The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Some questions for everybody
Some questions for everybody [message #66978] Mon, 17 April 2006 18:46 Go to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
I'm kind of thinking out loud.

What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?


What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?

If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
you guys be willing to pay for that?

I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing to
pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?

If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?

I may have somebody interested.

James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66980 is a reply to message #66978] Mon, 17 April 2006 18:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing to
pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?

I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one feature
if I could use UAD-1 cards..


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:444444fa$1@linux...
>
> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
Paris?
>
>
> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing to
> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
> I may have somebody interested.
>
> James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66982 is a reply to message #66980] Mon, 17 April 2006 19:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
thesandbox is currently offline  thesandbox
Messages: 12
Registered: March 2007
Junior Member
I second that!

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one feature
>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>>
>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>
>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>Paris?
>>
>>
>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>
>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>
>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>
>> I may have somebody interested.
>>
>> James
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66983 is a reply to message #66980] Mon, 17 April 2006 19:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Macy is currently offline  John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
Well, I'd think twice, which would take about 10 seconds,
then I would head to PayPal....

Me three...


"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one feature
>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>>
>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>
>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>Paris?
>>
>>
>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>
>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>
>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>
>> I may have somebody interested.
>>
>> James
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66985 is a reply to message #66983] Mon, 17 April 2006 19:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jim Phillips[1] is currently offline  jim Phillips[1]
Messages: 1
Registered: April 2006
Junior Member
me 4th
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>to
>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one feature
>>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>>
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>>>
>>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>
>>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>>Paris?
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>
>>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>to
>>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>
>>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>
>>> I may have somebody interested.
>>>
>>> James
>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66986 is a reply to message #66985] Mon, 17 April 2006 20:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
Ok, the number one request would be latency compensation! This might be a
tuff one, but Ok. What about the other questions? What about native Paris
plugins? This is probably where we'd start.

A little more input please.

"jim Phillips" <jmp@nospamnecounty.net> wrote:
>
>me 4th
>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>to
>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>
>>>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one feature
>>>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>>>
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>>
>>>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>>>Paris?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>>
>>>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
would
>>>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>to
>>>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>>
>>>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
have
>>>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>>
>>>> I may have somebody interested.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66987 is a reply to message #66978] Mon, 17 April 2006 20:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
I'm not sure what you have in mind, but I would think that for PDC you'd
need access and the rights to the original Paris code, which ID don't seem
willing to part with. I don't think it's possible otherwise, though I'd be
very happy to be proven wrong.

Cheers,
Kim.

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?
>
>
>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
>I may have somebody interested.
>
>James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66988 is a reply to message #66978] Mon, 17 April 2006 22:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tony Benson is currently offline  Tony Benson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
James,

ALC would be first on my list also, along with support for VST instruments,
but you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" side of
things.

As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy with what we've already got.
I'm not really missing anything.

The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible routing
and grouping. Again, these things will be hard to tackle.

I'd support development for some more variety in comps, chorus,
delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good multi-pack?

Definitely more for ALC and major improvements along those lines.

Tony

On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article 444444fa$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?
>
>
> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing to
> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
> I may have somebody interested.
>
> James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66990 is a reply to message #66986] Mon, 17 April 2006 23:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
Not for me. There aren't enough/powerful enough DSP chips. The DP Pro algos
are gonna suck them right up. There's just not enough horsepower to run
enough of these per submix to make it worth further efforts. I would support
bringing whatever Chuck had on the boards to some sort of conclusion, but
PDC is the bottom line for me, and second would be being able to buss native
FX to the Paris auxes. Get these two things accomplished and it's a HUGE
deal......for me at least.

Deej

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44445cfd@linux...
>
> Ok, the number one request would be latency compensation! This might be a
> tuff one, but Ok. What about the other questions? What about native
Paris
> plugins? This is probably where we'd start.
>
> A little more input please.
>
> "jim Phillips" <jmp@nospamnecounty.net> wrote:
> >
> >me 4th
> >>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
willing
> >>to
> >>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
> >>>
> >>>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one
feature
> >>>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:444444fa$1@linux...
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
> >>>>
> >>>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
> >>>Paris?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
> >>>>
> >>>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
> would
> >>>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
willing
> >>to
> >>>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
> >>>>
> >>>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
> have
> >>>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
> >>>>
> >>>> I may have somebody interested.
> >>>>
> >>>> James
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66991 is a reply to message #66988] Mon, 17 April 2006 23:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tom Bruhl is currently offline  Tom Bruhl   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00F1_01C66292.800CD630
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

James,
I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp and native effects on auxes
would be easily worth the $300 to me. Major issues at this point.

New effects are fun but there are so many third party jobs it's not
that important to me. The Paris comp and NoLimit are just too good
as they are. A side chain insert would be nice for gates and comps. =20
Didn't somebody say they were doing that already? Hmmm?
Tom
"Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message =
news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com...
James,

ALC would be first on my list also, along with support for VST =
instruments,
but you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" side =
of
things.

As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy with what we've already =
got.
I'm not really missing anything.

The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible =
routing
and grouping. Again, these things will be hard to tackle.

I'd support development for some more variety in comps, chorus,
delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good multi-pack?

Definitely more for ALC and major improvements along those lines.

Tony

On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article 444444fa$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>=20
> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>=20
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for =
Paris?
>=20
>=20
> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these =
plugins?
>=20
> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what =
would
> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>=20
> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be =
willing to
> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>=20
> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you =
have
> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this =
software/service?
>=20
> I may have somebody interested.
>=20
> James

------=_NextPart_000_00F1_01C66292.800CD630
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>James,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Deej.&nbsp; Auto delay comp =
and native=20
effects on auxes</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>would be easily worth the $300 to =
me.&nbsp; Major=20
issues at this point.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>New effects are fun but there are so =
many third=20
party jobs it's not</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>that important to me.&nbsp; The Paris =
comp and=20
NoLimit are just too good</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>as they are.&nbsp; A side chain insert =
would be=20
nice for gates and comps.&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Didn't somebody </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial size=3D2>say=20
they were doing that already?&nbsp; Hmmm?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tony Benson" &lt;<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:tony@standinghampton.com">tony@standinghampton.com</A>&gt;=
wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com">news:C069E3BF.A62A%t=
ony@standinghampton.com</A>...</DIV>James,<BR><BR>ALC=20
would be first on my list also, along with support for VST =
instruments,<BR>but=20
you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" side=20
of<BR>things.<BR><BR>As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy =
with what=20
we've already got.<BR>I'm not really missing anything.<BR><BR>The =
places PARIS=20
lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible routing<BR>and =
grouping.=20
Again, these things will be hard to tackle.<BR><BR>I'd support =
development for=20
some more variety in comps, chorus,<BR>delays,modulation effects, etc. =
$100.00=20
for a good multi-pack?<BR><BR>Definitely more for ALC and major =
improvements=20
along those lines.<BR><BR>Tony<BR><BR>On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article =
<A=20
href=3D"mailto:444444fa$1@linux">444444fa$1@linux</A>, "James=20
McCloskey"<BR>&lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>&gt;=20
wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I'm kind of thinking out loud.<BR>&gt; =
<BR>&gt;=20
What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for=20
Paris?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; What do you think you guys would be =
willing=20
to pay for these plugins?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; If we could get the =
algorithms=20
ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would<BR>&gt; you guys be willing =
to pay=20
for that?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I'm not sure that this is possible, but, =
what would=20
you guys be willing to<BR>&gt; pay for automatic plugin delay=20
compensation?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; If you could have somebody do coding =
work for=20
Paris, what would you have<BR>&gt; them do?&nbsp; What would you be =
willing to=20
pay for this software/service?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I may have somebody=20
interested.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; James<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00F1_01C66292.800CD630--
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66996 is a reply to message #66991] Tue, 18 April 2006 01:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C66295.CEC76120
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can't you use Wires to side chain Tom?

For me, it is about getting the DSP algo's out to VST format, and =
topping my list is PDC. $300 for that?=20
Oh yeah, I'd go it. See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi =
engine out and fix the compact feature for other stuff I'd have interest =
in.=20

AA

"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:44448abc$1@linux...
James,
I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp and native effects on auxes
would be easily worth the $300 to me. Major issues at this point.

New effects are fun but there are so many third party jobs it's not
that important to me. The Paris comp and NoLimit are just too good
as they are. A side chain insert would be nice for gates and comps. =20
Didn't somebody say they were doing that already? Hmmm?
Tom
"Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message =
news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com...
James,

ALC would be first on my list also, along with support for VST =
instruments,
but you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" =
side of
things.

As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy with what we've =
already got.
I'm not really missing anything.

The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible =
routing
and grouping. Again, these things will be hard to tackle.

I'd support development for some more variety in comps, chorus,
delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good multi-pack?

Definitely more for ALC and major improvements along those lines.

Tony

On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article 444444fa$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>=20
> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>=20
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed =
for Paris?
>=20
>=20
> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these =
plugins?
>=20
> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, =
what would
> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>=20
> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be =
willing to
> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>=20
> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would =
you have
> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this =
software/service?
>=20
> I may have somebody interested.
>=20
> James



I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C66295.CEC76120
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5296.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Can't you use Wires to side chain =
Tom?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For me, it is about getting the DSP =
algo's out to=20
VST format, and topping my list is PDC. $300 for that? <BR>Oh yeah, I'd =
go it.=20
See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi engine out and fix the =
compact=20
feature for other stuff I'd have interest in. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>&gt; wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:44448abc$1@linux">news:44448abc$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>James,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Deej.&nbsp; Auto delay comp =
and native=20
effects on auxes</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>would be easily worth the $300 to =
me.&nbsp; Major=20
issues at this point.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>New effects are fun but there are so =
many third=20
party jobs it's not</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>that important to me.&nbsp; The Paris =
comp and=20
NoLimit are just too good</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>as they are.&nbsp; A side chain =
insert would be=20
nice for gates and comps.&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Didn't somebody </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>say they were doing that already?&nbsp; Hmmm?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tony Benson" &lt;<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:tony@standinghampton.com">tony@standinghampton.com</A>&gt;=
=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com">news:C069E3BF.A62A%t=
ony@standinghampton.com</A>...</DIV>James,<BR><BR>ALC=20
would be first on my list also, along with support for VST=20
instruments,<BR>but you're right about those things being on the =
"very=20
difficult" side of<BR>things.<BR><BR>As far as EDS effects, I'm =
actually=20
very happy with what we've already got.<BR>I'm not really missing=20
anything.<BR><BR>The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, =
and more=20
flexible routing<BR>and grouping. Again, these things will be hard =
to=20
tackle.<BR><BR>I'd support development for some more variety in =
comps,=20
chorus,<BR>delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good=20
multi-pack?<BR><BR>Definitely more for ALC and major improvements =
along=20
those lines.<BR><BR>Tony<BR><BR>On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article <A=20
href=3D"mailto:444444fa$1@linux">444444fa$1@linux</A>, "James=20
McCloskey"<BR>&lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>&gt;=20
wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I'm kind of thinking out loud.<BR>&gt; =
<BR>&gt;=20
What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for =

Paris?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; What do you think you guys would be =
willing=20
to pay for these plugins?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; If we could get the =
algorithms=20
ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would<BR>&gt; you guys be =
willing to=20
pay for that?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I'm not sure that this is possible, =
but, what=20
would you guys be willing to<BR>&gt; pay for automatic plugin delay=20
compensation?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; If you could have somebody do coding =
work for=20
Paris, what would you have<BR>&gt; them do?&nbsp; What would you be =
willing=20
to pay for this software/service?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I may have =
somebody=20
interested.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; James<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C66295.CEC76120--
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #66999 is a reply to message #66996] Tue, 18 April 2006 01:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dimitrios is currently offline  Dimitrios   
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
Senior Member
Hi,
I would like to drop in too here...

I am sure we could gather 100 people here willing to pay 300$ for the delay
compensation and aux DX/VST as global insert also.

That makes around 30.000 $ which is sufficient in my own oppinion to justify
the work.

But can someone do this without code ?

I think chuck can enlighten us if he has any access to this.

I think though that someone could build a VST plugin that could work as delay
compensator.
That plugin could be loaded on every Paris audio track say at the bottom
VST slot so every vst added on any audio track would "inform" all vst instances
of that plugin to delay all tracks for the amount needed.
Maybe that more easy to do and would get paid a lot less than the above amount
of money.
If I had the programming skills thats what I would do.
Anyone knows programming ?
I could give him more details about my idea...
Regards,
Dimitrios

"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>
>
>Can't you use Wires to side chain Tom?
>
>For me, it is about getting the DSP algo's out to VST format, and =
>topping my list is PDC. $300 for that?=20
>Oh yeah, I'd go it. See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi =
>engine out and fix the compact feature for other stuff I'd have interest
=
>in.=20
>
>AA
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
>news:44448abc$1@linux...
> James,
> I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp and native effects on auxes
> would be easily worth the $300 to me. Major issues at this point.
>
> New effects are fun but there are so many third party jobs it's not
> that important to me. The Paris comp and NoLimit are just too good
> as they are. A side chain insert would be nice for gates and comps. =20
> Didn't somebody say they were doing that already? Hmmm?
> Tom
> "Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message =
>news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com...
> James,
>
> ALC would be first on my list also, along with support for VST =
>instruments,
> but you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" =
>side of
> things.
>
> As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy with what we've =
>already got.
> I'm not really missing anything.
>
> The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible =
>routing
> and grouping. Again, these things will be hard to tackle.
>
> I'd support development for some more variety in comps, chorus,
> delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good multi-pack?
>
> Definitely more for ALC and major improvements along those lines.
>
> Tony
>
> On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article 444444fa$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
> <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >=20
> > I'm kind of thinking out loud.
> >=20
> > What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed =
>for Paris?
> >=20
> >=20
> > What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these =
>plugins?
> >=20
> > If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, =
>what would
> > you guys be willing to pay for that?
> >=20
> > I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be =
>willing to
> > pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
> >=20
> > If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would =
>you have
> > them do? What would you be willing to pay for this =
>software/service?
> >=20
> > I may have somebody interested.
> >=20
> > James
>
>
>
>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5296.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Can't you use Wires to side chain =
>Tom?</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For me, it is about getting the DSP =
>algo's out to=20
>VST format, and topping my list is PDC. $300 for that? <BR>Oh yeah, I'd
=
>go it.=20
>See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi engine out and fix the =
>compact=20
>feature for other stuff I'd have interest in. </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
>in message=20
> <A href=3D"news:44448abc$1@linux">news:44448abc$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>James,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Deej.  Auto delay comp =
>and native=20
> effects on auxes</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>would be easily worth the $300 to =
>me.  Major=20
> issues at this point.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>New effects are fun but there are so
=
>many third=20
> party jobs it's not</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>that important to me.  The Paris =
>comp and=20
> NoLimit are just too good</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>as they are.  A side chain =
>insert would be=20
> nice for gates and comps.  </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Didn't somebody </FONT><FONT =
>face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>say they were doing that already?  Hmmm?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Tony Benson" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:tony@standinghampton.com">tony@standinghampton.com</A>>=
>=20
> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com">news:C069E3BF.A62A%t=
>ony@standinghampton.com</A>...</DIV>James,<BR><BR>ALC=20
> would be first on my list also, along with support for VST=20
> instruments,<BR>but you're right about those things being on the =
>"very=20
> difficult" side of<BR>things.<BR><BR>As far as EDS effects, I'm =
>actually=20
> very happy with what we've already got.<BR>I'm not really missing=20
> anything.<BR><BR>The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, =
>and more=20
> flexible routing<BR>and grouping. Again, these things will be hard =
>to=20
> tackle.<BR><BR>I'd support development for some more variety in =
>comps,=20
> chorus,<BR>delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good=20
> multi-pack?<BR><BR>Definitely more for ALC and major improvements =
>along=20
> those lines.<BR><BR>Tony<BR><BR>On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article <A=20
> href=3D"mailto:444444fa$1@linux">444444fa$1@linux</A>, "James=20
> McCloskey"<BR><<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>>=20
> wrote:<BR><BR>> <BR>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.<BR>> =
><BR>>=20
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
=
>
> Paris?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> What do you think you guys would be =
>willing=20
> to pay for these plugins?<BR>> <BR>> If we could get the =
>algorithms=20
> ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would<BR>> you guys be =
>willing to=20
> pay for that?<BR>> <BR>> I'm not sure that this is possible, =
>but, what=20
> would you guys be willing to<BR>> pay for automatic plugin delay=20
> compensation?<BR>> <BR>> If you could have somebody do coding =
>work for=20
> Paris, what would you have<BR>> them do?  What would you be =
>willing=20
> to pay for this software/service?<BR>> <BR>> I may have =
>somebody=20
> interested.<BR>> <BR>> James<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A>   </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67004 is a reply to message #66978] Tue, 18 April 2006 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
I don't know whether this can be done but some sort of metering of
parameters in all EDS plugs...i.e. on the compressor - an input level meter
/ level of compression meter / ouput level meter. Same with the chorus,
delays, reverbs etc.

I like visuals...coloured blinky lighty thingies

Don


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:444444fa$1@linux...
>
> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
> Paris?
>
>
> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing to
> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
> I may have somebody interested.
>
> James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67005 is a reply to message #67004] Tue, 18 April 2006 05:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>
>I like visuals...coloured blinky lighty thingies

Then here you go...

http://www.hobbytron.com/ColorOrgans.html

:D
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67006 is a reply to message #67005] Tue, 18 April 2006 05:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Ooooh, a color organ...mmmmmmm

dcn


"Neil" <IOI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:4444d87e$1@linux...
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>
>>I like visuals...coloured blinky lighty thingies
>
> Then here you go...
>
> http://www.hobbytron.com/ColorOrgans.html
>
> :D
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67007 is a reply to message #67005] Tue, 18 April 2006 05:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Ooooh, a color organ...mmmmmmm

dcn


"Neil" <IOI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:4444d87e$1@linux...
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>
>>I like visuals...coloured blinky lighty thingies
>
> Then here you go...
>
> http://www.hobbytron.com/ColorOrgans.html
>
> :D
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67010 is a reply to message #66978] Tue, 18 April 2006 09:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emarenot is currently offline  emarenot   UNITED STATES
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
I agree with others, a delay comp plug would be very helpful. I still
wonder about Matt's reverb plug and what became of it, but would it be
possible to make a reverb plug that was better than the stock Paris verbs,
but not a resource hog? I use the Room reverb and the Plates, but generally
only for short rooms, or in the "background." It would be to have something
whose quality would sit somewhere between the Paris verbs and and something
"higher end."
....and I hope the price might be somewhat below 300.00 -poor boy that I am.
Thanks James,
MR


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:444444fa$1@linux...
>
> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
Paris?
>
>
> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing to
> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
> I may have somebody interested.
>
> James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67011 is a reply to message #66990] Tue, 18 April 2006 06:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rod Lincoln is currently offline  Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
Yeah, PDC and native fx on auxes for me also. Those, and fix the render bug
where everything gets timewhacked if there's a small gap in the edit.
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Not for me. There aren't enough/powerful enough DSP chips. The DP Pro algos
>are gonna suck them right up. There's just not enough horsepower to run
>enough of these per submix to make it worth further efforts. I would support
>bringing whatever Chuck had on the boards to some sort of conclusion, but
>PDC is the bottom line for me, and second would be being able to buss native
>FX to the Paris auxes. Get these two things accomplished and it's a HUGE
>deal......for me at least.
>
>Deej
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:44445cfd@linux...
>>
>> Ok, the number one request would be latency compensation! This might
be a
>> tuff one, but Ok. What about the other questions? What about native
>Paris
>> plugins? This is probably where we'd start.
>>
>> A little more input please.
>>
>> "jim Phillips" <jmp@nospamnecounty.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >me 4th
>> >>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
>willing
>> >>to
>> >>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>> >>>
>> >>>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one
>feature
>> >>>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed
for
>> >>>Paris?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
>> would
>> >>>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
>willing
>> >>to
>> >>>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
>> have
>> >>>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I may have somebody interested.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> James
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67012 is a reply to message #67005] Tue, 21 March 2006 07:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jef knight[1] is currently offline  jef knight[1]   CANADA
Messages: 201
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
holy 1975 batman...

Neil wrote:

>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>I like visuals...coloured blinky lighty thingies
>>
>>
>
>Then here you go...
>
>http://www.hobbytron.com/ColorOrgans.html
>
>:D
>
>
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67014 is a reply to message #67010] Tue, 18 April 2006 07:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I agree with others, a delay comp plug would be very helpful.
>I still wonder about Matt's reverb plug and what became of it,
>but would it be possible to make a reverb plug that was better
>than the stock Paris verbs, but not a resource hog? I use the
>Room reverb and the Plates, but generally only for short rooms,
>or in the "background." It would be to have something
>whose quality would sit somewhere between the Paris verbs and
>and something "higher end." ...and I hope the price might be
>somewhat below 300.00 -poor boy that I am.


Buy a Lexicon Alpha for $129, strictly for the purposes of the
Pantheon license (and you'll also get a copy of CubaseLE for
free - there's your integrated MIDI app, as well).

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/Alpha/

And you'll also get a complementary doorstop! (the convertor box)

Just copy the Pantheon DLL over to your VST folder & you're
rollin' with a nice 'verb that's not too ridiculous when it
comes to pigging out on all your CPU cycles.

As for the Latency Compensator VST plug, you guys should e-mail
Aleksey at Voxengo & see if he can do it for you. I'm betting he
could.

Neil
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67018 is a reply to message #67010] Tue, 18 April 2006 08:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Yip, I'd pay for delay comp!
also native on Auxes.
Also for the UPS..Kim, I'll donate!

"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I agree with others, a delay comp plug would be very helpful. I still
>wonder about Matt's reverb plug and what became of it, but would it be
>possible to make a reverb plug that was better than the stock Paris verbs,
>but not a resource hog? I use the Room reverb and the Plates, but generally
>only for short rooms, or in the "background." It would be to have something
>whose quality would sit somewhere between the Paris verbs and and something
>"higher end."
>...and I hope the price might be somewhat below 300.00 -poor boy that I
am.
>Thanks James,
>MR
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>>
>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>
>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>Paris?
>>
>>
>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>
>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>
>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>
>> I may have somebody interested.
>>
>> James
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67020 is a reply to message #66978] Tue, 18 April 2006 09:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do you
think it would be worth?


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?
>
>
>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
>I may have somebody interested.
>
>James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67022 is a reply to message #67020] Tue, 18 April 2006 09:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Like what FXpansion does?

Don

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4445155e$1@linux...
>
> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do you
> think it would be worth?
>
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>
>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>>Paris?
>>
>>
>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>
>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>
>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
> to
>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>
>>I may have somebody interested.
>>
>>James
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67023 is a reply to message #67022] Tue, 18 April 2006 10:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
I have not tried FXpansion yet. Will it wrap a VST and run it natively on
the EDS1000 card? With out latency?

"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>Like what FXpansion does?
>
>Don
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4445155e$1@linux...
>>
>> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do
you
>> think it would be worth?
>>
>>
>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>
>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>>>Paris?
>>>
>>>
>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>
>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>> to
>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>
>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>
>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>
>>>James
>>
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67024 is a reply to message #67020] Tue, 18 April 2006 10:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dimitrios is currently offline  Dimitrios   
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
Senior Member
Let me see that...
You mean that to be able to run VST plugins on Paris dsp's ?
That would be great...
Is though a Paris dsp sufficient to run any VST plugin ?
I am sure if it does the vst plugins will sound BETTER running on Paris dsp...
I would pay for 150$
Dimitrios

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do you
>think it would be worth?
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>
>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?
>>
>>
>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>
>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>
>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>to
>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>
>>I may have somebody interested.
>>
>>James
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67025 is a reply to message #67023] Tue, 18 April 2006 10:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dimitrios is currently offline  Dimitrios   
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
Senior Member
Dear Don,
Would you ever believe that FXpansion by itself would wanna suicide and make
a VST to EDS wrapper ?
And also without latency ?
Nice thought,
Regards,
Dimitrios

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I have not tried FXpansion yet. Will it wrap a VST and run it natively
on
>the EDS1000 card? With out latency?
>
>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>Like what FXpansion does?
>>
>>Don
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:4445155e$1@linux...
>>>
>>> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do
>you
>>> think it would be worth?
>>>
>>>
>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>>
>>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for

>>>>Paris?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>>
>>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>> to
>>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>>
>>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>>
>>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>>
>>>>James
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67026 is a reply to message #66991] Tue, 18 April 2006 11:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gary Flanigan is currently offline  Gary Flanigan
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>James,
>I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp and native effects on auxes
>would be easily worth the $300 to me. Major issues at this point.
>

Add my name to the list of those who want and would pay well for the above.
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67027 is a reply to message #67024] Tue, 18 April 2006 12:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tom Bruhl is currently offline  Tom Bruhl   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0184_01C662F9.EFE29320
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We'll all need 8 card systems.

"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message =
news:444525f4$1@linux...

Let me see that...
You mean that to be able to run VST plugins on Paris dsp's ?
That would be great...
Is though a Paris dsp sufficient to run any VST plugin ?
I am sure if it does the vst plugins will sound BETTER running on =
Paris dsp...
I would pay for 150$
Dimitrios

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What =
do you
>think it would be worth?
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>
>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for =
Paris?
>>
>>
>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these =
plugins?
>>
>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what =
would
>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>
>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be =
willing
>to
>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>
>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you =
have
>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this =
software/service?
>>
>>I may have somebody interested.=20
>>
>>James
>

------=_NextPart_000_0184_01C662F9.EFE29320
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>We'll all need 8 card =
systems.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Dimitrios" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:musurgio@otenet.gr">musurgio@otenet.gr</A>&gt; wrote in =
message=20
<A =
href=3D"news:444525f4$1@linux">news:444525f4$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Let =
me=20
see that...<BR>You mean that to be able to run VST plugins on Paris =
dsp's=20
?<BR>That would be great...<BR>Is though a Paris dsp sufficient to run =
any VST=20
plugin ?<BR>I am sure if it does the vst plugins will sound BETTER =
running on=20
Paris dsp...<BR>I would pay for 150$<BR>Dimitrios<BR><BR>"James =
McCloskey"=20
&lt;<A href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>&gt; =

wrote:<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to =
EDS FX=20
wrapper?&nbsp; What do you<BR>&gt;think it would be=20
worth?<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;"James McCloskey" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>&gt;=20
wrote:<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;I'm kind of thinking out=20
loud.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;What kind of native plugins would you =
guys like=20
to see developed for Paris?<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;What do =
you=20
think you guys would be willing to pay for these=20
plugins?<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;If we could get the algorithms ported =
from the=20
Ensoniq DP pro, what would<BR>&gt;&gt;you guys be willing to pay for=20
that?<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;I'm not sure that this is possible, but, =
what=20
would you guys be willing<BR>&gt;to<BR>&gt;&gt;pay for automatic =
plugin delay=20
compensation?<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;If you could have somebody do =
coding work=20
for Paris, what would you have<BR>&gt;&gt;them do?&nbsp; What would =
you be=20
willing to pay for this software/service?<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;I may =
have=20
somebody interested.=20
<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;James<BR>&gt; <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0184_01C662F9.EFE29320--
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67028 is a reply to message #66978] Tue, 18 April 2006 12:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
What do you think the problem is with XP not working with multiple Adat cards?
Is this a fix you guys would be willing to pay for?

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>
>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?
>
>
>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>
>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>
>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
to
>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>
>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>
>I may have somebody interested.
>
>James
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67031 is a reply to message #67023] Tue, 18 April 2006 13:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chuck duffy is currently offline  chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Hehe .. That's not even remotely possible.

Chuck
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I have not tried FXpansion yet. Will it wrap a VST and run it natively
on
>the EDS1000 card? With out latency?
>
>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>Like what FXpansion does?
>>
>>Don
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:4445155e$1@linux...
>>>
>>> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do
>you
>>> think it would be worth?
>>>
>>>
>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>>
>>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for

>>>>Paris?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>>
>>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>> to
>>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>>
>>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>>
>>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>>
>>>>James
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67032 is a reply to message #67024] Tue, 18 April 2006 13:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chuck duffy is currently offline  chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
That's just not possible.

"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>Let me see that...
>You mean that to be able to run VST plugins on Paris dsp's ?
>That would be great...
>Is though a Paris dsp sufficient to run any VST plugin ?
>I am sure if it does the vst plugins will sound BETTER running on Paris
dsp...
>I would pay for 150$
>Dimitrios
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What do
you
>>think it would be worth?
>>
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>
>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for Paris?
>>>
>>>
>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>
>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>to
>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>
>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>
>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>
>>>James
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67034 is a reply to message #66990] Tue, 18 April 2006 13:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
The DP Pro used the same ESP2 chips as Paris, so I don't think it would suck
up that much horsepower. Does anybody know how many ESP2 chips are in a
DP Pro?

Can any of you AU guys try to look up Mathew Craig?

Anybody know how to reach Kevin Monahan? He was doing some video production
company last time I heard.

I don't know what can be done, but if there is a chance that we can improve
Paris we should try.

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Not for me. There aren't enough/powerful enough DSP chips. The DP Pro algos
>are gonna suck them right up. There's just not enough horsepower to run
>enough of these per submix to make it worth further efforts. I would support
>bringing whatever Chuck had on the boards to some sort of conclusion, but
>PDC is the bottom line for me, and second would be being able to buss native
>FX to the Paris auxes. Get these two things accomplished and it's a HUGE
>deal......for me at least.
>
>Deej
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:44445cfd@linux...
>>
>> Ok, the number one request would be latency compensation! This might
be a
>> tuff one, but Ok. What about the other questions? What about native
>Paris
>> plugins? This is probably where we'd start.
>>
>> A little more input please.
>>
>> "jim Phillips" <jmp@nospamnecounty.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >me 4th
>> >>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
>willing
>> >>to
>> >>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>> >>>
>> >>>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one
>feature
>> >>>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed
for
>> >>>Paris?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
>> would
>> >>>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
>willing
>> >>to
>> >>>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
>> have
>> >>>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I may have somebody interested.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> James
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67036 is a reply to message #67031] Tue, 18 April 2006 13:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
Hey Chuck! Can you fill us in on what you think is possible? Is there any
thing that you or anybody else was working on that could be completed by
somebody else that has the time?

Thanks
James

"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>
>Hehe .. That's not even remotely possible.
>
>Chuck
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I have not tried FXpansion yet. Will it wrap a VST and run it natively
>on
>>the EDS1000 card? With out latency?
>>
>>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>>Like what FXpansion does?
>>>
>>>Don
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4445155e$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What
do
>>you
>>>> think it would be worth?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>>>
>>>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>
>>>>>Paris?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>>>
>>>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
would
>>>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>>> to
>>>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>>>
>>>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
have
>>>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>>>
>>>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>>>
>>>>>James
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67037 is a reply to message #67036] Tue, 18 April 2006 13:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
Hey Chuck, one other thing. What programming language was used to write Paris
and the plugins?


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Chuck! Can you fill us in on what you think is possible? Is there
any
>thing that you or anybody else was working on that could be completed by
>somebody else that has the time?
>
>Thanks
>James
>
>"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hehe .. That's not even remotely possible.
>>
>>Chuck
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I have not tried FXpansion yet. Will it wrap a VST and run it natively
>>on
>>>the EDS1000 card? With out latency?
>>>
>>>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>>>Like what FXpansion does?
>>>>
>>>>Don
>>>>
>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:4445155e$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What
>do
>>>you
>>>>> think it would be worth?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>>
>>>>>>Paris?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
>would
>>>>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>>>> to
>>>>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
>have
>>>>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>James
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67038 is a reply to message #67034] Tue, 18 April 2006 13:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mike audet[1] is currently offline  mike audet[1]
Messages: 129
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Hi James,

I contacted Matt about a year ago, and he had just moved to England. I asked
him about the mega verb, and he said that he just needed to get an online
payment/delivery system setup, and he would make it available. I never heard
from him after that.

About a month ago, I emailed him at every address that I had and could find.
I haven't heard back yet, but you never know.

Personally, I'm finishing up my second compuer science course so that I can
work on the effects. I'm hoping ot take a third this summer.

All the best,
Mike


"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>The DP Pro used the same ESP2 chips as Paris, so I don't think it would
suck
>up that much horsepower. Does anybody know how many ESP2 chips are in
a
>DP Pro?
>
>Can any of you AU guys try to look up Mathew Craig?
>
>Anybody know how to reach Kevin Monahan? He was doing some video production
>company last time I heard.
>
>I don't know what can be done, but if there is a chance that we can improve
>Paris we should try.
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>Not for me. There aren't enough/powerful enough DSP chips. The DP Pro algos
>>are gonna suck them right up. There's just not enough horsepower to run
>>enough of these per submix to make it worth further efforts. I would support
>>bringing whatever Chuck had on the boards to some sort of conclusion, but
>>PDC is the bottom line for me, and second would be being able to buss native
>>FX to the Paris auxes. Get these two things accomplished and it's a HUGE
>>deal......for me at least.
>>
>>Deej
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:44445cfd@linux...
>>>
>>> Ok, the number one request would be latency compensation! This might
>be a
>>> tuff one, but Ok. What about the other questions? What about native
>>Paris
>>> plugins? This is probably where we'd start.
>>>
>>> A little more input please.
>>>
>>> "jim Phillips" <jmp@nospamnecounty.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >me 4th
>>> >>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>> >>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
>>willing
>>> >>to
>>> >>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>I would pay $300.00 without even thinking twice, just for this one
>>feature
>>> >>>if I could use UAD-1 cards..
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >>>news:444444fa$1@linux...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed
>for
>>> >>>Paris?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
>>> would
>>> >>>> you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be
>>willing
>>> >>to
>>> >>>> pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would
you
>>> have
>>> >>>> them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I may have somebody interested.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> James
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67040 is a reply to message #67025] Tue, 18 April 2006 14:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mark McDermott is currently offline  Mark McDermott   
Messages: 204
Registered: February 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Senior Member
Yeah! And right after we accomplish magically translating between DSP and
x86 microcode maybe someone can hook me up with Jenny McCarthy? I hear she's
single now.

Just joshin'! ^-}

Mark

"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>Dear Don,
>Would you ever believe that FXpansion by itself would wanna suicide and
make
>a VST to EDS wrapper ?
>And also without latency ?
>Nice thought,
>Regards,
>Dimitrios
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I have not tried FXpansion yet. Will it wrap a VST and run it natively
>on
>>the EDS1000 card? With out latency?
>>
>>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>>Like what FXpansion does?
>>>
>>>Don
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4445155e$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> would you guys be willing to pay for a VST to EDS FX wrapper? What
do
>>you
>>>> think it would be worth?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm kind of thinking out loud.
>>>>>
>>>>>What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
>
>>>>>Paris?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
>>>>>
>>>>>If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what
would
>>>>>you guys be willing to pay for that?
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
>>>> to
>>>>>pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
>>>>>
>>>>>If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you
have
>>>>>them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
>>>>>
>>>>>I may have somebody interested.
>>>>>
>>>>>James
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67041 is a reply to message #67038] Tue, 18 April 2006 15:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wmarkwilson is currently offline  wmarkwilson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 114
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
This makes the 8th and/or 9th time I've read here that someone wants to know
where this guy is. I did some light sleuthing; here's what I found in 3
minutes. If this is him, I figger I'm owed at least a McDonald's gift
certificate or something.

http://www.bath.ac.uk/comp-sci/people/cspmgc.shtml

Dubya

"Mike Audet" wrote:
> I contacted Matt about a year ago, and he had just moved to England.
> I haven't heard back yet, but you never know.


> "James McCloskey" wrote:
>>Can any of you AU guys try to look up Mathew Craig?
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67046 is a reply to message #66999] Tue, 18 April 2006 16:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
>I think though that someone could build a VST plugin that could work as
delay compensator<

UAD has a VST delay compensator. The problem with it is that the delay it's
compensating for is *HUGE*. This puts the audible sound so far behind the
waveform that using automation is pretty much impossible.

Right now, I think Dimitrios has come about as close as we're going to get
with this using his ingenius coctail of wrappers and consoles. I haven't
tried it yet, but if 90 ms (M?L) is possible and it's possible to create a
32-48 track mix template with this combination of VST wrappers, etc.
inserted on each channel without too much CPU overhead , then this is major
and pretty much puts the automation issues to rest. This could be very
usable.

I've got virtually *zero* plugin delay working with Paris/Cubase hybrid rig,
but it is neither cheap nor simple.

Dimitrios method could, in theory, allow a template to be created with a VST
chainer which would allow multiple UAD plugins per channel running at the
same latency and at the same time a compensator could be inserted in this
scenario which would, when a preset is used, allow virtual delay
compensation by simply nudging a Paris track 100ms to the left in the
deitor. This is much simpler than the hoops I'm jumping through with flying
files back and forth between computers..........much much simpler. The only
issue for me would be CPU the overhead created by a 48 track mix timplate
with this stuvff inserted on each channel..


"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:4444a563$1@linux...
>
> Hi,
> I would like to drop in too here...
>
> I am sure we could gather 100 people here willing to pay 300$ for the
delay
> compensation and aux DX/VST as global insert also.
>
> That makes around 30.000 $ which is sufficient in my own oppinion to
justify
> the work.
>
> But can someone do this without code ?
>
> I think chuck can enlighten us if he has any access to this.
>
> I think though that someone could build a VST plugin that could work as
delay
> compensator.
> That plugin could be loaded on every Paris audio track say at the bottom
> VST slot so every vst added on any audio track would "inform" all vst
instances
> of that plugin to delay all tracks for the amount needed.
> Maybe that more easy to do and would get paid a lot less than the above
amount
> of money.
> If I had the programming skills thats what I would do.
> Anyone knows programming ?
> I could give him more details about my idea...
> Regards,
> Dimitrios
>
> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Can't you use Wires to side chain Tom?
> >
> >For me, it is about getting the DSP algo's out to VST format, and =
> >topping my list is PDC. $300 for that?=20
> >Oh yeah, I'd go it. See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi =
> >engine out and fix the compact feature for other stuff I'd have interest
> =
> >in.=20
> >
> >AA
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
> >news:44448abc$1@linux...
> > James,
> > I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp and native effects on auxes
> > would be easily worth the $300 to me. Major issues at this point.
> >
> > New effects are fun but there are so many third party jobs it's not
> > that important to me. The Paris comp and NoLimit are just too good
> > as they are. A side chain insert would be nice for gates and comps.
=20
> > Didn't somebody say they were doing that already? Hmmm?
> > Tom
> > "Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message =
> >news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com...
> > James,
> >
> > ALC would be first on my list also, along with support for VST =
> >instruments,
> > but you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" =
> >side of
> > things.
> >
> > As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy with what we've =
> >already got.
> > I'm not really missing anything.
> >
> > The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible =
> >routing
> > and grouping. Again, these things will be hard to tackle.
> >
> > I'd support development for some more variety in comps, chorus,
> > delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good multi-pack?
> >
> > Definitely more for ALC and major improvements along those lines.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article 444444fa$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
> > <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >=20
> > > I'm kind of thinking out loud.
> > >=20
> > > What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed =
> >for Paris?
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these =
> >plugins?
> > >=20
> > > If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, =
> >what would
> > > you guys be willing to pay for that?
> > >=20
> > > I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be =
> >willing to
> > > pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
> > >=20
> > > If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would =
> >you have
> > > them do? What would you be willing to pay for this =
> >software/service?
> > >=20
> > > I may have somebody interested.
> > >=20
> > > James
> >
> >
> >
> >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> >
> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> ><HTML><HEAD>
> ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> >charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5296.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
> ><STYLE></STYLE>
> ></HEAD>
> ><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Can't you use Wires to side chain =
> >Tom?</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For me, it is about getting the DSP =
> >algo's out to=20
> >VST format, and topping my list is PDC. $300 for that? <BR>Oh yeah, I'd
> =
> >go it.=20
> >See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi engine out and fix the =
> >compact=20
> >feature for other stuff I'd have interest in. </FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> ><BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
> >style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
> >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > <DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> > href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
> >in message=20
> > <A href=3D"news:44448abc$1@linux">news:44448abc$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>James,</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp =
> >and native=20
> > effects on auxes</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>would be easily worth the $300 to =
> >me. Major=20
> > issues at this point.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>New effects are fun but there are so
> =
> >many third=20
> > party jobs it's not</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>that important to me. The Paris =
> >comp and=20
> > NoLimit are just too good</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>as they are. A side chain =
> >insert would be=20
> > nice for gates and comps. </FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Didn't somebody </FONT><FONT =
> >face=3DArial=20
> > size=3D2>say they were doing that already? Hmmm?</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
> > <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> > style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
> >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > <DIV>"Tony Benson" <<A=20
> > =
> >href=3D"mailto:tony@standinghampton.com">tony@standinghampton.com</A>>=
> >=20
> > wrote in message <A=20
> > =
>
>href=3D"news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com">news:C069E3BF.A62A%t=
> >ony@standinghampton.com</A>...</DIV>James,<BR><BR>ALC=20
> > would be first on my list also, along with support for VST=20
> > instruments,<BR>but you're right about those things being on the =
> >"very=20
> > difficult" side of<BR>things.<BR><BR>As far as EDS effects, I'm =
> >actually=20
> > very happy with what we've already got.<BR>I'm not really missing=20
> > anything.<BR><BR>The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, =
> >and more=20
> > flexible routing<BR>and grouping. Again, these things will be hard =
> >to=20
> > tackle.<BR><BR>I'd support development for some more variety in =
> >comps,=20
> > chorus,<BR>delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good=20
> > multi-pack?<BR><BR>Definitely more for ALC and major improvements =
> >along=20
> > those lines.<BR><BR>Tony<BR><BR>On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article <A=20
> > href=3D"mailto:444444fa$1@linux">444444fa$1@linux</A>, "James=20
> > McCloskey"<BR><<A=20
> > href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>>=20
> > wrote:<BR><BR>> <BR>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.<BR>> =
> ><BR>>=20
> > What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
> =
> >
> > Paris?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> What do you think you guys would be =
> >willing=20
> > to pay for these plugins?<BR>> <BR>> If we could get the =
> >algorithms=20
> > ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would<BR>> you guys be =
> >willing to=20
> > pay for that?<BR>> <BR>> I'm not sure that this is possible, =
> >but, what=20
> > would you guys be willing to<BR>> pay for automatic plugin delay=20
> > compensation?<BR>> <BR>> If you could have somebody do coding =
> >work for=20
> > Paris, what would you have<BR>> them do? What would you be =
> >willing=20
> > to pay for this software/service?<BR>> <BR>> I may have =
> >somebody=20
> > interested.<BR>> <BR>> James<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
> ><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
> >and=20
> >you?<BR><A=20
>
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
> >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> >
> >
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67048 is a reply to message #67046] Tue, 18 April 2006 16:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
oops.......sorry Dimitrios....I'm talking to you like you're the third
person here. I meant to be answering Tony's original subthread here.

;o)

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:444579d1@linux...
> >I think though that someone could build a VST plugin that could work as
> delay compensator<
>
> UAD has a VST delay compensator. The problem with it is that the delay
it's
> compensating for is *HUGE*. This puts the audible sound so far behind the
> waveform that using automation is pretty much impossible.
>
> Right now, I think Dimitrios has come about as close as we're going to get
> with this using his ingenius coctail of wrappers and consoles. I haven't
> tried it yet, but if 90 ms (M?L) is possible and it's possible to create a
> 32-48 track mix template with this combination of VST wrappers, etc.
> inserted on each channel without too much CPU overhead , then this is
major
> and pretty much puts the automation issues to rest. This could be very
> usable.
>
> I've got virtually *zero* plugin delay working with Paris/Cubase hybrid
rig,
> but it is neither cheap nor simple.
>
> Dimitrios method could, in theory, allow a template to be created with a
VST
> chainer which would allow multiple UAD plugins per channel running at the
> same latency and at the same time a compensator could be inserted in this
> scenario which would, when a preset is used, allow virtual delay
> compensation by simply nudging a Paris track 100ms to the left in the
> deitor. This is much simpler than the hoops I'm jumping through with
flying
> files back and forth between computers..........much much simpler. The
only
> issue for me would be CPU the overhead created by a 48 track mix timplate
> with this stuvff inserted on each channel..
>
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:4444a563$1@linux...
> >
> > Hi,
> > I would like to drop in too here...
> >
> > I am sure we could gather 100 people here willing to pay 300$ for the
> delay
> > compensation and aux DX/VST as global insert also.
> >
> > That makes around 30.000 $ which is sufficient in my own oppinion to
> justify
> > the work.
> >
> > But can someone do this without code ?
> >
> > I think chuck can enlighten us if he has any access to this.
> >
> > I think though that someone could build a VST plugin that could work as
> delay
> > compensator.
> > That plugin could be loaded on every Paris audio track say at the bottom
> > VST slot so every vst added on any audio track would "inform" all vst
> instances
> > of that plugin to delay all tracks for the amount needed.
> > Maybe that more easy to do and would get paid a lot less than the above
> amount
> > of money.
> > If I had the programming skills thats what I would do.
> > Anyone knows programming ?
> > I could give him more details about my idea...
> > Regards,
> > Dimitrios
> >
> > "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >Can't you use Wires to side chain Tom?
> > >
> > >For me, it is about getting the DSP algo's out to VST format, and =
> > >topping my list is PDC. $300 for that?=20
> > >Oh yeah, I'd go it. See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi =
> > >engine out and fix the compact feature for other stuff I'd have
interest
> > =
> > >in.=20
> > >
> > >AA
> > >
> > > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
> > >news:44448abc$1@linux...
> > > James,
> > > I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp and native effects on auxes
> > > would be easily worth the $300 to me. Major issues at this point.
> > >
> > > New effects are fun but there are so many third party jobs it's not
> > > that important to me. The Paris comp and NoLimit are just too good
> > > as they are. A side chain insert would be nice for gates and comps.
> =20
> > > Didn't somebody say they were doing that already? Hmmm?
> > > Tom
> > > "Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message =
> > >news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com...
> > > James,
> > >
> > > ALC would be first on my list also, along with support for VST =
> > >instruments,
> > > but you're right about those things being on the "very difficult" =
> > >side of
> > > things.
> > >
> > > As far as EDS effects, I'm actually very happy with what we've =
> > >already got.
> > > I'm not really missing anything.
> > >
> > > The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, and more flexible
=
> > >routing
> > > and grouping. Again, these things will be hard to tackle.
> > >
> > > I'd support development for some more variety in comps, chorus,
> > > delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good multi-pack?
> > >
> > > Definitely more for ALC and major improvements along those lines.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article 444444fa$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
> > > <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >=20
> > > > I'm kind of thinking out loud.
> > > >=20
> > > > What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed
=
> > >for Paris?
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these =
> > >plugins?
> > > >=20
> > > > If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, =
> > >what would
> > > > you guys be willing to pay for that?
> > > >=20
> > > > I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be =
> > >willing to
> > > > pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
> > > >=20
> > > > If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would =
> > >you have
> > > > them do? What would you be willing to pay for this =
> > >software/service?
> > > >=20
> > > > I may have somebody interested.
> > > >=20
> > > > James
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> > >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> > >
> > ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> > ><HTML><HEAD>
> > ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> > >charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> > ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5296.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
> > ><STYLE></STYLE>
> > ></HEAD>
> > ><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Can't you use Wires to side chain =
> > >Tom?</FONT></DIV>
> > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For me, it is about getting the DSP =
> > >algo's out to=20
> > >VST format, and topping my list is PDC. $300 for that? <BR>Oh yeah, I'd
> > =
> > >go it.=20
> > >See if you can get them to rip that shoddy midi engine out and fix the
=
> > >compact=20
> > >feature for other stuff I'd have interest in. </FONT></DIV>
> > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
> > ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > ><BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
> > >style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
> > >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > > <DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> > > href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
> > >in message=20
> > > <A href=3D"news:44448abc$1@linux">news:44448abc$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>James,</FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Deej. Auto delay comp =
> > >and native=20
> > > effects on auxes</FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>would be easily worth the $300 to =
> > >me. Major=20
> > > issues at this point.</FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>New effects are fun but there are so
> > =
> > >many third=20
> > > party jobs it's not</FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>that important to me. The Paris =
> > >comp and=20
> > > NoLimit are just too good</FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>as they are. A side chain =
> > >insert would be=20
> > > nice for gates and comps. </FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Didn't somebody </FONT><FONT =
> > >face=3DArial=20
> > > size=3D2>say they were doing that already? Hmmm?</FONT></DIV>
> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
> > > <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> > > style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
> > >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > > <DIV>"Tony Benson" <<A=20
> > > =
> > >href=3D"mailto:tony@standinghampton.com">tony@standinghampton.com</A>>=
> > >=20
> > > wrote in message <A=20
> > > =
> >
>
>href=3D"news:C069E3BF.A62A%tony@standinghampton.com">news:C069E3BF.A62A%t=
> > >ony@standinghampton.com</A>...</DIV>James,<BR><BR>ALC=20
> > > would be first on my list also, along with support for VST=20
> > > instruments,<BR>but you're right about those things being on the =
> > >"very=20
> > > difficult" side of<BR>things.<BR><BR>As far as EDS effects, I'm =
> > >actually=20
> > > very happy with what we've already got.<BR>I'm not really
missing=20
> > > anything.<BR><BR>The places PARIS lacks for me is in VST support, =
> > >and more=20
> > > flexible routing<BR>and grouping. Again, these things will be hard
=
> > >to=20
> > > tackle.<BR><BR>I'd support development for some more variety in =
> > >comps,=20
> > > chorus,<BR>delays,modulation effects, etc. $100.00 for a good=20
> > > multi-pack?<BR><BR>Definitely more for ALC and major improvements =
> > >along=20
> > > those lines.<BR><BR>Tony<BR><BR>On 4/17/06 8:46 PM, in article
<A=20
> > > href=3D"mailto:444444fa$1@linux">444444fa$1@linux</A>, "James=20
> > > McCloskey"<BR><<A=20
> > > href=3D"mailto:excelsm@hotmail.com">excelsm@hotmail.com</A>>=20
> > > wrote:<BR><BR>> <BR>> I'm kind of thinking out loud.<BR>> =
> > ><BR>>=20
> > > What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed
for
> > =
> > >
> > > Paris?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> What do you think you guys would be =
> > >willing=20
> > > to pay for these plugins?<BR>> <BR>> If we could get the =
> > >algorithms=20
> > > ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would<BR>> you guys be =
> > >willing to=20
> > > pay for that?<BR>> <BR>> I'm not sure that this is possible, =
> > >but, what=20
> > > would you guys be willing to<BR>> pay for automatic plugin delay=20
> > > compensation?<BR>> <BR>> If you could have somebody do coding =
> > >work for=20
> > > Paris, what would you have<BR>> them do? What would you be =
> > >willing=20
> > > to pay for this software/service?<BR>> <BR>> I may have =
> > >somebody=20
> > > interested.<BR>> <BR>> James<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
> > ><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
> > >and=20
> > >you?<BR><A=20
> >
>
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
> > >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Some questions for everybody [message #67050 is a reply to message #67028] Tue, 18 April 2006 16:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
...........yeah.....I guess I would, but it's not an huge issue as PDC.

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44454216$1@linux...
>
> What do you think the problem is with XP not working with multiple Adat
cards?
> Is this a fix you guys would be willing to pay for?
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >I'm kind of thinking out loud.
> >
> >What kind of native plugins would you guys like to see developed for
Paris?
> >
> >
> >What do you think you guys would be willing to pay for these plugins?
> >
> >If we could get the algorithms ported from the Ensoniq DP pro, what would
> >you guys be willing to pay for that?
> >
> >I'm not sure that this is possible, but, what would you guys be willing
> to
> >pay for automatic plugin delay compensation?
> >
> >If you could have somebody do coding work for Paris, what would you have
> >them do? What would you be willing to pay for this software/service?
> >
> >I may have somebody interested.
> >
> >James
>
Previous Topic: Shut you’re damn mouth already!
Next Topic: paris systems on ebay
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Dec 01 14:43:56 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02607 seconds