The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Conspiracy theories
Conspiracy theories [message #71677] Wed, 23 August 2006 12:03 Go to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
and thought some of you may be interested.

I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these issues.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblog
Re: Conspiracy theories [message #71686 is a reply to message #71677] Wed, 23 August 2006 21:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dubya Mark Wilson is currently offline  Dubya Mark Wilson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 108
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
They wrote a book too, Don. Totally shoots the conspiracy theories of a
government involvement and cover-up to itsy-bitsy pieces with cold hard
complete factual and multiple independent verifications per point. The book
project began with a completely open question and a willingness to examine
all the evidence and let the answers be whatever they were. If you're
afraid of the real story, don't read this book.

W.

"DC" <dc@spammersinnyc.com> wrote in message news:44eca694$1@linux...
>
> I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
> and thought some of you may be interested.
>
> I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these
> issues.
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblog
Re: Conspiracy theories [message #71687 is a reply to message #71677] Wed, 23 August 2006 21:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
Well, by golly, if it was written by engineers, it must be accurate within
+-1.5dB.

;o)

"DC" <dc@spammersinnyc.com> wrote in message news:44eca694$1@linux...
>
> I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
> and thought some of you may be interested.
>
> I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these
issues.
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblog
Re: Conspiracy theories [message #71688 is a reply to message #71677] Wed, 23 August 2006 22:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
The stuff in the 911 movie on the internet, said that the pentagon wasn't
hit by a jet, then it was a two engine NAVY jet, so which is it? Then it
was a different kind of jet, or a military drone that was painted to look
like a airline jet. So which is it? According to these deceivers, it's
everything other than what it really was. I guess we didn't really see Airliners
crash in to the World Trade Center on 9/11, it was just smoke and mirrors.
The Government payed all the people that were supposed to be on those flights
and their families and friends to move to a private government island and
keep quiet. All this stuff is just propaganda.

Our government is so mismanaged and disorganized, it couldn't find it's ass
with both hands and a road map, much less pull this 911 conspiracy off.

Please, It's bull shit! The 911 conspiracy movie is just somebody's political
agenda.

Unfortunately, people are going to believe what they want, regardless of
the truth, that is right in front of them, because, it conveniently fits
their agenda.


Evil always denies the truth first.

James

"DC" <dc@spammersinnyc.com> wrote:
>
>I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
>and thought some of you may be interested.
>
>I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these issues.
>
>http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblog
Re: Conspiracy theories [message #71689 is a reply to message #71687] Wed, 23 August 2006 22:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Well, by golly, if it was written by engineers, it must be accurate within
>+-1.5dB.
>
>;o)


A weighted or C weighted???

hmmm?
Re: Conspiracy theories [message #71690 is a reply to message #71688] Wed, 23 August 2006 22:45 Go to previous message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Guys, I rilly don't want to get into this here.

I do think each of us who saw that movie ought to read that PM
article at least, (if not the book) and make up their own mind.

I suggest anything further go on "general"

my .025384

DC
Previous Topic: MOTU interfaces
Next Topic: Adam S3As-Anyone use/used them
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 26 21:36:44 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01153 seconds