The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » 442 and MEC with BNC?

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » 442 and MEC with BNC?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

442 and MEC with BNC? [message #62870]

Wed, 11 January 2006 08:36

Messages: 51
Registered: December 2005

Member

Wanna hook my ol' trusty 442 to the MEC with the BNC. Is it better to have
the 442 (ext clock out) on card A (ext. clock out to the MEC) or B (clock in
from the MEC), and are there any configs in Paris you have to make or will
Paris initialize and recognize both units?

Thanks

Kent

Report message to a moderator

Re: 442 and MEC with BNC? [message #62871 is a reply to message #62870]

Wed, 11 January 2006 08:38

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

I can't speak for a twio card system, but on a 3 x card system being clocked
externally, it works much better if the 442 is on card A.

"Kent" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43c5346e@linux...
> Wanna hook my ol' trusty 442 to the MEC with the BNC. Is it better to
have
> the 442 (ext clock out) on card A (ext. clock out to the MEC) or B (clock
in
> from the MEC), and are there any configs in Paris you have to make or will
> Paris initialize and recognize both units?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kent
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: 442 and MEC with BNC? [message #62884 is a reply to message #62870]

Wed, 11 January 2006 10:46

EK Sound

Messages: 939
Registered: June 2005

Senior Member

I am assuming that you have two EDS cards to hook these interfaces
to... With the MEC on the "A" card, patch from word clock out on the
MEC to word clock in on the 442. Use a good quality 75 Ohm cable, as
short as possible to make the connection.

David.

Kent wrote:
> Wanna hook my ol' trusty 442 to the MEC with the BNC. Is it better to have
> the 442 (ext clock out) on card A (ext. clock out to the MEC) or B (clock in
> from the MEC), and are there any configs in Paris you have to make or will
> Paris initialize and recognize both units?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kent
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: 442 and MEC with BNC? [message #62890 is a reply to message #62870]

Wed, 11 January 2006 12:02

Messages: 51
Registered: December 2005

Member

Right on, thanks.

Kent

"Kent" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43c5346e@linux...
> Wanna hook my ol' trusty 442 to the MEC with the BNC. Is it better to
have
> the 442 (ext clock out) on card A (ext. clock out to the MEC) or B (clock
in
> from the MEC), and are there any configs in Paris you have to make or will
> Paris initialize and recognize both units?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kent
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: 442 and MEC with BNC? [message #62923 is a reply to message #62890]

Wed, 11 January 2006 21:19

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

FWIW, I used a MEC to 442 2 card, then 3 card rig for years. A card had the
MEC, C card the 442. Use a good quality BNC cable, keep it short as you can.

AA

"Kent" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43c564e1@linux...
> Right on, thanks.
>
> Kent
>
> "Kent" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43c5346e@linux...
>> Wanna hook my ol' trusty 442 to the MEC with the BNC. Is it better to
> have
>> the 442 (ext clock out) on card A (ext. clock out to the MEC) or B (clock
> in
>> from the MEC), and are there any configs in Paris you have to make or
>> will
>> Paris initialize and recognize both units?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kent
>>
>>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Importing .wavs from a cd
Next Topic:	Dual-Proc / Dual-Core and Paris

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Dec 18 12:39:43 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03958 seconds