| Yamaha digital mixers [message #61708] |
Wed, 21 December 2005 06:53  |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ith mLan... there have been massive problems with it
as far as streaming audio is concerned. If you are only using it for
remote control protocol it should be fine. A better choice (albeit
more money) would be either an 02R/96 or a DM1000 and an RME
HDSP9652... totally solid combination there.
Cheers,
David.
TCB wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been looking for a new audio interface, as my Aardvark Q10 has no continuing
> driver support. I'm kind of out of the loop these days, but a friend suggested
> that since I'm a SX boy and Yamaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Yamaha digital mixers [message #61719 is a reply to message #61708] |
Wed, 21 December 2005 08:40  |
Bill Lorentzen
Messages: 140
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; > > the
> > > mobo. It's OK to load the rest of the drivers. If you load this AGP
> driver
> > > under these circumstances (ie..using the Matrox cards) you might as well
> > > do
> > > a clean install and start over. Removing the VIA AGP driver using the
> > > uninstall feature doesn't clear up the problem and your life will be a
> > > living hell until you surrender and restore your original clean install
> > > that
> > > you Ghosted........you did remember to Ghost,,,,,,didn't you? ;o)
> > >
> > > Secondly,. if you're using removable caddies and you remove the system
> > > drive, you will get a system drive error (as invalid system
> drive/coronary
> > > arrest) when you reinsert it into the caddy unless you remove the other
> > > drives from their caddies first, insert the system drive solo, then
> reboot
> > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Yamaha digital mixers [message #61732 is a reply to message #61711] |
Wed, 21 December 2005 13:35 |
Mark McCurdy
Messages: 35
Registered: February 2006
|
Member |
|
|
/>
> ...............drop one of these into my ASUS A8V-Deluxe 939 mobo and see
> what happens?
>
> http://www.mwave.com/mwave/skusearch.hmx?SCriteria=BA22051&a mp;CartID=done&nextl
> oc=
>
> .............I mean, the AMD 64 4200 x 2 is also a socket 939 and, of
> course, so is the mobo socket, so barring a bios snafu (entirely possible)
> mighn't this be possible? It would seem that the AMD 64 4200 X2 would be
> faster since the cores are running at 2200 MHz per processor, but the
> Opteron has 2 x 1MB L2 cache and an unlocked multiplier (if accessable
> from
> the bios) and from what I hear, a better formulation of silicon.
>
> Hmmmmmm............man I'm tempted. Why don't y'all pass the plate and
> send
> me one of these?
>
> ;oD
>
>The 2400 is a good idea because it's got the same chip form factor. The 2800
would require a new mobo and the whole point of this is to get this working
on my existing mobo that isn't meant to be used with the
Opteron..........first of all, so I don't have to reformat and reload all ov
my programs/drivers, second of all, so that I can be doing something totally
inappropriate.
;o)
"erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote in message news:43aa5f43$1@linux...
> .....what so?-o).... ....if you're first thinking these thoughts, why not
> think bigger? Opteron have a 2400 MHz too for socket 939, named 180. For
the
> socket 940 you can get a 2800 MHz for about 1500 boxes to use with a cheap
> Asus SK8N 70$ board, so the brain will have big problems to follow it up
> when it comes to speed;-).......
>
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30 _118_8825,00.htm
l
>
> Erling
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> skrev i melding
> news:43aa1971$1@linux...
> > ...............drop one of these into my ASUS A8V-Deluxe 939 mobo and
see
> > what happens?
> >
> >
http://www.mwave.com/mwave/skusearch.hmx?SCriteria=BA22051&a mp;CartID=done&nextl
> > oc=<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Yamaha digital mixers [message #61805 is a reply to message #61785] |
Fri, 23 December 2005 09:03 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
video, and graphics software moving ahead, step by
>>step. If you're involved in any of that, kudos to you!
>>
>>For now, OSX and the available software for OSX offers a very capable
>>platform for the media production I do, and the dual 2.5GHZ box I use
>>is, for the most part, amazing. The kernel may have drawbacks for server
>
>
>>use, but it has some very nice features that support audio, video and
>>graphics system-wide.
>>
>>It's not perfect, mind you. That's still out there waiting to happen.
>>
>>Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>Remember, in addition to what
>>
>>>I do with audio apps I work 50-80 hour weeks as a network admin and developer.
>>>And I hate M$oft just as much as I hate Apple. So then, about this urban
>>>legend nonsense, I give you Anandtech, wherein he proves a) the G5 is
>
> a fabulous
>
>>>RISC processor and that b) thanks to some very bad choices made in kernel
>>>development and implementation OS X hamstrings it in highly mult-threaded
>>>environments.
>>>
>>>http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2436
>>>
>>>Then benchmarks run by a fine fellow in Berkely. Skip how Intel does and
>>>note that the same machine running OS X performs 25-30% slower than the
>
> same
>
>>>hardware running Yellow Dog Linux.
>>>
>>>http://sekhon.polisci.berkeley.edu/macosx/
>>>
>>>Now, let me tell you that masturbation causes blindness and about the
>
> guy
>
>>>who woke up in a bathtub full of ice short a kidney and the supermodel
>
> who
>
>>>banged me and then left "Welcome to AIDS" in lipstick written on the hotel
>>>bathroom mirror . . .
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hey Thad,
>>>>
>>>>I'm all for Gnu/Linux but that sounds like urban legend. I'd be curious
>>>
>>>
>>>>to check out the evidence you mention. Any URLs?
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>-Jamie
>>>>http://www.JamieKrutz.com
&
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
