The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » 96k????...harumph!!!

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » 96k????...harumph!!!

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

96k????...harumph!!! [message #79820]

Fri, 09 February 2007 22:11

Deej [4]

Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007

Senior Member

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C74C9F.A9E6E160
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well.........poo!!!!........... I've been working with a bunch of 96k =
material tonight. Big yawn. Yeah, it sounds a little different......but =
not necessarily better......at least to my ears. SRC'ed and dithered =
down, the difference is neglibible. I'm playing back through a Benchmark =
DAC-1.=20

Well...at least I can record at 96k now........whoopee
------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C74C9F.A9E6E160
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Well.........poo!!!!........... I've =
been working=20
with a bunch of 96k material tonight. Big yawn. Yeah, it sounds a =
little=20
different......but not necessarily better......at least to my ears. =
SRC'ed and=20
dithered down, the difference is neglibible. I'm playing back through a=20
Benchmark DAC-1. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Well...at least I can record at 96k=20
now........<FONT size=3D1>whoopee</FONT></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C74C9F.A9E6E160--

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Fri, 09 February 2007 22:11
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: rick on Sat, 10 February 2007 03:39
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: chuck duffy on Sat, 10 February 2007 05:30
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Neil on Sat, 10 February 2007 08:02
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Sat, 10 February 2007 07:23
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sat, 10 February 2007 10:54
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sat, 10 February 2007 15:06
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Neil on Sat, 10 February 2007 17:52
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sat, 10 February 2007 19:13
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Sat, 10 February 2007 18:36
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sat, 10 February 2007 23:53
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 11 February 2007 06:50
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Neil on Sun, 11 February 2007 08:52
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Sun, 11 February 2007 09:09
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Martin Harrington on Sun, 11 February 2007 15:35
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 11 February 2007 12:50
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Sun, 11 February 2007 13:26
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sun, 11 February 2007 16:25
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 11 February 2007 20:19
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: John Macy on Mon, 12 February 2007 08:57
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Mon, 12 February 2007 10:27
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Mon, 12 February 2007 09:40
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Mon, 12 February 2007 10:42
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Mon, 12 February 2007 10:08
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Mon, 12 February 2007 13:20
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: excelav on Mon, 12 February 2007 13:24
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Mon, 12 February 2007 13:31
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: brandon[2] on Mon, 12 February 2007 08:53
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: TCB on Mon, 12 February 2007 09:28
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Mon, 12 February 2007 09:12
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Sun, 11 February 2007 09:28
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Graham Duncan on Sun, 11 February 2007 15:29
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Sun, 11 February 2007 16:12
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: IOUOI on Sun, 11 February 2007 08:43
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sun, 11 February 2007 12:32
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Nil on Sun, 11 February 2007 15:09
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sun, 11 February 2007 16:15
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Neil on Sun, 11 February 2007 16:21
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Sun, 11 February 2007 16:27
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Neil on Sun, 11 February 2007 17:17
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Ted Gerber on Sun, 11 February 2007 22:02
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 11 February 2007 22:49
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Ted Gerber on Mon, 12 February 2007 06:28
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Deej [4] on Mon, 12 February 2007 07:23
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: Ted Gerber on Mon, 12 February 2007 10:21
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: IOUOI on Mon, 12 February 2007 07:19
		Re: 96k????...harumph!!! By: LaMont on Mon, 12 February 2007 10:50

Previous Topic:	C - 16 not working... HUMMMMM
Next Topic:	Quick and dirty guitar production for $99.00!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 16 17:47:01 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02062 seconds