|
|
|
|
|
Re: PreSonus Eureka [message #75999 is a reply to message #75989] |
Tue, 14 November 2006 17:45 |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
And if for some reason you decide later that it stinks, you can
always call it the: "You-REEK-a".
:D
yne Carson" <carson_wayne@msn.com> wrote:
>Thanks guys. I purchased the Eureka. Got a pretty good deal at GC. $435
>with some sweet talking and coupons.
>
>The unit sounds pretty clean and clear with just a tiny bit of
>electronic/processing heard. The soft knee compression is just what I
>needed. The 3 band parametric is pretty sensitive and a +/- 2 or 3 db is
>audible. The VU is nice showing either output gain or compression gain
>reduction. The compressor and EQ have a bypass for a reality check. The
>variable input impeadance does dramatically change the gain and tone of
my
>mic. I use a Conneaut Audio Devices (CAD) Equitek E-100 with 200 ohm
>impeadance. Using the Eureka in 600 ohm the mic is bright and using 150
ohm
>it's quite a bit darker sounding. The saturation control (digital tube
>simulation for warmth) using a FET draining method does smooth out harshness
>and brashness but also cuts some of the clarity and airyness. One thing
>that is annoying is that the shiny sky blue knobs, although pretty, are
hard
>to see the white line on them all the time. Fortunately, I plan to set
and
>forget once I've dialed in my vox. They do have just enough detent to
feel
>changes. All in all, I'm happy.
>
>Wayne
>
>
|
|
|