The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » UAD-1 DBX 160

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97104]

Wed, 19 March 2008 16:37

Deej [5]

Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008

Senior Member

W....O......****in W!!!!

This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97105 is a reply to message #97104]

Wed, 19 March 2008 16:50

Dedric Terry

Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007

Senior Member

So, you think it sounds pretty decent I take it. ;-)

"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47e1a6a4@linux...
> W....O......****in W!!!!
>
> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97106 is a reply to message #97105]

Wed, 19 March 2008 18:34

Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

so what's it do that the ll67, or the fairchild, or the Neve won't do? I used
to have one of these (got it somewhere around 78 or 79) but sold it for $150
I think. It was the first compressor I ever owned, so I didn't have anything
to compare it to.
Rod
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>So, you think it sounds pretty decent I take it. ;-)
>
>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47e1a6a4@linux...
>> W....O......****in W!!!!
>>
>> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>>
>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97108 is a reply to message #97104]

Wed, 19 March 2008 17:35

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

I've got a coupla the original 160 VU models.. wanna compare to see how they
hold up?

AA

"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47e1a6a4@linux...
> W....O......****in W!!!!
>
> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97109 is a reply to message #97106]

Wed, 19 March 2008 17:36

Deej [5]

Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008

Senior Member

"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:47e1b107$1@linux...
>
> so what's it do that the ll67, or the fairchild, or the Neve won't do? I
> used
> to have one of these (got it somewhere around 78 or 79) but sold it for
> $150
> I think. It was the first compressor I ever owned, so I didn't have
> anything
> to compare it to.

You own a kick drum.....right? ;) I like the way this snags a kick better
than I like the 1176. It's just so fast. There's a contouring you can do
with it by just noodling around with the settings that keeps the attack just
right without oversquashing so that it really thumps in the mix. You can do
just a little boost and still meld with the bass guitar without needing to
cut so much bass info at 400/800 Hz.at least on the material I am working on
right now.
It's very retro and "alive" sounding. DL the demo and play around with it.
It's worth the trouble. Nice on snare and bass too.....but on kick, it
rules.

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97110 is a reply to message #97108]

Wed, 19 March 2008 17:37

Deej [5]

Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008

Senior Member

Sure!!!.........I'll give you my address!!! Send 'em on!!!

;oD

"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:47e1b44a@linux...
> I've got a coupla the original 160 VU models.. wanna compare to see how
> they hold up?
>
> AA
>
>
> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47e1a6a4@linux...
>> W....O......****in W!!!!
>>
>> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>>
>>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97111 is a reply to message #97104]

Wed, 19 March 2008 18:04

Bill L

Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006

Senior Member

I think I used to have a stereo version of that. It had a shiny black
plastic face and a kind of beveled metal border around it. Might have
been a 165 or 166? I remember it did bass really well.

Mr. Simplicity wrote:
> W....O......****in W!!!!
>
> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97113 is a reply to message #97111]

Wed, 19 March 2008 18:10

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

Bass is probably what it's best at, IMO. I adore what it does for my basses,
and kick directly behind that. I'm not much of a snare 'squish' dude, but if
you're into that it's good at doing that to a snare.
I find, for my tastes and how I work it to be best at lowered fundamental
instruments/sounds.

AA

"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47e1baf6@linux...
>I think I used to have a stereo version of that. It had a shiny black
>plastic face and a kind of beveled metal border around it. Might have been
>a 165 or 166? I remember it did bass really well.

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97114 is a reply to message #97111]

Wed, 19 March 2008 19:39

Cujjo

Messages: 325
Registered: June 2007

Senior Member

166 is the one rack space stereo thing. I see them at clubs alot Sort of
prosumerish, but still usable in my opinion. I touch overheads with mine.
I have a couple 160X's. Mono one space rack units..I use em sparingly on
Kick and Snare in to paris. Not bad on bass either.

Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>I think I used to have a stereo version of that. It had a shiny black
>plastic face and a kind of beveled metal border around it. Might have
>been a 165 or 166? I remember it did bass really well.
>
>Mr. Simplicity wrote:
>> W....O......****in W!!!!
>>
>> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>>
>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97115 is a reply to message #97104]

Wed, 19 March 2008 18:55

Graham Duncan

Messages: 147
Registered: December 2008

Senior Member

How does it compare to the Stillwell Major Tom?
http://www.stillwellaudio.com/?page_id=13

Graham

Mr. Simplicity wrote:
> W....O......****in W!!!!
>
> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UAD-1 DBX 160 [message #97126 is a reply to message #97114]

Thu, 20 March 2008 06:42

Bill L

Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006

Senior Member

Yeah, I had the 165, which is 2 space and older than the 166.

Cujo wrote:
> 166 is the one rack space stereo thing. I see them at clubs alot Sort of
> prosumerish, but still usable in my opinion. I touch overheads with mine.
> I have a couple 160X's. Mono one space rack units..I use em sparingly on
> Kick and Snare in to paris. Not bad on bass either.
>
>
>
> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>> I think I used to have a stereo version of that. It had a shiny black
>> plastic face and a kind of beveled metal border around it. Might have
>> been a 165 or 166? I remember it did bass really well.
>>
>> Mr. Simplicity wrote:
>>> W....O......****in W!!!!
>>>
>>> This thing is a real sonofabitch on rye. You must have it, or.......
>>>
>>>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	GOT ER' DONE! This MEC thing. Thanks Rod and the rest!
Next Topic:	OMG! Return To Forever reunites for summer 2008 tour!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 17 20:38:29 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01645 seconds