The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » Yamaha Subkick-you need this

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Yamaha Subkick-you need this

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Yamaha Subkick-you need this [message #63925]

Sun, 29 January 2006 13:14

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

I've been going through some mixes re4placing the kicks with various BFD
samples. The original kick tracks were OK, but not really stellar. They were
recorded here with a Beta 52 inside the shell and a 57 on the beater. They
were also compressed and EQ'ed while tracking. Very tight and focused, but
nothing like the BFD samples as far a s fidelity goes. Then I opened up a
project where I used the Yamaha subkick in fornt of the kick and a beta 52
inside the shell. WOAH!!!!(says I). This track sounds easily as good as the
BFD samples. What a huge difference this makes. Another thing of note
concerning the Subkick, I have been using it a bit while tracking electric
bass as a close mic on the cone. For a while I was liking it, until I tried
to get it to work in a mix. Somewho it just doesn't flatter an amp as I had
hoped. An ATM 25 up close with an LDC (I'm liking the RODE NTV these days)
off the amp about 8 ft away and 5' off the floor has yielded much better
results when the room mic track is phase aligned with the close mic'ed
track.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Yamaha Subkick-you need this [message #63942 is a reply to message #63925]

Sun, 29 January 2006 23:15

LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005

Senior Member

So, are saying BFD or Drummagog??

I'm lazy these days..I'll stay with Drummagog( I have BFD as well)..I just
got Battery2, with 4 gigs of new acoutic Multi Mic drums..KillER!!!
It's a good time for replacing or even using a midi kit for real performances
using any of the sampled drum librarys.

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I've been going through some mixes re4placing the kicks with various BFD
>samples. The original kick tracks were OK, but not really stellar. They
were
>recorded here with a Beta 52 inside the shell and a 57 on the beater. They
>were also compressed and EQ'ed while tracking. Very tight and focused, but
>nothing like the BFD samples as far a s fidelity goes. Then I opened up
a
>project where I used the Yamaha subkick in fornt of the kick and a beta
52
>inside the shell. WOAH!!!!(says I). This track sounds easily as good as
the
>BFD samples. What a huge difference this makes. Another thing of note
>concerning the Subkick, I have been using it a bit while tracking electric
>bass as a close mic on the cone. For a while I was liking it, until I tried
>to get it to work in a mix. Somewho it just doesn't flatter an amp as I
had
>hoped. An ATM 25 up close with an LDC (I'm liking the RODE NTV these days)
>off the amp about 8 ft away and 5' off the floor has yielded much better
>results when the room mic track is phase aligned with the close mic'ed
>track.
>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	uad-1 latency?
Next Topic:	Help - anyone still using a Dakota Card

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Apr 02 10:11:18 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01794 seconds