Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » At long last....everything WORKS....
At long last....everything WORKS.... [message #54740] |
Sun, 19 June 2005 12:39 |
DavidLee
Messages: 3 Registered: June 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
r />
>news:42b462c4$1@linux...
>
> There is an on-board LAN adapter and one other onboard device that =
i =3D
>don't
> need that i have disabled them in the device manager....hmm...when =
i =3D
>get
> back to the studio i'll check these things out...
>
> thanks.
>
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >Check to see if you have the proper drivers installed for all your =
=3D
>hardware.
> >Sometimes you have to update them. Try updateing your vid card =3D
>driver. Make
> >sure DMA is checked for all ATA/ATAPI channels that have your hard =
=3D
>drives
|
|
|
Re: At long last....everything WORKS.... [message #54741 is a reply to message #54740] |
Sun, 19 June 2005 12:59 |
Deej [3]
Messages: 181 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> >on them.
> >Rod
> >
> >Rod
> >"DavidLee" <dormesher@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Fresh install of XP, new Asus AN7...whatever the rest of the =
model =3D
>number
> >>is, delux...new ram, new shoes, new processor...
> >>
> >>paris starts up great, was working like a dream, but now when i =
arm
=3D
>anything
> >>more than 4 tracks or so it starts kind of showing signs of =3D
>strain...little
> >>mini freezes but never actually halts up or crashes...
> >>
> >>i've tried many combinations of disk i/o, cache, etc, and no real =
=3D
>sign
> that
> >>these changes are doing anything good or bad to the system.
> >>
> >>any ideas?
> >
>
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html; =3D
>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3D3DG
|
|
|
|
|
Re: At long last....everything WORKS.... [message #54748 is a reply to message #54744] |
Sun, 19 June 2005 18:55 |
Deej [3]
Messages: 181 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
about all that. Nice rant, though.
Mostly what riles the Moslem world is perceived threats against what
they see as holy sites, especially in Saudi but also other places.
As far as free speech goes, people who don't like free speech are people
who don't like to be criticized.
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
Mr Simplicity wrote:
> "justcron" <cron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote in message
> news:42b15bf7@linux...
>
>>Th'-th'-th'-th'-th'-th'-that's All, Folks!
>>
>>
>>
>
> Ya know, bening a former liberal hippie dope smoker and all, I sometimes
> wish that things were as they want us to believe and that if we just would
> appease and *be sensitive* to the terrorists, they would reciprocate and
> leave us alone so we could live in a social utopia and I could just come
> over to your place and borrrow you gear whenever I wanted because everything
> belongs to everyone........nice car, BTW...........gimme the keys. Be back
> later dude.
>
> I sometimes want to believe that it's really all about oil and that if I
> could just grow myself a garden, communicate using coconut shells and hemp
> string, harvest rubber for my tires from organic rubber trees grown in the
> rain forest and ride a bicycle, crush my own grapes, grow my own dope, live
> in a teepee and run around naked all day and live the blissful hippie
> existence that I envisioned for myself and the world back in the 60's, that
> we could solve the problems of the world and that every other country in the
> world would follow suit and that we would be just one big happy family. This
> way, we could all culturally revert to the stone age and be hunter
> gatherers. I mean, that's what these Islamic fundamentalists pretty much
> want (or say they want......right???.......a return to the 6th century, or
> thereabouts).
>
> What my liberal bretherin tend to miss in all of this is that it's not
> really about oil to these terrorists. It's about the spread of what they
> consider to be western decadence.
> Take the recent Paris Hilton commercial for Carl's Jr. for example. It may
> not be that offensive to lots of us westerners, but stuff like this is
> extremely offensive to fundamentalist's, be they Christian, Muslim,
> Jewish......etc....but, oh well, fuck'em. After all, it's our first
> amendment right to broadcast this all over the earth and make every
> fundamentalist parent in the world who has a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: At long last....everything WORKS.... [message #54772 is a reply to message #54765] |
Mon, 20 June 2005 16:55 |
emarenot
Messages: 345 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s westerners, but stuff like this is
> > extremely offensive to fundamentalist's, be they Christian, Muslim,
> > Jewish......etc....but, oh well, fuck'em. After all, it's our first
> > amendment right to broadcast this all over the earth and make every
> > fundamentalist parent in the world who has a television or computer
hooked
> > up to the net, watch their kids like hawks lest they view this stuff.
> > American advertizing and Hollywood movies don't just stay here. There
are
> > lots of mullah's and Imams out there who use this stuff as verbal
ammunition
> > against the very segment of the American political landscape (the
liberals)
> > who seek to appease these assholes.
> >
> > Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. It's tragically hilarious that
the
> > liberal Hollywood types who want *cultural harmony* and one world
government
> > via the UN, have so often teamed up with the capitalist advertizing
industry
> > to come up with movies and ads that are so totally insensitive and
morally
> > offensive to those cultures whose support they say that the US needs and
> > whose more radical elements they seek to appease.
> > Will Susan and Tim...Warren & Shirley, Martin & his boys, Jodie Foster,
> > Julia Roberts, Sarah Jessica Parker, Natalie Portman and Reese
Witherspoon
> > and others who want the world to be one big family and to all get along
and
> > be *culturally sensitive* side with the traditionalists who denounce
things
> > like open displays of pono and legal drug use? The muslim
traditionalists
> > condemn this stuff. The Muslim fundamentalists will kill you for doing
it.
> > Does Hollywood take any kind of moral position on film nudity and
> > libertinism being broadcast over global media outlets that are easily
> > accessible to children? This stuff really pisses off those they seek to
> > appease. If any of their *activist* juices are flowing regarding this
issue,
> > I haven't seen it. Will Sean Penn, who is covering the elections in
Iran
> > for the SF Chronicle and who makes such a big issue of catering to the
> > cultural sensitivities of the world have anything to say about how
> > insensitive *freedom of speech* is to those cultures? I'm waiting to
see,
> > but I doubt I will.
> >
> > IMO, there's a place for this kind of stuff, but it's not on easily
> > accessable media outlets. I see many more conservative/traditionalist
people
> > and groups advocating some kind of control of this than I do liberals.
The
> > liberals who seek to appease the Muslim fundamentalists while abhorring
the
> > Christian fundamentalists don't seem to have a fucking clue what they
are
> > doing. Where is the cultural sensitivity that they so adamantly promote
when
> > it comes to restricting first amendment rights to offer up offensive
media
> > content on vehicles that can be readily accessed by kids all over the
globe
> > and piss off their parents?
> >
> > I'm not saying that we should have censorship laws. I'm saying that
those
> > who prod
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 29 02:36:50 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03296 seconds
|