The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » a discovery RE: Using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » a discovery RE: Using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

a discovery RE: Using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor [message #66250]

Thu, 06 April 2006 15:47

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

.......for UAD-1 cards. In an earlier post, I reported that PDC was working
in SX when sending/returning audio from Paris, through UAD-1 plugins, then
back to Paris. This is true, but it has it's limits. It works when the
buffers in SX are set to 64k or 128k. Any more than this and the PDC engine
in SX can't manage. I am finding the same situatiion in beta testing a
similar situation for a software developer who is trying to get something
similar happening using a VSTi. there seems to be a limit to what the Cubase
SX PDC can handle in *real time*. This is much more problematic when using
Cubase SX as the audio host and instantiating VSTi's than it is when just
passing audio through the tracks when SX isn't actually streaming the audio
from the app. I'm sending/returning 32 tracks of Paris audio through Cubase
SX right now with 21 UAD-1 plugins inserted in Cubase SX which is basically
acting as a standalone FX processor for Paris. Buffers are set to 64k. The
CPU usage on my dual core AMD 4200 is around 30% and PDC is working fine. No
flamming. Now, if I can get this kind of PDC happening when using FXT from a
with x UAD-1 cards while keeping two UAD-1 cards in the Cubase SX host
machine, I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*

Report message to a moderator

Re: a discovery RE: Using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor [message #66251 is a reply to message #66250]

Thu, 06 April 2006 15:53

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

......I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*

Doug.
Repeat after me...
It's Never Enough.
It's Never Enough.
It's Never Enough.

AA

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:44359d0b$1@linux...
> ......for UAD-1 cards. In an earlier post, I reported that PDC was working
> in SX when sending/returning audio from Paris, through UAD-1 plugins, then
> back to Paris. This is true, but it has it's limits. It works when the
> buffers in SX are set to 64k or 128k. Any more than this and the PDC
> engine
> in SX can't manage. I am finding the same situatiion in beta testing a
> similar situation for a software developer who is trying to get something
> similar happening using a VSTi. there seems to be a limit to what the
> Cubase
> SX PDC can handle in *real time*. This is much more problematic when using
> Cubase SX as the audio host and instantiating VSTi's than it is when just
> passing audio through the tracks when SX isn't actually streaming the
> audio
> from the app. I'm sending/returning 32 tracks of Paris audio through
> Cubase
> SX right now with 21 UAD-1 plugins inserted in Cubase SX which is
> basically
> acting as a standalone FX processor for Paris. Buffers are set to 64k. The
> CPU usage on my dual core AMD 4200 is around 30% and PDC is working fine.
> No
> flamming. Now, if I can get this kind of PDC happening when using FXT from
> a
> with x UAD-1 cards while keeping two UAD-1 cards in the Cubase SX host
> machine, I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*
>
>

I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html

Report message to a moderator

Re: a discovery RE: Using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor [message #66253 is a reply to message #66251]

Thu, 06 April 2006 16:07

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

> Doug.
> Repeat after me...
> It's Never Enough.
> It's Never Enough.
> It's Never Enough.

.......I thought that was our God given right as Americans.

;oP

"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message news:44359db1@linux...
>
> .....I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*
>
> Doug.
> Repeat after me...
> It's Never Enough.
> It's Never Enough.
> It's Never Enough.
>
> AA
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:44359d0b$1@linux...
> > ......for UAD-1 cards. In an earlier post, I reported that PDC was
working
> > in SX when sending/returning audio from Paris, through UAD-1 plugins,
then
> > back to Paris. This is true, but it has it's limits. It works when the
> > buffers in SX are set to 64k or 128k. Any more than this and the PDC
> > engine
> > in SX can't manage. I am finding the same situatiion in beta testing a
> > similar situation for a software developer who is trying to get
something
> > similar happening using a VSTi. there seems to be a limit to what the
> > Cubase
> > SX PDC can handle in *real time*. This is much more problematic when
using
> > Cubase SX as the audio host and instantiating VSTi's than it is when
just
> > passing audio through the tracks when SX isn't actually streaming the
> > audio
> > from the app. I'm sending/returning 32 tracks of Paris audio through
> > Cubase
> > SX right now with 21 UAD-1 plugins inserted in Cubase SX which is
> > basically
> > acting as a standalone FX processor for Paris. Buffers are set to 64k.
The
> > CPU usage on my dual core AMD 4200 is around 30% and PDC is working
fine.
> > No
> > flamming. Now, if I can get this kind of PDC happening when using FXT
from
> > a
> > with x UAD-1 cards while keeping two UAD-1 cards in the Cubase SX host
> > machine, I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*
> >
> >
>
>
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: a discovery RE: Using Cubase SX as a standalone FX processor [message #66254 is a reply to message #66253]

Thu, 06 April 2006 16:33

Don Nafe

Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

Bit-rate-slut

dcn

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:4435a17d$1@linux...
>> Doug.
>> Repeat after me...
>> It's Never Enough.
>> It's Never Enough.
>> It's Never Enough.
>
> ......I thought that was our God given right as Americans.
>
> ;oP
>
> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
> news:44359db1@linux...
>>
>> .....I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*
>>
>> Doug.
>> Repeat after me...
>> It's Never Enough.
>> It's Never Enough.
>> It's Never Enough.
>>
>> AA
>>
>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>> news:44359d0b$1@linux...
>> > ......for UAD-1 cards. In an earlier post, I reported that PDC was
> working
>> > in SX when sending/returning audio from Paris, through UAD-1 plugins,
> then
>> > back to Paris. This is true, but it has it's limits. It works when the
>> > buffers in SX are set to 64k or 128k. Any more than this and the PDC
>> > engine
>> > in SX can't manage. I am finding the same situatiion in beta testing a
>> > similar situation for a software developer who is trying to get
> something
>> > similar happening using a VSTi. there seems to be a limit to what the
>> > Cubase
>> > SX PDC can handle in *real time*. This is much more problematic when
> using
>> > Cubase SX as the audio host and instantiating VSTi's than it is when
> just
>> > passing audio through the tracks when SX isn't actually streaming the
>> > audio
>> > from the app. I'm sending/returning 32 tracks of Paris audio through
>> > Cubase
>> > SX right now with 21 UAD-1 plugins inserted in Cubase SX which is
>> > basically
>> > acting as a standalone FX processor for Paris. Buffers are set to 64k.
> The
>> > CPU usage on my dual core AMD 4200 is around 30% and PDC is working
> fine.
>> > No
>> > flamming. Now, if I can get this kind of PDC happening when using FXT
> from
>> > a
>> > with x UAD-1 cards while keeping two UAD-1 cards in the Cubase SX host
>> > machine, I'll have achieved my goal of *wretched excess*
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>
>>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Anyone using FX Teleport here?
Next Topic:	The Coolest Guitar in the World

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Mar 21 05:50:52 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02449 seconds