Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » lightpipe/ADAT input for laptops
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: lightpipe/ADAT input for laptops [message #77016 is a reply to message #77012] |
Wed, 13 December 2006 19:38 |
Gene Lennon[4]
Messages: 26 Registered: November 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Gene! It sounds like it could be usable if it's only around 3ms. I'm
>wondering about multi tracks. Please let me know more when you find out.
> What do you think of PT with it? Can you get 32 track of I/O in PT at
44.1,
>48K? It was unclear if it is stuck at 18 I/Os with PT at 44.1/48.
>
>Thanks
>James
>
I�m doing a mix right now that is stemming 16 out from PT to Paris for summing.
PT MP is hobbled at a max I/O of 18 by Digi, but it is possible to get a
�Paris� sounding mix with this setup even without more outputs.
The latency has no effect on this config. Paris is simply sitting there,
running in �Live Mix� mode. As usual, I am returning to the Mac for the 2-track
mix � in this instance its 2 channels in Pro Tools. Whatever the small amount
of latency is in this loop, it is not affecting my tightest mutes or delaying
any metering to the point that I can perceive it.
My choice for PT for this mix has to do with the complexity of the mix and
the fact that PT has the best options for editing and mix automation (for
me), and it integrates very nicely with my MotorMix.
I have the Oxford plugs running native in PT, so having an unlimited number
of Oxford plugs and Waves SSL plugs gives a lot of options. So far I like
this better than mixing from Logic or DP. The limited number of tracks (48
mono or stereo) and the limited I/O will force me to use other options in
some circumstances, but this setup benefits from many of Pro Tools strengths
and maintains most of the Paris depth. It�s what I�ve been preaching for
years.
I�m not sure I will have any way to verify the throughput latency. Both Performer
and Logic mess with the input timing just the way PT seems to do. I think
I�m out of options for verifying it, but I�m open for suggestions.
Gene
P.S. I�m also enjoying the Medodyne Plugin.
|
|
|
|
Re: lightpipe/ADAT input for laptops [message #77023 is a reply to message #77016] |
Thu, 14 December 2006 00:14 |
excelav
Messages: 2130 Registered: July 2005 Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey guys! Thanks for the info. Maybe Deej could pipe in with some test
ideas for the round trip thing.
Gene, are you sub mixing the PT 48 track down to 18 outs? At least there
are other software options for 32x34 I/Os.
Thanks again.
James
"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSpammyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey Gene! It sounds like it could be usable if it's only around 3ms.
I'm
>>wondering about multi tracks. Please let me know more when you find out.
>> What do you think of PT with it? Can you get 32 track of I/O in PT at
>44.1,
>>48K? It was unclear if it is stuck at 18 I/Os with PT at 44.1/48.
>>
>>Thanks
>>James
>>
>
>I�m doing a mix right now that is stemming 16 out from PT to Paris for summing.
>
>
>PT MP is hobbled at a max I/O of 18 by Digi, but it is possible to get a
>�Paris� sounding mix with this setup even without more outputs.
>
>The latency has no effect on this config. Paris is simply sitting there,
>running in �Live Mix� mode. As usual, I am returning to the Mac for the
2-track
>mix � in this instance its 2 channels in Pro Tools. Whatever the small amount
>of latency is in this loop, it is not affecting my tightest mutes or delaying
>any metering to the point that I can perceive it.
>
>My choice for PT for this mix has to do with the complexity of the mix and
>the fact that PT has the best options for editing and mix automation (for
>me), and it integrates very nicely with my MotorMix.
>
>I have the Oxford plugs running native in PT, so having an unlimited number
>of Oxford plugs and Waves SSL plugs gives a lot of options. So far I like
>this better than mixing from Logic or DP. The limited number of tracks (48
>mono or stereo) and the limited I/O will force me to use other options in
>some circumstances, but this setup benefits from many of Pro Tools strengths
>and maintains most of the Paris depth. It�s what I�ve been preaching for
>years.
>
>I�m not sure I will have any way to verify the throughput latency. Both
Performer
>and Logic mess with the input timing just the way PT seems to do. I think
>I�m out of options for verifying it, but I�m open for suggestions.
>
>Gene
>
>P.S. I�m also enjoying the Medodyne Plugin.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Dec 26 19:28:55 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02503 seconds
|