|
|
Re: Legendary Jazz Singer Nancy [message #58917 is a reply to message #58912] |
Mon, 10 October 2005 08:32 |
|
/>
> >If you put a DX reverb you probably will get 0 latency !!, so no
> >compensation needed at all.
> >It ius like having AUX with DX effect for Paris !
> >
> >19. Now if you insist of using a UAD1 plugin reverb, the to compensate
you
> >do the following:
> >
> >You nudge ALL YOUR TRACKS (except for the reverb return on tracks 15 and
> >16-well even if you put it there too nothing will happen anyway- )100ms
> to
> >the left and put voxengo sample delay (Try this instead of AnalogX DX
> >plugin because you have the 64 plugin limit and with VST plugins NO LIMIT
> >Then put inside latency plugin 384 samples to the right.
> >Thus all processed tracks will be alligned to reverb return on tracks.
> >
> >That is for now.
> >Please ask questions so I can see where I did my wrong ho
Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Legendary Jazz Singer Nancy [message #59042 is a reply to message #59028] |
Wed, 12 October 2005 14:09 |
Phil Aiken
Messages: 62 Registered: February 2008
|
Member |
|
|
com/tonepress.htm
DC
no commercial relationship to this product....Isn't this the one being rebadged as the Apex 460?
I have a pal that has the tele version and loves it on drums.
"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>I think the above mics are rebadged chinese models with a >*tele* nametag
>which you pay over double for...
>>
>>el miguel (it must be so, i read it on the net)
>
>You are correct Miguel. Tony said that they were manufactured that way as
>to provide lower pricing. He did share with me that thye did use authentic
>Telefunken tubes. If I recall correctly, the primary difference was that
>the housing was made in China.
>
>Tyrone
>
>Tyrone
>You've got to do the header thing, Deej.
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Legendary Jazz Singer Nancy [message #59049 is a reply to message #59042] |
Wed, 12 October 2005 21:15 |
Rich Lamanna
Messages: 316 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
><BR>I have a pair of DBX 160 VU's that come =
close=20
to the sound I <BR>want if I keep the ratio really low. =
Close, but=20
not perfect.<BR><BR>What I have always wanted to hear is the trick we =
do in=20
the studio <BR>where we mult the return (on tape) or copy the track =
(in a DAW)=20
and <BR>squeeze one track and don't squeeze the other. =
Play with=20
the <BR>relative levels a bit, and maybe some EQ and you can get=20
some<BR>sterling tones. (btw, this is not panned left and right, =
this is=20
a mono<BR>effect I am speaking of) I used to use my =
Carl=20
Martin compressor<BR>this way by using the 4 inputs on a Matchless=20
DC-30. Run the<BR>guitar into the high gain input, then run a =
shorty=20
from the low-gain<BR>input on the same channel to the compressor, then =
run the=20
comp<BR>out to the other channel in. This got the signal =
to both=20
channels, <BR>one side compressed and one not compressed. =
I got=20
some great<BR>tones, but it was pretty cumbersome to setup and =
adjusting=20
the<BR>volume got pretty involved...<BR><BR>The Barber Tone Press, =
does it all=20
in one box. You get volume,<BR>blend, and =
compression. What=20
I do is run the blend up to full <BR>compressor and then adjust the =
compressor=20
knob until I am hearing<BR>quite a bit of squeeze going on, and then =
pull the=20
blend back until<BR>I get just the right amount of uncomp
|
|
|