The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » China

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: China [message #97028 is a reply to message #97006]

Tue, 18 March 2008 08:14

Bill L

Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006

Senior Member

The Jewish conspiracy thing was a justification created in Europe as far
back as the Crusades to avoid paying debts to Jews. It's a brilliant
plan, really:

1. Forbid Jews living anywhere but the ghetto, for convenience in
locating them
2. Forbid Jews doing anything but money lending, banking, gold/silver
smithing, etc.
3. When you owe too much money to a Jew, kill him.
4. If anyone complains about you killing him, say, "Everyone knows the
Jews have horns and eat Christian babies."
5. Walk away scott and debt free!

During the Crusades, it was common practice for a German army heading
off to Jerusalem to make a swing through the ghetto and erase all their
debts (kill their bankers) before the long march to reclaim the "Holy Land".

chuck duffy wrote:
> Erling,
>
> Bill made some great points, but along with those ...
>
> Beware of those who speculate that the arms race and the money behind it
> is a vast jewish conspiracy.
>
> Beware of those who postulate that the first banker to loan someone the money
> for a bomb was a jew.
>
> Be on guard against those who espouse that jew x or jewish race Y is responsible
> for Z. In my experience people who raise these issues are morally bankrupt.
>
> Chuck
>
> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>> Erling, When you talk about Americans, remember that the small number
>> who made money from WW2 are not the same ones who laid down their lives
>
>> or gave their time or sweat to save our European brothers and sisters.
>>
>> Bankers and arms manufacturers are the ones who really win in a war.
>> It's been that way since the very first banker loaned a war lord or king
>
>> money to finance a war, probably thousands of years ago. Part of the
>> money they get back and part they take out in influence. Remember the
>> hundred years war in Europe. That was a field day for the bankers. They
>
>> gained enormous influnce from that - so much so that they managed to
>> keep the war going for a HUNDRED years, loaning money to all sides.
>>
>> Please do not make the mistake of seeing all Americans as a great big
>> generality. Yes, we elect some really, really crappy presidents and
>> other leaders. My guess is it's about a 4:1 ratio of bad to good. But
>> bear in mind we are heavily influenced by the lying PR spread by the
>> same bankers who make money from the dumbass shit that 4 out of 5
>> presidents do at the bankers bidding.
>>
>> For those with an interest in this sort of thing there is a fine and
>> extremely enlightening book called "The Warlords" that details the
>> influence bankers have had for many centuries in fomenting man's wars.
>>
>> erlilo wrote:
>>> James, if it wasn't for Pearl Harbour, Americans had only made money on
> both
>>> parts in the last worldwar, like president Bush's granddad did really
> well
>>> under that war. Isn't it time to learn some real history about how America
>
>>> was being involved in both the first and second worldwar, years after
> they
>>> really started? I wrote about these historical facts here some years ago,
> in
>>> the days when Iraq was being occupied, so if you're interested, you can
> try
>>> to find the posts from those days, or you can find it some other places,
>
>>> like the internet, that I know you love to search after meanings you can
>
>>> follow. It's unbelieveable that many Americans yet don't know a shit about
>
>>> historical facts and still yelling about the glory they got around their
>
>>> heads after the two worldwars and still love to have these glories today,
>
>>> after all the shit some of their presidents have made in newer times around
>
>>> the world.
>>>
>>> Erling
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>>> news:47de8d9b$1@linux...
>>>> Hey erlilo, if it wasn't for Americans coming across the ocean and
>>>> standing
>>>> up to tyranny you'd be speaking Deutsche right now.
>>>>
>>>> "erlilo" <erlingl@tdcadsl.dk> wrote:
>>>>> Is there any difference when a neighbour nation occupying Tibet or a
>
>>>>> nation
>>>>> travel over the whole Pasific Ocean, occupying Iraq?
>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>>>>> news:47dd6e18@linux...
>>>>>> I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no
> sense
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> supporting this government in any way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.html
>>>
>

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		China By: excelav on Sun, 16 March 2008 12:59
		Re: China By: Bill L on Sun, 16 March 2008 14:02
		Re: China By: excelav on Sun, 16 March 2008 16:02
		Re: China By: TCB on Sun, 16 March 2008 23:37
		Re: China By: JeffH on Sun, 16 March 2008 22:59
		Re: China By: TCB on Mon, 17 March 2008 00:29
		Re: China By: JeffH on Mon, 17 March 2008 00:39
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Mon, 17 March 2008 09:00
		Re: China By: Sarah on Sun, 16 March 2008 16:41
		Re: China By: rick on Mon, 17 March 2008 01:43
		Re: China By: Gary Flanigan on Mon, 17 March 2008 09:27
		Re: China By: excelav on Mon, 17 March 2008 10:20
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Mon, 17 March 2008 10:14
		Re: China By: excelav on Mon, 17 March 2008 12:00
		Re: China By: excelav on Mon, 17 March 2008 12:36
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Sun, 16 March 2008 14:11
		Re: China By: TCB on Sun, 16 March 2008 15:25
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Sun, 16 March 2008 14:17
		Re: China By: TCB on Sun, 16 March 2008 23:33
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Sun, 16 March 2008 23:08
		Re: China By: Kim on Sun, 16 March 2008 17:30
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Sun, 16 March 2008 23:17
		Re: China By: erlilo on Mon, 17 March 2008 00:55
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Mon, 17 March 2008 07:53
		Re: China By: Kim on Mon, 17 March 2008 03:26
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Mon, 17 March 2008 07:53
		Re: China By: rick on Mon, 17 March 2008 08:45
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Mon, 17 March 2008 08:46
		Re: China By: Jamie K on Mon, 17 March 2008 10:30
		Re: China By: Jamie K on Mon, 17 March 2008 10:26
		Re: China By: rick on Tue, 18 March 2008 01:50
		Re: China By: erlilo on Mon, 17 March 2008 00:41
		Re: China By: Bill L on Mon, 17 March 2008 06:55
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Mon, 17 March 2008 08:15
		Re: China By: excelav on Mon, 17 March 2008 09:26
		Re: China By: Don Nafe on Mon, 17 March 2008 10:00
		Re: China By: erlilo on Mon, 17 March 2008 16:42
		Re: China By: Bill L on Mon, 17 March 2008 18:48
		Re: China By: chuck duffy on Mon, 17 March 2008 20:13
		Re: China By: excelav on Tue, 18 March 2008 00:03
		Re: China By: Bill L on Tue, 18 March 2008 08:14
		Re: China By: excelav on Tue, 18 March 2008 11:58
		Re: China By: erlilo on Tue, 18 March 2008 14:39
		Re: China By: Bill L on Tue, 18 March 2008 20:11
		Re: China By: erlilo on Tue, 18 March 2008 02:08
		Re: China By: Bill L on Tue, 18 March 2008 08:19
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Tue, 18 March 2008 18:08
		Re: China By: Aaron Allen on Tue, 18 March 2008 17:12
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Tue, 18 March 2008 23:58
		Re: China By: Bill L on Tue, 18 March 2008 20:16
		Re: China By: erlilo on Wed, 19 March 2008 01:25
		Re: China By: Bill L on Wed, 19 March 2008 06:17
		Re: China By: DC on Wed, 19 March 2008 08:51
		Re: China By: Bill L on Wed, 19 March 2008 08:34
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Wed, 19 March 2008 15:30
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Wed, 19 March 2008 16:24
		Re: China By: erlilo on Thu, 20 March 2008 01:39
		Re: China By: excelav on Thu, 20 March 2008 03:26
		Re: China By: erlilo on Thu, 20 March 2008 04:39
		Re: China By: excelav on Thu, 20 March 2008 14:30
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Thu, 20 March 2008 10:10
		Re: China By: dc[3] on Thu, 20 March 2008 11:21
		Re: China By: erlilo on Thu, 20 March 2008 11:15
		Re: China By: DC on Thu, 20 March 2008 12:46
		Re: China By: Bill L on Thu, 20 March 2008 07:03
		Re: China By: Dedric Terry on Thu, 20 March 2008 08:15
		Re: China By: Bill L on Thu, 20 March 2008 09:07
		Re: China By: Stevehwan on Thu, 20 March 2008 12:16
		Re: China By: rick on Fri, 21 March 2008 04:48
		Re: China By: Stevehwan on Fri, 21 March 2008 07:03
		Re: China By: rick on Fri, 21 March 2008 07:32
		Re: China By: excelav on Tue, 18 March 2008 00:31
		Re: China By: erlilo on Tue, 18 March 2008 02:21
		Re: China By: Bill L on Tue, 18 March 2008 08:24
		Re: China By: TCB on Tue, 18 March 2008 05:37
		Re: China By: Bill L on Tue, 18 March 2008 08:30
		Re: China By: TCB on Wed, 19 March 2008 02:53
		Re: China By: Bill L on Wed, 19 March 2008 06:04
		Re: China By: rick on Mon, 17 March 2008 01:41
		Re: China By: Kim on Mon, 17 March 2008 03:20
		Re: China By: Deej [5] on Mon, 17 March 2008 07:55
		Re: China By: excelav on Fri, 21 March 2008 11:23
		Re: China By: excelav on Fri, 21 March 2008 16:16
		Re: China By: excelav on Fri, 21 March 2008 16:19
		Re: China By: excelav on Fri, 21 March 2008 18:43

Previous Topic:	OK...here's the plan
Next Topic:	It's Bach's Birthday today!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Sep 24 19:45:03 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02787 seconds