Paris v2.1 vs v3.0 [message #108208] |
Mon, 12 May 2014 13:47 |
MusicWorks
Messages: 10 Registered: April 2014
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi everyone!
Ok, so I am deciding which version of Paris I should start out on. I will be spending the summer near the coast and have decided I should take my PARIS system and start working. Trying to decide whether I should go for version 2.1 or version 3.0...
I did do a quick search trying to find specific differences between both versions, but only found the main differences.
- Aside from version 2.1 being a workflow nightmare, lack of extended import/export OMF capabilities and the VST plugin architecture, would you say they are both equally responsive? (I have noticed version 2.1 has a considerable smaller footprint, at least in Mac).
- If I had installed version 3.0 in my main workstation, would it making sense installing 2.1 in the computer I will be taking with me during the summer? Or should I go for the same version on both computers?
Was thinking maybe version 2.1 is a good start point, to get to know PARIS and then upgrade to 3.0 when I am back here in the studio...Also, installing 2.1 would be easier, no authorization required.
Anyone around here actually prefer v2??
|
|
|
|
|