Trim gain control in Paris [message #69737] |
Wed, 28 June 2006 03:54 |
Dan B
Messages: 54 Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
Hi,
I'm attempting to set individual channel levels to +2db on a VU meter when
the channel is solod and the fader is cranked to +10. Unfortunately the only
VU plug in I have is native and so can only work on the inserts. Which means
I can't use an EDS comp to set the gain since they're post native inserts.
And the channel fader won't have any effect either. Still, figure I could
insert a native plug to control the gain before the VU meter plug. Any idea
what plug in I could use to do this without introducing artefacts and without
introducing unnecessary load on the CPU.
I could use Waves L2, though that will have artefacts (not necessarily a
bad thing) and increase CPU load.
Thanks for any thoughts.
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Trim gain control in Paris [message #69758 is a reply to message #69747] |
Wed, 28 June 2006 16:21 |
Dan B
Messages: 54 Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
Hey Rod,
I have indeed! Most of Stav's advice seems to be pure gold (best money I
ever spent in the studio!), so I though I ought to give his VU mix trick
a spin too ... You had much luck with it? And how are you implementing it
through Paris? (with the VST eq and PSP meter?)
Cheers,
Dan
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Sounds like you've been reading "Mixing with your Mind"
>The Paris vst eq has a trim and would work work well for that application
>"dan b" <daniel_burneNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>I'm attempting to set individual channel levels to +2db on a VU meter when
>>the channel is solod and the fader is cranked to +10. Unfortunately the
>only
>>VU plug in I have is native and so can only work on the inserts. Which
means
>>I can't use an EDS comp to set the gain since they're post native inserts.
>>And the channel fader won't have any effect either. Still, figure I could
>>insert a native plug to control the gain before the VU meter plug. Any
idea
>>what plug in I could use to do this without introducing artefacts and without
>>introducing unnecessary load on the CPU.
>>
>>I could use Waves L2, though that will have artefacts (not necessarily
a
>>bad thing) and increase CPU load.
>>
>>Thanks for any thoughts.
>>
>>Dan
>
|
|
|