Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Paris EQ Q
Paris EQ Q [message #56942] |
Tue, 16 August 2005 06:48 |
cujo
Messages: 285 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>
>
> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>>I don't believe that getting this analytical about something
>>will necessarly make it sound better. Why do you feel you have
>>to create a specific space (unless you're trying to match it to
>
|
|
|
Re: Paris EQ Q [message #56948 is a reply to message #56942] |
Tue, 16 August 2005 08:53 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
probably
> > about 8 on ME/98 SE), but this is my first XP boot (actually second,
since
> > it was unstable the first time. and still is now).
> >
> > 1) With 1 card running, the system was unstable. It would sometimes
crash,
> > particularly when opening a project after having closed another project.
> > Sometimes a crash would trigger the machine to reboot (i.e. just reset
> > it).
> > Equally (perhaps even more!) frustratingly, EDS effects presets (even in
> > the main library) would not save when Paris was rebooted. Other than
that,
> > everything was fine.
> >
> > 2) Having added a second recently purchased second-hand card, I'm now
> > getting
> > Error 2/2 messages when I start Paris. On a few occasions the 2/2
message
> > did not appear, but once Paris was started no audio would play back from
> > the project. Audio on Card A would show on the meters (channel, submix
and
> > master); audio on Card B would show on the channel meters, but not in
the
> > submix or master meters).
> >
> > Is it possible that the EDS to EDS ribbon cables are at fault? They are
> > homemade.
> > I've connected one 10 pin to
|
|
|
|
Re: Paris EQ Q [message #56951 is a reply to message #56949] |
Tue, 16 August 2005 09:09 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e or two, a couple of
Fairchilds, an LA-2A and the EMT 140.
The UAD-1 meter is only showing about 30% so there's definitely a horsepower
reserve advantage to the 4th card.
Deej
"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:4301fd15$1@linux...
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >I have listened very
> >closely and I hear absolutely no audible problems, other than the sort of
> >smooth glue that is the *secret sauce* that mixing hot on this system can
> >impart to the tracks.
>
> Deej, do you have anything that you can insert on individual
> tracks or across the master before No-Limit in real-time to
> see if you're getting any of these kind of problems beforehand?
>
> If you don't, grab a copy of Voxengo's "Span" - it's a freebie
> and seems to be very accurate in tracking overs, etc:
>
> http://www.voxengo.com/product/SPAN/
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
>Hi Chris,
Thanks for the link. So I assume that I should stay away from
Pentium processors with Paris then? The reason I was looking
at that asus one was that my dealer down the street carries it,
and gave me a good price on a customized system. I'm not going
to be able to fit that many EDS cards in my tower so I thought I
may as well go smaller and use the magma.
Cheers,
TC
Chris Ludwig wrote:
> Hi TC,
> Not sure what your planning for this but if you having some strange urge
> to use a small form factor PC with Paris then I would say the Shuttle
> boxes are a far better option. They actually make a great AMD Nforce 3
> chipset 939 based system.
> http://global.shuttle.com/Product/Barebone/SN95G5%20V3.asp
>
> Chris
>
>
> TC wrote:
>
>>
>> I am thinking of putting together a new system with a magma chassis
>> for Paris, and am looking at the following:
>>
>> http://usa.asus.com/prog/spec.asp?m=S-presso&langs=09
&
|
|
|
|
Re: Paris EQ Q [message #56965 is a reply to message #56948] |
Tue, 16 August 2005 16:32 |
Cujjo
Messages: 325 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nd them. I know that since they are broadcasting into the room, that
>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>>front makes sense, but music travels all directions and it seems it would
>>>>make smoe sense to at least take the back wall into consideration.
>>>>
>>>>Also, I'm thinking that using actual short (2-3 ms delays) between the
>>>>instruments/performers themselves would help to create some sense of
>>>>relative front-to-back relational spatiality.
>>>>
>>>>I'm working mostly with acoustic musicians, some drums, but very little
>>>
>>>in
>>>
>>>>the way of special FX like phaser/chorus/synth stuff,..........just trying
>>>>to create a realistic optimal and dimensionally realistic space for the
>>>>performance.
>>>>
>>>>How big a soundstage is generally used for commercial studio projects?
>>
>> I
>>
>>>>know it's all relative, but if there is some sxort of *go-by* here that
>>>
>>>is
>>>
>>>>an accepted standard, I'd like to know.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for indulging my ignorance and enlightening me..Also, I've got
an
>>>
>>>MP3
>>>
>>>>of a mix that I did last night that I'd like to get some of your opinions
>>>>on. It's a very talented bluegrass band-5 pieces. It's about 2.5 MB and
>>>>the soundstage I created for it is small.......around 30' wide. I was
trying
>>>>to get an intimate, realistic feeling to this as it was tracked live
in
>>>
>>>my
>>>
>>>>studio with 10 open mics.
>>>>
>>>>I'd be glad to e-mail it to those here who would be willing to critique
>>>
>>>it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Paris EQ Q [message #57225 is a reply to message #56951] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 21:11 |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t only as an
>observer, not userhave you tried running it with just a basic XP install and no SP1 or
SP2 updates?
On 25 Aug 2005 08:56:16 +1000, "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Yeh. I've hit one of those stupid faults which is hard to pin down, but I'll
>get it eventually. I'm going to put some hours in over the weekend on it
>and see if I can't nail it.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"Jon Jiles" <nono@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hi Kim,
>>
>>Sounds like you're really having to really arm wrestle the set up with this
>>mobo. I'll be interested to know how stable it stays once you get it stable.
>> :>)
>>
>>Keep us posted.
>>
>>Thanks for the info,
>>Jon
>>
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>you do sleep don't you?
>>>
>>>Yeh! It was only 9:30pm here when I wrote that.
>>>
>>>>what type does the mfg. recommend?
>>>
>>>I had a look last night and can't for the life of me find a recomendation
>>>anywhere. I checked the website, and read the MB manual, and neither seems
>>>to indicate any preference memory wise.
>>>
>>>The more I'm thinking about it the more I'm going back to memory being
>the
>>>culprit. Only issue is that the only ram I have which I could swap out
>with
>>>it is probably the same stick as what's in there.
>>>
>>>I'll go out tonight and have another look and see what I can learn...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>you could try a random password generator then plug in your
limitations. as an
example...http://search.cpan.org/~jdporter/Crypt-RandPasswd- 0.02/lib/Crypt/RandPasswd.pm
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:06:38 -0500, "Brandon"
<brandon_goodwin@REMOVETHISsbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Does anyone know of a website that will give me a list of all 7 letter words
>with the second letter being "E" ?
>
>
>This in 1997 was a better than PCM-80 sounding reverb, anyone ever worked
with it ?
Does this work in Me ?
Regards,
DimitriosNot at home any more, well not full time anyhow, one lives in the UK and the
other is more often than not, at the boyfriends house.
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0rg19ude28jhp7a9g2c0fvrcj6tuviob@4ax.com...
> man, i bet your kids are nervous...if you have any that is.
>
> ;o)
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:09:15 +1000, "Martin Harrington"
> <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>>That's it...It'
|
|
|
Re: Paris EQ Q [message #57245 is a reply to message #57225] |
Thu, 25 August 2005 08:50 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt; with it ?
> >> Does this work in Me ?
> >> Regards,
> >> Dimitrios
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>Does anyone know where I can get my hands on a Instrutional DVD by Nashville
producer Brian Tankersely? Have looked all around without any luck. Thanks
David Stadalnik@aol.comMake sure flow control matches on each card (if you can configure it).
If one's set for flow control and the other isn't, it can be extremely
slow.
JH
Dimitrios wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> I try to answer about my configuration.
>
> 1. PC's are connected via CAT5 cable
> 2.Becuase I had some problems at 1000 speed I lowered both lan cards at 100
> speed and now is working.
> 3. Speed is very slow, reminds me of USB1.1
> needs around 6 minutes to transfer a 734 MB wavefile.
> 4.On Me I have installed Client for Microsoft Networks.
> TCP/IP and File and printer sharing and of course Planet ENW 9606 Gigabit
> card
> On XP pc I have
> Client for microsoft networks
> File anprinter sharing
> Qos Packet scheduler
> TCP/IP
> Same cable works fine with two XP PC's...
> Thank you
> Dimitrios
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com>
> Newsgroups: IDEA.EMUEnsoniqPARIS
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:47 PM
> Subject: Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer !
>
>
>
>>Hi Dimitrios,
>>
>>Many factors can cause this issue. Here are a few questions:
>>
>>1. What is the physical connection between PC's? Crossover cable, hub,
>
> switch?
>
>>If hub or switch, is it a 100BASE-TX device?
>>
>>2. What network protocols are installed? NetBEUI, TCP/IP, other?
>>
>>3. Have you tried a different cable and is the cable you're using Cat-5 or
>>better?
>>
>>Please let me know how you're configured and I'll try to help.
>>
>>Good luck!
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>
>>>I wonder why there is an extremely slow transfer beetween XP and Me via
>>
>>lan.
>>
>>>I use ethernet cards at 100 and at 1000 but same results.
>>>I tried to make either one master and or slave but same results...
>>>Any tip ?
>>>Regards,
>>>Dimitrios
>>>
>>>
>>
> "Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com> wrote in message
> news:430de82d$1@linux...
>
>>Hi Dimitrios,
>>
>>Many factors can cause this issue. Here are a few questions:
>>
>>1. What is the physical connection between PC's? Crossover cable, hub,
>
> switch?
>
>>If hub or switch, is it a 100BASE-TX device?
>>
>>2. What network protocols are installed? NetBEUI, TCP/IP, other?
>>
>>3. Have you tried a different cable and is the cable you're using Cat-5 or
>>better?
>>
>>Please let me know how you're configured and I'll try to help.
>>
>>Good luck!
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>
>>>I wonder why there is an extremely slow transfer beetween XP and Me via
>>
>>lan.
>>
>>>I use ethernet cards at 100 and at 1000 but same results.
>>>I tried to make either one master and or slave but same resul
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 28 17:11:47 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01434 seconds
|