Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609
|
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76460 is a reply to message #76243] |
Sun, 26 November 2006 20:55 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C711B6.554BF5B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For those that care,
My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:
44K Neve 60933 =3D 557ms, 64 samples
UAD-1 4.3 and before
44K =3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)
Tom
"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote in message news:45628cda@linux...
Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 actually.
Deej
"cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
news:455db889$1@linux...
>
>
>
> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,
> But did the latency change in the newer UAD updates?
> I think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while back.
> C
>
> "Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
> >
> >"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from way back when I =
bought
another
> >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had =
previously
> >>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd =
be.....well,
> >you know.
> >
> >Needing to die?
> >
> >:)
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C711B6.554BF5B0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For those that care,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 =
were:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D 557ms, 64=20
samples</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and before</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>44K =3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =
(Pultec 3=20
samples)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"DJ" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry =
Chris.I think=20
it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo" =
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
..com</A>>=20
wrote in message<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&g=
t;<BR>><BR>>=20
hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> =
But did=20
the latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> I think it was =
Tom B who=20
was having this issue a while back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =
><BR>>=20
>"DJ" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from =
way back=20
when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the $149.00 =
discount=20
coupon because I had previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =
now own=20
both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you =
know.<BR>>=20
><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>> ><BR>>=20
>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C711B6.554BF5B0--
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76463 is a reply to message #76460] |
Mon, 27 November 2006 06:41 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Tom, All the old plugs are the same as they've always been.
The Neve 1078 and 1081 (big versions)have the same latency wich you correctly
repored. Your correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve plugs
have the same latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have more
latency, and they're all different, with the Multiband being about twice
as much.
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>For those that care,
>
>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:
>44K Neve 60933 =3D 557ms, 64 samples
>
>UAD-1 4.3 and before
>44K =3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)
>Tom
>
> "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote in message news:45628cda@linux...
> Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 actually.
>
> Deej
> "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
> news:455db889$1@linux...
> >
> >
> >
> > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,
> > But did the latency change in the newer UAD updates?
> > I think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while back.
> > C
> >
> > "Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from way back when I =
>bought
> another
> > >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had =
>previously
> > >>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd =
>be.....well,
> > >you know.
> > >
> > >Needing to die?
> > >
> > >:)
>
>
>
>
>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For those that care,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 =
>were:</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D 557ms, 64=20
>samples</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and before</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>44K =3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =
>(Pultec 3=20
>samples)</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"DJ" <<A =
>href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
> wrote in message <A=20
> href=3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry =
>Chris.I think=20
> it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"
=
><<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
>.com</A>>=20
> wrote in message<BR><A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&g=
>t;<BR>><BR>>=20
> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> =
>But did=20
> the latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> I think it was =
>Tom B who=20
> was having this issue a while back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =
><<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =
>><BR>>=20
> >"DJ" <<A =
>href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from =
>way back=20
> when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the $149.00 =
>discount=20
> coupon because I had previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =
>now own=20
> both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you =
>know.<BR>>=20
> ><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>> ><BR>>=20
>>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76467 is a reply to message #76463] |
Mon, 27 November 2006 13:33 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C71241.BC1D00A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the correction Rod. It's never easy is it.
If you have a chart on all those latencies I'd find it
very useful. I still use the older one you posted a
while back.
Tom
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
news:456aeaf0$1@linux...
Tom, All the old plugs are the same as they've always been.
The Neve 1078 and 1081 (big versions)have the same latency wich you =
correctly
repored. Your correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve =
plugs
have the same latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =
more
latency, and they're all different, with the Multiband being about =
twice
as much.
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>For those that care,
>
>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:
>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, 64 samples
>
>UAD-1 4.3 and before
>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)
>Tom
>
> "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote in message news:45628cda@linux...
> Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =
actually.
>
> Deej
> "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
> news:455db889$1@linux...
> >
> >
> >
> > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,
> > But did the latency change in the newer UAD updates?
> > I think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while back.
> > C
> >
> > "Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from way back when I =
=3D
>bought
> another
> > >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had =3D
>previously
> > >>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd =3D
>be.....well,
> > >you know.
> > >
> > >Needing to die?
> > >
> > >:)
>
>
>
>
>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html; =3D
>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3D3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>For those that =
care,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 =3D
>were:</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, =
64=3D20
>samples</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and =
before</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 =
samples =3D
>(Pultec 3=3D20
>samples)</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20
>style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
=3D
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"DJ" <<A =3D
>href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
> wrote in message <A=3D20
> =
href=3D3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry =3D
>Chris.I think=3D20
> it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =
actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"
=3D
><<A=3D20
> =3D
=
>href=3D3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstu=
dio=3D
>.com</A>>=3D20
> wrote in message<BR><A=3D20
> =3D
=
>href=3D3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&g=
=3D
>t;<BR>><BR>>=3D20
> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> =
=3D
>But did=3D20
> the latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> I think it was =
=3D
>Tom B who=3D20
> was having this issue a while back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =3D
><<A=3D20
> href=3D3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =3D
>><BR>>=3D20
> >"DJ" <<A =3D
>href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
> wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from =3D
>way back=3D20
> when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the $149.00 =3D
>discount=3D20
> coupon because I had previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D
>now own=3D20
> both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you =3D
>know.<BR>>=3D20
> ><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>> ><BR>>=3D20
>>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
spam, =3D
>and=3D20
>you?<BR><A=3D20
=
>href=3D3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/re=
fer=3D
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>
------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C71241.BC1D00A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for the correction Rod. =
It's never=20
easy is it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If you have a chart on all those =
latencies I'd find=20
it</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>very useful. I still use the =
older one you=20
posted a</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>while back.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:456aeaf0$1@linux">news:456aeaf0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Tom,=
All=20
the old plugs are the same as they've always been.<BR>The Neve 1078 =
and 1081=20
(big versions)have the same latency wich you correctly<BR>repored. =
Your=20
correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve plugs<BR>have the =
same=20
latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =
more<BR>latency, and=20
they're all different, with the Multiband being about twice<BR>as=20
much.<BR><BR>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>For those that care,<BR>><BR>>My =
numbers=20
on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:<BR>>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, 64=20
samples<BR>><BR>>UAD-1 4.3 and before<BR>>44K =3D3D most =
plugs 365ms,=20
12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)<BR>>Tom<BR>><BR>> "DJ" =
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<A =
href=3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR>> =
Sorry=20
Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4=20
actually.<BR>><BR>> Deej<BR>> "cujo" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
..com</A>>=20
wrote in message<BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>> =
=20
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > hey DJ, =
I know=20
you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> > But =
did the=20
latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> > I think it =
was Tom=20
B who was having this issue a while back.<BR>> > =
C<BR>> =20
><BR>> > "Neil" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =
>=20
><BR>> > >"DJ" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 =
credit from=20
way back when I =3D<BR>>bought<BR>> another<BR>> =
>=20
>>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had=20
=3D<BR>>previously<BR>> > >>purchased the 1073, I =
now own=20
both of these, otherwise I'd =3D<BR>>be.....well,<BR>> =
> >you=20
know.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >Needing to=20
die?<BR>> > ><BR>> >=20
>:)<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> <BR>>I choose Polesoft =
Lockspam to=20
fight spam, and =
you?<BR>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
<BR>><BR>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=20
Transitional//EN"><BR>><HTML><HEAD> <BR>><META=20
http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html;=20
=3D<BR>>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>><META =
content=3D3D"MSHTML=20
6.00.2800.1400"=20
=
name=3D3DGENERATOR><BR>><STYLE></STYLE> <BR>></HEA=
D><BR>><BODY=20
bgColor=3D3D#ffffff><BR>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial =
size=3D3D2>For=20
those that care,</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> =
</DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4=20
=3D<BR>>were:</FONT></DIV> <BR>><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms,=20
=
64=3D20<BR>>samples</FONT></DIV> <BR>><DIV><FON=
T=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> =
</DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and=20
before</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT =
face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =
=3D<BR>>(Pultec=20
=
3=3D20<BR>>samples)</FONT></DIV> <BR>><DIV><FON=
T=20
face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV&g t; <BR>><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT>=20
=
</DIV><BR>><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20<BR >>style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: =
0px;=20
PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =3D<BR>>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 =
2px solid;=20
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>> <DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
=3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&n=
bsp;=20
wrote in message <A=3D20<BR>> href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry'>news:=
45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry</A> =
=3D<BR>>Chris.I think=3D20<BR>> it changed (basically =
doubled) in v4.4=20
=
actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR& amp;gt; "cujo"<BR>=3D<BR>><<A=
=3D20<BR>> =20
=3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
'>mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio</A=
>=3D<BR>>.com</A>>=3D20<BR>> =20
wrote in message<BR><A=3D20<BR>> =
=3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&=
g'>news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>=
><BR>&g</A>=3D<BR> >t;<BR>><BR>&g t;=3D20 <BR=
>> =20
hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set =
up,<BR>>=20
=3D<BR>>But did=3D20<BR>> the latency change in the newer =
UAD=20
updates?<BR>> I think it was =3D<BR>>Tom B =
who=3D20<BR>> was=20
having this issue a while back.<BR>> =
C<BR>><BR>>=20
"Neil" =3D<BR>><<A=3D20<BR>> href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOU=
OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=20
wrote:<BR>> =3D<BR>>><BR>>=3D20<BR >> =
>"DJ"=20
<<A =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&n=
bsp;=20
wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit =
from=20
=3D<BR>>way back=3D20<BR>> when I=20
bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the =
$149.00=20
=3D<BR>>discount=3D20<BR>> coupon because I had=20
previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D<BR>>now=20
own=3D20<BR>> both of these, otherwise I'd =
be.....well,<BR>>=20
>you =3D<BR>>know.<BR>>=3D20<BR>> =
><BR>>=20
>Needing to die?<BR>>=20
=
><BR>>=3D20<BR> >>:)<BR><BR>&l t;/BLOCKQUOTE&=
gt;<BR>><DIV><FONT=20
size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
spam,=20
=
=3D<BR>>and=3D20<BR>>you?<BR><A=3D20 <BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
'>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer</A=
>=3D<BR>>.html</A>=20
=
</FONT></DIV></BODY&g t;</HTML> <BR>><BR>><BR></=
BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C71241.BC1D00A0--
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76475 is a reply to message #76467] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 06:50 |
cujo
Messages: 285 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hmm, so let me get this straight,
Only the newer NEVE plugs changed in 4.4?
Have a list of your nudge and sample slide values?
Thank you so much.
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for the correction Rod. It's never easy is it.
>
>If you have a chart on all those latencies I'd find it
>very useful. I still use the older one you posted a
>while back.
>Tom
>
>
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
>news:456aeaf0$1@linux...
>
> Tom, All the old plugs are the same as they've always been.
> The Neve 1078 and 1081 (big versions)have the same latency wich you =
>correctly
> repored. Your correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve =
>plugs
> have the same latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =
>more
> latency, and they're all different, with the Multiband being about =
>twice
> as much.
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >For those that care,
> >
> >My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:
> >44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, 64 samples
> >
> >UAD-1 4.3 and before
> >44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)
> >Tom
> >
> > "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote in message news:45628cda@linux...
> > Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =
>actually.
> >
> > Deej
> > "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
> > news:455db889$1@linux...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,
> > > But did the latency change in the newer UAD updates?
> > > I think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while back.
> > > C
> > >
> > > "Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
> > > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from way back when I =
>=3D
> >bought
> > another
> > > >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had =3D
> >previously
> > > >>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd =3D
> >be.....well,
> > > >you know.
> > > >
> > > >Needing to die?
> > > >
> > > >:)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
> >
> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> ><HTML><HEAD>
> ><META http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html; =3D
> >charset=3D3Diso-8859-1">
> ><META content=3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3D3DGENERATOR>
> ><STYLE></STYLE>
> ></HEAD>
> ><BODY bgColor=3D3D#ffffff>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>For those that =
>care,</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 =3D
> >were:</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, =
>64=3D20
> >samples</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and =
>before</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 =
>samples =3D
> >(Pultec 3=3D20
> >samples)</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> ><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20
> >style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>=3D
> >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > <DIV>"DJ" <<A =3D
> >href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
> > wrote in message <A=3D20
> > =
>href=3D3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry =3D
> >Chris.I think=3D20
> > it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =
>actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"
> =3D
> ><<A=3D20
> > =3D
> =
>>href=3D3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstu=
>dio=3D
> >.com</A>>=3D20
> > wrote in message<BR><A=3D20
> > =3D
> =
>>href=3D3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&g=
>=3D
> >t;<BR>><BR>>=3D20
> > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>>
=
>=3D
> >But did=3D20
> > the latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> I think it was =
>=3D
> >Tom B who=3D20
> > was having this issue a while back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =3D
> ><<A=3D20
> > href=3D3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =3D
> >><BR>>=3D20
> > >"DJ" <<A =3D
> >href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
> > wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from =3D
> >way back=3D20
> > when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the $149.00 =3D
> >discount=3D20
> > coupon because I had previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D
> >now own=3D20
> > both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you =3D
> >know.<BR>>=3D20
> > ><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>> ><BR>>=3D20
> >>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
> ><DIV><FONT size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
>spam, =3D
> >and=3D20
> >you?<BR><A=3D20
> =
>>href=3D3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/re=
>fer=3D
> >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> >
> >
>
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for the correction Rod. =
>It's never=20
>easy is it.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If you have a chart on all those =
>latencies I'd find=20
>it</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>very useful. I still use the =
>older one you=20
>posted a</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>while back.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&g=
>t;=20
> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:456aeaf0$1@linux">news:456aeaf0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Tom,=
> All=20
> the old plugs are the same as they've always been.<BR>The Neve 1078 =
>and 1081=20
> (big versions)have the same latency wich you correctly<BR>repored. =
>Your=20
> correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve plugs<BR>have the
=
>same=20
> latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =
>more<BR>latency, and=20
> they're all different, with the Multiband being about twice<BR>as=20
> much.<BR><BR>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>For those that care,<BR>><BR>>My =
>numbers=20
> on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:<BR>>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, 64=20
> samples<BR>><BR>>UAD-1 4.3 and before<BR>>44K =3D3D most =
>plugs 365ms,=20
> 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)<BR>>Tom<BR>><BR>> "DJ" =
><<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>> wrote in =
>message=20
> <A =
>href=3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR>> =
>Sorry=20
> Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4=20
> actually.<BR>><BR>> Deej<BR>> "cujo" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
>.com</A>>=20
> wrote in message<BR>> <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>> =
>=20
> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > hey DJ, =
>I know=20
> you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> > But =
>did the=20
> latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> > I think it =
>was Tom=20
> B who was having this issue a while back.<BR>> > =
>C<BR>> =20
> ><BR>> > "Neil" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =
>>=20
> ><BR>> > >"DJ" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 =
>credit from=20
> way back when I =3D<BR>>bought<BR>> another<BR>> =
>>=20
> >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had=20
> =3D<BR>>previously<BR>> > >>purchased the 1073, I =
>now own=20
> both of these, otherwise I'd =3D<BR>>be.....well,<BR>> =
>> >you=20
> know.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >Needing to=20
> die?<BR>> > ><BR>> >=20
> >:)<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>I choose Polesoft =
>Lockspam to=20
> fight spam, and =
>you?<BR>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
> <BR>><BR>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=20
> Transitional//EN"><BR>><HTML><HEAD><BR>><META=20
> http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html;=20
> =3D<BR>>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>><META =
>content=3D3D"MSHTML=20
> 6.00.2800.1400"=20
> =
>name=3D3DGENERATOR><BR>><STYLE></STYLE><BR>></HEA=
>D><BR>><BODY=20
> bgColor=3D3D#ffffff><BR>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial =
>size=3D3D2>For=20
> those that care,</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> =
></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4=20
> =3D<BR>>were:</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms,=20
> =
>64=3D20<BR>>samples</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FON=
>T=20
> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> =
></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and=20
> before</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT =
>face=3D3DArial=20
> size=3D3D2>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =
>=3D<BR>>(Pultec=20
> =
>3=3D20<BR>>samples)</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FON=
>T=20
> face=3D3DArial=20
> size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT>=20
> =
></DIV><BR>><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20<BR>>style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: =
>0px;=20
> PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =3D<BR>>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 =
>2px solid;=20
> MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>> <DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
> =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
> =
>href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
>owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&n=
>bsp;=20
> wrote in message <A=3D20<BR>> href=3D3D"<A=20
> =
>href=3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry'>news:=
>45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry</A> =
>
> =3D<BR>>Chris.I think=3D20<BR>> it changed (basically =
>doubled) in v4.4=20
> =
>actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"<BR>=3D<BR>><<A=
>=3D20<BR>> =20
> =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
> =
>href=3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
>'>mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio</A=
>>=3D<BR>>.com</A>>=3D20<BR>> =20
> wrote in message<BR><A=3D20<BR>> =
>=3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
> =
>href=3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&=
>g'>news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>=
>><BR>&g</A>=3D<BR>>t;<BR>><BR>>=3D20<BR=
>>> =20
> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set =
>up,<BR>>=20
> =3D<BR>>But did=3D20<BR>> the latency change in the newer =
>UAD=20
> updates?<BR>> I think it was =3D<BR>>Tom B =
>who=3D20<BR>> was=20
> having this issue a while back.<BR>> =
>C<BR>><BR>>=20
> "Neil" =3D<BR>><<A=3D20<BR>> href=3D3D"<A=20
> =
>href=3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOU=
>OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=20
> wrote:<BR>> =3D<BR>>><BR>>=3D20<BR>> =
>>"DJ"=20
> <<A =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
> =
>href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
>owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&n=
>bsp;=20
> wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit =
>from=20
> =3D<BR>>way back=3D20<BR>> when I=20
> bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the =
>$149.00=20
> =3D<BR>>discount=3D20<BR>> coupon because I had=20
> previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D<BR>>now=20
> own=3D20<BR>> both of these, otherwise I'd =
>be.....well,<BR>>=20
> >you =3D<BR>>know.<BR>>=3D20<BR>> =
>><BR>>=20
> >Needing to die?<BR>>=20
> =
>><BR>>=3D20<BR>>>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE&=
>gt;<BR>><DIV><FONT=20
> size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
>spam,=20
> =
>=3D<BR>>and=3D20<BR>>you?<BR><A=3D20<BR>>href=3D3D" <A=20
> =
>href=3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>'>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer</A=
>>=3D<BR>>.html</A>=20
> =
></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML><BR>><BR>><BR></=
>BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76476 is a reply to message #76475] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 11:39 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Nothing changed. The newer Neve (1081 and 60933) weren't available before
4.4. The Neve 1078 was on 4.3. It's the same as always..which is more latency
than the "normal" UAD plugs. I'm at another sudio right now (twiddling my
thumbs, I did all my tracks last night in paris, and brought files in.) so
I don't have access to the list, but I'll try to get it posted when I get
home.
Rod
"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>hmm, so let me get this straight,
>Only the newer NEVE plugs changed in 4.4?
>Have a list of your nudge and sample slide values?
>Thank you so much.
>
>
>"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Thanks for the correction Rod. It's never easy is it.
>>
>>If you have a chart on all those latencies I'd find it
>>very useful. I still use the older one you posted a
>>while back.
>>Tom
>>
>>
>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
>>news:456aeaf0$1@linux...
>>
>> Tom, All the old plugs are the same as they've always been.
>> The Neve 1078 and 1081 (big versions)have the same latency wich you =
>>correctly
>> repored. Your correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve =
>>plugs
>> have the same latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have
=
>>more
>> latency, and they're all different, with the Multiband being about =
>>twice
>> as much.
>>
>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >For those that care,
>> >
>> >My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:
>> >44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, 64 samples
>> >
>> >UAD-1 4.3 and before
>> >44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)
>> >Tom
>> >
>> > "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote in message news:45628cda@linux...
>> > Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =
>>actually.
>> >
>> > Deej
>> > "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>> > news:455db889$1@linux...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,
>> > > But did the latency change in the newer UAD updates?
>> > > I think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while back.
>> > > C
>> > >
>> > > "Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>> > > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from way back when I =
>>=3D
>> >bought
>> > another
>> > > >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had =3D
>> >previously
>> > > >>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd =3D
>> >be.....well,
>> > > >you know.
>> > > >
>> > > >Needing to die?
>> > > >
>> > > >:)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
>> >
>> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>> ><HTML><HEAD>
>> ><META http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html; =3D
>> >charset=3D3Diso-8859-1">
>> ><META content=3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3D3DGENERATOR>
>> ><STYLE></STYLE>
>> ></HEAD>
>> ><BODY bgColor=3D3D#ffffff>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>For those that =
>>care,</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 =3D
>> >were:</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, =
>>64=3D20
>> >samples</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and =
>>before</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12
=
>>samples =3D
>> >(Pultec 3=3D20
>> >samples)</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>> ><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20
>> >style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
=
>>=3D
>> >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
>> > <DIV>"DJ" <<A =3D
>> >href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
>> > wrote in message <A=3D20
>> > =
>>href=3D3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry =3D
>> >Chris.I think=3D20
>> > it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =
>>actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"
>> =3D
>> ><<A=3D20
>> > =3D
>> =
>>>href=3D3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstu=
>>dio=3D
>> >.com</A>>=3D20
>> > wrote in message<BR><A=3D20
>> > =3D
>> =
>>>href=3D3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&g=
>>=3D
>> >t;<BR>><BR>>=3D20
>> > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>>
>=
>>=3D
>> >But did=3D20
>> > the latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> I think it was =
>>=3D
>> >Tom B who=3D20
>> > was having this issue a while back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =3D
>> ><<A=3D20
>> > href=3D3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =3D
>> >><BR>>=3D20
>> > >"DJ" <<A =3D
>> >href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
>> > wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from =3D
>> >way back=3D20
>> > when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the $149.00 =3D
>> >discount=3D20
>> > coupon because I had previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D
>> >now own=3D20
>> > both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you =3D
>> >know.<BR>>=3D20
>> > ><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>> ><BR>>=3D20
>> >>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
>> ><DIV><FONT size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
>>spam, =3D
>> >and=3D20
>> >you?<BR><A=3D20
>> =
>>>href=3D3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/re=
>>fer=3D
>> >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>><HTML><HEAD>
>><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
>><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
>><STYLE></STYLE>
>></HEAD>
>><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for the correction Rod. =
>>It's never=20
>>easy is it.</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If you have a chart on all those =
>>latencies I'd find=20
>>it</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>very useful. I still use the =
>>older one you=20
>>posted a</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>while back.</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
>> <DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&g=
>>t;=20
>> wrote in message <A=20
>> =
>>href=3D"news:456aeaf0$1@linux">news:456aeaf0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Tom,=
>> All=20
>> the old plugs are the same as they've always been.<BR>The Neve 1078 =
>>and 1081=20
>> (big versions)have the same latency wich you correctly<BR>repored. =
>>Your=20
>> correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve plugs<BR>have the
>=
>>same=20
>> latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =
>>more<BR>latency, and=20
>> they're all different, with the Multiband being about twice<BR>as=20
>> much.<BR><BR>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
>> href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
>> wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>For those that care,<BR>><BR>>My =
>>numbers=20
>> on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:<BR>>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms, 64=20
>> samples<BR>><BR>>UAD-1 4.3 and before<BR>>44K =3D3D most =
>>plugs 365ms,=20
>> 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)<BR>>Tom<BR>><BR>> "DJ" =
>><<A=20
>> href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>> wrote in =
>>message=20
>> <A =
>>href=3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR>> =
>>Sorry=20
>> Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4=20
>> actually.<BR>><BR>> Deej<BR>> "cujo" <<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
>>.com</A>>=20
>> wrote in message<BR>> <A=20
>> =
>>href=3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>> =
>>=20
>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > hey DJ, =
>>I know=20
>> you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> > But =
>>did the=20
>> latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> > I think it =
>>was Tom=20
>> B who was having this issue a while back.<BR>> > =
>>C<BR>> =20
>> ><BR>> > "Neil" <<A=20
>> href=3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =
>>>=20
>> ><BR>> > >"DJ" <<A=20
>> href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
>> wrote:<BR>> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 =
>>credit from=20
>> way back when I =3D<BR>>bought<BR>> another<BR>> =
>>>=20
>> >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had=20
>> =3D<BR>>previously<BR>> > >>purchased the 1073, I =
>>now own=20
>> both of these, otherwise I'd =3D<BR>>be.....well,<BR>> =
>>> >you=20
>> know.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >Needing to=20
>> die?<BR>> > ><BR>> >=20
>> >:)<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>I choose Polesoft =
>>Lockspam to=20
>> fight spam, and =
>>you?<BR>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
>> <BR>><BR>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=20
>> Transitional//EN"><BR>><HTML><HEAD><BR>><META=20
>> http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html;=20
>> =3D<BR>>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>><META =
>>content=3D3D"MSHTML=20
>> 6.00.2800.1400"=20
>> =
>>name=3D3DGENERATOR><BR>><STYLE></STYLE><BR>></HEA=
>>D><BR>><BODY=20
>> bgColor=3D3D#ffffff><BR>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial =
>>size=3D3D2>For=20
>> those that care,</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
>> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> =
>></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
>> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4=20
>> =3D<BR>>were:</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
>> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D 557ms,=20
>> =
>>64=3D20<BR>>samples</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FON=
>>T=20
>> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> =
>></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
>> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and=20
>> before</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT =
>>face=3D3DArial=20
>> size=3D3D2>44K =3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =
>>=3D<BR>>(Pultec=20
>> =
>>3=3D20<BR>>samples)</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FON=
>>T=20
>> face=3D3DArial=20
>> size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=20
>> face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT>=20
>> =
>></DIV><BR>><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20<BR>>style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: =
>>0px;=20
>> PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =3D<BR>>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 =
>>2px solid;=20
>> MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>> <DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
>> =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
>>owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&n=
>>bsp;=20
>> wrote in message <A=3D20<BR>> href=3D3D"<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry'>news:=
>>45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry</A> =
>>
>> =3D<BR>>Chris.I think=3D20<BR>> it changed (basically =
>>doubled) in v4.4=20
>> =
>>actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"<BR>=3D<BR>><<A=
>>=3D20<BR>> =20
>> =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
>>'>mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio</A=
>>>=3D<BR>>.com</A>>=3D20<BR>> =20
>> wrote in message<BR><A=3D20<BR>> =
>>=3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&=
>>g'>news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>=
>>><BR>&g</A>=3D<BR>>t;<BR>><BR>>=3D20<BR=
>>>> =20
>> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set =
>>up,<BR>>=20
>> =3D<BR>>But did=3D20<BR>> the latency change in the newer =
>>UAD=20
>> updates?<BR>> I think it was =3D<BR>>Tom B =
>>who=3D20<BR>> was=20
>> having this issue a while back.<BR>> =
>>C<BR>><BR>>=20
>> "Neil" =3D<BR>><<A=3D20<BR>> href=3D3D"<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOU=
>>OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=20
>> wrote:<BR>> =3D<BR>>><BR>>=3D20<BR>> =
>>>"DJ"=20
>> <<A =3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
>>owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&n=
>>bsp;=20
>> wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit =
>>from=20
>> =3D<BR>>way back=3D20<BR>> when I=20
>> bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the =
>>$149.00=20
>> =3D<BR>>discount=3D20<BR>> coupon because I had=20
>> previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D<BR>>now=20
>> own=3D20<BR>> both of these, otherwise I'd =
>>be.....well,<BR>>=20
>> >you =3D<BR>>know.<BR>>=3D20<BR>> =
>>><BR>>=20
>> >Needing to die?<BR>>=20
>> =
>>><BR>>=3D20<BR>>>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE&=
>>gt;<BR>><DIV><FONT=20
>> size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
>>spam,=20
>> =
>>=3D<BR>>and=3D20<BR>>you?<BR><A=3D20<BR>>href=3D3D "<A=20
>> =
>>href=3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>>'>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer</A=
>>>=3D<BR>>.html</A>=20
>> =
>></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML><BR>><BR>><BR></=
>>BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>>
>>
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76478 is a reply to message #76476] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 11:09 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C712F6.CF26CDB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rod,
That is very cool of you.
Tom
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nosam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
news:456c8250$1@linux...
Nothing changed. The newer Neve (1081 and 60933) weren't available =
before
4.4. The Neve 1078 was on 4.3. It's the same as always..which is more =
latency
than the "normal" UAD plugs. I'm at another sudio right now =
(twiddling my
thumbs, I did all my tracks last night in paris, and brought files =
in.) so
I don't have access to the list, but I'll try to get it posted when I =
get
home.
Rod
"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>hmm, so let me get this straight,
>Only the newer NEVE plugs changed in 4.4?
>Have a list of your nudge and sample slide values?
>Thank you so much.
>
>
>"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Thanks for the correction Rod. It's never easy is it.
>>
>>If you have a chart on all those latencies I'd find it
>>very useful. I still use the older one you posted a
>>while back.
>>Tom
>>
>>
>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =3D
>>news:456aeaf0$1@linux...
>>
>> Tom, All the old plugs are the same as they've always been.
>> The Neve 1078 and 1081 (big versions)have the same latency wich =
you =3D
>>correctly
>> repored. Your correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve =
=3D
>>plugs
>> have the same latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs =
have
=3D
>>more
>> latency, and they're all different, with the Multiband being about =
=3D
>>twice
>> as much.
>>
>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >For those that care,
>> >
>> >My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:
>> >44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D 557ms, 64 samples
>> >
>> >UAD-1 4.3 and before
>> >44K =3D3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)
>> >Tom
>> >
>> > "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote in message =
news:45628cda@linux...
>> > Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =3D
>>actually.
>> >
>> > Deej
>> > "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>> > news:455db889$1@linux...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set up,
>> > > But did the latency change in the newer UAD updates?
>> > > I think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while back.
>> > > C
>> > >
>> > > "Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>> > > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from way back when =
I =3D
>>=3D3D
>> >bought
>> > another
>> > > >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had =
=3D3D
>> >previously
>> > > >>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd =
=3D3D
>> >be.....well,
>> > > >you know.
>> > > >
>> > > >Needing to die?
>> > > >
>> > > >:)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =3D20
>> >
>> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>> ><HTML><HEAD>
>> ><META http-equiv=3D3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D3D"text/html; =
=3D3D
>> >charset=3D3D3Diso-8859-1">
>> ><META content=3D3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3D3D3DGENERATOR>
>> ><STYLE></STYLE>
>> ></HEAD>
>> ><BODY bgColor=3D3D3D#ffffff>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>For those that =3D
>>care,</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver =
4.4 =3D3D
>> >were:</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D =
557ms, =3D
>>64=3D3D20
>> >samples</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and =3D
>>before</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>44K =3D3D3D most plugs =
365ms, 12
=3D
>>samples =3D3D
>> >(Pultec 3=3D3D20
>> >samples)</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
>> ><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>> ><BLOCKQUOTE=3D3D20
>> >style=3D3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px;
=3D
>>=3D3D
>> >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
>> > <DIV>"DJ" <<A =3D3D
>> =
>href=3D3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20
>> > wrote in message <A=3D3D20
>> > =3D
=
>>href=3D3D3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry =
=3D3D
>> >Chris.I think=3D3D20
>> > it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4 =3D
>>actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"
>> =3D3D
>> ><<A=3D3D20
>> > =3D3D
>> =3D
=
>>>href=3D3D3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplema=
nstu=3D
>>dio=3D3D
>> >.com</A>>=3D3D20
>> > wrote in message<BR><A=3D3D20
>> > =3D3D
>> =3D
=
>>>href=3D3D3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><B=
R>&g=3D
>>=3D3D
>> >t;<BR>><BR>>=3D3D20
>> > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set =
up,<BR>>
>=3D
>>=3D3D
>> >But did=3D3D20
>> > the latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> I think it =
was =3D
>>=3D3D
>> >Tom B who=3D3D20
>> > was having this issue a while back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =
=3D3D
>> ><<A=3D3D20
>> > href=3D3D3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =
=3D3D
>> >><BR>>=3D3D20
>> > >"DJ" <<A =3D3D
>> =
>href=3D3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20
>> > wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit from =
=3D3D
>> >way back=3D3D20
>> > when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the $149.00 =
=3D3D
>> >discount=3D3D20
>> > coupon because I had previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =
=3D3D
>> >now own=3D3D20
>> > both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you =3D3D
>> >know.<BR>>=3D3D20
>> > ><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>> ><BR>>=3D3D20
>> >>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
>> ><DIV><FONT size=3D3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to =
fight =3D
>>spam, =3D3D
>> >and=3D3D20
>> >you?<BR><A=3D3D20
>> =3D
=
>>>href=3D3D3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.co=
m/re=3D
>>fer=3D3D
>> >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>><HTML><HEAD>
>><META http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html; =3D
>>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1">
>><META content=3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3D3DGENERATOR>
>><STYLE></STYLE>
>></HEAD>
>><BODY bgColor=3D3D#ffffff>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Thanks for the correction Rod. =
=3D
>>It's never=3D20
>>easy is it.</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>If you have a chart on all =
those =3D
>>latencies I'd find=3D20
>>it</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>very useful. I still use the =
=3D
>>older one you=3D20
>>posted a</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>while back.</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
>><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20
>>style=3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
=3D
>>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
>> <DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</=
A>&g=3D
>>t;=3D20
>> wrote in message <A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D"news:456aeaf0$1@linux">news:456aeaf0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>=
Tom,=3D
>> All=3D20
>> the old plugs are the same as they've always been.<BR>The Neve =
1078 =3D
>>and 1081=3D20
>> (big versions)have the same latency wich you correctly<BR>repored. =
=3D
>>Your=3D20
>> correct on the 60933. The light versions of the Neve plugs<BR>have =
the
>=3D
>>same=3D20
>> latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =3D
>>more<BR>latency, and=3D20
>> they're all different, with the Multiband being about =
twice<BR>as=3D20
>> much.<BR><BR>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=3D20
>> =
href=3D3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=3D20
>> wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>For those that care,<BR>><BR>>My =3D
>>numbers=3D20
>> on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:<BR>>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D 557ms, 64=3D20
>> samples<BR>><BR>>UAD-1 4.3 and before<BR>>44K =3D3D3D most =3D
>>plugs 365ms,=3D20
>> 12 samples (Pultec 3 samples)<BR>>Tom<BR>><BR>> "DJ" =3D
>><<A=3D20
>> href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>> wrote =
in =3D
>>message=3D20
>> <A =3D
>>href=3D3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR>> =3D
>>Sorry=3D20
>> Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4=3D20
>> actually.<BR>><BR>> Deej<BR>> "cujo" <<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanst=
udio=3D
>>.com</A>>=3D20
>> wrote in message<BR>> <A=3D20
>> =3D
>>href=3D3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>> =
=3D
>>=3D20
>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > hey DJ, =3D
>>I know=3D20
>> you guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> > But =3D
>>did the=3D20
>> latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>> > I think it =3D
>>was Tom=3D20
>> B who was having this issue a while back.<BR>> > =3D
>>C<BR>> =3D20
>> ><BR>> > "Neil" <<A=3D20
>> href=3D3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> =3D
>>>=3D20
>> ><BR>> > >"DJ" <<A=3D20
>> href=3D3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20
>> wrote:<BR>> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 =3D
>>credit from=3D20
>> way back when I =3D3D<BR>>bought<BR>> another<BR>> =3D
>>>=3D20
>> >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>previously<BR>> > >>purchased the 1073, I =3D
>>now own=3D20
>> both of these, otherwise I'd =3D3D<BR>>be.....well,<BR>> =3D
>>> >you=3D20
>> know.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >Needing to=3D20
>> die?<BR>> > ><BR>> >=3D20
>> >:)<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>I choose Polesoft =3D
>>Lockspam to=3D20
>> fight spam, and =3D
>>you?<BR>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =3D20
>> <BR>><BR>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=3D20
>> Transitional//EN"><BR>><HTML><HEAD><BR>><META=3D20
>> http-equiv=3D3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D3D"text/html;=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>charset=3D3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>><META =3D
>>content=3D3D3D"MSHTML=3D20
>> 6.00.2800.1400"=3D20
>> =3D
>>name=3D3D3DGENERATOR><BR>><STYLE></STYLE><BR>></HEA=3D
>>D><BR>><BODY=3D20
>> bgColor=3D3D3D#ffffff><BR>><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial =3D
>>size=3D3D3D2>For=3D20
>> those that care,</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> =3D
>></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>were:</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D 557ms,=3D20
>> =3D
>>64=3D3D20<BR>>samples</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FON=3D
>>T=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> =3D
>></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and=3D20
>> before</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT =3D
>>face=3D3D3DArial=3D20
>> size=3D3D3D2>44K =3D3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =3D
>>=3D3D<BR>>(Pultec=3D20
>> =3D
>>3=3D3D20<BR>>samples)</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FON=3D
>>T=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial=3D20
>> size=3D3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV><BR>><DIV><FONT=3D20
>> face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT>=3D20
>> =3D
>></DIV><BR>><BLOCKQUOTE=3D3D20<BR>>style=3D3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: =3D
>>0px;=3D20
>> PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =3D3D<BR>>BORDER-LEFT: =
#000000 =3D
>>2px solid;=3D20
>> MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>> <DIV>"DJ" <<A=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20'>ma=
ilto:n=3D
>>owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20</A><BR>>&n=3D
>>bsp;=3D20
>> wrote in message <A=3D3D20<BR>> href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry'>n=
ews:=3D
>>45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry</A> =3D
>>
>> =3D3D<BR>>Chris.I think=3D3D20<BR>> it changed (basically =3D
>>doubled) in v4.4=3D20
>> =3D
>>actually.<BR><BR>Deej<BR>"cujo"<BR>=3D3D<BR>><<A=3D
>>=3D3D20<BR>> =3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanst=
udio=3D
=
>>'>mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio</A=3D=
>>>=3D3D<BR>>.com</A>>=3D3D20<BR>> =3D20
>> wrote in message<BR><A=3D3D20<BR>> =3D
>>=3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&=
=3D
>>g'>news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>=3D
>>><BR>&g</A>=3D3D<BR>>t;<BR>><BR>>=3D3D20<BR=3D
>>>> =3D20
>> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this in your set =3D
>>up,<BR>>=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>But did=3D3D20<BR>> the latency change in the newer =3D
>>UAD=3D20
>> updates?<BR>> I think it was =3D3D<BR>>Tom B =3D
>>who=3D3D20<BR>> was=3D20
>> having this issue a while back.<BR>> =3D
>>C<BR>><BR>>=3D20
>> "Neil" =3D3D<BR>><<A=3D3D20<BR>> href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IO=
U=3D
>>OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=3D20
>> wrote:<BR>> =3D3D<BR>>><BR>>=3D3D20<BR>> =3D
>>>"DJ"=3D20
>> <<A =3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20'>ma=
ilto:n=3D
>>owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20</A><BR>>&n=3D
>>bsp;=3D20
>> wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit =3D
>>from=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>way back=3D3D20<BR>> when I=3D20
>> bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the =3D
>>$149.00=3D20
>> =3D3D<BR>>discount=3D3D20<BR>> coupon because I had=3D20
>> previously<BR>> >>purchased the 1073, I =3D3D<BR>>now=3D20
>> own=3D3D20<BR>> both of these, otherwise I'd =3D
>>be.....well,<BR>>=3D20
>> >you =3D3D<BR>>know.<BR>>=3D3D20<BR>> =3D
>>><BR>>=3D20
>> >Needing to die?<BR>>=3D20
>> =3D
>>><BR>>=3D3D20<BR>>>:)<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE&=3D
>>gt;<BR>><DIV><FONT=3D20
>> size=3D3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =3D
>>spam,=3D20
>> =3D
>>=3D3D<BR>>and=3D3D20<BR>>you?<BR><A=3D3D20<BR>>href=3D3D3D "<A=3D20
>> =3D
=
>>href=3D3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/r=
efer=3D
=
>>'>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer</A=3D=
>>>=3D3D<BR>>.html</A>=3D20
>> =3D
>></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML><BR>><BR>><BR></=3D
>>BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>>
>>
------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C712F6.CF26CDB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rod,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>That is very cool of you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nosam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nosam.kc.rr.com</A>>=
wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:456c8250$1@linux">news:456c8250$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Noth=
ing=20
changed. The newer Neve (1081 and 60933) weren't available =
before<BR>4.4. The=20
Neve 1078 was on 4.3. It's the same as always..which is more =
latency<BR>than=20
the "normal" UAD plugs. I'm at another sudio right now =
(twiddling=20
my<BR>thumbs, I did all my tracks last night in paris, and brought =
files in.)=20
so<BR>I don't have access to the list, but I'll try to get it posted =
when I=20
get<BR> home.<BR>Rod<BR>"Cujo" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
..com</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>hmm, so let me get this =
straight,<BR>>Only=20
the newer NEVE plugs changed in 4.4?<BR>>Have a list of your nudge =
and=20
sample slide values?<BR>>Thank you so =
much.<BR>><BR>><BR>>"Tom=20
Bruhl" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>Thanks for the correction =
Rod. =20
It's never easy is it.<BR>>><BR>>>If you have a chart on =
all those=20
latencies I'd find it<BR>>>very useful. I still use the =
older one=20
you posted a<BR>>>while=20
back.<BR>>>Tom<BR>>><BR>>> <BR>>> "Rod =
Lincoln"=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message=20
=3D<BR>>>news:456aeaf0$1@linux...<BR>>><BR>>> =
Tom, All=20
the old plugs are the same as they've always been.<BR>>> =
The Neve=20
1078 and 1081 (big versions)have the same latency wich you=20
=3D<BR>>>correctly<BR>>> repored. Your correct on =
the 60933.=20
The light versions of the Neve =3D<BR>>>plugs<BR>>> =
have the=20
same latecny as all the old plugs. All the Prec. Plugs=20
have<BR>=3D<BR>>>more<BR>>> latency, and they're all =
different, with the Multiband being about =
=3D<BR>>>twice<BR>>> =20
as much.<BR>>><BR>>> "Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>> ><BR>>> ><BR>>> =
>For=20
those that care,<BR>>> ><BR>>> >My =
numbers on=20
UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:<BR>>> >44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D =
557ms, 64=20
samples<BR>>> ><BR>>> >UAD-1 4.3 and=20
before<BR>>> >44K =3D3D3D most plugs 365ms, 12 samples =
(Pultec 3=20
samples)<BR>>> >Tom<BR>>> =
><BR>>> =20
> "DJ" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<A =
href=3D"news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR>>> =
=20
> Sorry Chris.I think it changed (basically doubled) in v4.4=20
=3D<BR>>>actually.<BR>>> ><BR>>> =
> =20
Deej<BR>>> > "cujo" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
..com</A>>=20
wrote in message<BR>>> > <A=20
=
href=3D"news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>>>&n=
bsp;=20
> ><BR>>> > ><BR>>> =
> =20
><BR>>> > > hey DJ, I know you guys don;t =
care=20
about this in your set up,<BR>>> > > But did =
the=20
latency change in the newer UAD updates?<BR>>> > =
> I=20
think it was Tom B who was having this issue a while =
back.<BR>>> =20
> > C<BR>>> > ><BR>>> =20
> > "Neil" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>> > > ><BR>>> =
> =20
> >"DJ" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>> > > >>Of course, since I =
had a=20
$100.00 credit from way back when I =
=3D<BR>>>=3D3D<BR>>> =20
>bought<BR>>> > another<BR>>> =
> =20
> >>card and I got the $149.00 discount coupon because I had=20
=3D3D<BR>>> >previously<BR>>> > =
>=20
>>purchased the 1073, I now own both of these, otherwise I'd=20
=3D3D<BR>>> >be.....well,<BR>>> > =
>=20
>you know.<BR>>> > > ><BR>>> =
> > >Needing to die?<BR>>> > >=20
><BR>>> > > >:)<BR>>> =20
><BR>>> ><BR>>> ><BR>>> =20
><BR>>> >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR>>> >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html =20
=3D20<BR>>> ><BR>>> ><!DOCTYPE HTML =
PUBLIC=20
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><BR>>> =20
><HTML><HEAD><BR>>> ><META=20
http-equiv=3D3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D3D"text/html; =
=3D3D<BR>>> =20
>charset=3D3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>>> ><META=20
content=3D3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" =
name=3D3D3DGENERATOR><BR>>> =20
><STYLE></STYLE><BR>>> =20
></HEAD><BR>>> ><BODY=20
bgColor=3D3D3D#ffffff><BR>>> ><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>For those that=20
=3D<BR> >>care,</FONT></DIV&g t; <BR>>> =20
><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> =
</DIV><BR>>> ><DIV><FONT =
face=3D3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver 4.4 =3D3D<BR>>> =20
>were:</FONT></DIV><BR>>> =
><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D 557ms,=20
=3D<BR>>>64=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
>samples</FONT></DIV><BR >>> =
><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> =
</DIV><BR>>> =20
><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and =
=3D<BR> >>before</FONT></DIV& gt; <BR>>> =20
><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>44K =3D3D3D =
most plugs=20
365ms, 12<BR>=3D<BR>>>samples =3D3D<BR>>> =
>(Pultec=20
3=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
>samples)</FONT></DIV><BR >>> =20
><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV& ;gt; <BR>>> =20
><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT> =
</DIV><BR>>> =
><BLOCKQUOTE=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
>style=3D3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT:=20
5px;<BR>=3D<BR>>>=3D3D<BR>>> >BORDER-LEFT: =
#000000 2px solid;=20
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>>> > <DIV>"DJ" =
<<A=20
=3D3D<BR>>> >href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20'>mailto=
:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20</A><BR>&g=
t;> =20
> wrote in message <A=3D3D20<BR>>> > =20
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry'>news:=
45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...</DIV>Sorry</A> =
=3D3D<BR>>> >Chris.I think=3D3D20<BR>>> =
> it=20
changed (basically doubled) in v4.4=20
=
=3D<BR> >>actually.<BR><BR> ;Deej<BR> "cujo"<BR>>&=
gt; =20
=3D3D<BR>>> ><<A=3D3D20<BR>>> =
> =20
=3D3D<BR>>> =3D<BR>>>>href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstu'>m=
ailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstu</A>=3D<B=
R>>>dio=3D3D<BR>>> =20
>.com</A>>=3D3D20<BR>>> > wrote in=20
message<BR><A=3D3D20<BR>>> > =
=3D3D<BR>>> =20
=3D<BR>>>>href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>><BR>&=
g'>news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>=
><BR>&g</A>=3D<BR>>>=3D3D <BR>>> =20
>t;<BR>><BR>&g t;=3D3D20 <BR>>> > =
hey DJ, I=20
know you guys don;t care about this in your set=20
up,<BR>><BR>>=3D<BR>>>=3D3D <BR>>> =
>But=20
did=3D3D20<BR>>> > the latency change in the =
newer UAD=20
updates?<BR>> I think it was =
=3D<BR>>>=3D3D<BR>>> =20
>Tom B who=3D3D20<BR>>> > was having this =
issue a while=20
back.<BR>> C<BR>><BR>> "Neil" =
=3D3D<BR>>> =20
><<A=3D3D20<BR>>> > href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOU=
OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=20
wrote:<BR>> =3D3D<BR>>> =20
>><BR>>=3D3D20<BR>>> > >"DJ" =
<<A=20
=3D3D<BR>>> >href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20'>mailto=
:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D3D20</A><BR>&g=
t;> =20
> wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a =
$100.00=20
credit from =3D3D<BR>>> >way =
back=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
> when I bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card =
and I got=20
the $149.00 =3D3D<BR>>> =
>discount=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
> coupon because I had previously<BR>> =
>>purchased the=20
1073, I =3D3D<BR>>> >now own=3D3D20<BR>>> =
> =20
both of these, otherwise I'd be.....well,<BR>> >you=20
=3D3D<BR>>> =
>know.<BR>>=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
> ><BR>> >Needing to die?<BR>>=20
><BR>>=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
>>:)<BR><BR>&l t;/BLOCKQUOTE> <BR>>> =20
><DIV><FONT size=3D3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose =
Polesoft=20
Lockspam to fight =3D<BR>>>spam, =3D3D<BR>>> =20
>and=3D3D20<BR>>> =
>you?<BR><A=3D3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D<BR>>>>href=3D3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/re'>h=
ttp://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/re</A>=3D<B=
R>>>fer=3D3D<BR>>> =20
>.html</A>=20
</FONT></DIV></BODY&g t;</HTML> <BR>>> =20
><BR>>> =
><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><!DOCTYPE=20
HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=20
=
Transitional//EN"><BR>>><HTML><HEAD> <BR>>><=
META=20
http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html;=20
=3D<BR>>>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR >>><META =
content=3D3D"MSHTML=20
6.00.2800.1400"=20
=
name=3D3DGENERATOR><BR>>><STYLE></STYLE> <BR>>>=
</HEAD><BR>>><BODY=20
bgColor=3D3D#ffffff><BR>>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2>Thanks for the correction Rod. =3D<BR>>>It's=20
never=3D20<BR>>>easy is=20
it.</FONT></DIV><BR>>><DIV><FONT =
face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2></FONT> =
</DIV><BR>>><DIV><FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>If you have a chart on all those=20
=3D<BR>>>latencies I'd=20
=
find=3D20<BR>>>it</FONT></DIV> <BR>>><DIV>&l=
t;FONT=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>very useful. I still use the =
=3D<BR>>>older one=20
you=3D20<BR>>>posted=20
a</FONT></DIV><BR>>><DIV><FONT =
face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2>while=20
back.</FONT></DIV><BR>>><DIV><FONT =
face=3D3DArial=20
=
size=3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV&g t; <BR>>><DIV><FONT=
=20
face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT>=20
</DIV><BR>>><DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2></FONT>=20
=
</DIV><BR>>><BLOCKQUOTE=3D20 <BR>>>style=3D3D"PADDING=
-RIGHT:=20
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =3D<BR>>>BORDER-LEFT: =
#000000=20
2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>>> <DIV>"Rod =
Lincoln"=20
<<A=3D20<BR>>> =3D<BR>>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&a=
mp;g'>mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</=
A>&g</A>=3D<BR>>>t;=3D20<BR >>> =20
wrote in message <A=3D20<BR>>> =
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:456aeaf0$1@linux">news:456aeaf0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Tom'=
>news:456aeaf0$1@linux">news:456aeaf0$1@linux</A>...</DIV>=
<BR>Tom</A>,=3D<BR>>>=20
All=3D20<BR>>> the old plugs are the same as they've =
always=20
been.<BR>The Neve 1078 =3D<BR>>>and =
1081=3D20<BR>>> (big=20
versions)have the same latency wich you correctly<BR>repored.=20
=3D<BR>>>Your=3D20<BR>>> correct on the 60933. The =
light=20
versions of the Neve plugs<BR>have=20
the<BR>>=3D<BR>>>same=3D20<BR>>> latecny as all =
the old=20
plugs. All the Prec. Plugs have =3D<BR>>>more<BR>latency,=20
and=3D20<BR>>> they're all different, with the Multiband =
being about=20
twice<BR>as=3D20<BR>>> much.<BR><BR>"Tom =
Bruhl"=20
<<A=3D20<BR>>> href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto=
:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>&g=
t;> =20
wrote:<BR>><BR>>&a mp;lt;BR>>For those that=20
care,<BR>><BR>>My =
=3D<BR>>>numbers=3D20<BR>>> =20
on UAD-1 ver 4.4 were:<BR>>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D 557ms,=20
64=3D20<BR>>> samples<BR>><BR>>U AD-1 4.3 =
and=20
before<BR>>44K =3D3D3D most =3D<BR>>>plugs=20
365ms,=3D20<BR>>> 12 samples (Pultec 3=20
samples)<BR>>Tom<BR>& gt;<BR>> "DJ"=20
=3D<BR>>><<A=3D20<BR>>> href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A'>mailto:nowayjos=
e@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A</A>>>=20
wrote in =3D<BR>>>message=3D20<BR>>> <A=20
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR'>news:45628cda=
@linux">news:45628cda@linux</A>...<BR</A>>>=20
=3D<BR>>>Sorry=3D20<BR>>> Chris.I think it changed =
(basically=20
doubled) in v4.4=3D20<BR>>> =
actually.<BR>><BR>> ;=20
Deej<BR>> "cujo" <<A=3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
'>mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio</A=
>=3D<BR>>>.com</A>>=3D20 <BR>>> =20
wrote in message<BR>> <A=3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR'>news:455d=
b889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR</A>>>=20
=3D<BR>>>=3D20<BR>>> ><BR>> =
><BR>>=20
><BR>> > hey DJ, =3D<BR>>>I =
know=3D20<BR>>> you=20
guys don;t care about this in your set up,<BR>> > But=20
=3D<BR>>>did the=3D20<BR>>> latency change in the =
newer UAD=20
updates?<BR>> > I think it =3D<BR>>>was=20
Tom=3D20<BR>>> B who was having this issue a while=20
back.<BR>> > =3D<BR>>>C<BR>> =
=3D20<BR>>> =20
><BR>> > "Neil" <<A=3D20<BR>>> =
href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOU=
OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=20
wrote:<BR>> =3D<BR>>>>=3D20<BR>>> =
><BR>>=20
> >"DJ" <<A=3D20<BR>>> href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20'>mailto:n=
owayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net</A>>=3D20</A><BR>>&g=
t; =20
wrote:<BR>> > >>Of course, since I had a $100.00=20
=3D<BR>>>credit from=3D20<BR>>> way back when I=20
=3D3D<BR>>bought<BR>& gt; another<BR>>=20
=3D<BR>>>>=3D20<BR>>> >>card and I got the =
$149.00=20
discount coupon because I had=3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D3D<BR>>previously<BR>& amp;gt; > >>purchased the =
1073, I=20
=3D<BR>>>now own=3D20<BR>>> both of these, otherwise =
I'd=20
=3D3D<BR>>be.....well,<BR> ;> =3D<BR>>>>=20
>you=3D20<BR>>> know.<BR>> > =
><BR>> >=20
>Needing to=3D20<BR>>> die?<BR>> > =
><BR>>=20
>=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
>:)<BR>><BR>&g t;<BR>><BR>>&l t;BR>&=
gt;I=20
choose Polesoft =3D<BR>>>Lockspam to=3D20<BR>>> =
fight spam, and=20
=3D<BR>>>you?<BR>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html=20
=3D20<BR>>> <BR>><BR>>< !DOCTYPE HTML =
PUBLIC=20
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
Transitional//EN" ><BR>><HTML>&l t;HEAD><BR>>=
<META=3D20<BR>>> =20
http-equiv=3D3D3DContent-Type =
content=3D3D3D"text/html;=3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D3D<BR>>charset=3D3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>><META =
=3D<BR>>>content=3D3D3D"MSHTML=3D20<BR>>> =20
6.00.2800.1400"=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >>name=3D3D3DGENERATOR><BR&g t;><STYLE></ST=
YLE><BR>></HEA=3D<BR> >>D><BR>><B ODY=3D=
20<BR>>> =20
bgColor=3D3D3D#ffffff><BR>>& lt;DIV><FONT =
face=3D3D3DArial=20
=3D<BR>>>size=3D3D3D2>For=3D20<BR>>> those that=20
=
care,</FONT></DIV><BR& ;gt;><DIV><FONT=3D20 <BR>&=
gt;> =20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT>=20
=
=3D<BR> >></DIV><BR>&g t;<DIV><FONT=3D20 <BR>>=
> =20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>My numbers on UAD-1 ver =
4.4=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D3D<BR>>were:</FONT>&am p;lt;/DIV><BR>><DIV&g t=
;<FONT=3D20<BR>>> =20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>44K Neve 60933 =3D3D3D =
557ms,=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >>64=3D3D20<BR>>samples&a mp;lt;/FONT></DIV><=
;BR>><DIV><FON=3D<BR>>>T=3D20 <BR>>> =20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT>=20
=
=3D<BR> >></DIV><BR>&g t;<DIV><FONT=3D20 <BR>>=
> =20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>UAD-1 4.3 and=3D20<BR>>> =20
before</FONT></DIV><BR&am p;gt;><DIV><FONT=20
=3D<BR>>>face=3D3D3DArial=3D20<BR>>> =
size=3D3D3D2>44K =3D3D3D most=20
plugs 365ms, 12 samples=20
=3D<BR>>>=3D3D<BR>>(Pultec=3D20 <BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >>3=3D3D20<BR>>samples)&a mp;lt;/FONT></DIV><=
;BR>><DIV><FON=3D<BR>>>T=3D20 <BR>>> =20
face=3D3D3DArial=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
size=3D3D3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV& ;gt;<BR>><DIV><=
FONT=3D20<BR>>> =20
face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2></FONT>=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >></DIV><BR>&g t;<BLOCKQUOTE=3D3D20<BR>&=
gt;style=3D3D3D"PADDING-RIGHT:=20
=3D<BR>>>0px;=3D20<BR>>> PADDING-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;=20
=3D3D<BR>>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 =3D<BR>>>2px=20
solid;=3D20<BR>>> MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR>>=20
<DIV>"DJ" <<A=3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20<BR >>> =20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net=
</A>>=3D3D20'>mailto:n=3D<BR>>>owayjose@dude.net">no=
wayjose@dude.net </A>>=3D3D20</A><B R>>&n=3D <BR=
>>>bsp;=3D20<BR>>> =20
wrote in message <A=3D3D20<BR>> =
href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'news:45628cda@linux">news:45628cda@linux</=
A>...</DIV>Sorry'>news:=3D<BR>>>45628cda@linux">news=
:45628cda@linux </A>...</DIV>Sorry</A& ;gt;=20
=3D<BR>>><BR>>> =3D3D<BR>>Chris.I=20
think=3D3D20<BR>> it changed (basically =
=3D<BR>>>doubled) in=20
v4.4=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >>actually.<BR><BR> ;Deej<BR> "cujo"<BR>=
;=3D3D<BR>><<A=3D<BR>>>=3D3D20<BR>>=20
=3D20<BR>>> =
=3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20<BR >>> =20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@=
nospamapplemanstudio=3D<BR>>>'>mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio=
..com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio</A=3D<BR>>>>=3D3D<BR&g=
t;>.com</A>>=3D3D20<BR&am p;gt;>=20
=3D20<BR>>> wrote in =
message<BR><A=3D3D20<BR>& amp;gt;=20
=
=3D<BR>>>=3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D "<A=3D20<BR>>> =
;=20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'news:455db889$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux&=
lt;/A>...<BR>><BR> &=3D <BR>>>g'>news:455db8=
89$1@linux">news:455db889$1@linux</A>...<BR>=3D<BR>>>=
;><BR>&g</A>=3D3D <BR>>t;<BR>>&l t;BR&=
gt;>=3D3D20<BR=3D<BR>>>>>=20
=3D20<BR>>> hey DJ, I know you guys don;t care about this =
in your=20
set =3D<BR>>>up,<BR>>=3D20<BR >>> =
=3D3D<BR>>But=20
did=3D3D20<BR>> the latency change in the newer=20
=3D<BR>>>UAD=3D20<BR>>> updates?<BR>> I =
think it was=20
=3D3D<BR>>Tom B =3D<BR>>>who=3D3D20<BR>>=20
was=3D20<BR>>> having this issue a while =
back.<BR>>=20
=3D<BR> >>C<BR>><BR> ;>=3D20 <BR>>> =
"Neil"=20
=3D3D<BR>><<A=3D3D20& lt;BR>>=20
href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'mailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOUOI@OI.com</A'>m=
ailto:IOUOI@OI.com">IOU=3D<BR>>>OI@OI.com</A</A>>>=
;=3D20<BR>>> =20
wrote:<BR>> =
=3D3D<BR>>><BR>&am p;gt;=3D3D20<BR>>=20
=3D<BR>>>>"DJ"=3D20<BR>>> <<A=20
=3D3D<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20<BR >>> =20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'mailto:nowayjose@dude.net">nowayjose@dude.net=
</A>>=3D3D20'>mailto:n=3D<BR>>>owayjose@dude.net">no=
wayjose@dude.net </A>>=3D3D20</A><B R>>&n=3D <BR=
>>>bsp;=3D20<BR>>> =20
wrote:<BR>> >>Of course, since I had a $100.00 credit=20
=3D<BR>>>from=3D20<BR>>> =3D3D<BR>>way=20
back=3D3D20<BR>> when I=3D20<BR>>> =20
bought<BR>another<BR>> >>card and I got the=20
=3D<BR>>>$149.00=3D20<BR>>> =20
=3D3D<BR>>discount=3D3D20<BR& ;gt;> coupon because I=20
had=3D20<BR>>> previously<BR>> >>purchased =
the 1073,=20
I =3D3D<BR>>now=3D20<BR>>> =
own=3D3D20<BR>> both of=20
these, otherwise I'd=20
=3D<BR>>>be.....well,<BR>>=3D20 <BR>>> =
>you=20
=3D3D<BR>>know.<BR>&g t;=3D3D20<BR>>=20
=3D<BR>>>><BR>>=3D20 <BR>>> >Needing =
to=20
die?<BR>>=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >>><BR>>=3D3D20&am p;lt;BR>>>:)<BR><=
;BR></BLOCKQUOTE&=3D<BR> >>gt;<BR>><DIV& ;gt;<=
;FONT=3D20<BR>>> =20
size=3D3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to =
fight=20
=3D<BR>>>spam,=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >>=3D3D<BR>>and=3D3D20&am p;lt;BR>>you?<BR>&=
lt;A=3D3D20<BR>>href=3D3D3D"<A=3D20 <BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR>>>href=3D3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://ww=
w.polesoft.com/refer=3D<BR>>>'>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.htm=
l">http://www.polesoft.com/refer</A=3D<BR>>>>=3D3D<BR&g=
t;>.html</A>=3D20<BR>>> =20
=
=3D<BR> >></FONT></DIV>&am p;lt;/BODY></HTML><BR&=
gt;><BR>><BR>& lt;/=3D <BR>>>BLOCKQUOTE></BOD=
Y></HTML><BR>>><BR>>> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>=
------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C712F6.CF26CDB0--
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76486 is a reply to message #76478] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 21:44 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1
For As7333 and Windows xp 16 bit
44.1 version 3.0 windows xp
Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate level
Bounce panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level
1ms=80 samples
Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 Other versions or brands
will most likely yeild different results
(for wrapped plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion had
a little lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen everytime
I used it. Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, instead
of a combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a bit
different.
1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb, Fairchild, channel strip, Nigel,
Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 light)
Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample slide
2.UAD Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms…add 1523 ss
3.UAD Prec. EQ and Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ’s back 400ms add 1505 ss
4.UAD Prec Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss
5.Prec Multiband back 800 add 4096 ss
6. Neve 33609 comp big version…..back 400ms add 1469ss
7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. (or just adding Dyn.) 1ms back and
78 samples
forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really a
big deal.
8.EDS Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33 samples
forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 and back
to 1)
9.EDS Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward 67
samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward 21
samples
w/.004 lookahead,
Back 3ms and forward 56 s
w/.005 lookahead,
Back 3ms and forward 10 s
DAVE BROWN
Dynamics Processor Back 2ms
Multiband Limiter Back 4ms
Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard knee
De-esser…none
DRUMAGOG
14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 samples forward (with 3.3 latency in tracking
window)
15. Drumagog (recorded files)3ms back and 25 samples forward
|
|
|
UAD 48k latiencies [message #76487 is a reply to message #76486] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 21:54 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The UAD is depentant on sample rate. Here are the 48k numbers.
1. Normal plugs (1176, LA2A, Farichild, Plate and Dreamverb,
as well as all light Neve plugs) -400ms add 2816 ss
2.Pultec -400ms add 2803 ss
3.Prec eq and both Neve EQ's (big versions) -400 add2785 ss
4. Prec Limiter -400 ms add 2747 ss
5.Prec Multiband -800ms add 5120 ss
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1
>For As7333 and Windows xp 16 bit
>
>44.1 version 3.0 windows xp
>Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate level
>Bounce panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level
>1ms=80 samples
>
>Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 Other versions or brands
>will most likely yeild different results
>(for wrapped plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion had
>a little lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen everytime
>I used it. Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, instead
>of a combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a bit
>different.
>
>1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb, Fairchild, channel strip, Nigel,
>Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 light)
>Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample slide
>
>2.UAD Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms…add 1523 ss
>
>3.UAD Prec. EQ and Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ’s back 400ms add 1505
ss
>
>4.UAD Prec Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss
>
>5.Prec Multiband back 800 add 4096 ss
>
>6. Neve 33609 comp big version…..back 400ms add 1469ss
>
> 7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. (or just adding Dyn.) 1ms back and
>78 samples
> forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really a
>big deal.
>8.EDS Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33 samples
>
> forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 and
back
>to 1)
>9.EDS Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward
67
>samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward 21
>samples
> w/.004 lookahead,
>Back 3ms and forward 56 s
> w/.005 lookahead,
>Back 3ms and forward 10 s
>
>
>DAVE BROWN
>Dynamics Processor Back 2ms
>Multiband Limiter Back 4ms
>Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard knee
>De-esser…none
>
>DRUMAGOG
>14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 samples forward (with 3.3 latency in tracking
>window)
>15. Drumagog (recorded files)3ms back and 25 samples forward
>
>
|
|
|
UAD 44.1 latiencies [message #76488 is a reply to message #76486] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 21:56 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1
For As7333 and Windows xp 16 bit
44.1 version 3.0 windows xp
Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate level
Bounce panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level
1ms=80 samples
Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 Other versions or brands
will most likely yeild different results
(for wrapped plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion had
a little lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen everytime
I used it. Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, instead
of a combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a bit
different.
1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb, Fairchild, channel strip, Nigel,
Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 light)
Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample slide
2.UAD Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms…add 1523 ss
3.UAD Prec. EQ and Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ’s back 400ms add 1505 ss
4.UAD Prec Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss
5.Prec Multiband back 800 add 4096 ss
6. Neve 33609 comp big version…..back 400ms add 1469ss
7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. (or just adding Dyn.) 1ms back and
78 samples
forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really a
big deal.
8.EDS Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33 samples
forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 and back
to 1)
9.EDS Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward 67
samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward 21
samples
w/.004 lookahead,
Back 3ms and forward 56 s
w/.005 lookahead,
Back 3ms and forward 10 s
DAVE BROWN
Dynamics Processor Back 2ms
Multiband Limiter Back 4ms
Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard knee
De-esser…none
DRUMAGOG
14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 samples forward (with 3.3 latency in tracking
window)
15. Drumagog (recorded files)3ms back and 25 samples forward
|
|
|
Re: UAD 44.1 latiencies [message #76492 is a reply to message #76488] |
Tue, 28 November 2006 23:46 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C71360.9D16E520
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rod ,
Massively good stuff here. You did alot of the work
I kept avoiding. I owe you more than a couple beers.
Hugely happy,
Tom
PS Do you use the Drumagog 'recorded files' often?
I've never tried them. A quick run through would also
be great!
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
news:456d12f0$1@linux...
Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1=20
For As7333 and Windows xp 16 bit =20
44.1 version 3.0 windows xp
Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate level
Bounce panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level
1ms=3D80 samples
Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 Other versions or =
brands
will most likely yeild different results
(for wrapped plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion =
had
a little lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen =
everytime
I used it. Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, =
instead
of a combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a =
bit
different.
1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb, Fairchild, channel strip, =
Nigel,
Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 light)
Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample slide
2.UAD Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms.add 1523 ss
3.UAD Prec. EQ and Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ's back 400ms add =
1505 ss
4.UAD Prec Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss
5.Prec Multiband back 800 add 4096 ss
6. Neve 33609 comp big version...back 400ms add 1469ss
7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. (or just adding Dyn.) 1ms back =
and
78 samples =20
forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really =
a
big deal.
8.EDS Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33 =
samples
forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 =
and back
to 1)
9.EDS Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and =
forward 67
samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward =
21
samples =20
w/.004 =
lookahead,
Back 3ms and forward 56 s
w/.005 =
lookahead,
Back 3ms and forward 10 s =20
DAVE BROWN
Dynamics Processor Back 2ms
Multiband Limiter Back 4ms
Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard knee
De-esser.none
DRUMAGOG
14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 samples forward (with 3.3 latency in =
tracking
window)
15. Drumagog (recorded files)3ms back and 25 samples forward
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C71360.9D16E520
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rod ,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Massively good stuff here. You =
did alot of=20
the work</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I kept avoiding. I owe you more =
than a couple=20
beers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hugely happy,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>PS Do you use the Drumagog 'recorded =
files'=20
often?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've never tried them. A quick =
run through=20
would also</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>be great!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:456d12f0$1@linux">news:456d12f0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR><BR>=
<BR><BR> =20
Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1 <BR>For As7333 and Windows xp =
16=20
bit &nb sp; <BR><BR>44.1 version 3.0 =
windows=20
xp<BR>Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate =
level<BR>Bounce=20
panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level<BR>1ms=3D80=20
samples<BR><BR>Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 =
Other=20
versions or brands<BR>will most likely yeild different results<BR>(for =
wrapped=20
plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion had<BR>a =
little=20
lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen everytime<BR>I =
used it.=20
Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, =
instead<BR>of a=20
combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a=20
bit<BR>different.<BR><BR>1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb,=20
Fairchild, channel strip, Nigel,<BR>Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 =
light)<BR>Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample =
slide<BR><BR>2.UAD=20
Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms.add 1523 ss<BR><BR>3.UAD Prec. EQ =
and =20
Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ's back 400ms add 1505 ss<BR><BR>4.UAD =
Prec=20
Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss<BR><BR>5.Prec Multiband back 800 add =
4096=20
ss<BR><BR>6. Neve 33609 comp big version...back 400ms add=20
1469ss<BR><BR> 7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. =
(or just=20
adding Dyn.) 1ms back and<BR>78=20
=
samples &am p;nbsp; =
&=
nbsp; =20
=
<BR> &nb=
sp; =20
forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really a<BR>big =
deal.<BR>8.EDS=20
Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33=20
=
samples<BR><BR> &nbs=
p; =20
forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 and back<BR>to =
1)<BR>9.EDS=20
Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward=20
67<BR>samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms =
and=20
forward 21<BR> samples =20
=
<BR> &nb=
sp; &nb sp; &nb s=
p; &nbs p; &nbs p=
;   ;   ;=
=20
w/.004 lookahead,<BR>Back 3ms and forward 56=20
=
s<BR> &n=
bsp; &n bsp; &n b=
sp; &nb sp; &nb s=
p; &nbs p; &nbs p=
;   ; =20
w/.005 lookahead,<BR>Back 3ms and forward 10 s <BR><BR><BR>DAVE=20
BROWN<BR>Dynamics Processor Back 2ms<BR>Multiband Limiter Back=20
4ms<BR>Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard=20
knee<BR>De-esser.none<BR><BR>DRUMAGOG<BR>14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 =
samples=20
forward (with 3.3 latency in tracking<BR>window)<BR>15. Drumagog =
(recorded=20
files)3ms back and 25 samples forward<BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C71360.9D16E520--
|
|
|
Re: UAD 44.1 latiencies [message #76496 is a reply to message #76492] |
Wed, 29 November 2006 06:41 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Tom...the Drumagog "recorded" files thing was from drumagog 2
before you could use "external files" That was just left over, and I forgot
to delete it. I don't do that anymore, it's a hassle. It refers to recording
your own sounds into drumagog. I never use the stock sounds.
Rod
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Rod ,
>Massively good stuff here. You did alot of the work
>I kept avoiding. I owe you more than a couple beers.
>Hugely happy,
>Tom
>
>PS Do you use the Drumagog 'recorded files' often?
>I've never tried them. A quick run through would also
>be great!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
>news:456d12f0$1@linux...
>
>
>
>
> Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1=20
> For As7333 and Windows xp 16 bit =20
>
> 44.1 version 3.0 windows xp
> Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate level
> Bounce panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level
> 1ms=3D80 samples
>
> Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 Other versions or
=
>brands
> will most likely yeild different results
> (for wrapped plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion
=
>had
> a little lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen =
>everytime
> I used it. Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only,
=
>instead
> of a combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a
=
>bit
> different.
>
> 1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb, Fairchild, channel strip,
=
>Nigel,
> Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 light)
> Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample slide
>
> 2.UAD Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms.add 1523 ss
>
> 3.UAD Prec. EQ and Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ's back 400ms add =
>1505 ss
>
> 4.UAD Prec Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss
>
> 5.Prec Multiband back 800 add 4096 ss
>
> 6. Neve 33609 comp big version...back 400ms add 1469ss
>
> 7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. (or just adding Dyn.) 1ms back
=
>and
> 78 samples =20
> forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really
=
>a
> big deal.
> 8.EDS Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33
=
>samples
>
> forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 =
>and back
> to 1)
> 9.EDS Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and =
>forward 67
> samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward
=
>21
> samples =20
> w/.004 =
>lookahead,
> Back 3ms and forward 56 s
> w/.005 =
>lookahead,
> Back 3ms and forward 10 s =20
>
>
> DAVE BROWN
> Dynamics Processor Back 2ms
> Multiband Limiter Back 4ms
> Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard knee
> De-esser.none
>
> DRUMAGOG
> 14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 samples forward (with 3.3 latency in =
>tracking
> window)
> 15. Drumagog (recorded files)3ms back and 25 samples forward
>
>
>
>
>
>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rod ,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Massively good stuff here. You =
>did alot of=20
>the work</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I kept avoiding. I owe you more =
>than a couple=20
>beers.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hugely happy,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>PS Do you use the Drumagog 'recorded =
>files'=20
>often?</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've never tried them. A quick =
>run through=20
>would also</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>be great!</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Rod Lincoln" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com</A>&g=
>t;=20
> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:456d12f0$1@linux">news:456d12f0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR><BR>=
><BR><BR> =20
> Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1 <BR>For As7333 and Windows xp =
>16=20
> bit <BR><BR>44.1 version 3.0 =
>windows=20
> xp<BR>Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate =
>level<BR>Bounce=20
> panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level<BR>1ms=3D80=20
> samples<BR><BR>Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 =
>Other=20
> versions or brands<BR>will most likely yeild different results<BR>(for
=
>wrapped=20
> plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion had<BR>a =
>little=20
> lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen everytime<BR>I =
>used it.=20
> Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, =
>instead<BR>of a=20
> combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a=20
> bit<BR>different.<BR><BR>1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb,=20
> Fairchild, channel strip, Nigel,<BR>Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609
=
>
> light)<BR>Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample =
>slide<BR><BR>2.UAD=20
> Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms.add 1523 ss<BR><BR>3.UAD Prec. EQ =
>and =20
> Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ's back 400ms add 1505 ss<BR><BR>4.UAD =
>Prec=20
> Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss<BR><BR>5.Prec Multiband back 800 add =
>4096=20
> ss<BR><BR>6. Neve 33609 comp big version...back 400ms add=20
> 1469ss<BR><BR> 7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. =
>(or just=20
> adding Dyn.) 1ms back and<BR>78=20
> =
>samples =
> &=
>nbsp; =20
> =
><BR> &nb=
>sp; =20
> forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really a<BR>big =
>deal.<BR>8.EDS=20
> Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33=20
> =
>samples<BR><BR> &nbs=
>p; =20
> forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 and back<BR>to =
>1)<BR>9.EDS=20
> Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward=20
> 67<BR>samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms =
>and=20
> forward 21<BR>samples =20
> =
><BR> &nb=
>sp; &nbs=
>p; =
>; =
> =20
> w/.004 lookahead,<BR>Back 3ms and forward 56=20
> =
>s<BR> &n=
>bsp; &nb=
>sp; &nbs=
>p; =
>; =20
> w/.005 lookahead,<BR>Back 3ms and forward 10 s <BR><BR><BR>DAVE=20
> BROWN<BR>Dynamics Processor Back 2ms<BR>Multiband Limiter Back=20
> 4ms<BR>Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard=20
> knee<BR>De-esser.none<BR><BR>DRUMAGOG<BR>14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43
=
>samples=20
> forward (with 3.3 latency in tracking<BR>window)<BR>15. Drumagog =
>(recorded=20
> files)3ms back and 25 samples forward<BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: OK....thoughts on the UA Neve 1081 and 33609 [message #76497 is a reply to message #76486] |
Wed, 29 November 2006 06:57 |
cujo
Messages: 285 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Wow! Thanks
I should have this laminated.
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Sample Slide Tables 3.0 44.1
>For As7333 and Windows xp 16 bit
>
>44.1 version 3.0 windows xp
>Bounce panned center, raise vol up 2.9 for accurate level
>Bounce panned hard left or Right, down 0.1 for accurate level
>1ms=80 samples
>
>Note: all latencies assume the use of FXPansion 3.3 Other versions or brands
>will most likely yeild different results
>(for wrapped plugs like the UAD) I know the older version of expansion had
>a little lower latency, but had an annoying bogus error screen everytime
>I used it. Also, I find it easier to hit the "100" nudge button only, instead
>of a combo nudge, like Tom uses..so my sample slide numbers will be a bit
>different.
>
>1. UAD (1176, LA2A, Dream verb, Plate verb, Fairchild, channel strip, Nigel,
>Neve 1078 light, 1081 light, 33609 light)
>Nudge back 400ms (4x100) add 1536 on sample slide
>
>2.UAD Pultec and Pultec Pro..back 400 ms…add 1523 ss
>
>3.UAD Prec. EQ and Neve 1078 and 1081 Big dog EQ’s back 400ms add 1505
ss
>
>4.UAD Prec Limiter back 400 ms add 1472 ss
>
>5.Prec Multiband back 800 add 4096 ss
>
>6. Neve 33609 comp big version…..back 400ms add 1469ss
>
> 7.Copying track and adding EDS dyn. (or just adding Dyn.) 1ms back and
>78 samples
> forward{{ EDS Dyn. adds 2 samples latency}}not really a
>big deal.
>8.EDS Dyn (track copy or just insert) w/.001 lookahead 1ms back and 33 samples
>
> forward (You might have to click the lookahead to 0 and
back
>to 1)
>9.EDS Dyn (track copy or insert) w/.002 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward
67
>samples.......other lookaheads w/.003 lookahead, Back 2ms and forward 21
>samples
> w/.004 lookahead,
>Back 3ms and forward 56 s
> w/.005 lookahead,
>Back 3ms and forward 10 s
>
>
>DAVE BROWN
>Dynamics Processor Back 2ms
>Multiband Limiter Back 4ms
>Mastering Limiter Back 2ms and forward 16 samples Hard knee
>De-esser…none
>
>DRUMAGOG
>14. Drumagog 3ms back and 43 samples forward (with 3.3 latency in tracking
>window)
>15. Drumagog (recorded files)3ms back and 25 samples forward
>
>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Dec 23 09:53:30 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03323 seconds
|