Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » XP assertion errors still
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #61838 is a reply to message #61828] |
Sat, 24 December 2005 06:30   |
Mike Audet
Messages: 294
Registered: December 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
plugs it really frustrating.
I
>>
>>
>>>even started with a new project not based on Default Project.ppj so I
>>>know it's not a corrupt project. Any help appreciated.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>John
>>
>>Hi,
Regard the disabling of disk caching you have firstly to remove if any the
Intel application accelarator if you have put it there.
After that you can do it as EDNA described it.
Regards and Merry Christmas.
Dimitrios
"Mike Audet" <mike@mikeF-SPAMaudet.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Edna,
>
>How do you disable the caching? I might try this since I'm getting the
occasional
>crash, too.
>
>All the best,
>
>Mike
>
>"Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote:
>>If you havent done so already, you might try disabling disk caching on
your
>>drives. I havent had any assertion errors since I did this.
>>Edna
>>
>>"John" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #61841 is a reply to message #61834] |
Sat, 24 December 2005 08:24 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Units, etc.) is not there and won't be for a
very
>> >long
>> >> time, if ever. But for the daily tasks that many computers do, web
>> >browsing,
>> >> emailing, writing, spreadsheets, and so on, GNU\Linux is not only there
>> >it's
>> >> BETTER than the proprietary options. OpenOffice.org is, in my opinion,
>> a
>> >> notable improvement over any proprietary office suite out there.
>Evolution
>> >> is a superb email/contact/scheduling app that will sync nicely to Palm
>> >devices.
>> >> I work in an Outlook/Exchange centric office so I can't use it for
>work,
>> >> but all of the super hip Google Desktop "index my 2GB inbox for me
so
>> I
>> >can
>> >> do complex searches in two seconds" stuff has been in Evolution for
>years.
>> >> Then, on top of all of that "desktop" stuff, a basic Debian install
>will
>> >> also include PostgreSQL (enterprise class database), Apache (#1 web
>server
>> >> in the world), Perl/Python/PHP programming languages, an elegant and
>> >powerful
>> >> shell, enterprise class firewall/router tools, and about fifty thousand
>> >other
>> >> cool things that will allow you to take control over your computing
>world
>> >> in a way that you might never have before. You know those moments when
>> you
>> >> think, "Crikey, I wish every time I booted the machine I didn't have
to
>> >click
>> >> these same four boxes and start these same two apps." One quick shell
>> >script
>> >> and you'll never have to touch it again.
>> >>
>> >> The downside is that nobody is OBLIGATED to help you with computer
>> >problems.
>> >> I'll personally volunteer to do whatever I can to help you out if
>you'll
>> >> give a swing, but leaving Big Brother (be he Jobs or Gates) means none
>> of
>> >> His underlings work on official help lines. If you want to get your
>first
>> >> taste (like most drugs the first taste is free, but unlike most drugs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #61987 is a reply to message #61941] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 04:09 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nity and generally behaved as excellent citizens in
that polis. I'd say IBM in the innovation and vision front surpass even google,
because while google provides many thinga that are free as in beer and some
things that are free as in speech (http://code.google.com/) IBM provides
many things that are free as in speech and a few that are free as in beer.
To me the latter is far more impressive, and companies like M$oft, Apple,
Dell, and the rest are just eating up the dust of companies like google and
IBM.
>Apple has sold more UNIX based operating systems than any other company!
> I wouldn't call that insignificant. Your version of UNIX maybe more efficient
>and more robust as a net work server than Mac OS, however that isn't what
>Mac OS was geared for. It's nothing more than a pissing match, to say Mac
>OSX is inefficient compared to some other version of UNIX, but at what?
>You can say that another version of UNIX is better than Mac OSX, but at
what???
>It's not as usable as a Mac. Certainly not for A/V, multi media! Isn't
>that where the computing world is going???
*Sold* being the operative word here. If you say OS X is unix, then maybe
Apple has sold the most machines with a *nix pre-installed on it. There are
tens (hundreds?) of millions of servers alone running GNY\Linux of one sort
or another, and likely a few time as many running on desktops, though nobody
knows for sure because each download of a distro doesn't could mean zero
installs o
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #61992 is a reply to message #61987] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 08:14 |
cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
u own?
Can you copy a friends cd if you own the vinyl album?
Can you copy a cd you get from the library?
Can you copy a dvd that you own?
Can you copy a dvd that you get from the library?
Can you copy the world onto your video/audio ipod?
Thanks,
JohnYep, I know what means RAID... ;-)
I have RAID 0 (stripe) on my second (Cubase) computer...
I'm just affraid if RAID will degrade PARIS streaming performance..
Protools lite, like pro digi 002 and 001 doesnt like RAID and
results in many streaming errors!!
Digidesign also claims not to use RAID with their 001 and 002 systems..
What a f__k?
My head will blow of that much thinking...
Thanks.
Suad
"erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote in message news:43b3b3e7@linux...
> Hello Suad.
>
> If you want to use RAID, be sure you allways have backups of everything on
> those disks. One of my best friends, working in Nuendo, lost a whole
> production a couple of months ago here in Norway without any backups. It's
> really speedy with RAID, but if you just get problems with one of the
> harddisks, you loose the other too.
>
> Erling
>
> "Suad" <suad@sail.hr> skrev i melding news:43b3abd5@linux...
> > Hello.
> >
> > Just making new computer for paris.
> > It's an Intel P4 3.2G Northwood with an Intel 875PBZ mainboard.
> > As the mainboard have ICH5R chip, I can choose to RAID or to not...
> >
> > I thougt to take 2x segate 160gig s-ata and put them into RAID...
> > ...or to take one WD Raptor for system and o
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62000 is a reply to message #61987] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 08:40 |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
cal. You might as well have just told them that Rush Limbaugh is a
> big Mac user! This is sure to start some stuff.
>
> Is GWB aware that Al Gore sits on Apples board of directors?
>
>
>>So I guess merely having a Mac will not necessarily assure domestic or
>>worldwide popularity, or inspiring governance.
>>
>>Yet another strike against Apple? ;^)
>>
>>Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>DJ wrote:
>>
>>>. The Mac bashing is more than just an opinion, it's ignorant and mean
>>>
>>>
>>>>spirited, and it deserves a response. It really is a slam on anybody
>>>
>>>that
>>>
>>>
>>>>uses a Mac.
>>>
>>>
>>>.........hmmmmm........sorta' like when people say "we really like
>>>Americans, we just don't like your government".
>
>Excellent rant, DC. You should run that on your blog.
BTW, the theory as I've heard it is "Computers are great." With the
immediately offered corollary "Computers suck."
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
DC wrote:
> Guys, computers all suck. all of 'em.
>
> On a good day, some suck less than others.
>
>
> There's several things we know.
>
> For the amount of money they make Microsoft still provides
> products that are, well, POS's. Imagine! an OS that lets scummers
> put things in the registry and install apps! That's just the beginning
> of course, but why belabor the point. XP is crap, compare to what
> it should be by now.
>
> Apple, like MS, Sony, GM and E-MU is quite capable of putting out
> utter crap as well as quite good stuff. (GM had a great idea with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62010 is a reply to message #62007] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 09:51 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
xer and own DSP fx and fx returns.
> Output of all submixes (cards) are summed together and output
> to master card mix and control room outputs. Master FX are related to
> master card only and therefore affects master card DSP chips only. (6 per
> card)
> Even aux sends are NOT summed across all submixes (cards).
> That is advantage, but in some cases BIG disadvantage.
> And finally, no cross conections between different cards and MEC's
> are possible in PARIS patchbay. That is worse of all.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Suad
>
>
> "RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43b42516@linux...
> > I just added a second eds 1000 card and want to have a mixer with 32
> > channels instead of two at 16. Also want to load more effects on the
> global
> > master. I know it's probably simple, but I can't make it happen.
Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>"Jon Jiles" <no@nomo.com> wrote:
>
>.. and you couldn't spend a fortune, what would it be?
Depends how you'd define "fortune".... if you're talking about
under $2k, I'd say my Chandler TG2... if you're talking about
under a grand & a single channel pre, it be the Grace 101 - they
can't do everything, but they're super-clean, and you can always
find a way to work with "clean".
NeilNeil,
I think the new mp5 format will actually fit the world on a single layer
DVD-R. I hear the high end is pretty grainy though. ;>)
Tony
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:43b42073$1@linux...
>
> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>Does anyone have a web site that makes it clear regarding audio cds and
>
>>video dvds regarding copying? Like:
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62015 is a reply to message #62009] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 10:24 |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
(Neutrik if possible)
Note that MIDI uses only 3 pins.
Make sure that you connect ground (pin2 at midi and cable shield) to XLR pin
1.
You can solder MIDI pin 4 to XLR 2 and MIDI pin 5 to XLR 3.
Midi pins 1 and 3 are not used.
And again - You MUST use XLR pin 1 for ground, to avoid MIDI interfering
with other audio lines inside the snake.
There are schematics:
Midi IN : http://www.hardwarebook.net/connector/serial/midiin.html
Midi OUT : http://www.hardwarebook.net/connector/serial/midiout.html
If you have any questions, contact me at suad@sail.hr or call at +385 91
3737465
Cheers!
Suad
"Mark McCurdy" <mark@mccurdy.net> wrote in message news:43b3edee@linux...
> I'm looking for an adapter that will allow me to send a midi signal down a
> standard XLR snake. I've seen them so I know they exist but it's been
> years. Does anyone know of a company that would still make these?
>
>
>Is this db from our group? If so, I'm very sorry to hear it. If not, still
very sorry to hear it. Passing away on a holiday has to be extra hard for
those loved ones left behind. Hopefully they can find a way to make
Christmas a day to remember the happy times and honor his life, rather than
his death.
Tony
"zornwil" <wilson.zorn@takeout_asterick_theobvious.com> wrote in message
news:43b36617@linux...
> In case anyone's interested and not aware, Derek Bailey passed away
> December
> 25th (Christmas) in London from Lou Gehrig's disease.
>
>Yep.
Master FX - Master card.
If the sharing DSP resources between the cards is possible,
audio cross-conections between the cards and MECs will also
be possible in PARIS patchbay. It is an PARIS hardware fact.
New PARIS hardware design should solve this "issue".
....but, not in this lifetime. ;-)
Btw, how did you maxed DSP's? What fx did you used?
Cheers!
Suad
"RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43b42b39@linux...
> Didn't read your post thoroughly enough. I see that you said Master FX
only
> correspond to the master card. So load the global FX on card A, right?
>
> "Suad" <suad@sail.hr> wrote in message news:43b429e8@linux...
> > NOT POSSIBLE.
> >
> > Sorry, but that's it.
> >
> > Adding more cards you can have more submixes in "card" possition.
> > Every card has its own 16 channel mixe
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62026 is a reply to message #62010] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 12:26 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ggedJamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>TCB wrote:
>> OK, I'll take these in order.
>
>> As far as my qualifications, I'm not an MSCE and in fact I have no formal
>> computer training at all. I have a dusty old humanities B.A. around here
>> somewhere. As far as my knowledge of Macs, you might want to google my
name
>> along with words like "audio" "Apple" and "computers" to see what shows
up.
>> I probably had 30 articles published about Macs and audio before 90% of
the
>> people currently using computers for music had heard of one. I've been
at
>> this long enough that I remember booting into Open Firmware and having
to
>> learn a little bit about Forth scripting in order to boot [pirated] beta
>> versions of BeOS and some Linux distro on a 603e based Mac. Am I a "Winoz"
>> user? Yes and no.
>
>MSWindows and Linux seem to be where you have current experience.
Probably in order of expertise I go Windows - Debian - OS X, though Debian
is getting close. That said, when long time OS X only people break their
machines (graphic designers, musicians, civilians) they call me to fix them
and I do. Also, every article I write for Electronic Musician and the books
I wrote I had to check on OS X and Mac compatibility. So I'd guess my OS
X skills would be somewhere above the median for *techs* not users. I don't
think ignorance clears the hurdle as an excuse.
>
>> What exactly Apple is or isn't is purely subjective. I think they were
a
>> visionary company a long time ago. I think they are still a superb consumer
>> electronics and design company, and nobody can managey hype like Steve
Jobs.
>> They were first to market with a really superb product that will be emblematic
>> of the oncoming tidal wave of portable devices that will largely replace
>> the desktop computers that we use now. Then again, they were first to
make
>> a home computer seem like a good (and chic) idea and they managed to parlay
>> that into . . . near bankruptcy. That's what I think Apple is.
>
>What Apple was, actually. You should get up to date on that.
>
>Like Microsoft, Apple got stuck in their early 80s decisions and really
>struggled to get past that.
>
>But that's ancient history at this point. Once the decision was made to
>go with NeXTSTEP, things began to change. That's when Apple became very
>interesting to me (although I did write for MacWEEK and MacUser before
>OSX - so I know the era you're stuck in).
>
>A
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62027 is a reply to message #62026] |
Thu, 29 December 2005 12:23 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s far as the financial performance NOW, the stock is through the roof FWIW.
I'm not "stuck in" any era. I deal with these things all the time, maybe
15% of my tech work. And the stock going through the roof has jack to do
with OS X, that's the iPod and there's a lot of future success built in to
the current price.
>
>> I don't think they've been terribly visionary of late.
>
>IOW, they don't support open source as much as you'd like. Which is a
>fair point.
>
>But as far as providing capabilities for media production on fast
>hardware, they've been doing pretty well of late. Long term support of a
>new OS has paid off. Long term vision has come to fruition. You should
>look into it.
None of which has anything to do with the original question, which is whether
OS X is or is not hindering the possible performance of the hardware on which
it runs.
>
>> You should read my other post to Jamie. The question put to me, somewhat
>> snidely in my opinion, was to prove that I wasn't passing off "urban legend"
>> about OS X performance being less than fantastic on PPC processors. This
>> came in response to someone saying a 1.3 Ghz Celeron running OS X was
out-benchmarking
>> much faster/more expensive G5s. I had heard similar things some time back
>> and investigated and found articles about how poorly multiple threads
are
>> managed. Presented with the fact that, surprisingly considering how dense
>> I am, I was not peddling "urban legend" Jamie decided that OS X was good
>> enough for him. This has absolutely nothing to do with the argument and
I
>> said so.
>
>Dude, sorry if I offended you. When you posted an assertion with no
>references, I gave an opinion (email does not convey voice tonality -
>I'm a very relaxed person so picture a calm voice). You backed up your
>assertion after that and I gave you full credit for that.
Dude, you didn't offend me, dude. However, dude, I don't like being told
I'm passing undigested misinformation around as fact, nor do I like being
called brainwashed (I realize the second part wasn't you). Also, as you probably
have noticed over the years on this NG I'm not a particularly nice person
and don't pretend to be otherwise. That said, I do have a good (though admitedly
dark) sense of humor and am not averse to well founded criticism. Accusing
me of dispensing "urban legend" without even taking the time to google "os
x vs linux G5" does not, in my book, qualify as well founded critique, dude.
>However, it's not just a matter of "good enough for me" although I offer
>that as evidence in the discussion. It's a matter that despite a design
>criticism of threading problems under certain kinds of server loads
>MacOSX still manages to easily offer a better overall media production
>platform than Linux, for the moment anyway. And IMO OSX also offers a
>better experience than MSWindows.
Throughout this discussion I have said every single time that linux is not
a good platform for multi-media authoring. This has more to do with the fact
that the software vendors us proprietary file formats and processing than
the underlying OS. If VST ran under linux I'm sure ableton would produce
the most badass version of Live you could imagind that I would run on
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62115 is a reply to message #62112] |
Fri, 30 December 2005 18:14 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r />
>>>>>>> Paris app resides. If you hvae version 3, it most likely is. If you
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> have
>>>
>>>>>>> version 2, it's in the ensoniq folder.
>>>>>>> Rod
>>>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What's the EMU directory thing ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martin Harrington wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That sounds right, but I'm going from memory here as I don't have
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paris
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> anymore and haven't used it for about 2 years.
>>>>>>>>> Don't forget the Emu directory thing though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>Well Martin, you do great work and it brings great joy to millions of
people. nice job !!
Martin Harrington wrote:
> Yep, that was me, a lifetime ago now.
> 1979, the year my eldest daughter was born.Thanks Pete.
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43b5edeb@linux...
> Well Martin, you do great work and it brings great joy to millions of
> people. nice job !!
>
> Martin Harrington wrote:
>> Yep, that was me, a lifetime ago now.
>> 1979, the year my eldest daughter was born.i don't get it? seriously
Martin Harrington wrote:
> Thanks Pete.Put 16 tracks in constrained mode. Add 1 BlueTubes VST to each channel.
Press play. BAM! ***Assertion Failed: FileCache.c:462 offset>
=0&&<p-> count
I guess I need to buy a new c:462. heheHey Martin, If you have a minute, what setup are you running now
instead of Paris.
John wrote:
> i don't get it? seriously
>
> Martin Harrington wrote:
>
>> Thanks Pete.I use full aiff files.
I use Itunes as my main Play back at home so i want the best sound I have
a pc the I riged with a emu 1404 through a bench mark. I dont buy song from
Itunes as I find it wrong to charge top dooler for files that are less in
quility than cd. j"Pete Ruthenburg"
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62116 is a reply to message #62115] |
Fri, 30 December 2005 18:15 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
; <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
>collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
>which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
>also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
>same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
>be the same quality in half the size?
>
> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
>it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>
>Happy Holidays,
>PeteYeah mp3s and the like truly do suck for sound. Those dumb kids are
wasting their money in my opinion.
Jpmoss wrote:
> I use full aiff files.
> I use Itunes as my main Play back at home so i want the best sound I have
> a pc the I riged with a emu 1404 through a bench mark. I dont buy song from
> Itunes as I find it wrong to charge top dooler for files that are less in
> quility than cd. j"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
>>collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
>>which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
>>also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
>> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
>>same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
>>be the same quality in half the size?
>>
>> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
>>it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>>
>>Happy Holidays,
>>Pete
>
>Gotta agree.I probably won't buy much from itunes.Just get the
cds and import.
Pete
"Jpmoss" <jp@ncounty.net> wrote:
>
> I use full aiff files.
> I use Itunes as my main Play back at home so i want the best sound I have
>a pc the I riged with a emu 1404 through a bench mark. I dont buy song from
>Itunes as I find it wrong to charge top dooler for files that are less in
>quility than cd. j"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
>>collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
>>which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
>>also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
>> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
>>same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
>>be the same quality in half the size?
>>
>> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
>>it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>>
>>Happy Holidays,
>>Pete
>Hmmm.......never tried this because I don't normlly track to Cubase. Cool
feature though. I'll \have to give it a go.
;o)
"Martin Harrington" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62118 is a reply to message #62116] |
Fri, 30 December 2005 18:33 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ws:43b5d878@linux...
> > Martin,
> >
> > I'm thinking that since no one uses mixers anymore during tracking and
> > *riding the fader* really doesn't apply as far as boosting/attenuating
> > signal levels in DAW control surfaces like the C-16, the appropriate
> > terminology for this situation while tracking would be *riding the
> > pot*....and somehow that just doesn't seem a good thing to discuss in
> > polite
> > company so it's easier to just use a compressor.
> >
> > ;o)
> >
> > "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> > news:43b5c2b5@linux...
> >> I know I'm going to sound like an "old fart" as Deej so eloquently put
it
> > a
> >> few posts back, but I see this a lot with "younger engineers" (sorry),
> > that
> >> weren't bought up with analogue.
> >> They are told that all you need to do is set an optimum level, and then
> > fix
> >> it in the mix.....Wrong...........
> >> You must always try and get the most amount of signal to tape, (disk),
> >> allowing for dynamics and song type of course.
> >> Riding record levels was one of the first things we were ever taught,
(I
> >> can't remember being taught it, but I know I was), because if you under
> >> recorded with tape, all you got was noise when you had to ride the
levels
> >> eventually in the mix, especially vocals.
> >> That's not to say we didn't limit or compress, but we still rode those
> >> levels.
> >> Rant off...thanks for reading.
> >> Cheers
> >> Martin Harrington
> >> www.lendanear-sound.com
> >>
> >> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:43b5b29a$1@linux...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This is the approach I often take. Or at times, if there's just a
> >> > couple
> >> > of noticeable sections, I'll just do a volume change on the track
> > itself.
> >> > Simply cut the track boost up the low bit to match better with the
> >> > rest.
> >> > Often you'll find the performer only uses a couple of different
> >> > intensities
> >> > through the performance, so cutting at the change point(s) and adding
> >> > or
> >> > subtracting a few db can do the job.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Kim.
> >> >
> >> > "Lance Reichert" <lance.rocks@nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>John,
> >> >>
> >> >>Another option would be to cut the performance into separate chunks,
=
> >> >>spread them over a few tracks, then adjust the volume
> >> >>on the individual tracks so they match.
> >> >>
> >> >>Lance
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
> >> >>news:43b59383$1@linux...
> >> >> John,
> >> >> Besides automation I like to put two La2as in series. A Waves
ren/C1
> >> > =
&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP assertion errors still [message #62181 is a reply to message #62118] |
Sun, 01 January 2006 07:41 |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
">animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message =
news:43b6f3e8$1@linux...
I've been puttering around inthe yard today doing this and that. =
There are
dead birds all over the place. It's not from cold. These birds are
year -round species and it hasn't been cold enough to hurt these =
little
critters. This looks like a classic West Nile die off.......either =
that or
our little cat has been working triple overtime (she's a major =
predator, but
this is too much, even for her). Strange that it should happen at =
this time
of year though. It's too cold for mosquitoes. I wonder if the =
infection can
lie dormant and then pop up later. We've called the health =
department.
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C60ECF.A66F77E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've always been a pathetic, sickly =
thing. If any=20
of these bugs gets to GA, I'm in trouble....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Jimmy</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net">animix_spam-this-ahole=
_@animas.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:43b7041e$1@linux">news:43b7041e$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's very prevalent in this area. =
We've had our=20
horses vaccinated, but there is no vaccination for humans. People have =
died=20
around here from this. I know a couple of folks who caught it a couple =
of=20
years ago and are still sick. Having lived a good part of my life in =
the=20
tropics and having survived some pretty nasty bugs, I've got a pretty =
strong=20
constitution/immune system. Summer of 2003 I got really sick for a few =
days.=20
Never felt anything like it before, but then it cleared up. =
</FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>No self respecting bug hangs around me for long, =
but I worry=20
a lot about my wife.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:43b6f6fb@linux">news:43b6f6fb@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Deej,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I hope you're wrong.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net">animix_spam-this-ahole=
_@animas.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:43b6f3e8$1@linux">news:43b6f3e8$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Jan 30 16:42:05 PST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06791 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
