> RichardFaylor@aol.com
>> (208) 343-7681
>>
>
>Well thanks Jimmy ;O). Hope this get's it working. On my spdif devices, I
just look to the monitoring of the hardware device itself for levels.
Cheers,
Deej
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:434f
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TWO DISPLAYS OR ONE? [message #59118 is a reply to message #59108] |
Sat, 15 October 2005 07:56 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
und (as oppsoed to a stereo track)
> just for the conveniece of being able to change the degree of
> pan on one channel or another, and alos being able to make
> slightly different EQ settings on the left vs. right side, if
> needed... however, am I costing myself badly-needed cycles by
> doing this?
>
> NeilI'm not sure what people are recommending lately. But, I think its safe to
say that Paris will run fine with either Athlons or Pentiums. On the mobo
questions, you might do a search of the newsgroup to see what other's have
used with success. I've been using the Asus A7S333. Its a stable board,
but picky about it's ram.
MR
"Sanbar" <sanbar@wi.rr.com> wrote:
>Does Paris work better with Athlon or Pentium. It seems as though Pentiums
>are actually cheaper, but I've noticed a lot of people in this group are
>using Athlons. I think I read that one gig of ram is enough for XP. Does
the
>speed of the ram matter much. Also, are there any motherboard considerations
>other than many PCI slots. I'm trying to upgrade and want to keep the cost
>down. I've got a two card system with one UAD-1 card. I'm not rigging it
to
>any other machines or midi or anything.
>
>Suggestions would be great. Thanks in advance.
>
>Barry
>
>Thanks Phil,
I figured many people around here havn;t heard that stuff which
engineering wise is so ahead of it's time. Sounds like some room micing on
the drums too.
Phil, I gotta talk to you about a Hammond session give me a call if you got
time.
"Phil Aiken" <paiken@partners.org> wrote:
>
>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Oh and the theme to "that 70's show" "In the Street" is a Big Star song.
>
> Performed by Cheap trick, however.......
>
> All the Big Star studio records are indeed fantastic.
>
>
>
>Time for that new dual Opteron with dual core processors.
;o)
"Neil" <OIUIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:435189c3$1@linux...
>
> ..if I have a L/R set of tracks (say a stereo piano sound, for
> example) on indivudal tracks, vs. a stereo interleaved track,
> and I insert a plugin on each of the L/R tracks, does it take
> twice as much CPU power to
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 23 15:58:54 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01234 seconds
|