The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Stupid or brilliant?
Stupid or brilliant? [message #72128] Thu, 07 September 2006 05:14 Go to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.

Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it back
in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss of
course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of course
you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would be
phase issues.
Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72132 is a reply to message #72128] Thu, 07 September 2006 06:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   FRANCE
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to make
some adjustments during the mix.

Deej

"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
news:45000d0a@linux...
>
>
> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>
> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
back
> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss of
> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
course
> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would be
> phase issues.
> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72133 is a reply to message #72132] Thu, 07 September 2006 06:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Oh yeah, I meant use bothe the original tracks and belnded compressed drum
group. I'm sure someone must have tried this before...


"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
>aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to make
>some adjustments during the mix.
>
>Deej
>
>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>news:45000d0a@linux...
>>
>>
>> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>
>> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>back
>> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
of
>> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
>course
>> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
be
>> phase issues.
>> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>
>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72134 is a reply to message #72133] Thu, 07 September 2006 07:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
pretty standard. you can even try bringing the smashed drums in as a
mono file to mix in with the unprocessed.

On 7 Sep 2006 23:31:18 +1000, "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
>Oh yeah, I meant use bothe the original tracks and belnded compressed drum
>group. I'm sure someone must have tried this before...
>
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
>>aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to make
>>some adjustments during the mix.
>>
>>Deej
>>
>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>>news:45000d0a@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>>back
>>> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>of
>>> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
>>course
>>> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>be
>>> phase issues.
>>> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>
>>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72135 is a reply to message #72134] Thu, 07 September 2006 07:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
I'll go one step further and add reverb to the snashed kit to place it
front to back in the mix

Nice treatment

Don


"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ona0g2t57aj9njr1l3jjadsuhicak54rn0@4ax.com...
> pretty standard. you can even try bringing the smashed drums in as a
> mono file to mix in with the unprocessed.
>
> On 7 Sep 2006 23:31:18 +1000, "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Oh yeah, I meant use bothe the original tracks and belnded compressed drum
>>group. I'm sure someone must have tried this before...
>>
>>
>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
>>>aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to make
>>>some adjustments during the mix.
>>>
>>>Deej
>>>
>>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>>>news:45000d0a@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>>>back
>>>> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>>of
>>>> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
>>>course
>>>> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>>be
>>>> phase issues.
>>>> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72136 is a reply to message #72133] Thu, 07 September 2006 07:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   FRANCE
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
I use a parallel compression scenario (sometimes called New York
compression, I think) where I strap a Sony V77 digitally across an aux bus
on the drum submix. There is a preset on this machine that is quite amazing
called Drum Room. It's got ambience and compression settings that are an
excellent starting point for creating a huge sound. I just enable this aux
on whatever channels I want to effect and the crank the send levels to the
point where this sits well with the existing tracks. It's ironic that I
spent lots of $$$ putting this Cubase rig together sdo I could compress drum
submixes in real time in Cubase and then return them to Paris and nowadays I
don't even do it at all. If Paris had delay compensation for UAD-1 cards, I
wouldn't be using Cubase at all in a mix.

Go figure.

;o)

"cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
news:45001f26$1@linux...
>
>
>
> Oh yeah, I meant use bothe the original tracks and belnded compressed drum
> group. I'm sure someone must have tried this before...
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
> >aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to make
> >some adjustments during the mix.
> >
> >Deej
> >
> >"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
> >news:45000d0a@linux...
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
> >>
> >> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
> >> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
> >back
> >> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
> of
> >> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
> >course
> >> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
> be
> >> phase issues.
> >> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
> >
> >
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72137 is a reply to message #72135] Thu, 07 September 2006 07:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
Don't forget to ride the automated faders in Paris to keep the
uncompressed drum tracks (especially kick and snare) just above the
compressed signal. Do for normal bass too. Ride them suckas.

John

Don Nafe wrote:
> I'll go one step further and add reverb to the snashed kit to place it
> front to back in the mix
>
> Nice treatment
>
> Don
>
>
> "rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ona0g2t57aj9njr1l3jjadsuhicak54rn0@4ax.com...
>> pretty standard. you can even try bringing the smashed drums in as a
>> mono file to mix in with the unprocessed.
>>
>> On 7 Sep 2006 23:31:18 +1000, "cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, I meant use bothe the original tracks and belnded compressed drum
>>> group. I'm sure someone must have tried this before...
>>>
>>>
>>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>> Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
>>>> aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to make
>>>> some adjustments during the mix.
>>>>
>>>> Deej
>>>>
>>>> "Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:45000d0a@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>>> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>>>> back
>>>>> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>>> of
>>>>> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
>>>> course
>>>>> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>>> be
>>>>> phase issues.
>>>>> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>>>
>
>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72147 is a reply to message #72128] Thu, 07 September 2006 11:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rod Lincoln is currently offline  Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
I do this all the time. The only thing else you really have to do, is adjust
for the bounce latency. If you do a bounce to disk, there will be some, and
it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj. It's
going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back with
the other drums...it will matter.
Rod
"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>
>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it back
>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss of
>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of course
>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would be
>phase issues.
>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72152 is a reply to message #72136] Thu, 07 September 2006 16:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Oh please pretty please can someone fix this!..waaah, I want my Paris to
work wihtout so many workarounds!
Really I don;t know whay it tool me so loing to think of this, I think I
may have tried it with the Nolimit on the stereo bus, but there was way
too much phase issues there that I gave up, but I don; think I have tried
it since I got UAD 2 years ago, now it makes so much sense.

I am trying out the the UAD NEve plug this weekend I hope, If I like it,
I am goin in for another card. Mayeb just the 256 dollar express then get
the NEVE and 140.



"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I use a parallel compression scenario (sometimes called New York
>compression, I think) where I strap a Sony V77 digitally across an aux
bus
>on the drum submix. There is a preset on this machine that is quite amazing
>called Drum Room. It's got ambience and compression settings that are an
>excellent starting point for creating a huge sound. I just enable this aux
>on whatever channels I want to effect and the crank the send levels to the
>point where this sits well with the existing tracks. It's ironic that I
>spent lots of $$$ putting this Cubase rig together sdo I could compress
drum
>submixes in real time in Cubase and then return them to Paris and nowadays
I
>don't even do it at all. If Paris had delay compensation for UAD-1 cards,
I
>wouldn't be using Cubase at all in a mix.
>
>Go figure.
>
>;o)
>
>"cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>news:45001f26$1@linux...
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh yeah, I meant use bothe the original tracks and belnded compressed
drum
>> group. I'm sure someone must have tried this before...
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >Just keep the original drum & bass tracks in the submix (hopefully there
>> >aren't more than 14) so you can have some felxibility if you need to
make
>> >some adjustments during the mix.
>> >
>> >Deej
>> >
>> >"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>> >news:45000d0a@linux...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>> >> Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring
it
>> >back
>> >> in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>> of
>> >> course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
>> >course
>> >> you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>> be
>> >> phase issues.
>> >> Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>> >
>> >
>
>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72165 is a reply to message #72147] Fri, 08 September 2006 05:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Ok, so there is latency on Bounce To DIsc, I suppose that makes sense, oes
anyone know the exact numbers? Also, what about if a externeal comp is used?
Thanks rod.


"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>I do this all the time. The only thing else you really have to do, is adjust
>for the bounce latency. If you do a bounce to disk, there will be some,
and
>it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
>than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
>your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj. It's
>going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back with
>the other drums...it will matter.
>Rod
>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>
>>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
back
>>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss of
>>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of course
>>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
be
>>phase issues.
>>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72166 is a reply to message #72165] Fri, 08 September 2006 05:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rod Lincoln is currently offline  Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
It varies from system to system. You just have to figure yours out. I've had
3 different systems, and they've all been different. I think it has to do
with how fast the cpu can kick into gear/the OS/ and the app.
The numbers for an external i/o should be the same however. I don't have
those. Maybe some one else does.
Rod
"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>Ok, so there is latency on Bounce To DIsc, I suppose that makes sense, oes
>anyone know the exact numbers? Also, what about if a externeal comp is used?
>Thanks rod.
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>I do this all the time. The only thing else you really have to do, is adjust
>>for the bounce latency. If you do a bounce to disk, there will be some,
>and
>>it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
>>than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
>>your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj.
It's
>>going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back
with
>>the other drums...it will matter.
>>Rod
>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>
>>>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>back
>>>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
of
>>>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of course
>>>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>be
>>>phase issues.
>>>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72167 is a reply to message #72166] Fri, 08 September 2006 06:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Thanks for the info,
Is the # static for each system?





"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>It varies from system to system. You just have to figure yours out. I've
had
>3 different systems, and they've all been different. I think it has to do
>with how fast the cpu can kick into gear/the OS/ and the app.
>The numbers for an external i/o should be the same however. I don't have
>those. Maybe some one else does.
>Rod
>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Ok, so there is latency on Bounce To DIsc, I suppose that makes sense,
oes
>>anyone know the exact numbers? Also, what about if a externeal comp is
used?
>>Thanks rod.
>>
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I do this all the time. The only thing else you really have to do, is
adjust
>>>for the bounce latency. If you do a bounce to disk, there will be some,
>>and
>>>it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
>>>than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
>>>your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj.
>It's
>>>going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back
>with
>>>the other drums...it will matter.
>>>Rod
>>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>>
>>>>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>>back
>>>>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>of
>>>>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
course
>>>>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>>be
>>>>phase issues.
>>>>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>>
>
Re: Stupid or brilliant? [message #72170 is a reply to message #72167] Fri, 08 September 2006 07:35 Go to previous message
Rod Lincoln is currently offline  Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
For the Bounce to disk? Once you figure it out,it will be the same for that
bit rate. 16bits will give a different number different than 24 bits (that
is, what your bitrate is set at during the bounce, bot what the existing
files are). 44.1 and 48k will yeild the same numbers for bounce to disk.
ME/98 will be different than XP on the same system.
Paris version 2.x will be different than version 3.0 on the same system.
All this info is for bounce to disk. If you bounce using a spdif loop or
lightipe loop, bit rate won't matter, and I think the #'s are the same from
sys to sys. But you should check for yourself.
Rod
"cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for the info,
>Is the # static for each system?
>
>
>
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>It varies from system to system. You just have to figure yours out. I've
>had
>>3 different systems, and they've all been different. I think it has to
do
>>with how fast the cpu can kick into gear/the OS/ and the app.
>>The numbers for an external i/o should be the same however. I don't have
>>those. Maybe some one else does.
>>Rod
>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Ok, so there is latency on Bounce To DIsc, I suppose that makes sense,
>oes
>>>anyone know the exact numbers? Also, what about if a externeal comp is
>used?
>>>Thanks rod.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I do this all the time. The only thing else you really have to do, is
>adjust
>>>>for the bounce latency. If you do a bounce to disk, there will be some,
>>>and
>>>>it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
>>>>than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
>>>>your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj.
>>It's
>>>>going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back
>>with
>>>>the other drums...it will matter.
>>>>Rod
>>>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>>>
>>>>>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>>>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring
it
>>>back
>>>>>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>>of
>>>>>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
>course
>>>>>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>>>be
>>>>>phase issues.
>>>>>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>>>
>>
Previous Topic: UAD-1 card: any special slot needed?
Next Topic: The REAL Story on "Billie Jean"...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 27 10:40:02 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08134 seconds