The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » what is the best way to do sample rate conversion.

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » what is the best way to do sample rate conversion.

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56113]

Wed, 20 July 2005 17:22

Jeremy Luzier

Messages: 102
Registered: November 2005

Senior Member

art from a mono Focusrite Voicemaster, I've only got console
>pres).
>
>What are the Grace pre's?
>
>As for the desk, I'm only using it for monitoring and for the mic pres (I
>use mic in to the direct outs str

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56117 is a reply to message #56113]

Wed, 20 July 2005 18:33

Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

C
>problems or just plainly didn't sound good. I'd be more inclined to steer

>you towards a Grace set, less of them but better quality per buck, because

>you already have generic pres in the console.
>As to the console, are you routing the mix through it or through paris?
>
>AA
>
>
>"Dan B" <daniel_burne@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>news:42de84ca$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In short - comments on $400-700 multichannel mic pre's - e.g.

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56119 is a reply to message #56117]

Wed, 20 July 2005 18:54

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

s:taqud11vhfl2b087cd7cav9olqubifvcoe@4ax.com...
>> yell at them til they agree with you.
>how about a Mixwizard 16:2

cujo wrote:
> I must agree tht the digimax sounds bad. I mixed a tune that another guy recorded
> using these and every thing was harsh thin and grainy. Of course I was not
> there so it could have been some other issue. (pro tools?) I have a 16 channel
> spirit folio rac pac. I used to use it only as extra pres for snare bottom
> and as a talk back and things like that. I have since discovered that it
> sounds really nice. I had to trac a scratch acoustic while working paris
> thinking I'd replace it..no way, it is sweet and musical. Since then I use
> it on snare top and toms too ( I like the eq pre paris) I would not say it
> is going to give you slammin Neve sound or whatever..but honestly, I am sorta
> tired of that anyway.
>
>
> "Aaron Allen" <

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56122 is a reply to message #56113]

Thu, 21 July 2005 02:23

rick

Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

o my wife boy? cuz that's the same p

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56124 is a reply to message #56122]

Thu, 21 July 2005 06:15

cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

comments on $400-700 multichannel mic pre's - e.g.
>>> Focusrite Octopre
>>> Focusrite Octopre LE
>>> Presonus Digimax LT
>>> Presonus MP20
>>> Presonus Bluetu

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56125 is a reply to message #56122]

Thu, 21 July 2005 06:23

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

be
>>> Presonus Firepod
>>> M-Audio Octane
>>> dbx 386
>>>
>>>
>>> In long... Mic pre wise at the moment I have only a Focusrite Platinum
>
>>> Voicemaster
>>> and a Soundcraft Spirit Folio Desk. I suspect the desk is the weak link
>in

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56126 is a reply to message #56122]

Thu, 21 July 2005 07:44

Jamie K

Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006

Senior Member

>>> my studio, and so am after some replacement pres. The budget's limited
>
>>> (ideally
>>> $600 ish, but may be able to stretch). Ideally it would have 8 channels,
>>&g

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56129 is a reply to message #56125]

Thu, 21 July 2005 12:25

rick

Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

br />
Regards,
Dedric

On 7/21/05 7:15 AM, in article 42df9fd5$1@linux, "cujo"
<chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:

>
> Better than doing it in a wave editor such as CEP?
>
>
>
> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> yell at them til they agree with you.
>left track,and check the stereo box, for native...for eds just use 2 instances
of the plug...not "linked" ster

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56131 is a reply to message #56126]

Thu, 21 July 2005 12:27

rick

Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

oks like a pretty cool recording device.

Thanks,

Deej
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:42e05f18$1@linux...
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >I've got a project coming up here that was tracked to an Akai DR 16. they
> >are just sending the whole

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56133 is a reply to message #56124]

Thu, 21 July 2005 16:18

Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007

Senior Member

external clock to Paris made the
reverb tails sound smoother. Is this just a benefit to the D/A converters
that allow you to hear more clearly or does it have any effect on internal
processing?

Can an external clock help the sound of already recorded tracks being
internally printed?

RZYeh, it's got BNC's. I'll get back to you once it gets here. A guy from Ft.
worth is bringing it to Colorado. I'm meeting him to pick it up in Silverton
at noon on Wednesday.

<neil OIUOIU.OIU.com> wrote in message news:42e068e9@linux...
>
> "DJ" <

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	PPJ and FXs presets...
Next Topic:	super dumb Q: stereo FX

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jan 13 10:01:39 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01090 seconds