Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o)
| OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73251] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 01:30  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as "Oh
Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
Cheers,
Kim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73266 is a reply to message #73260] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 07:24  |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
there are times when ancestral lineage plays an important role...i'm
just saying...you know...those people have a past...
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:10:32 -0600, "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind. Now
>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>
>;o)
>
>
>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>
>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>> thought I was you, or you me....
>> Hope the new job is going well.
>> The other Kim
>>
>>
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as "Oh
>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>> >
>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>> >
>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Kim.
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73310 is a reply to message #73260] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 16:04 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hehe, well we COULD be doing that ;o), though we live in different cities.
Kim W came to visit Melbourne recently, but we successfully failed to hook
up, despite him staying not far from my place, which was unfortunate, as
I was hoping to swap toothbrushes. ;o) As I recall he told me he sent me
a text when here, but I changed mobile numbers around that time and I think
he had the wrong one... ...I never got it.
Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days also...
...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had another
Kim also from Australia.
Cheers,
Kim.
Cheers,
Kim.
"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind. Now
>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>
>;o)
>
>
>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>
>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>> thought I was you, or you me....
>> Hope the new job is going well.
>> The other Kim
>>
>>
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as
"Oh
>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>> >
>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>> >
>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Kim.
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73320 is a reply to message #73310] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 19:32 |
Kim W
Messages: 165
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ah yes. The good old days.
My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced soul/funk
outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have some
fifteen members.
Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
demonstration disks.
If you're interested:
http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
Cheers
Kim Double Ewe
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days also...
> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had another
>Kim also from Australia.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
Now
>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>
>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>> The other Kim
>>>
>>>
>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as
>"Oh
>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>> >
>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>>> >
>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>> >
>>> >Cheers,
>>> >Kim.
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73326 is a reply to message #73320] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 20:54 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dude! Best music EVER!! ;o)
Kim Double Ewe? Not Kim Dubya? ;o)
Where can I get the full tracks? That is honestly really excellent.
Check my effort from around that time...
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
Cheers,
Kim.
"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>
>Ah yes. The good old days.
>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced soul/funk
>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have some
>fifteen members.
>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>demonstration disks.
>If you're interested:
>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>Cheers
>Kim Double Ewe
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days
also...
>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had another
>>Kim also from Australia.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>>
>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
>Now
>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>
>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>> The other Kim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as
>>"Oh
>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>> >
>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>>>> >
>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>> >
>>>> >Cheers,
>>>> >Kim.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73327 is a reply to message #73326] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 21:05 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
Gee, doesn't What You Need sound overcompressed these days? ;o) My ears have
certainly changed. I remember mastering that and thinking that compression
was the best thing since Paris...
....turns out it's all a little too squished really. Should have just pumped
the Paris mix bus a little harder...
Cheers,
Kim.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>
>>Ah yes. The good old days.
>>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced
soul/funk
>>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have some
>>fifteen members.
>>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>>demonstration disks.
>>If you're interested:
>>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>>Cheers
>>Kim Double Ewe
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days
>also...
>>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had another
>>>Kim also from Australia.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>>
>>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
>
>>Now
>>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>>
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W
as
>>>"Oh
>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73331 is a reply to message #73327] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 21:53 |
Kim W
Messages: 165
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Good stuff. Great live vibe!
Overcompressed?, maybe a little for my tastes, but it would
sit well on radio, and does so on small systems. A matter of
taste, really.
I didn't master the Goose stuff, but I remember hearing the first
mastered version of "schwang", and I felt it didn't breathe enough.
I told the band, and they got the mastering engineer to back off
the processing, and the result was much better.
As it turned out, the final master sounded pretty close to the
final mixes, but louder.
Perhaps for commercial airplay the first master would be better,
but the band decided to opt for the transparency of the second.
As I said, matter of taste.
Go to the goose homepage and you will find a list of outlets that
stock the cd's. There are a couple of full songs on the page, but
I think "rump" is a rough mix they posted.
Failing that, I could check with Dave, and send you a couple of
"evaluation" copies if you wish. I don't have spares of the prints.
Email me your postal address.
Kim Twosheep.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
>
>Gee, doesn't What You Need sound overcompressed these days? ;o) My ears
have
>certainly changed. I remember mastering that and thinking that compression
>was the best thing since Paris...
>
>...turns out it's all a little too squished really. Should have just pumped
>the Paris mix bus a little harder...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>>
>>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Ah yes. The good old days.
>>>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced
>soul/funk
>>>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have
some
>>>fifteen members.
>>>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>>>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>>>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>>>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>>>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>>>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>>>demonstration disks.
>>>If you're interested:
>>>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>>>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>>>Cheers
>>>Kim Double Ewe
>>>
>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days
>>also...
>>>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had another
>>>>Kim also from Australia.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Kim.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Kim.
>>>>
>>>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>>>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
>>
>>>Now
>>>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>>>
>>>>>;o)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W
>as
>>>>"Oh
>>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73335 is a reply to message #73331] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 22:20 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Kim,
I didn't see any links, but I didn't look that hard, and my monitors aren't
all that bright. I'll have a better look. I'm more than happy to shell out
the cash as it's excellent work.
If I get no joy trying to track down a copy I'll let you know. I've just
gotta get my hands on that though. Right up my alley...
Cheers,
Kim.
"Kim Dubya" <no@way.com> wrote:
>
>Good stuff. Great live vibe!
>Overcompressed?, maybe a little for my tastes, but it would
>sit well on radio, and does so on small systems. A matter of
>taste, really.
>I didn't master the Goose stuff, but I remember hearing the first
>mastered version of "schwang", and I felt it didn't breathe enough.
>I told the band, and they got the mastering engineer to back off
>the processing, and the result was much better.
>As it turned out, the final master sounded pretty close to the
>final mixes, but louder.
>Perhaps for commercial airplay the first master would be better,
>but the band decided to opt for the transparency of the second.
>As I said, matter of taste.
>Go to the goose homepage and you will find a list of outlets that
>stock the cd's. There are a couple of full songs on the page, but
>I think "rump" is a rough mix they posted.
>Failing that, I could check with Dave, and send you a couple of
>"evaluation" copies if you wish. I don't have spares of the prints.
>Email me your postal address.
>Kim Twosheep.
>
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
>>
>>Gee, doesn't What You Need sound overcompressed these days? ;o) My ears
>have
>>certainly changed. I remember mastering that and thinking that compression
>>was the best thing since Paris...
>>
>>...turns out it's all a little too squished really. Should have just pumped
>>the Paris mix bus a little harder...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>>
>>>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Ah yes. The good old days.
>>>>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced
>>soul/funk
>>>>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have
>some
>>>>fifteen members.
>>>>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>>>>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>>>>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>>>>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>>>>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>>>>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>>>>demonstration disks.
>>>>If you're interested:
>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Kim Double Ewe
>>>>
>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days
>>>also...
>>>>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had another
>>>>>Kim also from Australia.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with
us
>>>>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
>>>
>>>>Now
>>>>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>;o)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim
W
>>as
>>>>>"Oh
>>>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73339 is a reply to message #73335] |
Fri, 29 September 2006 22:45 |
Kim W
Messages: 165
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Kim.
http://www.goose.com.au/multimedia.php
There is a link to two mp3's and a bunch of videos.
http://www.goose.com.au/index.php
Here you will find a list of retailers.
Will check out your stuff further on the studio monitors. Sounds great so
far. Gotta keep painting the spare room right now.
I recoreded a band called "Dragster" some years ago on my fostex
b16. I will post a couple of songs somewhere and give you the links.
They were a scream...should be up your alley also.
In fact I'll start a new topic for the benefit of others overseas. Their
stuff was priceless, wildly funky and funny as
all hell. (very Australian as well).
Cheers.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Kim,
>
>I didn't see any links, but I didn't look that hard, and my monitors aren't
>all that bright. I'll have a better look. I'm more than happy to shell out
>the cash as it's excellent work.
>
>If I get no joy trying to track down a copy I'll let you know. I've just
>gotta get my hands on that though. Right up my alley...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"Kim Dubya" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>
>>Good stuff. Great live vibe!
>>Overcompressed?, maybe a little for my tastes, but it would
>>sit well on radio, and does so on small systems. A matter of
>>taste, really.
>>I didn't master the Goose stuff, but I remember hearing the first
>>mastered version of "schwang", and I felt it didn't breathe enough.
>>I told the band, and they got the mastering engineer to back off
>>the processing, and the result was much better.
>>As it turned out, the final master sounded pretty close to the
>>final mixes, but louder.
>>Perhaps for commercial airplay the first master would be better,
>>but the band decided to opt for the transparency of the second.
>>As I said, matter of taste.
>>Go to the goose homepage and you will find a list of outlets that
>>stock the cd's. There are a couple of full songs on the page, but
>>I think "rump" is a rough mix they posted.
>>Failing that, I could check with Dave, and send you a couple of
>>"evaluation" copies if you wish. I don't have spares of the prints.
>>Email me your postal address.
>>Kim Twosheep.
>>
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
>>>
>>>Gee, doesn't What You Need sound overcompressed these days? ;o) My ears
>>have
>>>certainly changed. I remember mastering that and thinking that compression
>>>was the best thing since Paris...
>>>
>>>...turns out it's all a little too squished really. Should have just pumped
>>>the Paris mix bus a little harder...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Kim.
>>>>
>>>>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Ah yes. The good old days.
>>>>>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced
>>>soul/funk
>>>>>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have
>>some
>>>>>fifteen members.
>>>>>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>>>>>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>>>>>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>>>>>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>>>>>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>>>>>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>>>>>demonstration disks.
>>>>>If you're interested:
>>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>>>>>Cheers
>>>>>Kim Double Ewe
>>>>>
>>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early days
>>>>also...
>>>>>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had
another
>>>>>>Kim also from Australia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with
>us
>>>>>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>>>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
>>>>
>>>>>Now
>>>>>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>;o)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim
>W
>>>as
>>>>>>"Oh
>>>>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim.
:o)
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73344 is a reply to message #73339] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 01:41 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Kim,
Thanks heaps for that. I've downloaded the two MP3's and am having a listen
now. Sounding excellent. Is this all your work or was some done elsewhere?
I'll have to check these guys out if they ever come over this way.
And do post about that other group. I'm very keen to have a listen...
Cheers,
Kim.
"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Kim.
>
>http://www.goose.com.au/multimedia.php
>There is a link to two mp3's and a bunch of videos.
>
>http://www.goose.com.au/index.php
>Here you will find a list of retailers.
>
>Will check out your stuff further on the studio monitors. Sounds great so
>far. Gotta keep painting the spare room right now.
>
>I recoreded a band called "Dragster" some years ago on my fostex
>b16. I will post a couple of songs somewhere and give you the links.
>They were a scream...should be up your alley also.
>In fact I'll start a new topic for the benefit of others overseas. Their
>stuff was priceless, wildly funky and funny as
>all hell. (very Australian as well).
>Cheers.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Kim,
>>
>>I didn't see any links, but I didn't look that hard, and my monitors aren't
>>all that bright. I'll have a better look. I'm more than happy to shell
out
>>the cash as it's excellent work.
>>
>>If I get no joy trying to track down a copy I'll let you know. I've just
>>gotta get my hands on that though. Right up my alley...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>>
>>"Kim Dubya" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Good stuff. Great live vibe!
>>>Overcompressed?, maybe a little for my tastes, but it would
>>>sit well on radio, and does so on small systems. A matter of
>>>taste, really.
>>>I didn't master the Goose stuff, but I remember hearing the first
>>>mastered version of "schwang", and I felt it didn't breathe enough.
>>>I told the band, and they got the mastering engineer to back off
>>>the processing, and the result was much better.
>>>As it turned out, the final master sounded pretty close to the
>>>final mixes, but louder.
>>>Perhaps for commercial airplay the first master would be better,
>>>but the band decided to opt for the transparency of the second.
>>>As I said, matter of taste.
>>>Go to the goose homepage and you will find a list of outlets that
>>>stock the cd's. There are a couple of full songs on the page, but
>>>I think "rump" is a rough mix they posted.
>>>Failing that, I could check with Dave, and send you a couple of
>>>"evaluation" copies if you wish. I don't have spares of the prints.
>>>Email me your postal address.
>>>Kim Twosheep.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
>>>>
>>>>Gee, doesn't What You Need sound overcompressed these days? ;o) My ears
>>>have
>>>>certainly changed. I remember mastering that and thinking that compression
>>>>was the best thing since Paris...
>>>>
>>>>...turns out it's all a little too squished really. Should have just
pumped
>>>>the Paris mix bus a little harder...
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Kim.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ah yes. The good old days.
>>>>>>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced
>>>>soul/funk
>>>>>>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have
>>>some
>>>>>>fifteen members.
>>>>>>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>>>>>>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>>>>>>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>>>>>>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>>>>>>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>>>>>>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>>>>>>demonstration disks.
>>>>>>If you're interested:
>>>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>>>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>>>>>>Cheers
>>>>>>Kim Double Ewe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early
days
>>>>>also...
>>>>>>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had
>another
>>>>>>>Kim also from Australia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with
>>us
>>>>>>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>>>>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Now
>>>>>>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>;o)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim
>>W
>>>>as
>>>>>>>"Oh
>>>>>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim.
>:o)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Kim W isn't me... ;o) [message #73368 is a reply to message #73344] |
Sat, 30 September 2006 11:10 |
Kim W
Messages: 165
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi, Kim.
Yes, mostly my work. (I didn't do the mastering).
Some guitar parts on the second album were recorded in Sam's home, as he
preferred to
nut out his parts at his own pace. Likewise the Hammond parts.
(Paul has a C3 in his lounge room).
Mixing was quite a challenge. One of the tunes peaked at 80
tracks. (the only time I used virtual submixing).
Half the band, including the leader, now live in Melbourne,
so they do gig there every couple of months, when the Adelaide
contingent can make it across.
I found the dragster stuff amongst the archives.
I'll convert them to mp3 in the next day or two.
Cheers,
Kim W
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Kim,
>
>Thanks heaps for that. I've downloaded the two MP3's and am having a listen
>now. Sounding excellent. Is this all your work or was some done elsewhere?
>I'll have to check these guys out if they ever come over this way.
>
>And do post about that other group. I'm very keen to have a listen...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hi Kim.
>>
>>http://www.goose.com.au/multimedia.php
>>There is a link to two mp3's and a bunch of videos.
>>
>>http://www.goose.com.au/index.php
>>Here you will find a list of retailers.
>>
>>Will check out your stuff further on the studio monitors. Sounds great
so
>>far. Gotta keep painting the spare room right now.
>>
>>I recoreded a band called "Dragster" some years ago on my fostex
>>b16. I will post a couple of songs somewhere and give you the links.
>>They were a scream...should be up your alley also.
>>In fact I'll start a new topic for the benefit of others overseas. Their
>>stuff was priceless, wildly funky and funny as
>>all hell. (very Australian as well).
>>Cheers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Kim,
>>>
>>>I didn't see any links, but I didn't look that hard, and my monitors aren't
>>>all that bright. I'll have a better look. I'm more than happy to shell
>out
>>>the cash as it's excellent work.
>>>
>>>If I get no joy trying to track down a copy I'll let you know. I've just
>>>gotta get my hands on that though. Right up my alley...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>>
>>>"Kim Dubya" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Good stuff. Great live vibe!
>>>>Overcompressed?, maybe a little for my tastes, but it would
>>>>sit well on radio, and does so on small systems. A matter of
>>>>taste, really.
>>>>I didn't master the Goose stuff, but I remember hearing the first
>>>>mastered version of "schwang", and I felt it didn't breathe enough.
>>>>I told the band, and they got the mastering engineer to back off
>>>>the processing, and the result was much better.
>>>>As it turned out, the final master sounded pretty close to the
>>>>final mixes, but louder.
>>>>Perhaps for commercial airplay the first master would be better,
>>>>but the band decided to opt for the transparency of the second.
>>>>As I said, matter of taste.
>>>>Go to the goose homepage and you will find a list of outlets that
>>>>stock the cd's. There are a couple of full songs on the page, but
>>>>I think "rump" is a rough mix they posted.
>>>>Failing that, I could check with Dave, and send you a couple of
>>>>"evaluation" copies if you wish. I don't have spares of the prints.
>>>>Email me your postal address.
>>>>Kim Twosheep.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=91
>>>>>
>>>>>Gee, doesn't What You Need sound overcompressed these days? ;o) My ears
>>>>have
>>>>>certainly changed. I remember mastering that and thinking that compression
>>>>>was the best thing since Paris...
>>>>>
>>>>>...turns out it's all a little too squished really. Should have just
>pumped
>>>>>the Paris mix bus a little harder...
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ah yes. The good old days.
>>>>>>>My first Paris recording was for a then Adelaide based 70's influenced
>>>>>soul/funk
>>>>>>>outfit called Goose. (now Melbourne based). At any one time they have
>>>>some
>>>>>>>fifteen members.
>>>>>>>Early versions of Paris had a bug which would
>>>>>>>corrupt segments occasionally, leaving the project unplayable.
>>>>>>>I emailed the .ppj (minus audio) to Edmund, and within an hour
>>>>>>>he sent it back fixed. The session continued.
>>>>>>>This album (and the sequel) are still being used by a couple of
>>>>>>>audiophile hifi shops in Melbourne as one of their system
>>>>>>>demonstration disks.
>>>>>>>If you're interested:
>>>>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/schwang.php
>>>>>>>http://www.goose.com.au/dancefloor.php
>>>>>>>Cheers
>>>>>>>Kim Double Ewe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Kim W has been dropping in here to the group since the very early
>days
>>>>>>also...
>>>>>>>> ...I think it was '98 or '99 when I realised that the group had
>>another
>>>>>>>>Kim also from Australia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with
>>>us
>>>>>>>>>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>>>>>>>>>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the
mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now
>>>>>>>>>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>;o)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>>>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>>>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>>>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>>>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim
>>>W
>>>>>as
>>>>>>>>"Oh
>>>>>>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>>>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim.
>>:o)
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 28 00:14:26 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.20701 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
