Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Shameless me plug. ;o)
| OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73330] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 21:24  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
host, please check out:
http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a pop
filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
the vibe is there. :o)
Tell me what you think...
Cheers,
Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73338 is a reply to message #73330] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 22:41  |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Very nice work. :)
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73341 is a reply to message #73330] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 23:24 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
Cool vibes, cool grooves, cool music! Sounds good Kim, keep going. Don't
worry about production values, their good enough. You can worry about perfection
later, just get your music out of you.
Good job!
James
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73350 is a reply to message #73330] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 08:48 |
gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
Me like.
I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
Gene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73355 is a reply to message #73341] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 09:05 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Cool vibes, cool grooves, cool music!
Thanks heaps. Nice things to say and I very much appreciate it.
The production does need improving somewhat, but as you say, it's not that
far wrong. It can be fixed, most of it in the mix. Step one is to get 30
songs done and whittle it down to one good album. So far I've done ten tunes
in about 6 weeks, so three more months and I should have about 30 to choose
from.
Pick the best and go over them with a little more attention to detail and
I should be right to... err... sit in this back room and burn copies of
it for my friends. ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
> Sounds good Kim, keep going. Don't
>worry about production values, their good enough. You can worry about perfection
>later, just get your music out of you.
>
>Good job!
>
>James
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73358 is a reply to message #73330] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 10:37 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Pretty kewl stuff, Kim!
"Good on ya, mate!" :)
Neil
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73363 is a reply to message #73330] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 10:56 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey man.............that was nice! I'm gonna DL this and play it for my 84
year old mum at "11" in the car. I'm getting ready to take her for her
weekly shopping. I wish I had some big bass drivers in the back and a 1000W
power amp.
;oP
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>
>
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73373 is a reply to message #73350] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 13:49 |
Nappy
Messages: 198
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
What Gene said!
Very nice!
respect
Nappy
"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>host, please check out:
>>
>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
>pop
>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>>Tell me what you think...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>
>
>Me like.
>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
>Gene
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73376 is a reply to message #73330] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 14:44 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
Sounds great. A very big present sound, especially considering
how fast you did it, plus the MySpace encoding. I think your
ethic/method revolution is a great idea. I'm trying to figure
out something similar, partly why I may switch from Paris. But
your sound is so big and present, makes me think I shouldn't
switch!!
Great job, Kim.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73379 is a reply to message #73374] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 16:17 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
TC <tc@spammetodeathyoubastards.org> wrote:
>I'd like to hear it with a bit better blend in the mix, but it's very cool.
Some of it certainly wants a proper mix process to take place. Basically,
with a couple of exceptions, the process to date has simply been record it,
edit it, and bounce it. Basic effects have been added, but there's almost
no eq on anything, and even actual levels are quite rough for the most part.
I will certainly go back and take a look at that at some point.
Thanks for the feedback. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.
>
>Cheers,
>
>TC
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73380 is a reply to message #73376] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 16:24 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote:
>Sounds great. A very big present sound, especially considering
>how fast you did it, plus the MySpace encoding.
Gee thanks. I must say I'm very happy with the sound myself.
To let out a little secret, my method has a slightly dodgy side, in that
all the audio runs through two Akai MB-76 "audio mix bays" before getting
to the system, which are busy in there adding noise and reducing clarity.
These things are way cool as they let me just press a footswitch and, for
arguments sake, patch my Juno-60 into my ol' school guitar footpedals, or
into my Quadraverb, or both, or into the GNX-4, or into all three, in whatever
combo I like, and then do the same for the digi piano or for the EPS. It's
way cool functionality wise because I can get any sound I'm likely to want
without any manual patches taking place...
....but I was kinda worried that it would take some sheen off the sound,
so your comments are very much appreciated. :o)
And I'm loving the method. In terms of speed, efficiency, inspiration, and
just sheer fun, it's the best thing since, err... actually I'm struggling
to think of something better. ;o) Paris? ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
>I think your
>ethic/method revolution is a great idea. I'm trying to figure
>out something similar, partly why I may switch from Paris. But
>your sound is so big and present, makes me think I shouldn't
>switch!!
>
>Great job, Kim.
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>host, please check out:
>>
>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
>pop
>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>>Tell me what you think...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73381 is a reply to message #73373] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 16:24 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
>What Gene said!
>Very nice!
Thanks heaps. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.
>
>respect
>Nappy
>
>
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>>host, please check out:
>>>
>>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>>
>>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
>>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>>
>>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a
>>pop
>>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>>
>>>Tell me what you think...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>
>>
>>Me like.
>>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
>>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
>>Gene
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73383 is a reply to message #73330] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 16:44 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Very enjoyable tunes, not to mention filled with great advice!
The GNX4 has also been an inspirational composing tool here, too. I've
written a number of new songs for my solo show that I multi-track live
on stage. Way fun!
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
Kim wrote:
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73384 is a reply to message #73383] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 16:47 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks for the comments.
One thing I've learned about the GNX-4, compared to either the GNX3 or the
BNX3, is that it's actually slightly inferior for live looping. On all four
of them, when you are running a loop, you can simply depress the play button
on the unit and it will return to the start of the loop. On the B/GNX-3 this
is an excellent tool live for keeping in sync with a band, as it allows you
to resync the loop at the start of the bar, however unfortunately the GNX-4
has a horrible almost random delay in it when you press play, so if you try
and resync the loop using this method it will end up out of time. On the
B/GNX-3 the response is instant, but on the 4 it's not, rendering the feature
fairly useless.
I suspect it's because the 3 series have onboard memory where I'm suspicious
the "working loops" are stored while in operation. The 4 I think works directly
of the CF card and hence communications is a little slower. I've been meaning
to write to digitech about it in the hope that they can fix it in a firmware
update, but I'm not holding my breath. If you get a moment perhaps you could/should
do the same. The ability to resync the loops in a live scenario would be,
well I don't have to tell you how useful it would be. ;o)
But it's a great tool none the less, and I'm loving it. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.
Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>Very enjoyable tunes, not to mention filled with great advice!
>
>The GNX4 has also been an inspirational composing tool here, too. I've
>written a number of new songs for my solo show that I multi-track live
>on stage. Way fun!
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>Kim wrote:
>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>> host, please check out:
>>
>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a pop
>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>> Tell me what you think...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73413 is a reply to message #73330] |
Sun, 01 October 2006 12:47 |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey Kim,
Nice work. Revolution of the Mind stayed with me throughout the day. Also
nifty was how clear the Paris sound came through. Man, it was like cool
water on my ears.
Cheers,
MR
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>
>
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73422 is a reply to message #73413] |
Sun, 01 October 2006 15:10 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks for the comments.
Annoyingly there's only two songs up there at the moment. I have two more
I keep trying to load but Myspace won't load them. Not sure why. I've tried
twice now. First time it came back with errors. This time it's still processing...
But it is astounding how the Paris sound can shine through so much. Especially
I guess on something like that which is barely mixed, and hence has few other
plugs and effects, it's very easy to hear that overall Paris thing in the
sound.
And I do love that. ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hey Kim,
>Nice work. Revolution of the Mind stayed with me throughout the day. Also
>nifty was how clear the Paris sound came through. Man, it was like cool
>water on my ears.
>Cheers,
>MR
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>> host, please check out:
>>
>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
>produce
>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
>recorded
>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a
>pop
>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>> Tell me what you think...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73435 is a reply to message #73422] |
Sun, 01 October 2006 19:27 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The two other new tunes have just appeared...
....finally...
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for the comments.
>
>Annoyingly there's only two songs up there at the moment. I have two more
>I keep trying to load but Myspace won't load them. Not sure why. I've tried
>twice now. First time it came back with errors. This time it's still processing...
>
>But it is astounding how the Paris sound can shine through so much. Especially
>I guess on something like that which is barely mixed, and hence has few
other
>plugs and effects, it's very easy to hear that overall Paris thing in the
>sound.
>
>And I do love that. ;o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Hey Kim,
>>Nice work. Revolution of the Mind stayed with me throughout the day.
Also
>>nifty was how clear the Paris sound came through. Man, it was like cool
>>water on my ears.
>>Cheers,
>>MR
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>> host, please check out:
>>>
>>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>>
>>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
>>produce
>>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
>>recorded
>>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete
song.
>>>
>>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
>a
>>pop
>>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but
hey,
>>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>>
>>> Tell me what you think...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kim.
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Dec 22 07:37:19 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03292 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
