|
Re: 2 card question [message #62307 is a reply to message #62304] |
Tue, 03 January 2006 16:48 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rt to the default setup.
>>Assign submix 1 card B to virtual ***. This disconnects EDS card 2 from
>>submix 1
>>Assign submix 2 card A to card B. This assigns the MEC and EDS card 2
>>to submix 2.
>>Assign submix 1 to card A.
>>
>>This puts submix 1 back on card A. Make sure to turn CARD back on from
>>Virtual.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
>
> --------------------
>
>>How to move your MEC from submix to submix for a 1 card system.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
>
> --------------------
>
>>In this example, the MEC is tied to EDS card 1 and is assigned to submix
>
> 1.
>
>>Open Master Mixer.
>>Assign submix 1 card A to virtual. This disconnects EDS card 1 from
>>submix 1
>>Assign submix 2 card A. This assigns the MEC and EDS card 1 to
>>submix 2.
>>
>>To revert to the default setup.
>>Assign submix 2 to virtual. This disconnects EDS card 2 from submix 1
>>Assign submix 1 to card A. This assigns the MEC and EDS card 1 back
>>to submix 1.
>>
>>Make sure to turn CARD back on from Virtual.
>>
>>
>>RK wrote:
>>
>>>So I got the two cards hooked up (I don't necessarily need 32 channels,
>
> but
>
>>>want extra FX resources) and I want to load FX up on the global inserts
>>>(card A) and record on card B (with various compressors, FX, etc. and
>
> lots
>
>>>of resource room.) I understand the global FX are assigned to card A,
>
> but
>
>>>then I can't record to card B (sumbix 2 where my per channel compression
>>>is.) If I assign the submix to different cards, it doesn't matter
>
> because
>
>>>now submix two is card A and there are no resources left for the global
>>>inserts. Of course, now submix one has all kinds of resources, but I
>
> can't
>
>>>record to it. Is this a Catch-22? Am I just an idiot? (ok, don't
>
> answer
>
>>>that!)
>>>
>>>Do you have to be happy with the resources on the card you are recording
>>>with (both mixer and global inserts) as there is no sharing of
>
> resources?
>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Kent
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and I'm
wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
Thanks
Kentsometimes, when playing, if I hit play again it locks up.
John wrote:
> Can anyone add or clarify my new list of Paris no nos ?
>
>
>
> Things to keep you from crashing.
|
|
|
Re: 2 card question [message #62308 is a reply to message #62307] |
Tue, 03 January 2006 16:58 |
RK
Messages: 51 Registered: December 2005
|
Member |
|
|
/>
>
>
> In STOP mode
>
> DON'T
> * select a new Native Effect if the current one is open
> * enter record mode without first setting your record path
> (Ctrl-R)
> * use the name of the project for your recording path
> * save with looping enabled
>
> During Playback or Recording
>
> DON'T
> * change inserts (native or eds)
> * move loop or punch points
> * enable or disable loop or punch
>
> Rendering
>
> DON'T
> * render tracks with different lengths
>
> NoLimit
>
> DON'T
> * use 0 or 50 valuesYes!
"RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and I'm
>wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
>
>Thanks
>Kent
>
>Bitchin'. Will I then have two active submixes? Do I leave the cards
connected in the computer? Still can't share card resources though, right?
Thanks.
Kent
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43bb2b84$1@linux...
>
> Yes!
>
> "RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and I'm
> >wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Kent
> >
> >
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>Hey guys,
>
>I know that this is an old thread, but I have to disagree with assessments
>on Pro Tools sound quality.
>
>First, I mix with Pro Tools HD at our Church's studio for major release
Gospel
>Cds. Pro Tools HD sounds wonderful with low and high track counts
To "sum" it up, IMO... HD = "Good"; earlier PT systems = "Bad"
Never mixed in "LE", so I cna't comment there, but I've done
some overdubs in it... the 002's convertors were adequate/OK.
NeilDon't forget the BNC cable from MEC out to 442 in, that's assuming your MEC
is on card A. NO, can't share resources between submixes. Yeap, cards stay
connected as before. That's my setup here, 2 card on MEC/442 works great.
Have fun..!
Rob_A
"RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43bb2ca7@linux...
> Bitchin'. Will I then have two active submixes? Do I leave the cards
> connected in the computer? Still can't share card resources though,
right?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kent
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> nws:43bb2b84$1@linux...
> >
> > Yes!
> >
> > "RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and
I'm
> > >wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >Kent
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>Don't try to edit the leng
|
|
|
|
|