|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: More obsolete digital music stuff we all can buy [message #93029 is a reply to message #93027] |
Sun, 25 November 2007 00:26   |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C82F13.08E7C430
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
full Synclavier 9600 system with 32 panning polyphonic sampling voices, =
V/PK velocity keyboard, and much more=20
$9,999.99=20
Seems a little steep for panning. I know.
I'm sure it sounds great but. . . my Rolands sound pretty good all of =
the sudden.
It's all great when budget isn't an object of insurmountable odds.
Tom
I graduated from Berklee happily.=20
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message =
news:4749105b$1@linux...
But they still sound great. One of my best friends has had one since =
the
80s--he just had it rebuilt and will be the centerpiece of his home =
scoring
studio. And this guy is the Dean of Music Technology at Berklee with =
access
to all the latest and greatest...
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>To be honest, The Synclav sound quality has not been top still today. =
With
>a Sampling rate @ 50k. I would get one if I had the available bucks. =
The
>sequencer is second to none as well as it's synthesis Fm on =
steroids.!!
:)
>
>
>"Neil" <OIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>
>>Synclavier... STILL expensive after all these years. :)
>>
>>http://www.fairlightcmi.com/NED-systems-home.html
>>
>>
>
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C82F13.08E7C430
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>full Synclavier 9600 system with 32 panning polyphonic sampling =
voices,=20
V/PK velocity keyboard, and much more <BR>$9,999.99 </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Seems a little steep for=20
panning. &a mp;nbsp; I=20
know.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm sure it sounds great but. . . =
my Rolands=20
sound pretty good all of the sudden.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's all great when budget isn't an =
object of=20
insurmountable odds.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I graduated from Berklee=20
happily. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"John Macy" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com">spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4749105b$1@linux">news:4749105b$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>But =
they=20
still sound great. One of my best friends has had one since=20
the<BR>80s--he just had it rebuilt and will be the centerpiece of his =
home=20
scoring<BR>studio. And this guy is the Dean of Music Technology =
at=20
Berklee with access<BR>to all the latest and=20
greatest...<BR><BR><BR><BR>"LaMont" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:jjdpro@gmail.com">jjdpro@gmail.com</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>>To be honest, The Synclav sound quality has not =
been top=20
still today. With<BR>>a Sampling rate @ 50k. I would get one if I =
had the=20
available bucks. The<BR>>sequencer is second to none as well as =
it's=20
synthesis Fm on steroids.!!<BR>:)<BR>><BR>><BR>> "Neil" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:OIU@OIU.com">OIU@OIU.com</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>Synclavier... STILL expensive after all =
these=20
years. =20
=
:)<BR>>><BR>>>http://www.fairlightcmi.com/NED-systems-home.ht=
ml<BR>>><BR>>><BR>> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C82F13.08E7C430--
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: More obsolete digital music stuff we all can buy [message #93037 is a reply to message #93027] |
Sun, 25 November 2007 09:24 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
OK, so if you're looking for a system of that nature, how would
it compare to let's say a Korg Oasys, which can be had for $7k-
$8k?
Neil
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>
>But they still sound great. One of my best friends has had one since the
>80s--he just had it rebuilt and will be the centerpiece of his home scoring
>studio. And this guy is the Dean of Music Technology at Berklee with access
>to all the latest and greatest...
>
>
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>To be honest, The Synclav sound quality has not been top still today. With
>>a Sampling rate @ 50k. I would get one if I had the available bucks. The
>>sequencer is second to none as well as it's synthesis Fm on steroids.!!
>:)
>>
>>
>>"Neil" <OIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Synclavier... STILL expensive after all these years. :)
>>>
>>>http://www.fairlightcmi.com/NED-systems-home.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
