Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » This should help boost your confidence in our government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89371 is a reply to message #89365] |
Thu, 06 September 2007 16:55   |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose the
usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability, leadership
qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst ever:
1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have put
our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not only are
we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and allies have
backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might feel for a wounded
bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around the world since the
Iraq invasion.
2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people die
needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to begin to
define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get those dirty
brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you that.
3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie. The
lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11 or
anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that before
the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, "Condi",
Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this national tragedy
to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for it, Richard Clarke was
there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and tells the story in painful
detail in his book Against All Enemies.
4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse damage
as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a president.
5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and then
believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal gain.
That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now, today,
how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will the USA ever
again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration has to
make this planet unliveable.
Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
S
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>
> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president ever.
> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our worst
> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
> presidents
> regardless of your individual politics.
>
> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>lower.
>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad it's
>>a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89378 is a reply to message #89371] |
Thu, 06 September 2007 19:51 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Here we go in to news group meltdown again, I shouldn't have made this post,
sorry.
"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose the
>usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability, leadership
>qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
>
>Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst ever:
>
> 1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have put
>our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not only
are
>we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and allies have
>backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might feel for a wounded
>bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around the world since the
>Iraq invasion.
>
> 2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people
die
>needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to begin to
>define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get those dirty
>brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you that.
>
> 3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
>Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
>talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie.
The
>lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11 or
>anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that before
>the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, "Condi",
>Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this national tragedy
>to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for it, Richard Clarke
was
>there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and tells the story in painful
>detail in his book Against All Enemies.
>
> 4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
>Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
>leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
>clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
>apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
>alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse damage
>as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a president.
>
> 5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
>Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and then
>believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal gain.
>That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
>
> 6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now, today,
>how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will the USA ever
>again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
>
> Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
>and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration has
to
>make this planet unliveable.
>
> Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
>
> And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
>
>S
>
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>>
>> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president ever.
>> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our worst
>> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
>> presidents
>> regardless of your individual politics.
>>
>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>>lower.
>>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad
it's
>>>a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89379 is a reply to message #89371] |
Thu, 06 September 2007 20:00 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Oh poo Sarah..........I can type lots more little symbols on my keyboard
that when strung together to make words which evolve into sentences, which
then evolve into paragraphs (which I can also number :o) that can then be
either interpreted to refute your little characters that make up words
(etc.) disputing the points you make or challengeing/discrediting those
whose statements, statistics and opinions you are reciting. Wanna see me do
it? Huh???...HUH!!!????.....do you???
(flexes digits in preparation for the typing equivalent of pulling a semi
truck with an unmentioned appendage and grunts in a manly way)
;o)
"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:46e09569$1@linux...
>I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose the
>usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability, leadership
>qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
>
> Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst ever:
>
> 1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have put
> our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not only
> are we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and allies
> have backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might feel for a
> wounded bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around the world
> since the Iraq invasion.
>
> 2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people die
> needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to begin to
> define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get those
> dirty brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you that.
>
> 3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
> Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
> talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie.
> The lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11 or
> anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that before
> the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, "Condi",
> Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this national
> tragedy to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for it, Richard
> Clarke was there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and tells the story
> in painful detail in his book Against All Enemies.
>
> 4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
> Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
> leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
> clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
> apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
> alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse
> damage as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a
> president.
>
> 5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
> Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and then
> believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal gain.
> That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
>
> 6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now,
> today, how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will the
> USA ever again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
>
> Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
> and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration has
> to make this planet unliveable.
>
> Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
>
> And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
>
> S
>
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>>
>> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president ever.
>> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our
>> worst
>> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
>> presidents
>> regardless of your individual politics.
>>
>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>>lower.
>>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad
>>> it's
>>>a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89380 is a reply to message #89379] |
Thu, 06 September 2007 20:02 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Sarah already knows all about poo.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
DJ wrote:
> Oh poo Sarah..........I can type lots more little symbols on my keyboard
> that when strung together to make words which evolve into sentences, which
> then evolve into paragraphs (which I can also number :o) that can then be
> either interpreted to refute your little characters that make up words
> (etc.) disputing the points you make or challengeing/discrediting those
> whose statements, statistics and opinions you are reciting. Wanna see me do
> it? Huh???...HUH!!!????.....do you???
>
> (flexes digits in preparation for the typing equivalent of pulling a semi
> truck with an unmentioned appendage and grunts in a manly way)
>
> ;o)
>
>
> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:46e09569$1@linux...
>> I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose the
>> usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability, leadership
>> qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
>>
>> Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst ever:
>>
>> 1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have put
>> our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not only
>> are we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and allies
>> have backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might feel for a
>> wounded bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around the world
>> since the Iraq invasion.
>>
>> 2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people die
>> needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to begin to
>> define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get those
>> dirty brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you that.
>>
>> 3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
>> Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
>> talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie.
>> The lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11 or
>> anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that before
>> the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, "Condi",
>> Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this national
>> tragedy to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for it, Richard
>> Clarke was there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and tells the story
>> in painful detail in his book Against All Enemies.
>>
>> 4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
>> Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
>> leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
>> clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
>> apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
>> alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse
>> damage as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a
>> president.
>>
>> 5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
>> Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and then
>> believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal gain.
>> That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
>>
>> 6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now,
>> today, how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will the
>> USA ever again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
>>
>> Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
>> and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration has
>> to make this planet unliveable.
>>
>> Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
>>
>> And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
>>
>> S
>>
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>>> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president ever.
>>> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our
>>> worst
>>> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
>>> presidents
>>> regardless of your individual politics.
>>>
>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>> With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>>> lower.
>>>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad
>>>> it's
>>>> a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89392 is a reply to message #89378] |
Fri, 07 September 2007 00:51 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
It's OK James, I shouldn't have responded. :)
S
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46e0bcc6$1@linux...
>
> Here we go in to news group meltdown again, I shouldn't have made this
> post,
> sorry.
>
> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose the
>
>>usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability, leadership
>
>>qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
>>
>>Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst ever:
>>
>> 1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have put
>
>>our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not only
> are
>>we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and allies have
>
>>backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might feel for a
>>wounded
>
>>bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around the world since the
>
>>Iraq invasion.
>>
>> 2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people
> die
>>needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to begin to
>
>>define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get those
>>dirty
>
>>brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you that.
>>
>> 3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
>
>>Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
>>talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie.
> The
>>lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11 or
>>anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that before
>
>>the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, "Condi",
>
>>Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this national
>>tragedy
>
>>to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for it, Richard Clarke
> was
>>there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and tells the story in painful
>
>>detail in his book Against All Enemies.
>>
>> 4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
>
>>Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
>
>>leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
>>clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
>>apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
>>alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse
>>damage
>
>>as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a president.
>>
>> 5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
>>Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and then
>
>>believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal gain.
>
>>That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
>>
>> 6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now,
>> today,
>
>>how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will the USA
>>ever
>
>>again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
>>
>> Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
>
>>and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration has
> to
>>make this planet unliveable.
>>
>> Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
>>
>> And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
>>
>>S
>>
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>>>
>>> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president
>>> ever.
>>> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our
>>> worst
>>> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
>>> presidents
>>> regardless of your individual politics.
>>>
>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>>>lower.
>>>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad
> it's
>>>>a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89393 is a reply to message #89380] |
Fri, 07 September 2007 00:52 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Boy do I ever.
S
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:46e0c134@linux...
>
> Sarah already knows all about poo.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
> DJ wrote:
>> Oh poo Sarah..........I can type lots more little symbols on my keyboard
>> that when strung together to make words which evolve into sentences,
>> which then evolve into paragraphs (which I can also number :o) that can
>> then be either interpreted to refute your little characters that make up
>> words (etc.) disputing the points you make or challengeing/discrediting
>> those whose statements, statistics and opinions you are reciting. Wanna
>> see me do it? Huh???...HUH!!!????.....do you???
>>
>> (flexes digits in preparation for the typing equivalent of pulling a semi
>> truck with an unmentioned appendage and grunts in a manly way)
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>>
>> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message
>> news:46e09569$1@linux...
>>> I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose
>>> the usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability,
>>> leadership qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
>>>
>>> Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst
>>> ever:
>>>
>>> 1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have
>>> put our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not
>>> only are we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and
>>> allies have backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might
>>> feel for a wounded bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around
>>> the world since the Iraq invasion.
>>>
>>> 2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people
>>> die needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to
>>> begin to define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get
>>> those dirty brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you
>>> that.
>>>
>>> 3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
>>> Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
>>> talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie.
>>> The lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11
>>> or anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that
>>> before the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney,
>>> "Condi", Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this
>>> national tragedy to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for
>>> it, Richard Clarke was there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and
>>> tells the story in painful detail in his book Against All Enemies.
>>>
>>> 4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
>>> Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
>>> leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
>>> clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
>>> apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
>>> alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse
>>> damage as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a
>>> president.
>>>
>>> 5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
>>> Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and
>>> then believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal
>>> gain. That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
>>>
>>> 6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now,
>>> today, how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will
>>> the USA ever again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
>>>
>>> Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
>>> and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration
>>> has to make this planet unliveable.
>>>
>>> Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
>>>
>>> And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
>>>
>>> S
>>>
>>>
>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>>>> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president
>>>> ever.
>>>> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our
>>>> worst
>>>> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
>>>> presidents
>>>> regardless of your individual politics.
>>>>
>>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>> With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>>>> lower.
>>>>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad
>>>>> it's
>>>>> a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: This should help boost your confidence in our government. [message #89395 is a reply to message #89379] |
Fri, 07 September 2007 00:55 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Boy do I ever.
S
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
news:46e0c04e@linux...
> Oh poo Sarah..........I can type lots more little symbols on my keyboard
> that when strung together to make words which evolve into sentences, which
> then evolve into paragraphs (which I can also number :o) that can then be
> either interpreted to refute your little characters that make up words
> (etc.) disputing the points you make or challengeing/discrediting those
> whose statements, statistics and opinions you are reciting. Wanna see me
> do it? Huh???...HUH!!!????.....do you???
>
> (flexes digits in preparation for the typing equivalent of pulling a semi
> truck with an unmentioned appendage and grunts in a manly way)
>
> ;o)
>
>
> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message
> news:46e09569$1@linux...
>>I guess it would depend on your criteria for worseness, and I suppose the
>>usual criteria would be things like competence, corruptability, leadership
>>qualities, and legacy. History book type evaluations.
>>
>> Here's why I myself consider Bush (and his administration) the worst
>> ever:
>>
>> 1. His ignorant, ethnocentric, machismo Middle East policies have put
>> our country in far more danger than we were in prior to 9/11. Not only
>> are we more hated than before, but even some of our friends and allies
>> have backed away in a sort of frightened pity, like you might feel for a
>> wounded bear. Terror attacks have increased steadily around the world
>> since the Iraq invasion.
>>
>> 2. He would rather continue to let more tens of thousands of people
>> die needlessly than admit defeat, all the while completely unable to
>> begin to define what "victory" is. I can tell you what victory is: get
>> those dirty brown Muslim feet off our oil. But they won't tell you that.
>>
>> 3. Tens of thousands are already dead or maimed, and all for a lie.
>> Yes, I said a lie. Not a mistake, not bad intelligence (unless you're
>> talking about their brains), but an intentional deception . . . a lie.
>> The lie, of course, is that invading Iraq and anything to do with 9/11 or
>> anything to do with the "war on terror" at all. The truth is that before
>> the sun even came up on 9/12/2001, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, "Condi",
>> Bush and all were working out how to take advantage of this national
>> tragedy to promote their Iraq agenda. Don't take my word for it, Richard
>> Clarke was there with them on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 etc., and tells the story
>> in painful detail in his book Against All Enemies.
>>
>> 4. I'm sick of hearing people talk about how it's a mistake to think
>> Bush is not intelligent, that beneath that lack of eloquence is a shrewd
>> leader. Bah. The man has worse problems than language mangling. He
>> clearly has reasoning problems, shows no evidence of conscience, and
>> apparently has learning disabilities. My long distance diagnosis is
>> alcoholic encephalopathy, but there may be some other substance abuse
>> damage as well. But to put it simply, we have an evil moron for a
>> president.
>>
>> 5. Why evil? Well, how 'bout the hypocrisy of calling oneself a
>> Christian, talking about a personal relationship with Jesus/God, and then
>> believing it's OK to decimate whole populations for one's personal gain.
>> That just don't sound none too Christian to me.
>>
>> 6. Even if we could stop Bush and his band of Bushies right now,
>> today, how many decades is it going to take to undo the damage? Will the
>> USA ever again be the "Shining City on the Hill?" I hope so.
>>
>> Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren may have been incompetent
>> and/or corrupt, but none had the ability that the Bush administration has
>> to make this planet unliveable.
>>
>> Bush and his whole greedy, lying crew belong in jail.
>>
>> And what did you do on YOUR summer vacation? :)
>>
>> S
>>
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46e0481a$1@linux...
>>>
>>> I still can't believe anyone considers GW to be the worst president
>>> ever.
>>> Perhaps the most venal or smallest minded, but he's nowhere near our
>>> worst
>>> ever. Wilson, McKinley, Buchanan, and van Buren were all FAR worse
>>> presidents
>>> regardless of your individual politics.
>>>
>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>With the Worst President Ever I don't think my confidence can go any
>>>>lower.
>>>> In fact, I'm sure of it and with both dems and repubs sucking so bad
>>>> it's
>>>>a trifecta in play ! Go fark !
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 14 18:07:37 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01749 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
