The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Another Dumb Q about standard MEC in/out
Another Dumb Q about standard MEC in/out [message #72210] Sun, 10 September 2006 10:51 Go to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
How much of a sonic hit would one take uing just the MEC's I/O for recording
or bussing?

I haven't tried it and can't right now but the answer could change my
immediate plans for Paris (not that I'm going anywhere)

DOn
Re: Another Dumb Q about standard MEC in/out [message #72213 is a reply to message #72210] Sun, 10 September 2006 12:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
Seeing that the bit depth is the deal and not the sample rate you should be
fine unless you have a big signal to noise ratio need like a vocal without
gating or acoustic guitar. If you can use it for electronic keyboards and
such you'll be even better off. They are also great for queue mix outs.
Use your ears and test them. I bet you'll be plenty happy.

John

"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>How much of a sonic hit would one take uing just the MEC's I/O for recording

>or bussing?
>
>I haven't tried it and can't right now but the answer could change my
>immediate plans for Paris (not that I'm going anywhere)
>
>DOn
>
>
Re: Another Dumb Q about standard MEC in/out [message #72219 is a reply to message #72210] Sun, 10 September 2006 13:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
Of course, 16 or 24 bit has no bearing on the quality of the convertors but
I have found that the 8 in convertors are better in either format than the
other interfaces (unless you use high end down the adat pipe). However, if
you're using something like say percussion and jam the levels down paris'
throat like I do, you'll hardly notice a difference I think. Where it
becomes more apparant is in vocals and acoustic instruments, and would like
take quite a few tracks of build up to note problems. For instance, a dude
like BT wouldn't be able to live on those convertors simply because
80-something tracks would be muddy :)
Normal earthlings however could likely hit over 18 tracks w/o noticing much.

AA


"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:45044ef4$1@linux...
> How much of a sonic hit would one take uing just the MEC's I/O for
> recording or bussing?
>
> I haven't tried it and can't right now but the answer could change my
> immediate plans for Paris (not that I'm going anywhere)
>
> DOn
>
Re: Another Dumb Q about standard MEC in/out [message #72225 is a reply to message #72219] Sun, 10 September 2006 15:41 Go to previous message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Thanks guys


"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:450475ce$1@linux...
> Of course, 16 or 24 bit has no bearing on the quality of the convertors
> but I have found that the 8 in convertors are better in either format than
> the other interfaces (unless you use high end down the adat pipe).
> However, if you're using something like say percussion and jam the levels
> down paris' throat like I do, you'll hardly notice a difference I think.
> Where it becomes more apparant is in vocals and acoustic instruments, and
> would like take quite a few tracks of build up to note problems. For
> instance, a dude like BT wouldn't be able to live on those convertors
> simply because 80-something tracks would be muddy :)
> Normal earthlings however could likely hit over 18 tracks w/o noticing
> much.
>
> AA
>
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:45044ef4$1@linux...
>> How much of a sonic hit would one take uing just the MEC's I/O for
>> recording or bussing?
>>
>> I haven't tried it and can't right now but the answer could change my
>> immediate plans for Paris (not that I'm going anywhere)
>>
>> DOn
>>
>
>
Previous Topic: OT: 51 years ago
Next Topic: Uncle.....
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Dec 03 22:03:19 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03747 seconds